Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
The study was conducted according to internationally accepted technical guidelines and in compliance with GLP in a contract research organization. The study is scientifically valid and the report is fully adequate for assessment, despite some minor restrictions (e.g. due to limited reporting).

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1985
Report date:
1985

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
of 1981
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics, Division of Pharmacology, FDA
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Tattooed New Zealands (albino rabbit)
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Number: 6 animals,
- Bodyweight: 2.5 to 3.0 kg
- Housing: Individual housing in cages.
- Diet: Commercially available standard laboratory diet for rabbits ( Altromin, Lage, Germany).
Prior to dosing the animals were starved for 16 hours.
- Water: Ad libitum

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

Room temperature kept constant at 18±2°C, the relative humidity at 50-60%. 12 hours illumination per day.

Test system

Vehicle:
other: CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose "Tylose") containing 40% test substance
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
Undiluted test substance could not be administered. Therefore, a dose formulation was prepared containing 40.5% WS400130.
After warming this test substance dilution to 40°C, 0.1 ml of it was administered into the conjunctival sac of one eye per rabbit. The contralateral eye remained untreated to serve as a control.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
There was no mentioning in the report that eyes were rinsed after treatment. Consequently the treatment/exposure period was equivalent to the entire observation period following administration, which was 7 days, or lasted until removal of the test material by physiological mechanisms, whichever happened sooner.
Observation period (in vivo):
7 days (i.e. the final observation time point was 7 days post instillation)
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6 adult rabbits
Details on study design:
Eyes were evaluated for occular lesions using ultraviolet light. Before and after the test the eyes of all animals were examained after staining with 2% fluorescein thus supporting the recognition of corneal lesions.

The numerical scoring system listed in Table 1 in the field below was adopted. Time points of evaluation were: Pretest (prior to treatment), 1, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours after administration and daily thereafter until 7 days after administration. Grades attained at 24, 48 and 72 hours after administration were included in the mean gradings of ocular lesions used for eye irritation/corrosion classification.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
over 6 animals and 3 time points
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Corneal irritation or opacity was not evident during the study
Remarks on result:
other: Treated with a dose formulation containing 40.5% WS400130
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
over 6 animals and 3 time points
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: Iridal changes were not evident during the study
Remarks on result:
other: Treated with a dose formulation containing 40.5% WS400130
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
(redness)
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
over 6 animals and 3 time points
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 4 hours
Remarks on result:
other: Treated with a dose formulation containing 40.5% WS400130
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
over 6 animals and 3 time points
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Chemosis was not evident during the study
Remarks on result:
other: Treated with a dose formulation containing 40.5% WS400130
Irritation parameter:
other: lacrimation score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
over 6 animals and 3 time points
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 4 hours
Remarks on result:
other: Treated with a dose formulation containing 40.5% WS400130
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Corneal and iridic lesions and chemosis were not evident throughout the study. Conjunctival redness and lacrimation, both findings grade 1, were seen in all treated eyes at 1 and 2 hours post instillation having completely disappeared in all animals by 4 hours post instillation. Examination of the eyes at 4 and 8 hours post instillation and daily afterwards until 7 days post instillation did not reveal any findings.
Other effects:
There was no mentioning of any other effects in the report.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: not irritating according to EU regulation
Conclusions:
WS400130 could not be administered undiluted. Therefore, a dilution in CMC (Tylose) containing 40.5% WS400130 was tested. The outcome of the present study does not necessitate any labelling regarding eye irritation according to EU classification rules [REGULATION (EC) 1272/2008]. The findings noted were very minor in degree, restricted to the 1 and 2 hour post instillation time points and fully reversible within 4 hours. Therefore, they fell within the category “not irritating to eyes”.