Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-467-2 | CAS number: 60-29-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Bacterial gene mutation
In the bacterial gene mutation tests, the substance tested negative. The study by De Flora (1981) was limited in that no strain sensitive to DNA cross-linking was used. While the study by Waskell (1978) corroborates the work of De Flora, only the strains TA98 and TA100 were used.
In a new study performed according to OECD 471, following an ECHA decision, further strains were tested (Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA) in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system. Also in this valid study the test item Diethyl ether (Batch Number: 19500647) has no mutagenic activity on the applied bacterial strains under the test conditions used in this study.
Micronucleus study
In an in vitro micronucleus assay, diethyl ether was tested at concentrations ranging from 2.5 to 5.0 µL/mL in human peripheral blood lymphocytes both in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation (Hofman-Huther, 2010). According to the study authors, diethyl ether did not cause an increase in the number of micronuclei either in the absence of presence of S9 metabolic activation in the 4 hour (i.e., short-term) but an increase in the number of micronuclei was noted in the 44 hour (i.e., long-term) study. It is possible that the positive result was driven, at least in part, by the low number of micronuclei noted in the control cultures. Additionally, the micronucleus frequency at 4.0 and 4.5 µL/mL are within the historical range of 0.4 to 2.3% (i.e., 2.2 % at 4.0 µL/mL and 2.3% at 4.5 µL/mL); the micronucleus frequency of 2.5% at a dose level of 5.0 µL/mL is slightly above the historical range. Due to the possible skewing of statistics induced by the control values, the results of Experiment II may be equivocal or weakly positive.
Gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Diethyl ether, when tested at concentrations ranging from 0.156 to 5 µL/mL in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells both in the absence and presence of S9 metabolic activation, did not produce an increase in the mutant frequency (Kraft, 2010). Incubation with positive control substances in the presence or absence of metabolic activation resulted in anticipated increases in the mutation frequencies.
Non-standard studies
The bacterial DNA-repair studies carried out by De Flora (1984) indicated no toxic effects to either repair deficient or proficient strains up to the maximum concentration tested. Similarly, the sister chromatid exchange study by Shite (1979) indicated no cause for concern. It should be noted that the interpretation of such studies is ambiguous with regards to potential mutagenicity.
Aqueous extracts tested positive in the Ames test using strains TA100 and TA102 by Chen (1993). These extracts were found to contain peroxides which were isolated and also tested positive in the same test, and negative with the strain TA1535. While the formation of potentially mutagenic peroxides is of concern, it is considered to only be of relevance in the case of preservative-free diethyl ether. In this case the explosive nature of these peroxides is of concern, and has resulted in well established measures to mitigate their formation (exclusion of air and light) and the need for regular testing. Positive Ames test results found by Chen were in extracts which tested strongly positive with standard commercial peroxide testing strips. These results are not considered relevant to the genotoxicity of pure diethyl ether.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
In an in vivo micronucleus assay, diethyl ether was administered via intraperitoneal injection to male and female NMRI mice at doses of 0 (control), 400, 1,000, or 2,000 mg/kg body weight (Donath, 2010). Cotton seed oil was used as the vehicle and cyclophosphamide was administered via intraperitoneal injection as the positive control. The administration of diethyl ether, at a dose of 2,000 mg/kg body weight, resulted in ataxia and constricted abdomen in 5 males and 5 females; however, the test article did not cause an increase in the number of micronuclei at any dose level. A significant increase in the number of micronuclei was noted in mice who received cyclophosphamide.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Short description of key information:
bacterial gene mutation: negative (De Flora)
bacterial gene mutation: negative (Waskell)
bacterial gene mutation: negative (Hargitai)
bacterial DNA-repair: ambiguous (De Flora)
mammalian gene mutation: negative (Kraft)
mammalian cytogenicity: equivocal (Hofman-Huther)
sister chromatid exchange: negative (Shite)
mammalian cytogenicity: negative (BSL2010)
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
The submission substance produced negative results in both in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicity studies. As a result, the substance does not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, Annex I section 3.5.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.