Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 283-479-0 | CAS number: 84649-98-9 Extractives and their physically modified derivatives such as tinctures, concretes, absolutes, essential oils, oleoresins, terpenes, terpene-free fractions, distillates, residues, etc., obtained from Cinnamomum zeylanicum, Lauraceae.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Water solubility
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- water solubility
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- QSAR prediction
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- other: QSAR model
- Title:
- WSKOWWIN v1.41a
- Author:
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- Year:
- 2 008
- Bibliographic source:
- US EPA. 2009. Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows, v 4.00. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: NCS Protocol
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- NCSs, consisting of a number of constituents, do not have one single water solubility value (Sw). The range of Sw can be given from calculated or measured values of the individual constituents. Calculated and measured data on the constituents are obtained from the WATERNT v1.01 from US-EPA.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of method:
- other: Estimation by calculation
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Cinnamomum zeylanicum, ext.
- EC Number:
- 283-479-0
- EC Name:
- Cinnamomum zeylanicum, ext.
- Cas Number:
- 84649-98-9
- Molecular formula:
- Not Applicable due to UVCB
- IUPAC Name:
- Cinnamomum zeylanicum, ext.
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Cinnamon leaf oil
- Physical state: liquid
Constituent 1
Results and discussion
Water solubility
- Key result
- Water solubility:
- >= 0.54 - <= 7 481.5 mg/L
- Temp.:
- 25 °C
- Remarks on result:
- other: The main constituent, Eugenol has a water solubility > 100 mg/L, 14.4 % of known constituents of the substance have a water solubility < 100 mg/L.
- Details on results:
- No data
Any other information on results incl. tables
Constituent | CAS-number | Sw [mg/L @ 25ºC] |
Eugenol | 97-53-0 | 979.83 |
beta-Caryophyllene | 87-44-5 | 0.54268 |
Linalool | 78-70-6 | 709.26 |
Benzyl benzoate | 120-51-4 | 20.002 |
alpha-Phellandrene | 99-83-2 | 37.447 |
Cinnamyl acetate | 103-54-8 | 183.76 |
Cinnamyl aldehyde | 104-55-2 | 3373.9 |
5-allyl-1,3-benzodioxole | 94-59-7 | 5.8996 |
4-allyl-2-methoxyphenyl acetate | 93-28-7 | 48.621 |
Pin-2(3)-ene | 80-56-8 | 3.4834 |
para-Cymene | 99-87-6 | 28.93 |
Humulene | 6753-98-6 | 1.5354 |
p-mentha-1(7),2-diene | 555-10-2 | 28.156 |
Camphene | 79-92-5 | 2.6192 |
D-Limone | 5989-27-5 | 44.388 |
p-mentha-1-en-8-ol | 98-55-5 | 1767.3 |
Pin-2(10)-ene | 127-91-3 | 2.6192 |
Cinnamyl alcohol | 104-54-1 | 7481.5 |
Benzaldehyde | 100-52-7 | 5128.6 |
beta-Myrcene | 123-35-3 | 17.814 |
alpha-Terpinene | 99-86-5 | 59.034 |
p-mentha-1,4(8)-diene | 586-62-9 | 93.066 |
WaterNT v1.01 model details
Reference to the type of model used
WATERNT uses a "fragment constant" methodology to predict water solubility. In a "fragment constant" method, a structure is divided into fragments (atom or larger functional groups) and coefficient values of each fragment or group are summed together to yield the solubility estimate. The WATERNT™s methodology is further referred to as the Atom/Fragment Contribution (AFC) method. Coefficients for individual fragments and groups in WATERNT were derived by multiple regression of 1000 reliably measured water solubility values.
Description of the applicability domain
The applicability domain is based on the maximum number of instances of that a fragment can be used in a chemical (based on the training and validation set, summarized in appendix D) and on molecular weight. The minimum and maximum values for molecular weight are the following:
Training Set Molecular Weights:
Minimum MW: 30.30
Maximum MW: 627.62
Average MW: 187.73
Currently there is no universally accepted definition of model domain. However, users may wish to consider the possibility that water solubility estimates are less accurate for compounds outside the MW range of the training set compounds, and/or that have more instances of a given fragment than the maximum for all training set compounds. It is also possible that a compound may have a functional group(s) or other structural features not represented in the training set, and for which no fragment coefficient was developed. These points should be taken into consideration when interpreting model results.
Description and results of any possible structural analogues of the substance to assess reliability of the prediction
External validation with a dataset containing 4636 substances resulted in a correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.815, a standard deviation of 1.045 and an absolute deviation of 0.796. The external validation set includes a diverse selection of chemical structures that rigorously test the predictive accuracy of any model. It contains many chemicals that are similar in structure to chemicals in the training set, but also many chemicals that are different from and structurally more complex than chemicals in the training set.
Uncertainty of the prediction
All constituents for which estimations were made fall within the applicability domain of the model.
Mechanistic domain
WATERNT uses a "fragment constant" methodology to predict water solubility. In a "fragment constant" method, a structure is divided into fragments (atom or larger functional groups) and coefficient values of each fragment or group are summed together to yield the solubility estimate.
It became apparent, for various types of structures, that water solubility estimates made from atom/fragment values alone could or needed to be improved by inclusion of substructures larger or more complex than "atoms"; hence, correction factors were added to the AFC method. The term "correction factor" is appropriate because their values are derived from the differences between the water solubility estimates from atoms alone and the measured water solubility values. The correction factors have two main groupings: first, factors involving aromatic ring substituent positions and second, miscellaneous factors. In general, the correction factors are values for various steric interactions, hydrogen-bondings, and effects from polar functional substructures. Individual correction factors were selected through a tedious process of correlating the differences (between solubility estimates from atom/fragments alone and measured solubility values) with common substructures. Results of two successive multiple regressions (first for atom/fragments and second for correction factors) yield the QSAR. In total 117 different types of fragments exist.
To estimate water solubility, WATERNT initially separates a molecule into distinct atom/fragments. In general, each non-hydrogen atom (e.g. carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, etc.) in a structure is a "core" for a fragment; the exact fragment is determined by what is connected to the atom. Several functional groups are treated as core "atoms"; these include carbonyl (C=O), thiocarbonyl (C=S), nitro (-NO2), nitrate (ONO2), cyano (-C/N), and isothiocyanate (-N=C=S). Connections to each core "atom" are either general or specific; specific connections take precedence over general connections.
As all regular and common fragments are included in this method, and the constituents for which this method was applied do not contain exotic fragments, there are no limits to the mechanistic domain.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The water solubility of the known constituents of Cinnamon Leaf Oil ranges from 0.54 to 7481.5 mg/L at 25 ºC. The main constituent, Eugenol has a water solubility > 100 mg/L, 14.4 % of known constituents of the substance have a water solubility < 100 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The water solubility of cinnamon leaf oil was estimated by calculation. Water solubilities for the known constiuents were estimated using the QSAR WSKOWWIN v 1.41 according to the fragment method.
The water solubility of the known constituents of Cinnamon Leaf Oil ranges from 0.54 to 7481.5 mg/L at 25 ºC. The main constituent, Eugenol has a water solubility > 100 mg/L, 14.4 % of known constituents of the substance have a water solubility < 100 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.