Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of ethylene glycol (CAS No. 107-21-1) in B6C3F1 mice (feed studies)
Author:
US NTP
Year:
1993
Bibliographic source:
NIH Publication NO.93-314, NTP TR 413

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Version / remarks:
1983
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
other: Chromosomal aberration in vitro

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Ethane-1,2-diol
EC Number:
203-473-3
EC Name:
Ethane-1,2-diol
Cas Number:
107-21-1
Molecular formula:
C2H6O2
IUPAC Name:
ethylene glycol

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Cytokinesis block (if used):
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix from Aroclor 1254 induced rat livers
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Test concentrations with and without S9: 160, 500, 1600, 5000 µg/mL ethane-1,2-diol
Vehicle / solvent:
Since ethan-1,2-diol was soluble in the culture medium (McCoy's 5A medium) no vehicle was used.
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
no
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
mitomycin C
Remarks:
-S9
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
no
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
Remarks:
+S9
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Total cells counted: 100 per concentration

Without S9:
Cells were incubated in McCoy's 5A medium with the ethylene glycol for 10 hours; Colcemid was added and incubation continued for 2 hours. The cells were then harvested by mitotic shake-off, fixed, and stained with Giemsa.

With S9:
Cells were treated with ethylene glycol and S9 for 2 hours, after which the treatment medium was removed and the cells incubated for 10 hours in fresh medium, with Colcemid present for the final 2 hours. Cells were harvested in the same manner as for the treatment without S9.
Evaluation criteria:
Cells were selected for scoring on the basis of good morphology and completeness of karyotype (21 ± 2 chromosomes). All slides were scored blind and those from a single test were read by the same person.

Classes of aberrations: simple (breaks and terminal deletions), complex (rearrangements and translocations), and other (pulverized cells, despiralized chromosomes, and cells containing 10 or more aberrations).
Statistics:
Statistical analyses were conducted on both the slopes of the dose-response curves and the individual dose points. Data are presented as percentage of cells with aberrations.

For a single trial, a statistically significant (P≤0.05) difference for one dose point and a significant trend (P≤0.015) were considered weak evidence for a positive response (+w); significant differences for two or more doses indicated the trial was positive (+)

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
see attached background material

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Ethane-1,2 -diol was considered to be negative in the chromosome aberration assay in CHO cells under the conditions of the study.
Executive summary:

Ethane-1,2 -diol was tested in Chinese hamster ovary cells with and without metabolic activation for its potential to induce chromosomal aberrations. Cells were incubated in culture medium with ethane-1,2 -diol at 0, 160, 500, 1600, 5000 µg/mL. Appropriate negative and positive controls were used in parallel.

No cytotoxicity was seen even at the highest dose tested. The negative and positive controls showed the expected results. The number of aberrations/cell and percent cells with aberrations were not increased.

It can be concluded that ethane-1,2 -diol is not clastogenic.