Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 215-575-5 | CAS number: 1332-77-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Bioaccumulation: terrestrial
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation: terrestrial
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 2000-2003
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Several cultivars of poplar and willow were planted in site (New Zealand) contaminated with wood waste and monitored over three years. Boron concentrations in leaves and stems were monitored, as well as in the substrate.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- Poplar tree heights measured annually to determine 25th, 50th and 75th percentile for tree height, then 3 specimens of each of 3 clones were destructively sampled for dry biomass and boron content of stems and leaves. Substrate sampled from root zone of each tree at depth of approx 5 cm.
- Test organisms (species):
- other: Clones of poplar and willow hybrids, and Eucalyptus
- Details on test organisms:
- Populus deltoides x nigra "Argyle" & "Selwin"; P. deltoides x yunnanensis "Kawa"; Populus euramericana x yunnanensis "Toa"; Populus alba x glandulos "Yeogi"; P. nigra x mamimowic "Shinsei"; Salix matsudana x alba "Tangoio"; Salix kinuyangi; Salix purpurea; Eucalyptus fastigata; E. nitens
- Details on results:
- Average for all (3) trees (n=21): wood waste - 30 mg-B/kg, stem - 21 mg B/kg, and leaf - 845 mg B/kg. The authors did not calculate bioaccumulation factors, but using these values, the BAF for stem would be 0.7 and the BAF for leaves would be 28.2
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation: terrestrial
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- One hundred and twenty-six pairs of breeding mallards were fed diets supplemented with boron at 0, 450, or 900 ppm in combination with Se at 0, 3.5, or 7 ppm, in a replicated factorial experiment. Ducklings produced received the same treatment combination as their parents.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Radiolabelling:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling intervals/frequency for test organisms: the eighth egg was removed from each nest and 14d after hatching the ducklings and their parents were euthanized. Samples of liver, kidney, and spleen from 10 randomly selected hens, drakes, and ducklings were saved in 10% buffered formalin.
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: content of eggs were frozen, ducklings and parents were weighted and the liver removed, weighted and frozen for analysis
- Details on sampling and analysis of test organisms and test media samples (e.g. sample preparation, analytical methods): - Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- other: Anas platyrhynchos
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: mallards
- Source: Outdoorsman Hunting Club, Webb, IA, USA
- Age at test initiation (mean and range, SD): 1-year-old
- Weight at test initiation (mean and range, SD):
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 17 days
- Feeding : untreated diet of commercially available developer mash
- Females were kept under controlled lighting (8h/d) to delay the onset of egg laying and to synchronize their cycles - Total exposure / uptake duration:
- ca. 120 d
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test container (material, size): 1m² outdoor pens
- No. of organisms per container (treatment): 1
- No. of replicates per treatment group: 14
- No. of replicates percontrol / vehicle control: 14 - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Added concentrations in diet are 450 and 900 ppm boron
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 0.03 dimensionless
- Basis:
- organ d.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: adult liver
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 0.05 dimensionless
- Basis:
- organ d.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: whole eggs
- Details on results:
- - Observations on body length and weight: weight loss in females between treatment onset and pairing (3 weeks) in the 900-ppm treatment group
- Other biological observations: egg weight and egg fertility were lower in the 900-ppm treatment group - Reported statistics:
- Data were analyzed by logistic regression under a mixed effects model with parameters for main and interactive effects between Band Se, and a pen effect. Parameters were tested for significance with F tests; multiple comparisons were made using contrasts. All remaining response wariables were analyzed by analysis of variance under a model appropriate for the main effects and interactions being tested and an error term suitable for unbalanced data. Tests of hypotheses that included more than one bird per pen were made with F tests under a mixed effects model using an appropriate error term. All other F tests assumed a fixed effects model and used the residual mean square as the error term. Normality of residuals was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk statistic and normal probability plots. Studentized residuals were plotted to assess homoscedasticity. Data that did not meet normality or homosccedasticity assumptions necessary for ANOVA were transformed so as to meet the assumptions. Consequently, all percentage data were arcsine transformed and all residue data were log. transformed before analysis. Multiple comparisons were made using Tukey's multiple comparison procedure (MCP) at alpha = 0.05.
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation: terrestrial
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Adult male mallard ducks were exposed to dietary concentrations of 1,600 ppm boron as boric acid and estimated the tissue accumulation and loss rates when the ducks were returned to uncontaminated food.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling intervals/frequency for test organisms: One bird from each of the 15 pens was randomly selected and sacrificed 0, 1,2,4, 8, 16, 32, and 48 d after feeding with treated diets began. After 48 d on treated diets, all remaining birds were fed the control diet for the remainder of the study. Following a pattern similar to that used in the accumulation phase of the study, one bird from each pen was sacrificed 1,2,4, 8, 16, 32, and 48 d after the switch to control food.
- Sampling intervals/frequency for test medium samples: Small (20 g) composite samples of feed from all batches mixed on the same day were saved for chemical analysis of boron. - Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- Boric acid powder was mixed directly with the feed
- Test organisms (species):
- other: Anas platyrhynchos
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Mallard ducks
- Source: A commercial game farm
- Age at test initiation (mean and range, SD): adult
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 2 weeks - Total exposure / uptake duration:
- 48 d
- Total depuration duration:
- 48 d
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test container (material, size): 2.5 x 6.5 m pens
- No. of organisms per container (treatment): 15
- No. of replicates per treatment group: 4
- No. of replicates percontrol / vehicle control: 3
RANGE-FINDING / PRELIMINARY STUDY
- Test concentrations: 1600 ppm boron
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: These dietary levels of boron were selected because mallards, both ducklings and adults, tolerate them without excessive mortality; also, they cause physiological and behavioral effects in mallards, and they approximate the maximum levels in aquatic plants consumed by waterfowl in areas exposed to agricultural drainwater in the Central Valley of California. - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentration : 1600 ppm
Measured concentration : 1615 ppm average - Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 0.02 dimensionless
- Basis:
- organ d.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: liver
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 0.02 dimensionless
- Basis:
- organ d.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: brain
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 0.04 dimensionless
- Basis:
- organ d.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: blood
- Reported statistics:
- The ability to predict levels of arsenic and boron in the liver from levels in the blood was described with linear regression. The possibility that these relationships differed by treatment groups was tested with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation: terrestrial
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) was grown in pots of a sandy soil to which six levels of boron were added. Plant tissues collected from each harvest were analysed for boron concentrations
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Radiolabelling:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling intervals/frequency for test organisms: sampling at three times of plant harvest: early tillering, booting, and maturity stage
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- - Method of application to soil surface (if used): Basal nutrient dressings of 300 mg KH2PO4, 300 mg KNO3, 400 mg CaCl2, 60 mg MgSO4.7H2O, 17.5 mg ZnSO4.7H2O, 17.5 mg CuSO4.5H2O, 45 mg MnSO4.H2O, and 0.428 mg Na2MoO4.2H2O were applied in solutions to the surface of soil in each pot. Boron solutions were also applied to the surfaces.
- Method of mixing into soil (if used): After the soils had dried, the nutrients were thoroughly mixed through the soils by shaking in a plastic bag. - Test organisms (species):
- other: Hordeum vulgare L.
- Details on test organisms:
- B concentration of germinating seeds : 3 µg/g
- Total exposure / uptake duration:
- 35 - ca. 120 d
- Test temperature:
- The pots were maintained near 18°C by immersion in root cooling tanks until harvest 2. Thereafter, the pots were placed on benches in an air-conditioned glasshouse.
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test container (material, size): polythene bags in undrained plastic pots of 16.5 cm surface diameter
- Amount of soil or substrate: 3.5 kg
- No. of organisms per container (treatment): 20 germinating seeds thinned to ten plants on day 12
- No. of replicates per treatment group: 3
SOURCE AND PROPERTIES OF SUBSTRATE (if soil)
- Geographical reference of sampling site (latitude, longitude): virgin sandy soil from Lancelin
- Depth of sampling: 0-10 cm
- Soil texture
- % clay: 3.5
- pH: 1:5, soil:water, 5.6
- Organic carbon (%): 0.69 - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal : 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 µg B/g
Measured : <0.5, <0.5, <0.5, 1.0, 2.1, 4.9 µg B/g (mannitol extracted concentrations) - Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 123 other: g/g
- Basis:
- organ d.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: leaves
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 44 other: g/g
- Basis:
- organ d.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: whole shoots
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 70 other: g/g
- Basis:
- organ d.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: straw
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 2.1 other: g/g
- Basis:
- organ d.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: grain
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 49 other: g/g
- Basis:
- organ d.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: shoots
- Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 5 other: g/g
- Basis:
- organ d.w.
- Remarks on result:
- other: roots
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation: terrestrial
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- 50 species (58 varieties) were grown in each of 6 large outdoor sand cultures supplied respectively with a trace (0.03-0.04 ppm), 1, 5, 10, 15, 25 ppm of boron.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Radiolabelling:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Test organisms (species):
- other: 50 different species reported
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- 50 different species
- Seeds planted directly in the sand and supplied from the start with culture solutions containing different boron concentrations - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test container (material, size): 6 large sand cultures - Type:
- BCF
- Value:
- 12 - 155 L/kg
- Details on results:
- - Behavioural abnormalities: Plants died, leafs were burned depending on the concentration and the species
- Observations on body length and weight: Depending on the concentration some plants showed deficiency and others toxicity
Referenceopen allclose all
Values for different varieties: (Table 3 of publication)
Kawa (n=7): substrate (wood waste) - 31 mg-B/kg, stem - 29 mg B/kg, and leaf - 827 mg B/kg.
Toa (n=6): substrate (wood waste) - 36 mg-B/kg, stem - 22 mg B/kg, and leaf - 1012 mg B/kg
Yeogi (n=8): substrate (wood waste) - 28 mg-B/kg, stem - 20 mg B/kg, and leaf - 776 mg B/kg.
Boron accumulates rapidly in adult mallard liver and is estimated to take 2.8d to reach 95% of its asymptotic level. On a dry-weight basis, B in adult liver in the control, 450 -, and 900 -ppm B treatments groups was 2, 15, and 27 ppm, respectively.
Dry-weight concentrations of B in eggs were 0.6, 22, and 38 ppm in the B control, and 450- and 900 -ppm treatment groups, respectively.
The authors reported BCF values < 0.1 and noted that liver and blood residues were eliminated within 1 day on a "clean diet".
Concentrations of B (µg B/g) were measusred in leaves, whole shoots, straw, grain, shoots and roots. An overview of the added B concentrations in soils, the concentrations in plant material and the BCF values are summarized below. Riley et al did not calculate BCF values. Based on the data presented the BCF's can be calculated.
B conc. in soil (µg/g) | B conc. in leaves (µg/g) |
BCF for leaves (g/g) | B conc. in whole shoots (µg/g) | BCF for whole shoots (g/g) | B conc. in straw (µg/g) | BCF for straw (g/g) | ||||||
0.5 | 50 | 100 | 19 | 38 | 54 | 108 | ||||||
1 | 92 | 92 | 39 | 39 | 52 | 52 | ||||||
2 | 210 | 105 | 88 | 44 | 120 | 60 | ||||||
4 | 520 | 130 | 190 | 48 | 260 | 65 | ||||||
8 | 1500 | 188 | 390 | 49 | 510 | 64 | ||||||
B conc. in soil (µg/g) | B conc. in grain (µg/g) |
BCF for grain (g/g) | B conc. in shoots (µg/g) | BCF for shoots (g/g) | B conc. in roots (µg/g) | BCF for roots (g/g) | ||||||
0.5 | 2 | 4 | 19 | 38 | 5 | 10 | ||||||
1 | 3 | 3 | 38 | 38 | 7 | 7 | ||||||
2 | 3 | 2 | 89 | 45 | 7 | 4 | ||||||
4 | 4 | 1 | 230 | 58 | 8 | 2 | ||||||
8 | 6 | 1 | 540 | 68 | 18 | 2 | ||||||
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Boron is known to be a critical element for the normal growth and productivity of terrestrial plants. Boron is required in plants for normal metabolic functioning of sugar transport, cell wall synthesis, lignification, carbohydrate metabolism, RNA metabolism, respiration, indole acetic acid (growth regulator) metabolism, phenol metabolism, the integrity of membranes, and the pollination process (Marschner, 1995). There is a certain minimum requirement of boron for a plant. However, there are considerable interspecies differences in the levels required for optimal growth. Monocotyledons generally require less than dicotyledons (Gupta et al, 1985).
Boron uptake varies with stage of growth and the concentration varies among the plant parts (Gupta et al, 1985). Plants also are known to change soil pH locally by root exudates to enhance uptake of essential nutrients (Reimann et al. 2001, WHO 1998).
The uptake mechanism has long been debated. It was first suggested that boron moves to the root surface in the soil solution by mass flow and enters the roots by passive diffusion (Bingham et al, 1970). However this concept has been challenged by Bowen (1968, 1969, 1972), Bowen and Nissen (1977), and Reisenauer et al (1973). They indicated that boron is actively absorbed in ionic form particularly when the boron concentration in soil is low (Gupta et al, 1985). This has been confirmed by more recent studies, which provided evidence for channel- and/or transporter-mediated boron transport systems (Tukano et al, 2005). The isolation of the boron transporter in BOR1-1 mutant plants showed elevated sensitivity to boron deficiency, especially in young growing organs in shoots. BOR1 is a membrane protein that belongs to the bicarbonate transporter superfamily (Takano et al, 2002; Frommer et al 2002).
Takano et al (2005) found that the activity of the BOR1 plasma membrane transporter for boron in plant is regulated (endocytosis and degradation) by boron availability, to avoid accumulation of toxic levels of boron in shoots under high boron supply, while protecting the shoot from boron deficiency under boron limitation.
Once in the plant, boron is passively carried in the transpiration stream to the leaves where the water evaporates and boron accumulates. This explains why boron concentrations are generally lower in roots, stems, and fruits than in leaves (WHO 1998). Once assimilated by the plant, boron becomes one of the least mobile micronutrients (Wolg 1940, Eaton 1944, Dible and Berger, 1952). Since boron is not readily transported from old to young plant parts, the earliest deficiency symptoms are found in young parts while the earliest toxicity symptoms are found in the old plant parts (Gupta et al, 1985).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.