Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 250-418-4 | CAS number: 30989-05-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1990-03-06 to 1990-04-06
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 990
- Report date:
- 1990
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- This study was performed before test guidance OECD 406 was finalised. However, the study was performed according to the test guideline requirements.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- In accordance with Annex VII of EC legislation 1907/2006 in-vivo testing studies apart from murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) meet the regulatory requirements if they were carried out or initiated before 11 October 2016. The described experimental test was performed according to the OECD 406 (GPMT method or Buehler test method) and meet the requirements set out in Article 13(3), first subparagraph, and Article 13(4).
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tris[2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethyl] orthoborate
- EC Number:
- 250-418-4
- EC Name:
- Tris[2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethyl] orthoborate
- Cas Number:
- 30989-05-0
- Molecular formula:
- C21H45BO12
- IUPAC Name:
- tris{2-[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]ethyl} borate
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Substance type: Borated Glycol Ether
- Physical state: Clear colourless liquid
- Analytical purity: 37 % B-TEGME (test material is a mixture)
- Purity test date: Not provided
- Lot/batch No.: KSLA Ref. 7842/89 (0.0039); Toxicology Ref. ST90/023
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: Not provided
- Stability under test conditions: Not provided
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Porcellus
- Age at study initiation: 5-9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 247 - 335 g
- Housing: steel cages with wire-mesh floors, 54 x 31 x 36 cm (2-3 animals/cage)
- Diet: pelleted diet (SG1 with vitamin C supplement, Grain Harvesters Ltd.) ad libitum
- Water: from the public supply was provided ad libitum
- Acclimation period: min. 2 weeks
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-23
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): No data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1990-03-06 to 1990-04-06
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.06, 0.2, 0.6, 2.0% / 0.1 ml of several dilutions
- Day(s)/duration:
- 24 h
- Adequacy of induction:
- other: Range finding study: determine the maximum concentration without toxicity
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- 10, 25, 60, 100% / 0.3 mL of several dilutions
- Day(s)/duration:
- 24 h
- Adequacy of induction:
- other: Range finding study: examination for signs of irritation
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.6 % / 0.1 mL
- Adequacy of induction:
- other: concentration that caused no unwanted toxicity
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- undiluted test material / 0.3 mL
- Day(s)/duration:
- 48 h
- Adequacy of induction:
- highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- 10, 25, 60, 100% / 0.3 mL
- Day(s)/duration:
- 24 h
- Adequacy of challenge:
- other: Range finding study: examination for signs of irritation
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- 60 % / 0.1 mL
- Day(s)/duration:
- 24 h
- Adequacy of challenge:
- highest non-irritant concentration
- No. of animals per dose:
- RANGE FINDING TEST: 2 male & 2 female guinea-pigs/dose group
MAIN STUDY: 10 male & 10 female guinea-pigs (5 male & 5 female guinea-pigs for controls) - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TEST:
1)
- 2 male & 2 female guinea-pigs
- shorn in the shoulder region using electric clippers followed by an electric razor
- 0.1 ml of several dilutions of the test material (0.06, 0.2, 0.6, 2.0%) injected intradermally on each side of the mid-line
- examination on the following day: determination of maximum concentration used in the main test without causing untoward toxicity
2)
- 2 male & 2 female guinea-pigs
- flank of each animal shorn as described before
- 0.3 ml dosis of several dilutions of the test material (10, 25, 60, 100%) absorbed onto 16 cm2 Whatman No. 3 filter paper patches and applied to skin on the shorn flanks
- coverage: occlusive tape, retained by elastic adhesive bandage for 24 hours
- examination after removal of patches and bandages for signs of irritation (scoring: four point scale as described below)
- topical induction concentration for the main test: concentration just causing irritation; topical challenge concentration: concentration just non-irritant
MAIN STUDY:
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- shorn in the shoulder region using electric clippers followed by an electric razor
- two rows of intradermal injections were made, one of either side of the mid-line, as follows:
- test animals: anterior sites (0.1 ml of FCA); middle sites (0.1 ml of test material 0.6% in vehicle); posterior sites (0.1 ml of test material 0.6% in 50:50 FCA/vehicle)
- control animals: anterior sites (0.1 ml of FCA); middle sites (0.1 ml of vehicle); posterior sites (0.1 ml of 50:50 FCA/vehicle)
[Freunds Complete Adjuvans (FCA): prepared as a 50% v/v aqueous emulsion]
- one week after induction: same area of dorsal skin shaven using electric clippers only
- 16 cm2 patch of Whatman No. 3 filter paper moistened with 0.3 ml of the undiluted test material, placed over the sites of intradermal injections
- patches covered with occlusive tape and held in place by elastic adhesive bandage for 48 hours
- filter paper moistened with the vehicle alone and applied to the control group guinea-pigs
- any abnormal reaction to the induction procedure was recorded
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- carried out 3 weeks after the intradermal induction
- clipping and shaving used to remove from one flank of all test and control animals by clipping and shaving. A 4 cm2 patch of Whatman No. 3 filter paper, moistened with 0.1 ml of 60% of test material, was placed on the shaven area, covered by occlusive tape and held in position by elastic adhesive bandage. After 24 hours the patches and bandages were removed and the challenge sites examined for any response. The response was scored using a four point scale. The result of the test is expressed as the number of positive responses shown by the test animals at 24 and/or 48 hours after removal of the challenge patches. the frequency of positive responses rather than their intensity is regarded as the important statistic in this test.
SCORING SYSTEM:
point scale used:
0 = No difference from surrounding skin
1 = Slight redness, edges not defined
2 = Pink/red area with defined edges
3 = Beet red area with well defined edges
OTHER: Individual body weights were recorded at the beginning of the main study and before challenge. - Challenge controls:
- 60% of test material
- Positive control substance(s):
- no
Results and discussion
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 0
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 60 % brake fluid (22% B-TEGME)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 0
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 60 % brake fluid (22% B-TEGME)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 60 % brake fluid (22% B-TEGME)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 60 % brake fluid (22% B-TEGME)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- other: 3rd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 60 % brake fluid (22% B-TEGME)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Reading:
- other: 3th reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 60 % brake fluid (22% B-TEGME)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Response after intradermal induction (dose range finding)
Animal No. |
Sex |
0.06% |
0.2% |
0.6% |
2.0% |
321 |
M |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
322 |
M |
1 |
1 |
1n |
2n |
301 |
F |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2n |
303 |
F |
1 |
1 |
1n |
2n |
n – slight necrosis at injection site
Table 2: Response after topical induction (dose range finding)
Animal No. |
Sex |
10% conc. |
25% conc. |
323 |
M |
0 |
0 |
324 |
M |
0 |
0 |
304 |
F |
0 |
0 |
305 |
F |
0 |
0 |
Animal No. |
Sex |
60% conc. |
Undiluted |
325 |
M |
0 |
0 |
326 |
M |
0 |
1 |
307 |
F |
0 |
0 |
308 |
F |
0. |
1 |
Table 3: Response after intradermal/topical induction & topical challenge (main study)
Group |
Animal No. |
Sex |
Body weight (g) |
Response to challenge at time |
|||
Start |
End |
0h |
24h |
48h |
|||
Test animals |
371 |
M |
521 |
678 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
372 |
M |
540 |
684 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
373 |
M |
508 |
665 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
374 |
M |
520 |
657 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
375 |
M |
510 |
720 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
376 |
M |
473 |
715 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
377 |
M |
539 |
703 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
378 |
M |
540 |
670 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
379 |
M |
545 |
720 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
380 |
M |
560 |
740 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
354 |
F |
412 |
562 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
355 |
F |
498 |
507 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
356 |
F |
412 |
615 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
357 |
F |
430 |
560 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
358 |
F |
480 |
575 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
381 |
F |
378 |
516 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
382 |
F |
412 |
560 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
383 |
F |
400 |
541 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
384 |
F |
452 |
533 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
385 |
F |
412 |
605 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Control animals |
391 |
M |
565 |
795 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
392 |
M |
618 |
812 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
393 |
M |
548 |
765 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
394 |
M |
535 |
740 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
395 |
M |
536 |
720 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
386 |
F |
418 |
652 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
387 |
F |
418 |
580 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
388 |
F |
418 |
586 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
389 |
F |
469 |
600 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
390 |
F |
427 |
601 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- In the guinea-pig maximization test of Magnussen and Kligman none of the twenty test animals and 10 control animals showed a positive respons 24 or 48 hours after removal of the challenge patches.
- Executive summary:
Brake fluid DOT 4 Super (containing 37% B-TEGME) was tested for sensitization in the guinea-pig maximization test of Magnussen and Kligman and according to the OECD 406. In a dose range finding test in 2 male and 2 female guinea-pigs/group, 0.1 ml (0.6% in water) and 0.3 ml (undiluted test material) showed slight irritancy and were therefore selected for intradermal and topical induction for 48h, respectively. For challenge, 60% test material (equivalent to 22% B-TEGME) in water was applied under occlusive tape for 24h.
None of the 10 male and 10 female test animals showed a positive response 24 or 48 hours after removal of the challenge patches. None of the 5 male and 5 female control animals showed any response to application of the 60% (equivalent to 22% B-TEGME) test material in water.
It can be occluded that B-TEGME is not sensitizing to the skin.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.