Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 800-253-4 | CAS number: 1419212-73-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Adsorption / desorption
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- adsorption / desorption: screening
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 11 to 15 August 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: guideline study under GLP
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 121 (Estimation of the Adsorption Coefficient (Koc) on Soil and on Sewage Sludge using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC))
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.19 (Estimation of the Adsorption Coefficient (KOC) on Soil and Sewage Sludge Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC))
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- adsorption coefficient should be carried out on substances in their ionized and unionized forms, where applicable. However, the dissociation constants of certain functional groups found in the test item made it impossible to satisfy this criterion; for some of the test item constituents, testing would be required at pH 12 or greater.
As a consequence of this, for some constituents one of the functional groups will always be present in its ionized form. Therefore, as pH 12 or above is outside the environmentally relevant pH range for this test and also experimentally impractical, testing was carried out at approximately neutral pH. - GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of method:
- HPLC estimation method
- Details on study design: HPLC method:
- EHPLC System : Agilent Technologies 1200 incorporating workstation
Column : XSelect HSS CN (150 x 4.6 mm id)
Column temperature : 30 ºC
Mobile phase : Methanol:purified water (55:45 v/v)*
pH of mobile phase : 7.0
Flow-rate : 1.0 mL/min
Injection volume : 10 μl
UV detector wavelength : Dead Time and Reference Standards: 210 nm
ELS detector : Sample:
Nebulizer temperature: 70 °C
Evaporator temperature 80 °C
Gas flow: 1 L/min
DETERMINATION OF DEAD TIME
- Method: by inert substance (formamide [purity* 99.94%, 604 mg/L solution in methanol:purified water (55:45 v/v)]) which is not retained by the column
- Dead time: retention 1.978 min
REFERENCE SUBSTANCES
- Identity: Acetanilide, Atrazine, Isoproturon,,Aniline, Triadimenol, Linuron, Naphthalene, Endosulfan-diol, Fenthion, alpha-Endosulfan, Phenanthrene, Diclofop-methyl, DDT - Type:
- log Koc
- Value:
- > 5.63
- Remarks on result:
- other: retention time of all substance peaks > 30 min
- Details on results (HPLC method):
- - Retention times of reference substances used for calibration: see table
- Details of fitted regression line:
Correlation coefficients (r): 0.921
Slope: 0.344
Intercept: 0.752
- Average retention data for test substance: > 30 min - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The logKoc of the substance is > 5.63
- Executive summary:
A determination of the Koc of the substance using the HPLC method gave a value of the logKoc of > 5.63 (the retention time of all peaks was > 30 min). Elution was only possible after increasing the mobile phase to 100% methanol (after elution of DDT)
- Endpoint:
- adsorption / desorption
- Remarks:
- other: QSAR
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Standard QSAR used in a worst case approach. Validation information on QSAR available
- Justification for type of information:
- calculation with KOCWIN (v2.00) performed with representative components
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- calculation with KOCWIN (v2.00) performed with representative components
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type:
- log Koc
- Value:
- >= 5.5 - <= 6.7
- Conclusions:
- The calculated logKoc is 5.5-6.7
- Executive summary:
The Koc has been calculated by the QSAR based on MCI included in the KOCWIN model (vs 2.00) and is calculated to be between 5.5 and 6.7.
- Endpoint:
- adsorption / desorption
- Remarks:
- other: QSAR
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Standard QSAR used in a worst case approach. Validation information on QSAR available
- Justification for type of information:
- calculation with KOCWIN (v2.00) performed with representative components
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- calculation with KOCWIN (v2.00) performed with representative components
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type:
- log Koc
- Value:
- >= 5 - <= 5.7
- Conclusions:
- The calculated logKoc is 5.0-5.7
- Executive summary:
The Koc has been calculated by the QSAR based on logPow included in the KOCWIN model (vs 2.00) and is calculated to be between 5.0 and 5.7.
Referenceopen allclose all
Standard |
Retention Time (mins) |
Retention Time (mins) Mean |
Capacity Factor (k) |
Log10 k |
Log10 Koc |
||||||
|
Injection 1 |
Injection 2 |
|
|
|
|
|||||
Acetanilide |
2.721 |
2.721 |
2.721 |
0.376 |
-0.425 |
1.25 |
|||||
Atrazine |
3.790 |
3.790 |
3.790 |
0.916 |
-0.038 |
1.81 |
|||||
Isoproturon |
4.048 |
4.048 |
4.048 |
1.05 |
0.020 |
1.86 |
|||||
Aniline |
2.551 |
2.556 |
2.554 |
0.291 |
-0.536 |
2.07 |
|||||
Triadimenol |
5.569 |
5.569 |
5.569 |
1.82 |
0.259 |
2.40 |
|||||
Linuron |
5.578 |
5.578 |
5.578 |
1.82 |
0.260 |
2.59 |
|||||
Naphthalene |
4.801 |
4.806 |
4.804 |
1.43 |
0.155 |
2.75 |
|||||
Endosulfan-diol |
6.876 |
6.871 |
6.874 |
2.48 |
0.394 |
3.02 |
|||||
Fenthion |
8.397 |
8.392 |
8.395 |
3.24 |
0.511 |
3.31 |
|||||
α-Endosulfan |
11.822 |
11.822 |
11.822 |
4.98 |
0.697 |
4.09 |
|||||
Diclofop-methyl |
12.891 |
12.896 |
12.894 |
5.52 |
0.742 |
4.20 |
|||||
Phenanthrene |
9.106 |
9.116 |
9.111 |
3.61 |
0.557 |
4.09 |
|||||
DDT |
25.933 |
25.962 |
25.948 |
12.1 |
1.08 |
5.63 |
|||||
see attachment
see attachment
Description of key information
The experimental value for the logKoc is > 5.63. The substance is surface active and QSAR predictions show very high values (>6.7).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Koc at 20 °C:
- 1 000 000
Additional information
For risk assessment the Koc will be set to the maximum value (indicated in EUSES) that will lead to reliable exposure assessment. This value is indicated as the key value above.
[LogKoc: 6.0]
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.