Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Data is from peer reviewed journal.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Fragrance raw materials monographs of test chemical
Author:
D. L. J. Opdyke
Year:
1979
Bibliographic source:
Food and Cosmetics Toxicology
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
THE IDENTIFICATION OF CONTACT ALLERGENS BY HUMAN ASSAY
Author:
ALBERT M. KLIGMAN
Year:
1966
Bibliographic source:
THE JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1966

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: As mentioned below
Principles of method if other than guideline:
To evaluate the skin sensitizing potential of the test chemical in Human by Human Maximisation test.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
other: Human Maximisation test.
Justification for non-LLNA method:
no data available

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Methyl o-aminobenzoate
Cas Number:
134-20-3
Molecular formula:
C8H9NO2
IUPAC Name:
Methyl o-aminobenzoate
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
IUPAC name: 2-Aminobenzoic acid, methyl ester
Mol. formula: C8H9NO2
Molecular Weight: 151.1641 gm/mol
Smiles: c1(c(cccc1)N)C(OC)=O
InChI: 1S/C8H9NO2/c1-11-8(10)6-4-2-3-5-7(6)9/h2-5H,9H2,1H3

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
other: Human
Strain:
other: Not applicable.
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
Age: the preferred age range is 18 to 50 years.

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
10%
Day(s)/duration:
48 hours
Adequacy of induction:
other: 1.0 ml of 5% aqueous sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) was applied to a 1.5 inch square of Webril under occlusive conditons for 24 hours.
Challenge
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
10%
Day(s)/duration:
48 hours
Adequacy of challenge:
other: A provocative patch test consists of pre-treating the skin occlusively with 0.4 ml of 10% SLS on a 1.0" Webril square for one hour.
No. of animals per dose:
Group 1: 24 human volunteers
Group 2: 26 human volunteers
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: no data available

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: total 5 exposures
- Exposure period: 48 hours
- Test groups: 2 (24 and 26)
- Control group: No data available.
- Site: forearm or back
- Frequency of applications: The procedure consists of five 48 hour exposures, each one preceded by a 24 hour pre-treatment with 5% SLS..
- Duration: 2 weeks
- Concentrations: 10% in petrolatum

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: single
- Day(s) of challenge:
- Exposure period: 48 hours
- Test groups: 2 (24 and 26)
- Control group: A control patch was necessary for the provocative test consisting of petrolatum applied for 48 hours to a site pretreated for one hour with 10% aqueous sodium lauryl sulfate.The allergen treated site was not regarded as positive unless it was clearly more inflammatory than the control site.
- Site: forearm or back
- Concentrations: 10% in petrolatum
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): The challenge reaction was read immediately after removal of the 48 hour patch and again in another two days
Challenge controls:
A control patch was necessary for the provocative test consisting of petrolatum applied for 48 hours to a site pretreated for one hour with 10% aqueous sodium lauryl sulfate.The allergen treated site was not regarded as positive unless it was clearly more inflammatory than the control site.
Positive control substance(s):
not specified

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
No data available

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10% in Petrolatum
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
24
Clinical observations:
No skin sensitization reaction observed.
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10% in petrolatum
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
26
Clinical observations:
No skin sensitization reaction
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation

Any other information on results incl. tables

No skin sensitization reaction observed.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: Not sensitizing.
Conclusions:
No dermal reactions were observed on the skin of the volunteers. Therefore, the test chemical was considered to be not sensitizing to humans. Hence, the test chemical can be classified under the category "Not Classified" as per CLP Regulation.
Executive summary:

A human maximization study was performed to assess the dermal sensitization potential of the test chemical. During the induction exposure, the sensitizing patches were applied to an extremity, either the forearm or the lower leg in the calf region. The entire series of patches were applied to exactly the same site. The procedure was as follows: 1.0 ml of 5% aqueous sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) was injected on to the Webril patches and fastened to an extremity under occlusive conditions for 24 hours. To the same site, a 48 hour occlusive patch with 10% test chemical in petrolatum was applied to the skin of 24 and 26 human volunteers. The procedure of alternating 24 hour irritant i.e 24 hour pre-treatment with 5% SLS and 48 hour allergen patches were repeated for a total of five exposures. After a suitable rest period, the challenge exposure was performed. Before conducting the challenge test, a "SLS provocative patch test," was performed at the test site. A provocative patch test consisted of pre-treating the skin occlusively with 0.4 ml of 10% SLS on a 1.0 inch Webril square for one hour. After provocative patch test, the test chemical patches were applied under occlusive conditions on the same site for 48 hours. The challenge reactions were read immediately after removal of the 48 hours patch and again in another two days. An evident erythema was regarded as the minimum positive response. No dermal reactions were observed on the skin of the volunteers. Therefore, the test chemical was considered to be not sensitizing to humans. Hence, the test chemical can be classified under the category "Not Classified" as per CLP Regulation.