Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
chronic toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1973
Report date:
1973

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 453 (Combined Chronic Toxicity / Carcinogenicity Studies)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Exposure started in-utero
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dihydrogen (ethyl)[4-[4-[ethyl(3-sulphonatobenzyl)]amino]-2'-sulphonatobenzhydrylidene]cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene](3-sulphonatobenzyl)ammonium, disodium salt
EC Number:
223-339-8
EC Name:
Dihydrogen (ethyl)[4-[4-[ethyl(3-sulphonatobenzyl)]amino]-2'-sulphonatobenzhydrylidene]cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene](3-sulphonatobenzyl)ammonium, disodium salt
Cas Number:
3844-45-9
Molecular formula:
C37 H34 N2 Na2 O9 S3
IUPAC Name:
disodium 2-({4-[ethyl(3-sulfonatobenzyl)amino]phenyl}{4-[ethyl(3-sulfonatobenzyl)iminio]cyclohexa-2,5-dien-1-ylidene}methyl)benzenesulfonate
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
further impurities not specified in detail
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): FD&C Blue No. 1 (CAS 3844-45-9)
- Supplier: Hilton Davis Co., Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Analytical purity: 90%
- Impurities (identity): subsidiary colourings, volatile chlorides and suiphates, and uncombined intermnediates
- Purity test date: no data
- Lot/batch No.: no data
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: no data
- Stability under test conditions: no data, but storage conditions not considered critical
- Storage condition of test material: no data
- Other: The compound was certified by the US FDA

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Charles-River CD
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories,Wilmington, MA, USA
- Age at study initiation: 38 days at beginning of F0-phase
- Weight at study initiation: F1 generation started exposure at weaning
- Housing: individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: no data

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-21 °C
- Humidity (%): 40 - 60%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Other: For F1-generation a maximum of two rats per sex from each litter were selected.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: feed
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Diets were blended in a twin-shell blender.

DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): weekly
- Storage temperature of food: 20-21 °C and a humidity range aof 40-60%.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
Homogeneity and stability were analysed in the prepared diets before study initiation, weekly during the first 13 weeks of study and then monthly thereafter.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
30 months F1 (plus in-utero phase) (with 10 animals per sex and dose for interim sacrifice after 12 months)
2 months (F0-generation)
Frequency of treatment:
daily
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
1 000 ppm
Remarks:
0.1% in the diet
Dose / conc.:
10 000 ppm
Remarks:
1% (w/w) in the diet
Dose / conc.:
20 000 ppm
Remarks:
2% (w/w) in the diet
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0, 50, 514, 1072 mg/kg bw (calculated for males)
Basis:
actual ingested
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0, 62, 631, 1319 mg/kg bw (calculated for females)
Basis:
actual ingested
No. of animals per sex per dose:
60 (F0)
70 (F1)
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: indicated to be based on existing studies

Two identical controi groups were used to account for random biological variation.

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
- Cage side observations were morbidity, mortality and gross clinical signs

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: weekly

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly through die first 14 weeks, biweekly for week 16-26 and monthly thereafter

FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study) and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes:
- Determined weekly through die first 14 weeks, biweekly for week 16-26 and monthly thereafter

- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: yes

FOOD EFFICIENCY:
No data


OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes (after 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months af the chronic phase.)

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and before termination
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data
- Animals fasted: Yes / No / No data
- How many animals: 10 per sex and dose group
- Parameters checked: haemoglobin, haematocrit, total eryrhrocyte count, total and differential leucocyte counts. and erythrocyte morphology

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes (3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and before termination)
aspartate aminatransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, blood urea nitrogen, fasting glucose, total protein and creatinine

URINALYSIS: Yes (3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and before termination)
specific gravity, pH and presence of protein, glucose, ketones, bilirubin and occult blood, appearance (gross and microscopic)

NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No
Sacrifice and pathology:
- Organ weights: brain, gonads, kidneys, liver, spleen and thyroid

HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes (all animals trom the two control groups and from the high-dose (5.0%) group). Further groups were analysed in case of findings at the high dose groups.
Organs examined: adrenal (twa), aorta (abdominal), bone and marrow (femur). blood smear, brain (three sections: frontal cortex and basal ganglia. parietal cortex and thalamus. and cerebellum and pons), oesphagus. eye, (two. with optic nerve), heart (with coronar vesels), intestine (caecum, colon, duodenum and iLeum), kidneys (two). liver, lung and mainstem, subbronchi (lungs inflated with formalin), lymph nodes, mesenteric and mediastinal), mammary gland, (inguinal), nerve (sciatic). ovaries pancreas, pituitary, prostate, salivar gland (mandibular), seminal vesicles (two), skeietal muscle (biceps femoris), skin.spinal cord (cervical), spieen stomach, testes, with epididymides, tbymus. thyroid with parathyraid, trachea, urinary bladder (inflated with formalin), uterus, any tissue with gross changes of an uncertain nature together with an apparentdy normal section of thc same tissue, and any tissue masses or suspect tumours rogether with regional lymph nodes.
Other examinations:
F0-examinations:
Female rats were weighed an gestation days 0, 4, 14 and 21
Statistics:
The variances of thde two groups were tested tor equality using the F test (Gull 1978). lt the variances were equal, a standard independent two-sample test was used to -determiüne equality ot mneans. lt the variances differed, Welch's t-test was used to determine equal ity of means, using the Smith-Satterthwaite correction for unequal variances (Gill 1978). All tests were conducted at the 1.0% two-sided risk level. More detailed information is provided in Fd. Chem. Toxicol. 28, 221-234 (1990)

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
high dose group females starting week 102.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
slightly increased at the high dose group
Ophthalmological findings:
no effects observed
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Clinical biochemistry findings:
no effects observed
Urinalysis findings:
no effects observed
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed
Details on results:
Survival was decreased (P < 0.01) in die 2.0% females compared to controls.

There was blue staining of fur, feces and exposed skin.

Effect levels

open allclose all
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
>= 2 other: % in the diet
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male
Basis for effect level:
other: ca 1000 mg/kg bw
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
1 other: % in the diet
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
female
Basis for effect level:
other: ca 630 mg/kg bw; 15% reduction in body weight (body weight affected after week 102).

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
yes
Lowest effective dose / conc.:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
System:
other: presumably food efficiency
Organ:
other: no target organ identified
Treatment related:
yes
Dose response relationship:
yes

Any other information on results incl. tables

 After week 90, mean body weights of the 2.0% females began a steady downward trend that was statistically significant (P < 0.01) from week 102 until the end of the study.

Applicant's summary and conclusion