Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 283-479-0 | CAS number: 84649-98-9 Extractives and their physically modified derivatives such as tinctures, concretes, absolutes, essential oils, oleoresins, terpenes, terpene-free fractions, distillates, residues, etc., obtained from Cinnamomum zeylanicum, Lauraceae.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin sensitisation (GPMT): Sensitising (based on read across from its major constituent eugenol)
Skin sensitisation (LLNA): Sensitising (based on read across from its major constituent eugenol)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- No data
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- This publication describes a Guinea Pig Maximisation Test, performed according to methods resembling OECD guideline 406 (ref: Magnusson and Kligman, 1970). It was not indicated if GLP conditions were met in the original study. The study was assigned a Klimisch 2 rating due to the read-across purpose, in accordance with the ECHA Practical guide #6 on the reporting of read-across in IUCLID.
- Justification for type of information:
- The read-across justification document is attached as a separate docuemt to the "Toxicological Information" summary of this dossier.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- Existing study
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- not specified
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Olac, Oxon, UK
- Weight at study initiation: approx. 350 g - Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- other: dobs/saline (intradermal) and acetone/PEG (epicutaneous)
- Concentration / amount:
- Intradermal: 0.1%
Epicutaneous induction: 100%
Epicutaneous challenge: 25% - Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: dobs/saline (intradermal) and acetone/PEG (epicutaneous)
- Concentration / amount:
- Intradermal: 0.1%
Epicutaneous induction: 100%
Epicutaneous challenge: 25% - No. of animals per dose:
- 10
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Preliminary irritation tests were performed to determine suitable assay concentrations.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Exposure period: 48 hours (epicutaneous)
- Test groups (n=10): Test article, six intradermal injections and one time epicutaneous application (6-8 days later)
- Control group (n=5): Vehicle only, six intradermal injections and one time epicutaneous application (6-8 days later)
- Site: Shoulder region
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: approx. 14 days after induction
- Exposure period: 24 hours
- Test/control group: Test article epicutaneously at maximum non-irritant concentration
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 hours
C. SCORING SYSTEM
Scoring for erythema on a 0-3 scale - Challenge controls:
- Not performed
- Positive control substance(s):
- no
- Positive control results:
- No positive control was included in the study.
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- vehicle and 25% test article
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100 and 25 % test article
- No. with + reactions:
- 3
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Sensitising
- Remarks:
- Based on CLP criteria
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study, positive skin reactions were noted in 3 out of 10 guinea pigs treated with 25% Eugenol at the challenge phase. A sensitisation rate of 30% was calculated. Based on the threshold value of 30% as mentioned in Annex I of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008/EC), the substance has to be classified as sensitising.
- Executive summary:
This Guinea Pig Maximisation Test (GPMT) was performed to determine the sensitising potential of Eugenol. In the test group (n=10), intradermal induction was performed with 0.1% test article, epicutaneous induction with 100% test article and the final challenge exposure was done with 25% test article. A negative control group (n=5) was also included. Positive skin reactions were scored and sensitisation rates were calculated.
Positive skin reactions were noted in 3 out of 10 guinea pigs treated with 25% Eugenol at the challenge phase (mean score of 0.8). A corresponding sensitisation rate of 30% was calculated. No positive skin reactions were noted in the negative control animals.
Based on the results of this study and considering the threshold value of 30% as mentioned in Annex I of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008/EC), the substance has to be classified as sensitising.
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- No data
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- This publication describes a Local Lymph Node Assay, performed according to methods resembling OECD guideline 429 (ref: Kimber and Basketter, 1992). It was not indicated if GLP conditions were met in the original study and there was no positive control included. The study was assigned a Klimisch 2 rating due to the read-across purpose, in accordance with the ECHA Practical guide #6 on the reporting of read-across in IUCLID.
- Justification for type of information:
- The read-across justification document is attached as a separate docuemt to the "Toxicological Information" summary of this dossier.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Balb/c
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Olac, Oxon, UK
- Age at study initiation: 6-12 weeks - Vehicle:
- acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
- Concentration:
- 0%, 5%, 10% and 25%
- No. of animals per dose:
- 4
- Details on study design:
- MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method: murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) - pooled approach
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: SI ≥3 (according to OECD guideline 429)
TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
25 ul of 0%, 5%, 10% or 25% test article in vehicle applied to dorsum of ears, for three consecutive days.
After five days mice were injected IV with 20 uCi of 3-HTdR in 250 ul PBS. - Positive control substance(s):
- other: not included in this test
- Statistics:
- Not performed
- Positive control results:
- Not included
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Remarks on result:
- other: Derived from graph (estimated pooled dpm/node per dose group): - 0%: 0.05 - 5%: 0.06 - 10%: 0.12 - 25%: 0.4
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.2
- Test group / Remarks:
- 5%
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 2.4
- Test group / Remarks:
- 10%
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 8
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25%
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Sensitising
- Remarks:
- Based on CLP criteria
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study, mice exhibited a dose dependent induction of proliferation in the lymph nodes as a result of exposure to Eugenol. A stimulation index (SI) of >3 was found only for the 25% dose group. It can be concluded that Eugenol is a sensitising substance at this concentration, based on the criteria outlined in Annex I of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008/EC)
- Executive summary:
This Local Lymph Node Assay (similar to OECD 429) was conducted to determine the sensitising potential of Eugenol in mice. Lymph node proliferation was determined after exposure to 0%, 5%, 10% or 25% Eugenol in vehicle, using beta-scintillation counting (dpm/node). A pooled approach (per test group) was used. Stimulation indices were calculated.
Measured disintegrations per node (pooled) were 0.05, 0.06, 0.12 and 0.4 for the 0%, 5%, 10% and 25% dosing groups, respectively. Corresponding stimulation indices (SI) were calculated to be 1.2, 2.4 and 8 for the 5%, 10% and 25% concentration, respectively.
Under the conditions of this study, mice exhibited a significant proliferation in the lymph nodes as a result of exposure to Eugenol. A stimulation index (SI) of >3 was found only for the 25% dose group. It can be concluded that Eugenol is a sensitising substance at this concentration, based on the criteria outlined in Annex I of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008/EC)
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Justification for type of information:
- The read-across justification document is attached as a separate docuemt to this endpoint record
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- Existing study
- Positive control results:
- No positive control was included in the study.
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 100 and 25 % test article
- No. with + reactions:
- 3
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Key result
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- vehicle and 25% test article
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Sensitising
- Remarks:
- Based on CLP criteria
- Conclusions:
- A Guinea Pig Maximisation Test (GPMT) was performed to determine the sensitising potential of the source substance Eugenol, the results are read-across to the target substance Cinnamon Leaf oil. Under the conditions of this study, positive skin reactions were noted in 3 out of 10 guinea pigs treated with 25% Eugenol at the challenge phase. A sensitisation rate of 30% was calculated. Based on the threshold value of 30% as mentioned in Annex I of 1272/2008/EC and Annex VI of 67/548/EEC, the substance has to be classified as sensitising.
- Executive summary:
A Guinea Pig Maximisation Test (GPMT) was performed to determine the sensitising potential of the source substance Eugenol, the results are read-across to the target substance Cinnamon Leaf oil. In the test group (n=10), intradermal induction was performed with 0.1% test article, epicutaneous induction with 100% test article and the final challenge exposure was done with 25% test article. A negative control group (n=5) was also included. Positive skin reactions were scored and sensitisation rates were calculated.
Positive skin reactions were noted in 3 out of 10 guinea pigs treated with 25% Eugenol at the challenge phase (mean score of 0.8). A corresponding sensitisation rate of 30% was calculated. No positive skin reactions were noted in the negative control animals.
Based on the results of this study and considering the threshold value of 30% as mentioned in Annex I of 1272/2008/EC and Annex VI of 67/548/EEC, the substance has to be classified as sensitising.
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Justification for type of information:
- The read-across justification document is attached as a separate docuemt to this endpoint record
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Positive control results:
- Not included
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Remarks on result:
- other: Derived from graph (estimated pooled dpm/node per dose group): - 0%: 0.05 - 5%: 0.06 - 10%: 0.12 - 25%: 0.4
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.2
- Test group / Remarks:
- 5%
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 2.4
- Test group / Remarks:
- 10%
- Key result
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 8
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25%
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Sensitising
- Remarks:
- Based on CLP criteria
- Conclusions:
- A Local lymph node assay was performed to determine the sensitising potential of the source substance Eugenol, the results are read-across to the target substance Cinnamon Leaf oil. Under the conditions of this study, mice exhibited a dose dependent induction of proliferation in the lymph nodes as a result of exposure to Eugenol. A stimulation index (SI) of >3 was found only for the 25% dose group. It can be concluded that Eugenol is a sensitising substance at this concentration, based on the criteria outlined in Annex I of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008/EC)
- Executive summary:
This Local Lymph Node Assay (similar to OECD 429) was conducted to determine the sensitising potential of Eugenol in mice the results are read-across to the target substance Cinnamon Leaf oil. Lymph node proliferation was determined after exposure to 0%, 5%, 10% or 25% Eugenol in vehicle, using beta-scintillation counting (dpm/node). A pooled approach (per test group) was used. Stimulation indices were calculated.
Measured disintegrations per node (pooled) were 0.05, 0.06, 0.12 and 0.4 for the 0%, 5%, 10% and 25% dosing groups, respectively. Corresponding stimulation indices (SI) were calculated to be 1.2, 2.4 and 8 for the 5%, 10% and 25% concentration, respectively.
Under the conditions of this study, mice exhibited a significant proliferation in the lymph nodes as a result of exposure to Eugenol. A stimulation index (SI) of >3 was found only for the 25% dose group. It can be concluded that Eugenol is a sensitising substance at this concentration, based on the criteria outlined in Annex I of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008/EC)
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vitro
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro skin sensitisation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin sensitisation study are available
Referenceopen allclose all
A sensitisation rate of 30% was calculated for the guinea pigs exposed to 25% Eugenol in the challenge phase.
A sensitisation rate of 30% was calculated for the guinea pigs exposed to 25% Eugenol in the challenge phase.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (sensitising)
- Additional information:
The sensitising potential of cinnamon leaf oil was based on read across to its major constituent eugenol. Both an LLNA and a guinea pig maximisation test are available for eugenol, which are both included in a weight-of-evidence approach.
In the Local Lymph Node Assay (similar to OECD 429), lymph node proliferation was determined after exposure to 0%, 5%, 10% or 25% eugenol in vehicle, using beta-scintillation counting (dpm/node). A pooled approach (per test group) was used.
Under the conditions of this study, mice exhibited a significant proliferation in the lymph nodes as a result of exposure to Eugenol. A stimulation index (SI) of >3 was found only for the 25% dose group. It can be concluded that Eugenol is a sensitising substance at this concentration, based on EU-criteria.
In the Guinea Pig Maximisation Test (GPMT), intradermal induction was performed with 0.1% test article, epicutaneous induction with 100% test article and the final challenge exposure was done with 25% test article. A negative control group (n=5) was also included. Positive skin reactions were scored and sensitisation rates were calculated. Positive skin reactions were noted in 3 out of 10 guinea pigs treated with 25% eugenol at the challenge phase (mean score of 0.8). A corresponding sensitisation rate of 30% was calculated. No positive skin reactions were noted in the negative control animals. Based on the results of this study and considering the threshold value of 30% as mentioned in EU-criteria, the substance has to be classified as sensitising.
Migrated from Short description of key information:
Mouse Local Lymphnode Assay (LLNA): sensitising (equivalent or similar to OECD429)
Guinea Pig Maximisation Test: sensitising (equivalent or similar to OECD406)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available results, cinnamon leaf oil needs to be classified as a skin sensitiser, in accordance with the criteria outlined in Annex I of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008/EC).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.