Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin Irritation:

The dermal irritation potential of Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid was estimated using OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with logPow as the primary descriptor.

Ethylbenzenesulphonic aci) was estimated to be not irritating to the skin of New Zealand White rabbits.

Based on the estimated result; Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid can be considered not irritating to skin and can be classified under the category “Not classified” as per CLP regulation.

Eye Irritation:

The ocular irritation potential of Ethylbenzenesulphonic acidwas estimated using OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with logPow as the primary descriptor.

Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid was estimated to be not irritating to the eyes of New Zealand White rabbits.

Based on the estimated results, Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid can be considered not irritating to eyes and can be classified under the category “Not Classified” as per CLP regulation.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
data is from OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3 and the QMRF report has been attached
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Estimated data
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Prediction was done using OECD QSAR toolbox v
GLP compliance:
not specified
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material: Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid
- Molecular formula : C8H10O3S
- Molecular weight : 186.23 g/mol
- Smiles notation : c1(ccc(CC)cc1)S(O)(=O)=O
- InChl : 1S/C8H10O3S/c1-2-7-3-5-8(6-4-7)12(9,10)11/h3-6H,2H2,1H3,(H,9,10,11)
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
no data available
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
not specified
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
no data available
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
7 days
Number of animals:
1
Details on study design:
no data available
Other effects / acceptance of results:
no data available
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
7 d
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No signs of irritation observed

Estimation method: Takes mode value from the 7 nearest neighbours
Domain  logical expression:Result: In Domain

(((((((((((((((("a" or "b" or "c" or "d" or "e" or "f" )  and "g" )  and "h" )  and ("i" and ( not "j") )  )  and ("k" and ( not "l") )  )  and "m" )  and "n" )  and "o" )  and "p" )  and "q" )  and "r" )  and "s" )  and "t" )  and "u" )  and "v" )  and ("w" and "x" )  )

Domain logical expression index: "a"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Linear alkylbenzene sulfonates by OECD HPV Chemical Categories

Domain logical expression index: "b"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Anionic Surfactants by US-EPA New Chemical Categories

Domain logical expression index: "c"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aromatic compound OR Sulfonic acid OR Sulfonic acid derivative by Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "d"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic Carbon [CH] OR Aliphatic Carbon [-CH2-] OR Aliphatic Carbon [-CH3] OR Aromatic Carbon [C] OR Hydroxy, sulfur attach [-OH] OR Miscellaneous sulfide (=S) or oxide (=O) OR Olefinic carbon [=CH- or =C<] OR Suflur {v+4} or {v+6} OR Sulfinic acid [-S(=O)OH] OR Sulfonate, aromatic attach [-SO2-O] by Organic functional groups (US EPA) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "e"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Alkyl arenes OR Overlapping groups OR Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups (nested) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "f"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Alkyl arenes OR Aryl OR Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "g"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by OASIS v.1.3 ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "h"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by OECD ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "i"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Non binder, without OH or NH2 group by Estrogen Receptor Binding

Domain logical expression index: "j"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Non binder, impaired OH or NH2 group OR Non binder, MW>500 OR Non binder, non cyclic structure by Estrogen Receptor Binding

Domain logical expression index: "k"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein binding by OASIS v1.3

Domain logical expression index: "l"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> Direct acylation involving a leaving group OR Acylation >> Direct acylation involving a leaving group >> (Thio)Acyl and (thio)carbamoyl halides and cyanides  OR Michael Addition OR Michael Addition >> Michael addition on conjugated systems with electron withdrawing group OR Michael Addition >> Michael addition on conjugated systems with electron withdrawing group >> alpha,beta-Carbonyl compounds with polarized double bonds  OR Michael Addition >> Polarised Alkenes OR Michael Addition >> Polarised Alkenes >> Polarised Alkene - alkenyl pyridines, pyrazines, pyrimidines or triazines  OR Nucleophilic addition OR Nucleophilic addition >> Addition to carbon-hetero double bonds OR Nucleophilic addition >> Addition to carbon-hetero double bonds >> Ketones OR SN2 OR SN2 >> Interchange reaction with sulphur containing compounds OR SN2 >> Interchange reaction with sulphur containing compounds >> Thiols and disulfide compounds  by Protein binding by OASIS v1.3

Domain logical expression index: "m"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein binding by OECD ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "n"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Class 5 (Not possible to classify according to these rules) by Acute aquatic toxicity classification by Verhaar (Modified) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "o"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Reactive unspecified by Acute aquatic toxicity MOA by OASIS ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "p"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Not Related to an Existing ECOSAR Class by Aquatic toxicity classification by ECOSAR ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "q"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Not Related to an Existing ECOSAR Class by Aquatic toxicity classification by ECOSAR ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "r"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Very fast by Bioaccumulation - metabolism half-lives ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "s"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Very fast by Bioaccumulation - metabolism half-lives ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "t"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Very fast by Bioaccumulation - metabolism half-lives ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "u"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Alkyl arenes AND Aryl AND Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "v"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Alkyl arenes AND Aryl AND Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "w"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -2.41

Domain logical expression index: "x"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 3.03

Interpretation of results:
other: not irritating
Conclusions:
Ethylbenzenesulphonic aci) was estimated to be not irritating to the skin of New Zealand White rabbits.
Executive summary:

The dermal irritation potential of Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid was estimated using OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with logPow as the primary descriptor.

Ethylbenzenesulphonic aci) was estimated to be not irritating to the skin of New Zealand White rabbits.

Based on the estimated result; Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid can be considered not irritating to skin and can be classified under the category “Not classified” as per CLP regulation.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
data is from OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3 and the QMRF report has been attached
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Estimated data
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Prediction was done using OECD QSAR toolbox v3.3
GLP compliance:
not specified
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material: Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid
- Molecular formula: C8H10O3S
- Molecular weight: 186.23 g/mol
- Smiles notation: c1(ccc(CC)cc1)S(O)(=O)=O
- InChl : 1S/C8H10O3S/c1-2-7-3-5-8(6-4-7)12(9,10)11/h3-6H,2H2,1H3,(H,9,10,11)
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
no data available
Vehicle:
not specified
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1ml
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single exposure
Observation period (in vivo):
7 days
Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
no data available
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6
Details on study design:
no data available
Other effects / acceptance of results:
no data available
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
7 d
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No signs of irritation observed

Estimation method: Takes mode value from the 5 nearest neighbours
Domain  logical expression:Result: In Domain

((((((((((("a" or "b" or "c" or "d" or "e" or "f" )  and "g" )  and "h" )  and ("i" and ( not "j") )  )  and ("k" and ( not "l") )  )  and "m" )  and "n" )  and "o" )  and "p" )  and "q" )  and ("r" and "s" )  )

Domain logical expression index: "a"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Linear alkylbenzene sulfonates by OECD HPV Chemical Categories

Domain logical expression index: "b"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Anionic Surfactants by US-EPA New Chemical Categories

Domain logical expression index: "c"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aromatic compound OR Sulfonic acid OR Sulfonic acid derivative by Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "d"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aliphatic Carbon [CH] OR Aliphatic Carbon [-CH2-] OR Aliphatic Carbon [-CH3] OR Aromatic Carbon [C] OR Hydroxy, sulfur attach [-OH] OR Miscellaneous sulfide (=S) or oxide (=O) OR Olefinic carbon [=CH- or =C<] OR Suflur {v+4} or {v+6} OR Sulfinic acid [-S(=O)OH] OR Sulfonate, aromatic attach [-SO2-O] by Organic functional groups (US EPA) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "e"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Alkyl arenes OR Overlapping groups OR Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups (nested) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "f"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Alkyl arenes OR Aryl OR Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "g"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by OASIS v.1.3 ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "h"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by OECD ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "i"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Non binder, without OH or NH2 group by Estrogen Receptor Binding

Domain logical expression index: "j"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Non binder, impaired OH or NH2 group OR Non binder, MW>500 OR Non binder, non cyclic structure by Estrogen Receptor Binding

Domain logical expression index: "k"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein binding by OASIS v1.3

Domain logical expression index: "l"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Acylation OR Acylation >> Direct acylation involving a leaving group OR Acylation >> Direct acylation involving a leaving group >> (Thio)Acyl and (thio)carbamoyl halides and cyanides  OR Michael Addition OR Michael Addition >> Michael addition on conjugated systems with electron withdrawing group OR Michael Addition >> Michael addition on conjugated systems with electron withdrawing group >> alpha,beta-Carbonyl compounds with polarized double bonds  OR Michael Addition >> Polarised Alkenes OR Michael Addition >> Polarised Alkenes >> Polarised Alkene - alkenyl pyridines, pyrazines, pyrimidines or triazines  OR Nucleophilic addition OR Nucleophilic addition >> Addition to carbon-hetero double bonds OR Nucleophilic addition >> Addition to carbon-hetero double bonds >> Ketones OR SN2 OR SN2 >> Interchange reaction with sulphur containing compounds OR SN2 >> Interchange reaction with sulphur containing compounds >> Thiols and disulfide compounds  by Protein binding by OASIS v1.3

Domain logical expression index: "m"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein binding by OECD ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "n"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Class 5 (Not possible to classify according to these rules) by Acute aquatic toxicity classification by Verhaar (Modified) ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "o"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Reactive unspecified by Acute aquatic toxicity MOA by OASIS ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "p"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Bioavailable by Lipinski Rule Oasis ONLY

Domain logical expression index: "q"

Similarity boundary:Target: CCc1ccccc1S(O)(=O)=O
Threshold=30%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Atom type; Count H attached; Hybridization

Domain logical expression index: "r"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -2.4

Domain logical expression index: "s"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 1.87

Interpretation of results:
other: not irritating
Conclusions:
Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid was estimated to be not irritating to the eyes of New Zealand White rabbits.
Executive summary:

The ocular irritation potential of Ethylbenzenesulphonic acidwas estimated using OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 with logPow as the primary descriptor.

Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid was estimated to be not irritating to the eyes of New Zealand White rabbits.

Based on the estimated results, Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid can be considered not irritating to eyes and can be classified under the category “Not Classified” as per CLP regulation.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Skin Irritation:

In different studies, Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid has been investigated for potential for dermal irritation to a greater or lesser extent. The studies are based on in vivo experiments along with predicted data for target chemical and its structurally and functionally similar read across substances, Sodium benzene sulfonate[CAS: 515-42-4] and Sodium cumenesulphonate[CAS: 28348-53-0]. The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental data.

In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the skin irritation potential was estimated forEthylbenzenesulphonic acid. It was estimated that Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid was not irritating to skin of New Zealand White rabbits.

This result is supported by the experimental performed by Chin H. Tay et.al [International Journal of Toxicology, January 2004 vol. 23 no. 1 pp.11-16] for thestructurally and functionally similar read across substance, Sodium benzene sulfonate[CAS: 515-42-4]. The study was performed according to EPA OPPTS 870.2500, “Acute Dermal Irritation” Guidelines. Four doses were applied: 5000 mg/L, 2000 mg/L, 1000 mg/L, and 500 mg/l to 6 male and 6 female rabbits per dose group. The pH of the 1000 mg/L dosage was 7.01 and 6.98 prior to dosing and after the 4-hour exposure, respectively. For the 5000 mg/L dosage, the pH was 7.00 and 7.02 prior to dosing and after the 4-hour exposure, respectively.

Each dose of test compound (0.5 ml of each concentration for each dose cohort) was applied to a small area of skin (approximately 6cm2) and covered with four layers of gauze patch held in place with nonirritating tape. Since the compound was in liquid form, it was applied to the gauze before application to the skin. The patch was loosely held in contact with the skin using a semi-occlusive dressing for the exposure period of 4 hours.

At the end of the 4-hour exposure period, the patches were removed and the skin wiped to remove any test substance still remaining. Animals were observed for signs of erythema and edema at 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours after patch removal. Observations of erythema or edema were scored according to the Draize Scale for Scoring Skin Reactions (USEPA 1998). This scale assesses irritation as follows: 0, no erythema or edema; 1, very slight erythema and/or edema (barely perceptible); 2, well-defined erythema and/or slight edema; 3, moderate to severe erythema or moderate edema, and 4, severe erythema and/or edema. Animals were weighed before exposure and at the end of the exposure period (day 3) and observed daily for the incidence of any clinical signs of toxicity (other than erythema and edema). Control skin showed no signs of irritation.

At a dose of 5000 mg/L, very slight erythema (Draize Score 1) was observed in all three test animals 1 hour after removal of the gauze containing the benzene sulfonate solution.

At the 24-hour observation point, very slight irritation (Draize Score 1) was observed in one of the three test animals. At the 48- and 72-hour observation points, the irritation was reversed, and no irritation was observed in any of the animals. Edema was not observed at any time. Control skin showed no signs of irritation. At 2000 mg/L, very slight erythema (Draize Score 1) was observed in two of the three test animals 1 hour after removal of the benzene sulfonate solution. The irritation was reversed by 24 hours. No erythema was observed in any test animals at this dosage at 24, 48 or 72 hours.

Since the effects at all dose levels were fully reversible within 72 hours, Sodium Benzene sulfonate can be considered not irritating to rabbit skin.

These results are supported by the experimental study summarized in International Journal of Toxicology; Vol 30, Issue 6_suppl, pp. 270S - 283S; 2011; for the structurally and functionally similar read across substance, Sodium cumenesulphonate[CAS: 28348-53-0]. The test was performed in accordance with OECD 404 Guidelines. 0.5g of 60% solution of Sodium cumenesulphonate was applied to the skin of rabbits and effects were observed till 4 hours.

No signs of irritation were observed in the rabbits when exposed to 60% solution of sodium cumenesulphonate for 4 hours.

Hence, Sodium cumenesulphonate was not irritating to rabbit skin.

Based on the available data for the target as well as it read across substances;and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded thatEthylbenzenesulphonic acid was not irritating to skin.Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation,Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid can be classified under the category “Not Classified”.

Eye Irritation:

In different studies, Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid has been investigated for potential for ocular irritation to a greater or lesser extent. The studies are based on in vivo experiments along with predicted data for target chemical and its structurally and functionally similar read across substances, 2-(Ethylamino)toluene-4-sulphonic acid [CAS: 98-40-8] and Sodium cumenesulphonate[CAS: 28348-53-0]. The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental data.

In a prediction done by SSS (2017) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the ocular irritation potential was estimated forEthylbenzenesulphonic acid. It was estimated thatEthylbenzenesulphonic acidwas not irritating to eyes of New Zealand White rabbits.

This is supported by the experimental study summarized in International Journal of Toxicology; Vol 30, Issue 6_suppl, pp. 270S - 283S; 2011; for the structurally and functionally similar read across substance, Sodium cumenesulphonate[CAS: 28348-53-0]. The test was performed in accordance with OECD 405 Guidelines.

Undiluted Sodium cumenesulphonate instilled in to the rabbit eyes and effects were observed (dose and duration not specified)

Sodium cumenesulphonate was not irritating to rabbit eyes.

The above results are supported by the experimental study summarized in Chemosphere, Vol. 28, No. 12, pp. 2203.2236, 1994;for the structurally and functionally similar read across substance, 2-(Ethylamino)toluene-4-sulphonic acid[CAS: 98-40-8].2-(Ethylamino)toluene-4-sulphonic acid was observed to be not irritating to rabbit eyes.

Based on the available data for the target as well as it read across substances;and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded thatEthylbenzenesulphonic acid was not irritating to eyes.Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation,Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid can be classified under the category “Not Classified”.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Available data for Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid indicates that it is not likely to cause any irritation or corrosion to skin and eyes.

Hence, Ethylbenzenesulphonic acid can be classified under the category “Not Classified” as per CLP regulation.