Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 293-263-8 | CAS number: 91053-01-9 A complex combination of hydrocarbons obtained from distillation of the butadiene-free C4 fraction of a naphtha steam-cracking process. It consists predominantly of olefinic hydrocarbons having carbon numbers of C8, C12, C16 and C20 and boiling in the range of approximately 170°C to 185°C (338°F to 365°F).
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to terrestrial arthropods
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to terrestrial arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number % weight
i-Olefin 12 100
Total 100 - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Folsomia candida
- Animal group:
- Collembola (soil-dwelling springtail)
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not required
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 3 297 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL50
- Effect conc.:
- 632 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance were 3297 and 632 mg/kg soil dw, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance for Folsomia candida were 3297 and 632 mg/kg soil dw, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to terrestrial arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number % weight
i-Olefin 16 100
Total 100 - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Folsomia candida
- Animal group:
- Collembola (soil-dwelling springtail)
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not required
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 714 802 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL50
- Effect conc.:
- 136 935 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance were 714802 and 136935 mg/kg soil dw, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance for Folsomia candida were 714802 and 136935 mg/kg soil dw, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to terrestrial arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number % weight
i-Olefin 20 100
Total 100 - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Folsomia candida
- Animal group:
- Collembola (soil-dwelling springtail)
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not required
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 714 802 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL50
- Effect conc.:
- 136 935 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance were 714802 and 136935 mg/kg soil dw, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance for Folsomia candida were 714802 and 13693 mg/kg soil dw, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to terrestrial arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- See Attached Justification
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Software tool(s) used including version:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model(s) used:
See Field 'Attached justification'
- Model description: See Field 'Attached justification'
- Justification of QSAR prediction: see field 'Attached justification' - GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- HC Block Type Carbon Number % weight
i-Olefin 8 100
Total 100 - Analytical monitoring:
- not required
- Test organisms (species):
- Folsomia candida
- Animal group:
- Collembola (soil-dwelling springtail)
- Study type:
- other: QSAR
- Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Remarks:
- Not required
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LL50
- Effect conc.:
- 122 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- other: EL50
- Effect conc.:
- 23.3 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- estimated
- Conc. based on:
- other: QSAR prediction
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: QSAR predicted value
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance were 122 and 23.3 mg/kg soil dw, respectively.
- Executive summary:
The QSAR predicted LL50 and EL10 for the UVCB substance for Folsomia candida were 122 and 23.3 mg/kg soil dw, respectively. The model used for the calculations was the PETROTOX v4.0 model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. This substance fits within the criteria of the model and there are no reservations about the validity of the model runs. It is expected that this data is reliable with restrictions.
Referenceopen allclose all
Description of key information
The terrestrial toxicity was predicted by a QSAR, the PETROTOX v4.0 computer model. PETROTOX is a well-documented and peer reviewed model that is widely used across the chemicals industry. The predicted LL50 values for Folsomia candida ranged from 122 to 714802 mg/kg soil dw. The predicted LL10 values for Folsomia candida ranged from 23.3 to 136935 mg/kg soil dw.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Species | Carbon No. | LL50 / EL50 (mg/kg_dw) | EL10 (mg/kg_dw) |
Folsomia candida | C8 | 122 | 23.3 |
Folsomia candida | C12 | 3297 | 632 |
Folsomia candida | C16 | 714802 | 136935 |
Folsomia candida | C20 | 714802 | 136935 |
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.