Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 235-462-4 | CAS number: 12236-62-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Toxic effect type:
- dose-dependent
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
In a Study according to OECD 422 the test item was administered to male rats for 39 days and to female rats for 14 days prior to pairing, through the pairing and gestation periods until the F1 generation reached day 4 post partum.
The following dose levels were applied:
Group 1: 0 mg/kg body weight/day (control group)
Group 2: 100 mg/kg body weight/day
Group 3: 300 mg/kg body weight/day
Group 4: 1000 mg/kg body weight/day
A standard dose volume of 10 mL/kg body weight with a daily adjustment to the actual body weight was used. Control animals were dosed with the vehicle alone (highly purified water).
The following results were obtained:
MORTALITY AND GENERAL TOLERABILITY OF PARENTAL ANIMALS: All animals survived the scheduled study period. Faeces stained red with dose-dependent intensity of discoloration were noted in all males and females in all dose groups starting from day 2 of the treatment until completion of the study. This observation was due to staining properties of the test item. No further test item-related clinical signs or observations were noted in males or females at any dose level.
FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL BATTERY IN PARENTAL ANIMALS: No test item-related findings were noted during the functional observational battery tests in males or females at any dose level.
FOOD CONSUMPTION OF PARENTAL ANIMALS: No effects on food consumption were noted in males or females at any dose level.
BODY WEIGHTS OF PARENTAL ANIMALS: In males at the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, a slight but statistically significant lower body weight gain was noted during the pre-pairing period. No differences in body weight gain were noted at any dose level during the remaining study period. Body weights of males in all dose groups were similar to the respective control values during the entire study period. Because reduction in body weight gain at the high-dose levels was reversible and did not cause significant changes in body weights, this effect was considered not to be adverse.
Body weights and body weight gain of females were not affected by the treatment at any dose level.
CLINICAL LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS IN PARENTAL ANIMALS: No test item-related effects on hematology and clinical biochemistry parameters were noted in males or females at any dose level.
No changes in urine parameters were noted in males at any dose level.
REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING DATA: Mating performance, fertility, corpora lutea count, duration of gestation, implantation rate and post-implantation loss, litter size or postnatal loss were not affected by the treatment with the test item.
SEMINOLOGY AND SPERMATID COUNT IN PARENTAL MALES: Effects on sperm motility which might be test item-related were noted in all dose groups. Mean count of progressive sperms was statistically significantly reduced at the dose levels of 1000, 300 and 100 mg/kg bw/day, mean count of stationary sperms was statistically significantly increased at the dose levels of 1000 and 100 mg/kg bw/day and mean count of not motile sperms was statistically significantly increased at the dose level of 1000 and 300 mg/kg bw/day. But a significant dose dependent trend couldn’t be established.
In the absence of any findings during necropsy or histopathological examination of male reproductive organs as well as in the absence of any effects on reproduction, the differences in sperm motility were considered not to be adverse.
ORGAN WEIGHTS OF PARENTAL ANIMALS: No changes in absolute organ weights or organ weights to body weights and to brain weights ratios were noted in males or females at any dose level.
MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL EXAMINATIONS OF PARENTAL ANIMALS: Type and distribution of findings noted during macroscopical examination did not indicate any test item-related effect.
Treatment with test item did not cause pathological findings. All findings recorded were within the range of normal background lesions which may be recorded in animals of this strain and age.
FINDINGS IN PUPS AT FIRST LITTER CHECK AND DURING LACTATION: No test item-related findings were noted in pups during first litter check and during lactation at any dose level.
Pups sex ratio was not affected by the exposure to the test item at any dose level.
PUP WEIGHTS TO DAY 4 POST PARTUM: Body Weights and body weight gain of pups were not affected by the treatment with the test item at any dose level.
MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS OF PUPS: No test item-related findings were noted at macroscopic examination of pups at any dose level.
CONCLUSION
Based on these results, the NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) for general toxicity in males and females and for reproduction/developmental toxicity in this study was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dose level used.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- extended one-generation reproductive toxicity - basic test design (Cohorts 1A, and 1B without extension)
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- the extended one-generation reproductive toxicity study does not need to be conducted because there are no results from available repeated dose toxicity studies that indicate adverse effects on reproductive organs or tissues, or reveal other concerns in relation with reproductive toxicity
- other:
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study (OECD 422, GLP-compliant)
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA OPPTS 870.3650 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Tocixity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Animals: Rat, RccHanTM: WIST(SPF)
- Rationale: Recognized by international guidelines as a recommended test system.
- Source: Harlan Laboratories, Inc., Maasheseweg 87c, 5800 AN Vernay / Netherlands
- Number of Animals: 44 males (11 per group) and 44 females (11 per group)
- Age (at Start of Treatment): 11 weeks
- Body Weight Range (at Start of Treatment): 301 to 362 g (males), 216 to 247 g (females)
- Identification: Parent animals had cage card and individual animal number (ear tattoo), pups were individually tattooed with Indian ink on day 1 post partum
- Randomization: Performed after at least three days of acclimatization using a computer-generated random algorithm. Body weights (recorded on the day of allocation) were taken into consideration in order to ensure similar mean body weights in all groups.
- Accommodation: In groups of five in Makrolon type-4 cages with wire mesh tops up to the day of randomization and afterwards individually in Makrolon type-3 cages with wire mesh tops and sterilized standard softwood bedding (‘Lignocel’ J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH & CoKG, 73494 Rosenberg / Germany, imported by Provimi Kliba SA, 4303 Kaiseraugst / Switzerland) with paper enrichment (ISO-BLOX from Harlan Laboratories B.V., Netherlands), batch/lot nos. 02105111001, 02105111201, 02105120301 and 6960C.CS-100099). During the pre-pairing period, cages with males were interspersed amongst those holding females to promote the development of regular estrus cycles.
- Diet: Pelleted standard Harlan Teklad 2018C (batch no. 80/11) rodent maintenance diet (Provimi Kliba SA, 4303 Kaiseraugst / Switzerland) was available ad libitum.
- Water: Community tap-water from Füllinsdorf was available ad libitum in water bottles.
- Acclimatization: Under test conditions after health examination. Only animals without any visible signs of illness were used for the study.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Standard laboratory conditions, continuously monitored.
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70
- Air changes (per hr): . Air-conditioned with 10 - 15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 (with at least eight hours music during the light period)
IN-LIFE DATES From 26 January 2012 to 28 March 2012. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- DOSE FORMULATIONS
The dose formulations were prepared weekly using the test item as supplied by the Sponsor.
The test item was weighed into a glass beaker on a tared precision balance and approximately 80% of the vehicle was added (w/v). Using a magnetic stirrer, a homogeneous suspension was prepared. Having obtained a homogeneous mixture, the remaining vehicle was added. Separate formulations were prepared for each concentration.
Homogeneity of the test item in the vehicle was maintained during the daily administration period using a magnetic stirrer.
STORAGE OF DOSE FORMULATIONS
Dose formulations were stored at room temperature (20 +/- 5 °C) in glass beakers.
Based upon the results of stability analyses performed within the non-GLP Harlan Laboratories study no. D33711 (Dose Range-Finding Study for a Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test in the Han Wistar Rat), dose formulations were stable for at least 8 days if stored at room temperature.
TREATMENT
- Method: Oral, by gavage
- Rationale for Method: Administration by gavage is a common and accepted route of exposure for this type studies.
- Frequency of Administration: Once daily
- Target Dose Levels: 0 mg/kg/day (control group), 100 mg/kg/day (group 2), 300 mg/kg/day (group 3) and 1000 mg/kg/day (group 4)
- Rationale for Dose Level Selection: The dose levels were selected based on a previous non-GLP dose range-finding toxicity study in Han Wistar rats, Harlan Laboratories Study D33711, using dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/ day, where no adverse effects were observed up to and including the highest dose level.
- Dose Volume: 10 mL/kg body weight
- Dose Concentrations: 0 mg/mL/day (control group), 10 mg/mL/day (group 2), 30 mg/mL/day (group 3) and 100 mg/mL/day (group 4).
- Duration of Acclimatization Period: 7 days. - Details on mating procedure:
- During the pairing period, females were housed with sexually mature males (1:1) until evidence of copulation was observed. The females were removed and housed individually if the daily vaginal smear was sperm positive, or a copulation plug was observed.
The day on which a positive mating was determined (copulation plug or sperm) was designated day 0 post coitum.
For a female which did not mate during the 14-day pairing period, a second pairing of this female with a male in the same group, which had already mated successfully, was performed.
All dams were allowed to give birth and rear their litters (F1 pups) up to day 4 post partum. Day 0 was designated as the day on which a female had delivered all her pups. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- METHOD
On the first treatment day samples from the control group as well as three samples (top, middle and bottom) of about 0.5 g of each concentration were taken prior to dosing for analysis of concentration and homogeneity. Samples of about 0.5 g of each concentration were taken from the middle only to confirm stability (8 days). During the last week of the treatment, samples were taken from the middle to confirm concentration. The aliquots for analysis of dose formulations were frozen (-20 +/- 5 °C) and delivered on dry ice to the responsible for formulation analysis (Harlan Laboratories Ltd., Itingen / Switzerland) and stored there at -20 +/- 5 °C until analysis.
The samples were analyzed by UV-VIS spectroscopy following an analytical procedure developed at Harlan Laboratories. The test item was used as the analytical standard.
RESULTS
Blank samples showed no significant absorbance and, therefore, it was confirmed that only highly purified water was applied within the control experiment.
The application formulations investigated during the study were found to comprise test material in the range of 93.1% to 105.6% and, thus, the required content limit of +/-20% with reference to the nominal content was met. The homogeneous distribution of test item in the preparations was approved because single results found did not deviate more than 5.5% (<15%) from the corresponding mean.
The test item was found to be stable in application formulations when kept eight days at 20 +/- 5 °C due to recoveries which met the variation limit of 10% from the time-zero (homogeneity) mean.
In conclusion, the results indicate the accurate use of the test item and highly purified water as vehicle during this study. Application formulations were found to be homogeneously prepared and stable over a storage period of eight days (20 +/- 5 °C). - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- MALES: 40 days
FEMALES: approximately 7 weeks - Frequency of treatment:
- once daily
- Details on study schedule:
- MALES
- Acclimatization: 7 days
- First Test Item Administration: Day 1 of pre-pairing
- Pre-Pairing: 14 days
- Pairing: 14 days maximum
- Treatment Ends: On day before sacrifice
- Blood Sampling: After 28 days of Treatment
- Necropsy: After treatment for 39 days, when no longer needed for assessment of reproductive effects
FEMALES
- Acclimatization: 7 days
- First Test Item Administration: Day 1 of pre-pairing
- Pre-Pairing: 14 days
- Pairing: 14 days maximum
- Gestation: Approximately 21 days
- Treatment Ends: On day 4 post partum
- Blood Sampling: Day 5 post partum
- Necropsy: On day 5 post partum (pups on day 4 post partum) - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 100, 300, 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 11
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control:
- Not required
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- VIABILITY/MORTALITY: Twice daily
CLINICAL SIGNS
Daily cage-side clinical observations (once daily, during acclimatization and up to day of necropsy). Additionally females were observed for signs of difficult or prolonged parturition, and behavioral abnormalities in nesting and nursing.
FOOD CONSUMPTION
Males: on days 1 - 4, 4 - 8, 8 - 11 and 11 - 14 during pre-pairing period and weekly during after pairing period.
Females: on days 1 - 4, 4 - 8, 8 - 11 and 11 - 14 during pre-pairing period; on days 0 - 7, 7 14 and 14 - 21 during gestation period and on days 1 - 4 of during lactation period.
No food consumption was recorded during the pairing period.
BODY WEIGHTS: Recorded daily from treatment start to day of necropsy.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
Detailed clinical observations were performed outside the home cage in all animals. In males, it was performed once prior to the first administration of the test item and weekly thereafter. In females, it was performed once prior to the first administration of the test item, weekly during the pre-pairing and pairing periods and on days 0, 6, 13 and 20 of the gestation period.
Animals were observed for the following: changes in skin, fur, eyes, mucous membranes, occurrence of secretions and excretions, and autonomic activity (e.g. lacrimation, piloerection, pupil size, unusual respiratory pattern). Changes in gait, posture and response to handling as well as the presence of clonic or tonic movements, stereotypies or bizarre behavior were also reported.
FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL BATTERY
At one time during the study (males shortly before the scheduled sacrifice and females on day 3 or 4 post partum) relevant parameters were performed with five P generation males and five P generation females from each group. This FOB assessment was conducted following the daily dose administration. Animals were observed for the following:
- Cage-side observations: faeces-balls, urine and posture as well as resistance to removal.
- Hand-held observations: muscle tone, constituation, skin, pupile size, palpebral closure, lacrimation, salivation, reaction to handling and general abnormalities.
- Open field observations: level of ambulatory activity including rearing (one minute evaluation), unusual body movements (e.g. spasms, convulsions), gait evaluation, behavior, hair coat, respiration, quantity of faeces-balls and urine.
- Reflexes: blinking, palpebral closure, pinna reflex, extensor thrust response, paw pinch, responsiveness to sharp noise, righting reflex and hearing ability (Preyer’s reflex).
- Measurements / Counts: hind limb / fore limb grip strength, landing foot splay, rectal temperature.
Any abnormal findings were recorded and, where appropriate, graded in severity.
Additionally, locomotor activity was measured quantitatively for the same animals. Activity was measured with an Activity Monitor AMS-0151 (FMI, Germany). Activity of the animals (based on beam count) was recorded for 6-minute intervals over a period of 30 minutes. These data and the total activity over 30 minutes were reported.
CLINICAL LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
Blood samples were obtained on the day of the scheduled necropsy from 5 males from each group. Blood samples from 5 lactating females from each group were obtained on day 5 post partum. Blood samples were drawn sublingually from all animals under light isoflurane anesthesia. The animals were fasted for approximately 18 hours before blood sampling but allowed access to water ad libitum. The samples were collected early in the working day to reduce biological variation caused by circadian rhythms.
The following hematology parameters were determined:
- Erythrocyte count
- Hemoglobin
- Hematocrit
- Mean corpuscular volume
- Red cell volume distribution width
- Mean corpuscular hemoglobin
- Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration
- Hemoglobin concentration distribution width
- Leukocyte count, total
- Differential leukocyte count
- Platelet count
- Prothrombin time (= Thromboplastin time)
- Activated partial Thromboplastin time
The following clinical biochemistry parameters were determined:
- Glucose
- Urea
- Creatinine
- Bilirubin, total
- Cholesterol, total
- Triglycerides
- Aspartate aminotransferase
- Alanine aminotransferase
- Alkaline phosphatase
- Gamma-glutamyl-transferase
- Bile acids
- Sodium
- Potassium
- Chloride
- Calcium
- Phosphorus
- Protein, total
- Albumin
- Globulin
- Albumin/Globulin ratio
URINALYSIS
The following urinalysis parameters were determined in five males of each group, which are allocated to the blood analysis, during the last week of the study using timed urine volume collection:
- Volume (18 hours)
- Specific gravity (relative density)
- Color
- Appearance
- pH
- Nitrite
- Osmolality
- Protein
- Glucose
- Ketones
- Urobilinogen
- Bilirubin
- Blood/Blood cells - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Not examined
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Sperm analysis was performed on the first 5 males per group.
MOTILITY
At necropsy of adult males an epididymal sperm sample was obtained from the left cauda epididymidis of each male. The sample was diluted with a pre-warmed (about 35 °C) physiological medium, and shortly after being obtained, one hundred sperm were counted microscopically for determination of percentage of not motile, stationary motile and progressively motile sperm.
MORPHOLOGY
A second sperm sample from the left cauda epididymidis was used for morphological assessment after fixation and Eosin staining. 500 sperm per sample were evaluated microscopically and classified into the following categories:
A: Normal, complete sperm
B: Normal head only (tail detached)
C: Complete sperm, misshapen hook
D: Complete sperm, abnormally curved hook
E: Complete sperm, reversed head
F: Abnormal head only (tail detached)
Morphological sperm evaluation was performed only for group 1 and 4 males. In the absence of a treatment-related effect the slides for the group 2 and 3 males were not evaluated.
SPERM, SPERMATID COUNT
The left caudal epididymis and left testis were taken for determination of homogenization-resistant spermatids and caudal epididymal sperm reserve. These tissues were frozen at -20 +/- 5 °C pending evaluation. For evaluation the weighed tissues were placed in Triton-X-100 solution and homogenized with a blender (Ultra Turrax) and an ultrasonic water bath. Sperm or spermatid heads were counted microscopically using a modified Neubauer chamber. These evaluations were performed in the first instance only for group 1 and 4 males. In the absence of a treatment-related effect the remaining frozen tissues were not evaluated. - Litter observations:
- The litters were examined for litter size, live births, still births and any gross anomalies. The sex ratio of the pups was recorded. Pups were weighed individually (without identification) on days 0 (if possible), 1 and 4 post partum.
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- TERMINATION AND NECROPSY
Males were sacrificed after treatment for 39 days, when no longer needed for the assessment of reproductive effects. Dams were sacrificed on day 5 post partum. If birth did not occur on the expected date (day 21 post coitum), the dam was sacrificed on day 25 post coitum.
All animals sacrificed were subjected to a detailed macroscopic examination. Specimens of abnormal tissue were fixed in neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution. At the scheduled sacrifice, all animals were sacrificed by an injection of sodium pentobarbital. All P generation animals were exsanguinated. All parent animals were examined macroscopically for any structural changes. For the parent animals, special attention was directed at the organs of the reproductive system.The number of implantation sites and corpora lutea was recorded for all dams with litters. The uteri of non-pregnant females were placed in a solution of ammonium sulfide to visualize possible hemorrhagic areas of implantation sites.
ORGAN WEIGHTS
At the scheduled sacrifice, testes and epididymides from all parental males were weighed separately. In addition, from 5 males and 5 females sacrificed at the end of the study which were selected from each group, the following organs were trimmed from any adherent tissue, as appropriate, and their wet weight taken.
- Adrenal glands (weighed as pairs)
- Brain
- Heart
- Kidneys (weighed as pairs)
- Liver
- Thymus
- Spleen
TISSUE PRESERVATION
The following tissues from all parental males were preserved in neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution:
- Prostate
- Seminal vesicles with coagulating gland
- Testes (in Bouin’s fixative)*
- Epididymides (in Bouin’s fixative)*
*From the first five males in each group which were used for sperm analysis, only the right testis and right epididymis were preserved for histopathological examination.
The following tissues from all parental females were preserved in neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution:
- Ovaries
In addition, from 5 males and 5 females per group selected for organ weights, the following tissues were preserved in neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution:
- Gross lesions
- Brain (representative regions including cerebrum, cerebellum and pons)
- Spinal chord
- Small and large intestines (incl. Peyer’s patches)
- Stomach
- Liver
- Kidneys
- Adrenals
- Spleen
- Heart
- Thymus
- Thyroids, and parathyroids if possible
- Trachea and lungs (preserved by inflation with fixative and then immersion)
- Uterus (with vagina)
- Urinary bladder
- Lymph nodes (mesenterial, mandibular)
- Peripheral nerve (sciatic)
- Bone marrow
HISTOTECHNIQUE
All organ and tissue samples to be examined by the study pathologist were processed, embedded and cut at an approximate thickness of 2 - 4 micrometers and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Additionally, the testis was stained by PAS-hematoxylin. Special stains were used at the discretion of the study pathologist.
HISTOPATHOLOGY
Slides of all organs and tissues listed collected at terminal sacrifice from the animals of the control and high-dose groups were examined by the study pathologist. The same applied to all occurring gross lesions.
Special emphasis was made on the stages of spermatogenesis and histopathology of interstitial cell structure.
Histological examination of ovaries was carried out on any females that did not give birth. In addition, microscopic examination of the reproductive organs of all infertile males was made, where necessary.
A histopathology peer review was performed. A histopathology phase report was provided by the principal investigator which is included in the report. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- Pups were sacrificed on day 4 post partum. All animals were sacrificedby by an injection of sodium pentobarbital and subjected to a detailed macroscopic examination. Specimens of abnormal tissue were fixed in neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution. Pups found dead during the study, except those excessively cannibalized, were examined macroscopically.
- Statistics:
- The following statistical methods were used to analyze food consumption, body weights and reproduction data:
- Means and standard deviations of various data were calculated.
- The Dunnett-test (many to one t-test) based on a pooled variance estimate was applied if the variables could be assumed to follow a normal distribution for the comparison of the treated groups and the control groups for each sex.
- The Steel-test (many-one rank test) was applied instead of the Dunnett-test when the data could not be assumed to follow a normal distribution.
- Fisher's exact-test was applied when the variables could be dichotomized without loss of information. - Reproductive indices:
- From the on-line recorded reproduction data, the following parameters were calculated: mean precoital time, percentage mating, fertility index, conception rate, post-implantation loss, gestation index, birth index and viability index.
- Offspring viability indices:
- From the on-line recorded reproduction data, the following parameters were calculated: dead/live pups at first litter check, pups sex ratio and viability index.
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Red stained faeces was noted in all males and females in dose groups; this was due to the staining properties of the test item.
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Transient in males at the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day during the pre-pairing period, secondary finding due to reduced food intake
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Transient in males at the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, Incidental variation,
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Sperm motility was reduced in all dose groups.
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- for general toxicity
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effects observed up to 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dose level tested.
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- for reproduction
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effects observed up to 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dose level tested.
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not examined
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- for development
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effects observed up to 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dose level tested.
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Treatment related:
- no
- Relation to other toxic effects:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- no
- Relevant for humans:
- no
- Conclusions:
- This study is a valid investigation of the toxicological effects resulting from repeated oral-gavage administration of the test item to rats (according to OECD 422, GLP compliant). The test item was administered in vehicle (highly purified water) at dosages of 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg body weight/day, animals in control groups received the vehicle only. Test item was administered to male rats for 28 days and to female rats for 14 days prior to pairing, through the pairing and gestation periods until the F1 generation reached day 4 post partum.
Under the conditions of this study, no adverse effects were found in males or females up to the highest dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
All animals survived the scheduled study period.
During the treatment, faeces stained red with dose-dependent intensity of discoloration were noted in all males and females receiving test material. This observation was due to staining properties of the test item.
No effects on food consumption were noted in males at any dose level. Body weight gain was slightly but statistically significantly reduced in males at the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day during the pre-pairing period. No differences in body weight gain were noted at any dose level during the remaining study period. Body weights of males in all dose groups were similar to the respective control values during the entire study period. Because lower body weight gain at the high-dose levels was reversible and did not cause significant changes in body weights, this effect was considered not to be adverse.
Food consumption, body weights and body weight gain of females were not affected by the treatment at any dose level.
No further test item-related observations were noted in males or females at any dose level during the live part of the study.
Terminal examinations revealed changes in motility of sperms in all dose groups. Statistically significant decrease in mean count of progressive sperms was noted at the dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, statistically significant increase in mean count of stationary sperms was noted at the dose levels of 100 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day and statistically significant increase in mean count in not motile sperms was noted at the dose levels of 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. However a significant dose dependent trend indicated by probability values of <0.05 was not established for any of these changes when performing a linear regression analysis (least squares).
No further effects on male reproductive system were noted during the study. Sperm morphology and sperm count at the high-dose level was similar to the control values. Weights of male reproductive organs, macroscopical and histopathological examination of testes and epididymides gave no indication of any treatment-related effect. Further, no indication of effects on reproduction was noted within this study up to and including the highest dose level. For this reason, changes in motility of sperms were considered not to be adverse in this study.
Reproduction and development were not affected by the treatment. Mating performance, fertility, duration of gestation, corpora lutea count, implantation rate, post implantation and postnatal loss or litter size were similar in the control and all dose groups. There were no test item-related findings in pups noted during the first litter check, the first 4 days post partum or during the necropsy, pups body weights and body weight gain were not affected by the treatment at any dose level.
Based on these results, the NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) for general toxicity in males and females and for reproduction/developmental toxicity in this study was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dose level used. - Executive summary:
The purpose of this study was to generatepreliminaryinformation concerning the effects of the test material on the possible health hazards likely to arise from repeated exposure over a relatively limited period of time. In addition it provides information on possible effects on male and female reproductive performance such as gonadal function, mating behavior, conception, development of the conceptus and parturition.
The test item was administered to male rats for 39 days and to female rats for 14 days prior to pairing, through the pairing and gestation periods until the F1 generation reached day 4 post partum.
The following dose levels were applied:
Group 1: 0 mg/kg body weight/day (control group)
Group 2: 100 mg/kg body weight/day
Group 3: 300 mg/kg body weight/day
Group 4: 1000 mg/kg body weight/day
A standard dose volume of 10 mL/kg body weight with a daily adjustment to the actual body weight was used. Control animals were dosed with the vehicle alone (highly purified water).
The following results were obtained:
MORTALITY AND GENERAL TOLERABILITY OF PARENTAL ANIMALS
All animals survived the scheduled study period.
Feces stained red with dose-dependent intensity of discoloration were noted in all males and females in all dose groups starting from day 2 of the treatment until completion of the study. This observation was due to staining properties of the test item.
No further test item-related clinical signs or observations were noted in males or females at any dose level.
FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL BATTERY IN PARENTAL ANIMALS
No test item-related findings were noted during the functional observational battery tests in males or females at any dose level.
FOOD CONSUMPTION OF PARENTAL ANIMALS
No effects on food consumption were noted in males or females at any dose level.
BODY WEIGHTS OF PARENTAL ANIMALS
In males at the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, a slight but statistically significant lower body weight gain was noted during the pre-pairing period. No differences in body weight gain were noted at any dose level during the remaining study period. Body weights of males in all dose groups were similar to the respective control values during the entire study period. Because reduction in body weight gain at the high-dose levels was reversible and did not cause significant changes in body weights, this effect was considered not to be adverse.
Body weights and body weight gain of females were not affected by the treatment at any dose level.
CLINICAL LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS IN PARENTAL ANIMALS
No test item-related effects on hematology and clinical biochemistry parameters were noted in males or females at any dose level.
No changes in urine parameters were noted in males at any dose level.
REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING DATA
Mating performance, fertility, corpora lutea count, duration of gestation, implantation rate and post-implantation loss, litter size or postnatal loss were not affected by the treatment with the test item.
SEMINOLOGY AND SPERMATID COUNT IN PARENTAL MALES
Effects on sperm motility which might be test item-related were noted in all dose groups. Mean count of progressive sperms was statistically significantly reduced at the dose levels of 1000, 300 and 100 mg/kg bw/day, mean count of stationary sperms was statistically significantly increased at the dose levels of 1000 and 100 mg/kg bw/day and mean count of not motile sperms was statistically significantly increased at the dose level of 1000 and 300 mg/kg bw/day. But a significant dose dependent trend couldn’t be established.
In the absence of any findings during necropsy or histopathological examination of male reproductive organs as well as in the absence of any effects on reproduction, the differences in sperm motility were considered not to be adverse.
ORGAN WEIGHTS OF PARENTAL ANIMALS
No changes in absolute organ weights or organ weights to body weights and to brain weights ratios were noted in males or females at any dose level.
MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL EXAMINATIONS OF PARENTAL ANIMALS
Type and distribution of findings noted during macroscopical examination did not indicate any test item-related effect.
Treatment with test item did not cause pathological findings. All findings recorded were within the range of normal background lesions which may be recorded in animals of this strain and age.
FINDINGS IN PUPS AT FIRST LITTER CHECK AND DURING LACTATION
No test item-related findings were noted in pups during first litter check and during lactation at any dose level.
Pups sex ratio was not affected by the exposure to the test item at any dose level.
PUP WEIGHTS TO DAY 4 POST PARTUM
Body Weights and body weight gain of pups were not affected by the treatment with the test item at any dose level.
MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS OF PUPS
No test item-related findings were noted at macroscopic examination of pups at any dose level.
CONCLUSION
Based on these results, the NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) for general toxicity in males and females and for reproduction/developmental toxicity in this study was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dose level used.
- Endpoint:
- reproductive toxicity, other
- Remarks:
- Evaluation of male reproductive parameters following repeated oral gavage
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The objective of this study was to determine the potential toxicity of Hostaperm Yellow H3G, Novoperm Orange HL70 and Permanent-ROT FGR when given orally by gavage for 14 days to male Wistar Han rats.
The following parameters and end points were evaluated in this study: mortality, clinical signs, body weights, food consumption, gross pathology, sperm analysis, organ weights and histopathologic examinations.
No toxicologically relevant changes were noted in any of the parameters investigated in this study (i.e. mortality, clinical appearance, body weight, food consumption, gross pathology, sperm analysis, organ weights, and histopathologic examination).
In conclusion, administration of Hostaperm Yellow H3G, Novoperm Orange HL 70 or Permanent-ROT FGR in rats at 1000 mg/kg/day by once daily oral gavage for 14 days was well tolerated. In addition, there were no signs of male reproductive toxicity. - GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- yes
- Justification for study design:
- The aim of this study wa the verification of unexpected effects on spern motility in rats in a previous OECD 422 study with oral gavavge of PO 36. For comparison 2 other pigments were included.
In an OECD422 with PO 36 (Novoperm Orange HL70), possible test item-related effects were observed on sperm motility. The data of this study was used for read-across purposes, therefore three test items were selected to cover a multitude of pigments over several pigment classes as well as a multitude of various functionalities.
The dose levels were selected based on information provided by the Sponsor (similar test materials were well tolerated at 2000 mg/kg bw or 1000 mg/kg bw in acute oral toxicity studies and repeated dose oral toxicity studies (OECD407, 421 and/or 422), respectively. In addition older chronic toxicity and NTP bioassays exist without effects up to 1000 mg/kg. For these studies Wistar and Sprague Dawley rats were used). - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Crl: WI(Han)
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 11-12 x wks;
- Weight at study initiation: Males: 328-345 g;
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: group housed (up to 5 animals of the same dosing group together) in polycarbonate cages
- Use of restrainers for preventing ingestion (if dermal): no
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad lib.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad lib.
- Acclimation period: 8 d
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18-24
- Humidity (%):40-50
- Air changes (per hr): >10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Remarks:
- Performed with approved procedures and documented in detail. Formulations visually inspected for homogeneity prior to use and used within 6 hours after adding vehicle to the test item.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 14 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- once daily
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- only the limit dose was employed to maximize possible effects
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Sperm motility and progressive motility were assessed from all samples.
- Sperm smears for morphological evaluation were fixed from all samples and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Abnormal forms of sperm from a differential count of at least 200 spermatozoa (if possible) per animal was recorded. Evaluation was performed for all samples.
- One epididymis (left) from all males was removed, placed in labeled bags, and kept in the freezer at ≤-15°C. After thawing, the left epididymis was weighed, homogenized and evaluated for sperm numbers. Evaluation was performed for all animals - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- gross necropsy;
histopathology of:
Epididymis
Gland, prostate
Gland, seminal vesicle
Gross lesions/masses - Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Coloring of faeces by test item (Orange pigment)
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive performance:
- not examined
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- System:
- male reproductive system
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- other: Only one generation employed
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- other: not determined
- Generation:
- other: no Offspring produced
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: No offspring produced as the aim of the study was the examination of sperm motility only
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Treatment related:
- no
- Conclusions:
- No adverse effects on sperm parameters were detected after 14 day ora gavage of the test item. The NOAEL for spernm effects was 1000 mg/kg/day. Therefore, the negative result in this two-week repeated dose study affirms that the effects on sperm motility observed in the OECD 422 study with Novoperm Orange HL70 were isolated findings and should be considered not adverse and are not to be considered for risk assessment purposes.
- Executive summary:
Male Wistar Han rats were treated with Novoperm Orange HL 70 for 14 consecutive days by daily oral gavage at a dose level of 1000 mg/kg.
No toxicologically relevant changes were noted in any of the parameters investigated in this study (i.e. mortality, clinical appearance, body weight, food consumption, gross pathology, sperm analysis, organ weights, and histopathologic examination).
In conclusion, administration of Novoperm Orange HL 70 in rats at 1000 mg/kg/day by once daily oral gavage for 14 days was well tolerated. In addition, there were no signs of male reproductive toxicity.
The effects observed in the OECD 422 study with Novoperm Orange HL70 were confined to sperm motility, which is an ability that spermatids acquire during epididymal transit. In the absence of effects on the testis, a two-week exposure period is considered sufficient to allow the detection of post-testicular effects on sperm. Therefore, the negative result in this two-week repeated dose study affirms that the effects on sperm motility observed in the OECD 422 study with Novoperm Orange HL70 were isolated findings and should be considered not adverse and are not to be considered for risk assessment purposes.
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- see Rationale and Justification for the Analogue Read-Across Approach – Nanoforms and Bulk Forms (Chapter 13)
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive performance:
- not examined
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- reproductive function (sperm measures)
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- viability
- sexual maturation
- clinical signs
- mortality
- body weight and weight gain
- gross pathology
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Treatment related:
- no
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Remarks:
- Sperm motility
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- see Rationale and Justification for the Analogue Read-Across Approach – Nanoforms and Bulk Forms (Chapter 13)
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- >= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- reproductive function (sperm measures)
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- System:
- male reproductive system
- Remarks on result:
- other: No offspring was created as the aim of this study was the verification of possible effects on sperm motility observed in the above OECD 422 study
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
- Treatment related:
- no
Referenceopen allclose all
VIABILITY / MORTALITY
All animals survived scheduled study period.
DAILY CLINICAL SIGNS OR OBSERVATIONS
Red stained feces was noted in all males and females in all dose groups starting from day 2 of the treatment until completion of the study with dose-related intensity of discoloration. This observation was due to staining properties of the test item.
No further test item-related clinical signs or observations were noted in males or females at any dose level.
Incidentally, in one male (no. 16) at the dose level of 100 mg/kg bw/day chromodacryorrhea was noted during the study (starting on day 1 of the pre-pairing period) and eye reduced in size was noted in the same animal from day 13 of the pre-pairing period.
No further test item-related findings were noted at any dose level.
FINDINGS AT DETAILED WEEKLY CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
No test item-related findings were noted during detailed weekly clinical observations.
The only findings noted were chromodacryorrhea and eye reduced in size in male no. 16 at the dose level of 100 mg/kg bw/day recorded already during the daily clinical observations.
FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL BATTERY
No test item-related findings were noted during the functional observational battery tests in males or females at any dose level.
Statistically significantly lower body temperature was noted in both sexes. In males mean body temperature was 37.9 °C and 37.8 °C at the high- and mid-dose levels, respectively, compared to 38.4 °C in the control group. In females, 38.5 °C was noted at the high-dose level, compared to 38.9 °C in the control group. The differences noted in males and females were only minor, not clearly dose dependent and all values remained in the historical control range. For these reasons, changes in body temperature were considered not to be test item-related.
No further findings were noted during functional observational battery in males or females at any dose level except for the eye findings in male no. 16 at 100 mg/kg bw/day.
LOCOMOTOR ACTIVITY
No effects on locomotor activity were noted in males or females at any dose level.
Mean beam counts during the 30 minutes of measurement at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were respectively: 1255, 1137, 1219 and 1209 in males and 924, 882, 1002 and 1050 in females.
FOOD CONSUMPTION OF MALES
No effects on food consumption were noted in males at any dose level.
Mean differences in food consumption at the dose levels 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were respectively: +1.1%, -3.4% and -3.4% during the pre-pairing period and -1.5%, -3.1% and -3.8% during the after pairing period ( percentages refer to the respective values in the control group).
FOOD CONSUMPTION OF FEMALES
No test item-related effects on food consumption were noted in females at any dose level.
Incidentally, statistically significantly higher food consumption was noted at the dose level of 100 mg/kg bw/day during lactation period. In the absence of an effect in females at the dose levels of 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, this difference was considered not to be related to the treatment.
Mean differences in food consumption at the dose levels 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were respectively: +5.9%, +2.7%, and +1.1% during the pre-pairing period, +7.0%, +2.5% and +2.9% during the gestation period and +23.2%, -5.9% and +11.0% during the lactation period (percentages refer to the respective values in the control group).
BODY WEIGHTS OF MALES
At the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, a slightly lower body weight gain if compared to the controls was noted during the pre-pairing period. Mean body weight gain within this period was +10%, compared to +13% in the control group. The difference in body weight gain was statistically significant during the most days starting from day 3 until the end of the pre-pairing period. This effect was considered to be test item-related. During the pairing and after pairing periods, body weight gain was similar at all dose levels.
No significant changes in body weights were noted in males at any time during the study.
Because the lower body weight gain at the high-dose level was reversible despite treatment continued and did not result in any significant changes in body weights, this finding was considered not to be adverse.
No significant changes in body weight gain or body weights were noted in males at the dose levels of 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day.
Mean differences in body weight gain at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were respectively: +13%, +13%, +11% and +10% during the pre-pairing period, +10%, +10%, +9% and +9% during the pairing period and +7%, +6%, +7% and +6% during the after pairing period (percentages refer to the body weight change within the respective period).
BODY WEIGHTS OF FEMALES
Body weights and body weight gain of females were not affected by the treatment with the test item at any dose level.
On individual days some statistically significantly changed values of body weight gain were noted at the low-, mid- and high-dose levels. The changes did not follow a dose dependency and were therefore not related to the treatment.
Mean differences in body weight gain at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were respectively: 5%, 7%, 6% and 7% during the pre-pairing period, 48%, 56%, 47% and 54% during the gestation period and 3%, 8%, 4% and 5% during the lactation period (percentages refer to the body weight change within the respective period).
2. CLINICAL LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
HEMATOLOGY
No test item-related effects on hematology parameters were noted in males or females at any dose level.
In males, statistically significant changes of several parameters: higher distribution width of red cell volume (RDW) at the low-dose level and higher distribution width of hemoglobin concentration (HDW) at the low- and mid-dose levels occurred in the absence of an effect at the high dose and therefore were considered not to be test item-related.
In females, at the low-dose level, statistically significantly higher platelets count was noted in the absence of any increase of this value at the mid- and high-dose levels and therefore it was not test item-related.
No further changes of hematology parameters were noted in males or females at any dose level.
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
No test item-related effects on biochemistry parameters were noted in males or females at any dose level.
In males, at the mid-dose level, statistically significantly lower concentration of triglycerides was noted. In the absence of dose dependency, this finding was not test item-related.
In females at the low dose level, following statistically significant changes were noted: higher concentration of cholesterol, higher concentration of globulin, and lower globulin to albumin ratio. These changes were not dose-dependent and therefore they were considered not to be test item-related.
No further changes of biochemistry parameters were noted in either males or females at any dose level.
URINALYSIS
No changes in urine parameters were noted in males at any dose level.
3. TERMINAL FINDINGS
SEMINOLOGY AND SPERMATID COUNT
In all dose groups, statistically significant changes in motility of sperms were noted. Following values were assessed in sperm samples at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day respectively: 81.1%, 64.6%, 57.3% and 47.5% of progressive sperms (changes were statistically significant in all dose groups), 3.7%, 11.3%, 6.0% and 11.9% of stationary sperms (changes were statistically significant at the dose levels of 1000 and 100 mg/kg bw/day) and 15.2%, 24.1, 36.7 and 40.6% of not motile sperms (changes were statistically significant at the dose levels of 1000 and 300 mg/kg bw/day). These changes might be test item-related. However no significant dose dependent trend indicated by probability values of <0.05 was determined for any of these changes when performing a linear regression analysis (least squares).
No further changes were noted during sperm analysis. At the high-dose level, all morphological categories of sperms were represented with similar frequency to that in the control group whereas sperm count was similar to the respective control values in samples from both testis and epididymidis.
ORGAN WEIGHTS
No changes in absolute organ weights or organ weights to body weights and to brain weights ratios were noted in males or females at any dose level.
MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS
Type and distribution of findings noted during macroscopical examination of males or females did not indicate any test item-related effect.
HISTOPATHOLOGY FINDINGS
Under the conditions of this experiment, treatment with the test item did not cause pathological findings. All findings recorded were within the range of normal background lesions which may be recorded in animals of this strain and age.
4. REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING
MATING PERFORMANCE AND FERTILITY
Mating performance and fertility were not affected by the treatment at any dose level.
All females in groups 2, 3 and 4 mated within the first pairing period. In group 1, one female (no. 54) was mated during the second pairing period.
Mean (median) precoital times were 4.5 (3), 2.5 (3), 4.0 (2) and 2.6 (3) days at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively.
Seven females were not pregnant: three in the control group and in the mid-dose level and one in the low-dose level. Consequently, fertility indexes (number of females pregnant as percentages of females paired) and conception rate (number of females pregnant as percentages of females mated) were 72.7%, 90.9%, 72.7% and 100.0% at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively.
One female at the high dose level had one implantation site but delivered no pups. Consequently, gestation index (number of females with living pups as percentages of females pregnant) was 100% in the control group and at low- and mid-dose levels and 90.9% at the high-dose level.
CORPORA LUTEA COUNT
No test item-related effects on corpora lutea count were observed at any dose level.
Mean number of corpora lutea per dam was 16.0, 17.2, 16.3 and 18.4 in order of ascending dose levels.
DURATION OF GESTATION
No effects on duration of gestation were observed at any dose level.
Mean duration of gestation was 21.6, 21.6, 21.5 and 21.7 days, in order of ascending dose level.
IMPLANTATION RATE AND POST-IMPLANTATION LOSS
No effects on implantation rate and post-implantation loss were observed at any dose level.
In order of ascending dose levels, mean number of implantations per dam was 12.6, 14.9, 12.6 and 14.0 whereas mean incidence of post-implantation loss per dam was 1.5, 0.8, 0.6 and 0.5 per dam.
LITTER SIZE AT FIRST LITTER CHECK
No effects on litter size were noted at any dose level.
During the first litter check, one dead pup was found in a litter at the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day. Because of isolated occurrence, this finding was considered to be incidental.
Mean number of living pups per dam at first litter check was 11.1, 14.3, 12.0 and 13.5 in order of ascending dose levels.
Birth index (number of pups born alive as a percentage of implantations) was 88.1%, 94.8%, 95.0% and 96.4% at the dose level of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Birth index at the dose level of 1000 mg kg bw/day was statistically significantly higher than the respective control value. This was considered to be a result of biological variability.
No test item-related effects on postnatal loss were noted at any dose level.
In the control group one pup was missing on day 4, at the low-dose level one pup was missing on day 2, at the mid dose level three pups (from two litters) were missing on day 2 and at the high dose level no postnatal loss was noted in any litter.
Mean postnatal loss per dam during four days of lactation was 0.1%, 0.1%, 0.4% and 0.0% at the dose level of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively. Consequently, viability index (number of pups alive at termination on day 4 p.p. as a percentage of pups born alive) was 98.9%, 99.3%, 96.9% and 100% in order of ascending dose levels.
EXTERNAL EXAMINATION AT FIRST LITTER CHECK AND DURING LACTATION
No test item-related findings were noted in pups during first litter check and during lactation at any dose level.
Incidentally, one pup in the control group was found with a wound and missing tail tip, two further pups, each one at the low- and mid-dose levels, had a wound at first litter check. These findings were also noted during the remaining lactation period.
SEX RATIOS
Pups sex ratio was not affected by exposure to the test item at any dose level.
At first litter check, percentages of male pups were 56%, 48%, 51% and 56% at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
BODY WEIGHTS TO DAY 4 POST PARTUM
Body weights and body weight gain of pups were not affected by the treatment with the test item at any dose level.
Mean body weights of pups on day 1 post partum were: 6.4 g, 6.1 g, 6.4 and 6.2 g and mean differences in body weights during lactation were +49.9%, +43.6%, +47.8% and +42.6%, at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, respectively.
At the dose levels of 100 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, slightly not statistically significantly lower body weight gain of pups was noted. This effect was considered to be due to a higher number of pups at these dose levels which was supported by observation that reduction of body weight gain was more pronounced in litters of higher size. Therefore this effect was considered not to be test item-related.
MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS
No test item-related findings were noted at macroscopic examination of pups at any dose level.
Incidentally, in the control group one pup had a sore in the thoraco-dorsal region, one further pup in this group had a missing tail tip. These findings were already recorded during the in life phase. At the high-dose level, one pup had a watery cyst in the left kidney.
No further findings were noted in pups at any dose level.
SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE
P Animals Breeding for F1 Litters
Group |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Female numbers |
45-55 |
56-66 |
67-77 |
78-88 |
Number of females paired |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
Number of females mated |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
Number of non pregnant females (A) |
3 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
Numbers of pregnant females, |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Number of females which reared their pups until day 4 post partum |
8 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
(A) Female Nos. 45, 46, 55, 62, 74, 75 and 77
(B) Female No. 85 had implantations only
No adverse effects at all observed
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Valid: Guideline study, screening
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
In a Study according to OECD 422 the test item was administered to male rats for 39 days and to female rats for 14 days prior to pairing, through the pairing and gestation periods until the F1 generation reached day 4 post partum.
The following dose levels were applied:
Group 1: 0 mg/kg body weight/day (control group)
Group 2: 100 mg/kg body weight/day
Group 3: 300 mg/kg body weight/day
Group 4: 1000 mg/kg body weight/day
A standard dose volume of 10 mL/kg body weight with a daily adjustment to the actual body weight was used. Control animals were dosed with the vehicle alone (highly purified water).
The following results were obtained:
MORTALITY AND GENERAL TOLERABILITY OF PARENTAL ANIMALS: All animals survived the scheduled study period.Faeces stained red with dose-dependent intensity of discoloration were noted in all males and females in all dose groups starting from day 2 of the treatment until completion of the study. This observation was due to staining properties of the test item.No further test item-related clinical signs or observations were noted in males or females at any dose level.
FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL BATTERY IN PARENTAL ANIMALS: No test item-related findings were noted during the functional observational battery tests in males or females at any dose level.
FOOD CONSUMPTION OF PARENTAL ANIMALS: No effects on food consumption were noted in males or females at any dose level.
BODY WEIGHTS OF PARENTAL ANIMALS: In males at the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, a slight but statistically significant lower body weight gain was noted during the pre-pairing period. No differences in body weight gain were noted at any dose level during the remaining study period. Body weights of males in all dose groups were similar to the respective control values during the entire study period. Because reduction in body weight gain at the high-dose levels was reversible and did not cause significant changes in body weights, this effect was considered not to be adverse.
Body weights and body weight gain of females were not affected by the treatment at any dose level.
CLINICAL LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS IN PARENTAL ANIMALS: No test item-related effects on hematology and clinical biochemistry parameters were noted in males or females at any dose level.
No changes in urine parameters were noted in males at any dose level.
REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING DATA: Mating performance, fertility, corpora lutea count, duration of gestation, implantation rate and post-implantation loss, litter size or postnatal loss were not affected by the treatment with the test item.
SEMINOLOGY AND SPERMATID COUNT IN PARENTAL MALES: Effects on sperm motility which might be test item-related were noted in all dose groups. Mean count of progressive sperms was statistically significantly reduced at the dose levels of 1000, 300 and 100 mg/kg bw/day, mean count of stationary sperms was statistically significantly increased at the dose levels of 1000 and 100 mg/kg bw/day and mean count of not motile sperms was statistically significantly increased at the dose level of 1000 and 300 mg/kg bw/day. But a significant dose dependent trend couldn’t be established.
In the absence of any findings during necropsy or histopathological examination of male reproductive organs as well as in the absence of any effects on reproduction, the differences in sperm motility were considered not to be adverse.
ORGAN WEIGHTS OF PARENTAL ANIMALS: No changes in absolute organ weights or organ weights to body weights and to brain weights ratios were noted in males or females at any dose level.
MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL EXAMINATIONS OF PARENTAL ANIMALS: Type and distribution of findings noted during macroscopical examination did not indicate any test item-related effect.
Treatment with test item did not cause pathological findings. All findings recorded were within the range of normal background lesions which may be recorded in animals of this strain and age.
FINDINGS IN PUPS AT FIRST LITTER CHECK AND DURING LACTATION: No test item-related findings were noted in pups during first litter check and during lactation at any dose level.
Pups sex ratio was not affected by the exposure to the test item at any dose level.
PUP WEIGHTS TO DAY 4 POST PARTUM: Body Weights and body weight gain of pups were not affected by the treatment with the test item at any dose level.
MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS OF PUPS: No test item-related findings were noted at macroscopic examination of pups at any dose level.
CONCLUSION
Based on these results, the NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) for general toxicity in males and females and for reproduction/developmental toxicity in this study was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dose level used.
The objective of a study according to OECD TG 414 in rats was to evaluate the developmental toxicity (teratogenic) potential of the test item C.I. Pigment Orange 36 to cause adverse effects on the pregnant female rats and development of the embryo and fetus consequent to exposure of C.I. Pigment Orange 36 to pregnant rats by oral route during gestation days (GD) 5 to 19. This study was intended to provide a rational basis for risk assessment in humans and to establish a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for maternal and developmental toxicity in rats.
A total of 96Day 0 pregnant rats[1]were randomly divided into different groups according to the study design as follows:
Group Nos. | Groups | Dose (mg/kg/day) | Dosage volume (mL/kg) | Concentration (mg/mL) | No. of Day 0 pregnant rats |
G1 | Vehicle control* | 0 | 10 | 0 | 24 |
G2 | Low dose | 111 | 10 | 11.1 | 24 |
G3 | Mid dose | 333 | 10 | 33.3 | 24 |
G4 | High dose | 1000 | 10 | 100 | 24 |
*0.5 % Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium salt (medium viscosity) in Milli-Q®Water
The following parameters and end points were evaluated in this study: Clinical signs, body weights, body weight gains, food consumption, gross pathology, gravid uterine weights, intrauterine growth and survival,number of corpora lutea, and fetal parameters [sex, weight and anogenital distance, and external, visceral and skeletal observations].Approximately half of the fetuses from each litter were examined for visceral malformations and the remaining half were evaluated for skeletal malformations. In addition, from each dam the thyroids were weighed and subjected to microscopic evaluation, and thyroid hormones were estimated from the blood collected at terminal sacrifie (GD20).
Results of the study are summarized below:
· Clinical signs and gross necropsy changes: There were no clinical signs, or mortalities in treated rats at any of the doses tested.Expected light to dark orange coloured faeces were observed in the test item treated groups which can be accounted for the physical nature of the test item.
Grossly, orangecontents noted in cecum at 333 and 1000 mg/kg/day and in ileum and colon at 1000 mg/kg/day was also related to the physical nature of test item and there were no other gross findings in the intestinal mucosa.
· Maternal Parameters: No treatment-related effects on maternal body weights and food consumption up to the highest tested dose of
1000 mg/kg/day. The other maternal parameters comprising of uterine weight, implantations and early and late resorptions, post implantation loss were comparable to vehicle control group up to the high dose of 1000 mg/kg/day. Gross evaluation of placenta revealed no remarkable findings.
· Litter Parameters: No treatment-related effects on litter parameters comprising of total number of fetuses, fetal weights, anogenital distance in male and female fetuses, were observed.
· Fetal examination: The fetal external, visceral and skeletal examinations revealed no signs of teratogenicity or developmental toxicity up to
1000 mg/kg/day.
· Thyroid hormone levels (T3, T4 and TSH), thyroid gland weights and histology of thyroid gland were unaffected by treatment with C.I. Pigment Orange 36 up to the highest dose of
1000 mg/kg/day.
Based on the above findings, it is concluded that, No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for
· Maternal toxicity is1000 mg/kg/dayas the maternal body weight and weight gain, corrected body weight gain and food consumption was unaffected up to 1000 mg/kg/day.
Fetal developmental toxicity and Teratogencity is1000 mg/kg/dayas fetal resorptions or post implantation loss were comparable to the controls, no effects on fetal body weights and further the fetal external, visceral and skeletal examinations revealed no signs of teratogenicity or developmental toxicity up to 1000 mg/kg/day
[1]The day of confirmed mating (sperm positive vaginal smear or presence of vaginal plug) was designated as GD 0.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2020
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Source: Hylasco Biotechnology (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Plot 4B, MN Park,
Shameerpet Mandal,
Turkapally Village,
Medchal District, Telangana -500078 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Samples for analysis of homogeneity and active ingredient (a.i.) were collected from the dose formulations intended for first treatment for the first batch of rats and last treatment (-2 days). The prepared formulations were sampled in duplicate sets wherein one set was used for analysis and another as back up set which was stored at ambient condition. For each set, duplicate sample were drawn from top, middle and bottom layers of each preparation and in case of control duplicate samples from the middle layer was drawn. The samples collected were sent to Analytical R&D of Eurofins Advinus Ltd. for formulation analysis to determine the homogeneity and concentration of the dose formulation.
- Details on mating procedure:
- The female rats were cohabited with males in a 1:1 ratio and vaginal smears and / or vaginal plug were examined in the morning hours of the subsequent day to confirm mating.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Gestation day 5 to gestation day 19
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily from gestation day 5 to gestation day 19
- Duration of test:
- Upto gestation day 20
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Vehicle control
- Dose / conc.:
- 111 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Low dose
- Dose / conc.:
- 333 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- Mid dose
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- High dose
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24 day 0 pergnant rats per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- Group Nos. Groups Dose
(mg/kg/day) Dosage volume (mL/kg) Concent-ration (mg/mL) No. of Day 0 pregnant rats Rat numbers
From To
G1 Vehicle control 0 10 0 24 Rz221 Rz244
G2 Low dose 111 10 11.1 24 Rz245 Rz268
G3 Mid dose 333 10 33.3 24 Rz269 Rz292
G4 High dose 1000 10 100 24 Rz293 Rz316 - Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATION: Yes
- Time schedule: Twice a day (pre dose and post dose) during treatment period
- Cage side observation checked in table 2 were included - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine contents were examined after termination GD 20.
• Pregnancy status
• Gravid uterine weight (from all rats subjected to caesarean section)
• Number of corpora lutea
• Number of implantation sites
• Number of early resorptions
• Number of late resorptions
• Gross evaluation of placenta - Fetal examinations:
- • Total number of fetuses
• Total number of live fetuses
• Total number of dead fetuses
• Individual fetal body weight
• Fetus sex (during visceral examination)
• External examination of fetus
• Soft tissue evaluation
• Skeletal examination
• Head examination (half the number of fetuses per litter) - Statistics:
- The data on maternal body weight, body weight change in interval, gravid uterine weight, body weight change corrected to gravid uterine weight, maternal food consumption, hormone analyses (T4, T3, TSH), weight of thyroid gland was analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) after testing for homogeneity for intra group variance using Levene’s test. Where intra group variances were heterogeneous, ANOVA was performed after suitable transformation of data. Dunnett’s pairwise comparison of the treated group means with the control group mean was performed, when the group differences were found significant.
Fetal weight for male and female was analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) taking litter size as covariate for group. Anogenital distance for male and female was analyzed using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) taking weight as covariate for group.
Number of corpora lutea, number of implantations, early and late resorptions, pre-implantation and post-implantation loss observations were analyzed using Kruskal Wallis test for group comparison. Wilcoxon pairwise comparison of the treated groups with the control group was performed, when the group differences were significant.
The incidence of dams with resorptions were tested for using Chi-square test followed by Fisher’s exact test for group association.
The incidence of fetus and litter (incidence and percent) observations for external, visceral and skeletal observations were tested using Cochran Armitage trend test and pair wise comparison will be tested by Fisher’s exact test for group association.
Statistically significant differences (p<0.05), indicated by the aforementioned tests was designated as * throughout the report. - Indices:
- Refer Table 6 of the final report
- Historical control data:
- Refer Annexure 8 of the final report
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Grossly, orange contents noted in cecum at 333 and 1000 mg/kg/day and in ileum and colon at 1000 mg/kg/day was also related to the physical nature of test item and there were no other gross findings in the intestinal mucosa.
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No abortions in the study
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- behaviour (functional findings)
- body weight and weight gain
- changes in number of pregnant
- changes in pregnancy duration
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical signs
- dead fetuses
- early or late resorptions
- effects on pregnancy duration
- food consumption and compound intake
- gross pathology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- maternal abnormalities
- mortality
- necropsy findings
- number of abortions
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- pre and post implantation loss
- total litter losses by resorption
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reduction in number of live offspring
- changes in sex ratio
- fetal/pup body weight changes
- changes in litter size and weights
- changes in postnatal survival
- external malformations
- skeletal malformations
- visceral malformations
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
- Conclusions:
- Based on the above findings, it is concluded that, No Observed Adverse- Effect Level (NOAEL) for
• Maternal toxicity is 1000 mg/kg/day as the maternal body weight and weight gain, corrected body weight gain and food consumption was unaffected up to 1000 mg/kg/day.
• Fetal developmental toxicity and Teratogencity is 1000 mg/kg/day as fetal resorptions or post implantation loss were comparable to the controls, no effects on fetal body weights and further the fetal external, visceral and skeletal examinations revealed no signs of teratogenicity or developmental toxicity up to 1000 mg/kg/day - Executive summary:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the developmental toxicity (teratogenic) potential of the test item C.I. Pigment Orange 36 to cause adverse effects on the pregnant female rats and development of the embryo and fetus consequent to exposure of C.I. Pigment Orange 36 to pregnant rats by oral route during gestation days (GD) 5 to 19. This study was intended to provide a rational basis for risk assessment in humans and to establish a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for maternal and developmental toxicity in rats.
A total of 96Day 0 pregnant rats[1]were randomly divided into different groups according to the study design as follows:
Group Nos.
Groups
Dose
(mg/kg/day)
Dosage volume (mL/kg)
Concentration (mg/mL)
No. of Day 0 pregnant rats
G1
Vehicle control*
0
10
0
24
G2
Low dose
111
10
11.1
24
G3
Mid dose
333
10
33.3
24
G4
High dose
1000
10
100
24
*0.5 % Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium salt (medium viscosity) in Milli-Q®Water
The following parameters and end points were evaluated in this study: Clinical signs, body weights, body weight gains, food consumption, gross pathology, gravid uterine weights, intrauterine growth and survival,number of corpora lutea, and fetal parameters [sex, weight and anogenital distance, and external, visceral and skeletal observations].Approximately half of the fetuses from each litter were examined for visceral malformations and the remaining half were evaluated for skeletal malformations. In addition, from each dam the thyroids were weighed and subjected to microscopic evaluation, and thyroid hormones were estimated from the blood collected at terminal sacrifie (GD20).
Results of the study are summarized below:
· Clinical signs and gross necropsy changes: There were no clinical signs, or mortalities in treated rats at any of the doses tested.Expected light to dark orange coloured faeces were observed in the test item treated groups which can be accounted for the physical nature of the test item.
Grossly, orangecontents noted in cecum at 333 and 1000 mg/kg/day and in ileum and colon at 1000 mg/kg/day was also related to the physical nature of test item and there were no other gross findings in the intestinal mucosa.
· Maternal Parameters: No treatment-related effects on maternal body weights and food consumption up to the highest tested dose of
1000 mg/kg/day. The other maternal parameters comprising of uterine weight, implantations and early and late resorptions, post implantation loss were comparable to vehicle control group up to the high dose of 1000 mg/kg/day. Gross evaluation of placenta revealed no remarkable findings.· Litter Parameters: No treatment-related effects on litter parameters comprising of total number of fetuses, fetal weights, anogenital distance in male and female fetuses, were observed.
· Fetal examination: The fetal external, visceral and skeletal examinations revealed no signs of teratogenicity or developmental toxicity up to
1000 mg/kg/day.· Thyroid hormone levels (T3, T4 and TSH), thyroid gland weights and histology of thyroid gland were unaffected by treatment with C.I. Pigment Orange 36 up to the highest dose of
1000 mg/kg/day.Based on the above findings, it is concluded that, No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for
· Maternal toxicity is1000 mg/kg/dayas the maternal body weight and weight gain, corrected body weight gain and food consumption was unaffected up to 1000 mg/kg/day.
Fetal developmental toxicity and Teratogencity is1000 mg/kg/dayas fetal resorptions or post implantation loss were comparable to the controls, no effects on fetal body weights and further the fetal external, visceral and skeletal examinations revealed no signs of teratogenicity or developmental toxicity up to 1000 mg/kg/day
[1]The day of confirmed mating (sperm positive vaginal smear or presence of vaginal plug) was designated as GD 0.
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study (OECD 422, GLP-compliant)
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA OPPTS 870.3650 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Tocixity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Animals: Rat, RccHanTM: WIST(SPF)
- Rationale: Recognized by international guidelines as a recommended test system.
- Source: Harlan Laboratories, Inc., Maasheseweg 87c, 5800 AN Vernay / Netherlands
- Number of Animals: 44 males (11 per group) and 44 females (11 per group)
- Age (at Start of Treatment): 11 weeks
- Body Weight Range (at Start of Treatment): 301 to 362 g (males), 216 to 247 g (females)
- Identification: Parent animals had cage card and individual animal number (ear tattoo), pups were individually tattooed with Indian ink on day 1 post partum
- Randomization: Performed after at least three days of acclimatization using a computer-generated random algorithm. Body weights (recorded on the day of allocation) were taken into consideration in order to ensure similar mean body weights in all groups.
- Accommodation: In groups of five in Makrolon type-4 cages with wire mesh tops up to the day of randomization and afterwards individually in Makrolon type-3 cages with wire mesh tops and sterilized standard softwood bedding (‘Lignocel’ J. Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH & CoKG, 73494 Rosenberg / Germany, imported by Provimi Kliba SA, 4303 Kaiseraugst / Switzerland) with paper enrichment (ISO-BLOX from Harlan Laboratories B.V., Netherlands), batch/lot nos. 02105111001, 02105111201, 02105120301 and 6960C.CS-100099). During the pre-pairing period, cages with males were interspersed amongst those holding females to promote the development of regular estrus cycles.
- Diet: Pelleted standard Harlan Teklad 2018C (batch no. 80/11) rodent maintenance diet (Provimi Kliba SA, 4303 Kaiseraugst / Switzerland) was available ad libitum.
- Water: Community tap-water from Füllinsdorf was available ad libitum in water bottles.
- Acclimatization: Under test conditions after health examination. Only animals without any visible signs of illness were used for the study.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Standard laboratory conditions, continuously monitored.
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3
- Humidity (%): 30 to 70
- Air changes (per hr): . Air-conditioned with 10 - 15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 (with at least eight hours music during the light period) - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- water
- Details on exposure:
- DOSE FORMULATIONS
The dose formulations were prepared weekly using the test item as supplied by the Sponsor.
The test item was weighed into a glass beaker on a tared precision balance and approximately 80% of the vehicle was added (w/v). Using a magnetic stirrer, a homogeneous suspension was prepared. Having obtained a homogeneous mixture, the remaining vehicle was added. Separate formulations were prepared for each concentration.
Homogeneity of the test item in the vehicle was maintained during the daily administration period using a magnetic stirrer.
STORAGE OF DOSE FORMULATIONS
Dose formulations were stored at room temperature (20 +/- 5 °C) in glass beakers.
Based upon the results of stability analyses performed within the non-GLP Harlan Laboratories study (Dose Range-Finding Study for a Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test in the Han Wistar Rat), dose formulations were stable for at least 8 days if stored at room temperature.
TREATMENT
- Method: Oral, by gavage
- Rationale for Method: Administration by gavage is a common and accepted route of exposure for this type studies.
- Frequency of Administration: Once daily
- Target Dose Levels: 0 mg/kg/day (control group), 100 mg/kg/day (group 2), 300 mg/kg/day (group 3) and 1000 mg/kg/day (group 4)
- Rationale for Dose Level Selection: The dose levels were selected based on a previous non-GLP dose range-finding toxicity study in Han Wistar rats, Harlan Laboratories Study D33711, using dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/ day, where no adverse effects were observed up to and including the highest dose level.
- Dose Volume: 10 mL/kg body weight
- Dose Concentrations: 0 mg/mL/day (control group), 10 mg/mL/day (group 2), 30 mg/mL/day (group 3) and 100 mg/mL/day (group 4).
- Duration of Acclimatization Period: 7 days. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- METHOD
On the first treatment day samples from the control group as well as three samples (top, middle and bottom) of about 0.5 g of each concentration were taken prior to dosing for analysis of concentration and homogeneity. Samples of about 0.5 g of each concentration were taken from the middle only to confirm stability (8 days). During the last week of the treatment, samples were taken from the middle to confirm concentration. The aliquots for analysis of dose formulations were frozen (-20 +/- 5 °C) and delivered on dry ice to the responsible for formulation analysis (Harlan Laboratories Ltd., Itingen / Switzerland) and stored there at -20 +/- 5 °C until analysis.
The samples were analyzed by UV-VIS spectroscopy following an analytical procedure developed at Harlan Laboratories. The test item was used as the analytical standard.
RESULTS
Blank samples showed no significant absorbance and, therefore, it was confirmed that only highly purified water was applied within the control experiment.
The application formulations investigated during the study were found to comprise test material in the range of 93.1% to 105.6% and, thus, the required content limit of +/-20% with reference to the nominal content was met. The homogeneous distribution of test item in the preparations was approved because single results found did not deviate more than 5.5% (<15%) from the corresponding mean.
The test item was found to be stable in application formulations when kept eight days at 20 +/- 5 °C due to recoveries which met the variation limit of 10% from the time-zero (homogeneity) mean.
In conclusion, the results indicate the accurate use of the test item and highly purified water as vehicle during this study. Application formulations were found to be homogeneously prepared and stable over a storage period of eight days (20 +/- 5 °C). - Details on mating procedure:
- During the pairing period, females were housed with sexually mature males (1:1) until evidence of copulation was observed. The females were removed and housed individually if the daily vaginal smear was sperm positive, or a copulation plug was observed.
The day on which a positive mating was determined (copulation plug or sperm) was designated day 0 post coitum.
For a female which did not mate during the 14-day pairing period, a second pairing of this female with a male in the same group, which had already mated successfully, was performed.
All dams were allowed to give birth and rear their litters (F1 pups) up to day 4 post partum. Day 0 was designated as the day on which a female had delivered all her pups. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- MALES: 40 days
FEMALES: Approximately 7 weeks - Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily
- Duration of test:
- MALES
- Acclimatization: 7 days
- First Test Item Administration: Day 1 of pre-pairing
- Pre-Pairing: 14 days
- Pairing: 14 days maximum
- Treatment Ends: On day before sacrifice
- Blood Sampling: After 28 days of Treatment
- Necropsy: After treatment for 39 days, when no longer needed for assessment of reproductive effects
FEMALES
- Acclimatization: 7 days
- First Test Item Administration: Day 1 of pre-pairing
- Pre-Pairing: 14 days
- Pairing: 14 days maximum
- Gestation: Approximately 21 days
- Treatment Ends: On day 4 post partum
- Blood Sampling: Day 5 post partum
- Necropsy: On day 5 post partum (pups on day 4 post partum) - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 11
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Maternal examinations:
- VIABILITY/MORTALITY: Twice daily
CLINICAL SIGNS: Daily cage-side clinical observations (once daily, during acclimatization and up to day of necropsy). Additionally the animals were observed for signs of difficult or prolonged parturition, and behavioral abnormalities in nesting and nursing.
FOOD CONSUMPTION
On days 1 - 4, 4 - 8, 8 - 11 and 11 - 14 during pre-pairing period; on days 0 - 7, 7 14 and 14 - 21 during gestation period and on days 1 - 4 of during lactation period.
No food consumption was recorded during the pairing period.
BODY WEIGHTS: Recorded daily from treatment start to day of necropsy.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
Detailed clinical observations were performed outside the home cage once prior to the first administration of the test item, weekly during the pre-pairing and pairing periods and on days 0, 6, 13 and 20 of the gestation period.
Animals were observed for the following: changes in skin, fur, eyes, mucous membranes, occurrence of secretions and excretions, and autonomic activity (e.g. lacrimation, piloerection, pupil size, unusual respiratory pattern). Changes in gait, posture and response to handling as well as the presence of clonic or tonic movements, stereotypies or bizarre behavior were also reported.
FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL BATTERY
On day 3 or 4 post partum) relevant parameters were performed with five P generation females from each group. This FOB assessment was conducted following the daily dose administration. Animals were observed for the following:
- Cage-side observations: faeces-balls, urine and posture as well as resistance to removal.
- Hand-held observations: muscle tone, constituation, skin, pupile size, palpebral closure, lacrimation, salivation, reaction to handling and general abnormalities.
- Open field observations: level of ambulatory activity including rearing (one minute evaluation), unusual body movements (e.g. spasms, convulsions), gait evaluation, behavior, hair coat, respiration, quantity of faeces-balls and urine.
- Reflexes: blinking, palpebral closure, pinna reflex, extensor thrust response, paw pinch, responsiveness to sharp noise, righting reflex and hearing ability (Preyer’s reflex).
- Measurements / Counts: hind limb / fore limb grip strength, landing foot splay, rectal temperature.
Any abnormal findings were recorded and, where appropriate, graded in severity.
Additionally, locomotor activity was measured quantitatively for the same animals. Activity was measured with an Activity Monitor AMS-0151 (FMI, Germany). Activity of the animals (based on beam count) was recorded for 6-minute intervals over a period of 30 minutes. These data and the total activity over 30 minutes were reported.
CLINICAL LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
Blood samples from 5 lactating females from each group were obtained on day 5 post partum. Blood samples were drawn sublingually from all animals under light isoflurane anesthesia. The animals were fasted for approximately 18 hours before blood sampling but allowed access to water ad libitum. The samples were collected early in the working day to reduce biological variation caused by circadian rhythms.
The following hematology parameters were determined:
- Erythrocyte count
- Hemoglobin
- Hematocrit
- Mean corpuscular volume
- Red cell volume distribution width
- Mean corpuscular hemoglobin
- Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration
- Hemoglobin concentration distribution width
- Leukocyte count, total
- Differential leukocyte count
- Platelet count
- Prothrombin time (= Thromboplastin time)
- Activated partial Thromboplastin time
The following clinical biochemistry parameters were determined:
- Glucose
- Urea
- Creatinine
- Bilirubin, total
- Cholesterol, total
- Triglycerides
- Aspartate aminotransferase
- Alanine aminotransferase
- Alkaline phosphatase
- Gamma-glutamyl-transferase
- Bile acids
- Sodium
- Potassium
- Chloride
- Calcium
- Phosphorus
- Protein, total
- Albumin
- Globulin
- Albumin/Globulin ratio
TERMINATION AND NECROPSY
Dams were sacrificed on day 5 post partum. If birth did not occur on the expected date (day 21 post coitum), the dam was sacrificed on day 25 post coitum.
All animals sacrificed were subjected to a detailed macroscopic examination. Specimens of abnormal tissue were fixed in neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution. At the scheduled sacrifice, all animals were sacrificed by an injection of sodium pentobarbital. All P generation animals were exsanguinated. All parent animals were examined macroscopically for any structural changes. For the parent animals, special attention was directed at the organs of the reproductive system.The number of implantation sites and corpora lutea was recorded for all dams with litters. The uteri of non-pregnant females were placed in a solution of ammonium sulfide to visualize possible hemorrhagic areas of implantation sites.
ORGAN WEIGHTS
From 5 females sacrificed at the end of the study which were selected from each group, the following organs were trimmed from any adherent tissue, as appropriate, and their wet weight taken:
- Adrenal glands (weighed as pairs)
- Brain
- Heart
- Kidneys (weighed as pairs)
- Liver
- Thymus
- Spleen
TISSUE PRESERVATION
The following tissues from all parental females were preserved in neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution:
- Ovaries
In addition, from 5 females per group selected for organ weights, the following tissues were preserved in neutral phosphate buffered 4% formaldehyde solution:
- Gross lesions
- Brain (representative regions including cerebrum, cerebellum and pons)
- Spinal chord
- Small and large intestines (incl. Peyer’s patches)
- Stomach
- Liver
- Kidneys
- Adrenals
- Spleen
- Heart
- Thymus
- Thyroids, and parathyroids if possible
- Trachea and lungs (preserved by inflation with fixative and then immersion)
- Uterus (with vagina)
- Urinary bladder
- Lymph nodes (mesenterial, mandibular)
- Peripheral nerve (sciatic)
- Bone marrow
HISTOTECHNIQUE
All organ and tissue samples to be examined by the study pathologist were processed, embedded and cut at an approximate thickness of 2 - 4 micrometers and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Special stains were used at the discretion of the study pathologist.
HISTOPATHOLOGY
Slides of all organs and tissues listed collected at terminal sacrifice from the animals of the control and high-dose groups were examined by the study pathologist. The same applied to all occurring gross lesions.
Special emphasis was made on the histopathology of interstitial cell structure.
Histological examination of ovaries was carried out on any females that did not give birth.
A histopathology peer review was performed. A histopathology phase report was provided by the principal investigator which was included in the report. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterus were examined after termination on day 5 post partum. Examinations included the number of corpora lutea and the number of implantation sites.
- Fetal examinations:
- Not performed
- Statistics:
- The following statistical methods were used to analyze food consumption, body weights and reproduction data:
- Means and standard deviations of various data were calculated.
- The Dunnett-test (many to one t-test) based on a pooled variance estimate was applied if the variables could be assumed to follow a normal distribution for the comparison of the treated groups and the control groups for each sex.
- The Steel-test (many-one rank test) was applied instead of the Dunnett-test when the data could not be assumed to follow a normal distribution.
- Fisher's exact-test was applied when the variables could be dichotomized without loss of information. - Indices:
- From the on-line recorded reproduction data, the following parameters were calculated: fertility indices, mean precoital time, post-implantation losses, mean litter size, pup sex ratios and viability indices.
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Details on maternal toxic effects:
1. IN-LIFE DATA
VIABILITY / MORTALITY: All animals survived the scheduled study period.
DAILY CLINICAL SIGNS OR OBSERVATIONS
Red stained feces were noted in all females in all dose groups starting from day 2 of treatment until completion of the study with dose-related intensity of discoloration. This observation was due to staining properties of the test item.
No further test item-related clinical signs or observations were noted in females at any dose level.
FINDINGS AT DETAILED WEEKLY CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
No test item-related findings were noted during detailed weekly clinical observations.
FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL BATTERY
No test item-related findings were noted during the functional observational battery tests in females at any dose level.
Statistically significantly lower body temperature was In females, 38.5 °C was noted at the high-dose level, compared to 38.9 °C in the control group. The differences were only minor, not clearly dose dependent and all values remained in the historical control range. For these reasons, changes in body temperature were considered not to be test item-related.
No further findings were noted during functional observational battery in females at any dose level.
LOCOMOTOR ACTIVITY
No effects on locomotor activity were noted in females at any dose level.
Mean beam counts during the 30 minutes of measurement at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were respectively: 924, 882, 1002 and 1050 in females.
FOOD CONSUMPTION
No test item-related effects on food consumption were noted in females at any dose level.
Incidentally, statistically significantly higher food consumption was noted at the dose level of 100 mg/kg bw/day during lactation period. In the absence of an effect in females at the dose levels of 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, this difference was considered not to be related to the treatment.
Mean differences in food consumption at the dose levels 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were respectively: +5.9%, +2.7%, and +1.1% during the pre-pairing period, +7.0%, +2.5% and +2.9% during the gestation period and +23.2%, -5.9% and +11.0% during the lactation period (percentages refer to the respective values in the control group).
BODY WEIGHTS
Body weights and body weight gain of females were not affected by the treatment with the test item at any dose level.
On individual days some statistically significantly changed values of body weight gain were noted at the low-, mid- and high-dose levels. The changes did not follow a dose dependency and were therefore not related to treatment.
Mean differences in body weight gain at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were respectively: 5%, 7%, 6% and 7% during the pre-pairing period, 48%, 56%, 47% and 54% during the gestation period and 3%, 8%, 4% and 5% during the lactation period (percentages refer to the body weight change within the respective period).
2. CLINICAL LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS
HEMATOLOGY
No test item-related effects on hematology parameters were noted in females at any dose level.
In females, at the low-dose level, statistically significantly higher platelets count was noted in the absence of any increase of this value at the mid- and high-dose levels and therefore it was not test item-related.
No further changes of hematology parameters were noted in females at any dose level.
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
No test item-related effects on biochemistry parameters were noted in females at any dose level.
In females at the low dose level, following statistically significant changes were noted: higher concentration of cholesterol, higher concentration of globulin, and lower globulin to albumin ratio. These changes were not dose-dependent and therefore they were considered not to be test item-related.
No further changes of biochemistry parameters were noted in females at any dose level.
3. TERMINAL FINDINGS
ORGAN WEIGHTS
No changes in absolute organ weights or organ weights to body weights and to brain weights ratios were noted in females at any dose level.
MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS
Type and distribution of findings noted during macroscopical examination of females did not indicate any test item-related effect.
HISTOPATHOLOGY FINDINGS
Under the conditions of this experiment, treatment with the test item did not cause pathological findings. All findings recorded were within the range of normal background lesions which may be recorded in animals of this strain and age. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: developmental toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:not examined
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- This study is a valid investigation of the toxicological effects resulting from repeated oral-gavage administration of the test item to rats (according to OECD 422, GLP compliant). The test item was administered in vehicle (highly purified water) at dosages of 0, 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg body weight/day, animals in control groups received the vehicle only. The test item was administered to male rats for 28 days and to female rats for 14 days prior to pairing, through the pairing and gestation periods until the F1 generation reached day 4 post partum.
Under the conditions of this study, no adverse effects were found in males or females up to the highest dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
All animals survived the scheduled study period.
During the treatment, faeces stained red with dose-dependent intensity of discoloration were noted in all males and females receiving test material. This observation was due to staining properties of the test item.
No effects on food consumption were noted in males at any dose level. Body weight gain was slightly but statistically significantly reduced in males at the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day during the pre-pairing period. No differences in body weight gain were noted at any dose level during the remaining study period. Body weights of males in all dose groups were similar to the respective control values during the entire study period. Because lower body weight gain at the high-dose levels was reversible and did not cause significant changes in body weights, this effect was considered not to be adverse.
Food consumption, body weights and body weight gain of females were not affected by the treatment at any dose level.
No further test item-related observations were noted in males or females at any dose level during the live part of the study.
Terminal examinations revealed changes in motility of sperms in all dose groups. Statistically significant decrease in mean count of progressive sperms was noted at the dose levels of 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, statistically significant increase in mean count of stationary sperms was noted at the dose levels of 100 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day and statistically significant increase in mean count in not motile sperms was noted at the dose levels of 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. However a significant dose dependent trend indicated by probability values of <0.05 was not established for any of these changes when performing a linear regression analysis (least squares).
No further effects on male reproductive system were noted during the study. Sperm morphology and sperm count at the high-dose level was similar to the control values. Weights of male reproductive organs, macroscopical and histopathological examination of testes and epididymides gave no indication of any treatment-related effect. Further, no indication of effects on reproduction was noted within this study up to and including the highest dose level. For this reason, changes in motility of sperms were considered not to be adverse in this study.
Reproduction and development were not affected by the treatment. Mating performance, fertility, duration of gestation, corpora lutea count, implantation rate, post implantation and postnatal loss or litter size were similar in the control and all dose groups. There were no test item-related findings in pups noted during the first litter check, the first 4 days post partum or during the necropsy, pups body weights and body weight gain were not affected by the treatment at any dose level.
Based on these results, the NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) for general toxicity in males and females and for reproduction/developmental toxicity in this study was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dose level used. - Executive summary:
The purpose of this study was to generatepreliminary information concerning the effects of test material on the possible health hazards likely to arise from repeated exposure over a relatively limited period of time. In addition it provides information on possible effects on male and female reproductive performance such as gonadal function, mating behavior, conception, development of the conceptus and parturition.
The test item was administered to male rats for 39 days and to female rats for 14 days prior to pairing, through the pairing and gestation periods until the F1 generation reached day 4 post partum.
The following dose levels were applied:
Group 1: 0 mg/kg body weight/day (control group)
Group 2: 100 mg/kg body weight/day
Group 3: 300 mg/kg body weight/day
Group 4: 1000 mg/kg body weight/day
A standard dose volume of 10 mL/kg body weight with a daily adjustment to the actual body weight was used. Control animals were dosed with the vehicle alone (highly purified water).
The following results were obtained:
MORTALITY AND GENERAL TOLERABILITY OF PARENTAL ANIMALS
All animals survived the scheduled study period.
Feces stained red with dose-dependent intensity of discoloration were noted in all males and females in all dose groups starting from day 2 of the treatment until completion of the study. This observation was due to staining properties of the test item.
No further test item-related clinical signs or observations were noted in males or females at any dose level.
FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL BATTERY IN PARENTAL ANIMALS
No test item-related findings were noted during the functional observational battery tests in males or females at any dose level.
FOOD CONSUMPTION OF PARENTAL ANIMALS
No effects on food consumption were noted in males or females at any dose level.
BODY WEIGHTS OF PARENTAL ANIMALS
In males at the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, a slight but statistically significant lower body weight gain was noted during the pre-pairing period. No differences in body weight gain were noted at any dose level during the remaining study period. Body weights of males in all dose groups were similar to the respective control values during the entire study period. Because reduction in body weight gain at the high-dose levels was reversible and did not cause significant changes in body weights, this effect was considered not to be adverse.
Body weights and body weight gain of females were not affected by the treatment at any dose level.
CLINICAL LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS IN PARENTAL ANIMALS
No test item-related effects on hematology and clinical biochemistry parameters were noted in males or females at any dose level.
No changes in urine parameters were noted in males at any dose level.
REPRODUCTION AND BREEDING DATA
Mating performance, fertility, corpora lutea count, duration of gestation, implantation rate and post-implantation loss, litter size or postnatal loss were not affected by the treatment with the test item.
SEMINOLOGY AND SPERMATID COUNT IN PARENTAL MALES
Effects on sperm motility which might be test item-related were noted in all dose groups. Mean count of progressive sperms was statistically significantly reduced at the dose levels of 1000, 300 and 100 mg/kg bw/day, mean count of stationary sperms was statistically significantly increased at the dose levels of 1000 and 100 mg/kg bw/day and mean count of not motile sperms was statistically significantly increased at the dose level of 1000 and 300 mg/kg bw/day. But a significant dose dependent trend couldn’t be established.
In the absence of any findings during necropsy or histopathological examination of male reproductive organs as well as in the absence of any effects on reproduction, the differences in sperm motility were considered not to be adverse.
ORGAN WEIGHTS OF PARENTAL ANIMALS
No changes in absolute organ weights or organ weights to body weights and to brain weights ratios were noted in males or females at any dose level.
MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL EXAMINATIONS OF PARENTAL ANIMALS
Type and distribution of findings noted during macroscopical examination did not indicate any test item-related effect.
Treatment with test item did not cause pathological findings. All findings recorded were within the range of normal background lesions which may be recorded in animals of this strain and age.
FINDINGS IN PUPS AT FIRST LITTER CHECK AND DURING LACTATION
No test item-related findings were noted in pups during first litter check and during lactation at any dose level.
Pups sex ratio was not affected by the exposure to the test item at any dose level.
PUP WEIGHTS TO DAY 4 POST PARTUM
Body Weights and body weight gain of pups were not affected by the treatment with the test item at any dose level.
MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS OF PUPS
No test item-related findings were noted at macroscopic examination of pups at any dose level.
CONCLUSION
Based on these results, the NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) for general toxicity in males and females and for reproduction/developmental toxicity in this study was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day, the highest dose level used.
Referenceopen allclose all
TABLE 1. Summary of Maternal Survival, Pregnancy Status and Fetus Disposition
Group No. Parameters Dose (mg/kg/day) | G1 0 | G2 111 | G3 333 | G4 1000 |
Total No. of rats found sperm positive / group | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 |
Duration of treatment |
| GD 5 to 19 (total 15 days) |
| |
Caesarean section (day of presumed gestation) |
| GD 20 |
| |
Number of rats sacrificed at caesarean section | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 |
Number. of rats non-pregnant at caesarean section | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
Number of rats pregnant at caesarean section | 23 | 21 | 24 | 23 |
Number of litters examined | 23 | 21 | 24 | 23 |
Total number of fetuses | 315 | 284 | 352 | 332 |
Total number of dead fetuses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of fetuses evaluated a. External examination |
315 |
284 |
352 |
332 |
b. Visceral examination | 152 | 137 | 172 | 159 |
c. Skeletal examination | 163 | 147 | 180 | 173 |
TABLE 3. Summary of Maternal Body Weight of Pregnant Rats
Sex: Female | Day(s) Relative to Mating | G1 0 mg/kg/day | G2 111 mg/kg/day | G3 333 mg/kg/day | G4 1000 mg/kg/day | |
Body Weight (g) | 0 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 251.75 16.44 23 - | 253.71 16.08 21 0.78 | 252.67 18.29 24 0.37 | 253.98 16.09 23 0.89 |
3 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 269.53 18.24 23 - | 268.36 17.20 21 -0.44 | 270.00 15.98 24 0.17 | 270.84 16.72 23 0.48 | |
5 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 278.82 18.87 23 - | 278.00 17.29 21 -0.29 | 277.08 14.82 24 -0.62 | 278.75 15.92 23 -0.03 | |
8 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 290.09 18.58 23 - | 288.73 19.12 21 -0.47 | 288.48 16.17 24 -0.56 | 290.29 16.40 23 0.07 | |
11 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 305.64 20.35 23 - | 303.84 19.22 21 -0.59 | 306.62 16.97 24 0.32 | 308.14 17.92 23 0.82 | |
14 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 321.97 20.18 23 - | 322.06 20.98 21 0.03 | 324.71 17.77 24 0.85 | 325.03 18.73 23 0.95 | |
17 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 354.81 24.31 23 - | 355.93 21.77 21 0.31 | 359.51 19.59 24 1.32 | 360.57 19.33 23 1.62 | |
20 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 406.10 29.81 23 - | 405.36 27.69 21 -0.18 | 408.60 24.29 24 0.62 | 411.19 21.33 23 1.26 |
TABLE 4. Summary of Maternal Body Weight Gain of Pregnant Rats
Sex: Female | Day(s) Relative to Mating | G1 0 mg/kg/day | G2 111 mg/kg/day | G3 333 mg/kg/day | G4 1000 mg/kg/day | |
Absolute Wei ght Gain (g) | 0 → 3 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 17.78 7.37 23 . | 14.65 4.29 21 -17.65 | 17.33 6.81 24 -2.56 | 16.85 3.97 23 -5.23 |
3 → 5 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 9.28 7.48 23 . | 9.64 3.47 21 3.82 | 7.08 4.79 24 -23.71 | 7.91 5.10 23 -14.80 | |
5 → 8 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 11.27 3.96 23 . | 10.73 3.53 21 -4.78 | 11.40 4.27 24 1.10 | 11.54 4.68 23 2.39 | |
8 → 11 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 15.55 4.70 23 . | 15.10 4.00 21 -2.88 | 18.14 4.52 24 16.63 | 17.85 4.51 23 14.80 | |
11 → 14 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 16.32 4.54 23 . | 18.23 3.86 21 11.65 | 18.09 5.56 24 10.83 | 16.89 5.39 23 3.44 | |
14 → 17 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 32.84 7.99 23 . | 33.87 7.05 21 3.12 | 34.79 9.40 24 5.94 | 35.54 12.79 23 8.20 | |
17 → 20 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 51.28 9.75 23 . | 49.43 8.61 21 -3.62 | 49.10 11.98 24 -4.26 | 50.63 11.05 23 -1.28 |
Sex: Female | Day(s) Relative to Mating | G1 0 mg/kg/day | G2 111 mg/kg/day | G3 333 mg/kg/day | G4 1000 mg/kg/day | |
Absolute Weight Gain (g) | 0 → 5 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 27.07 10.81 23 . | 24.29 4.70 21 -10.28 | 24.41 7.69 24 -9.82 | 24.76 5.36 23 -8.51 |
5 → 20 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 127.28 17.71 23 . | 127.36 17.31 21 0.06 | 131.52 16.57 24 3.33 | 132.45 12.40 23 4.06 | |
0 → 20 [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 154.35 21.67 23 . | 151.64 19.49 21 -1.75 | 155.93 18.28 24 1.03 | 157.21 14.81 23 1.86 | |
Adjusted Body weight (g) | GD20 - GU WT [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 321.91 19.51 23 . | 319.50 21.72 21 -0.75 | 319.77 20.49 24 -0.67 | 323.23 17.42 23 0.41 |
Adjusted Body weight Gain (g) | ADJ BWT- GD5BWT [a] | Mean SD N %Diff | 43.10 11.26 23 . | 41.51 6.50 21 -3.69 | 42.69 12.01 24 -0.95 | 44.48 8.44 23 3.21 |
GU WT: Gravid Uterus Weight ADJ BWT: Adjusted Body Weight
TABLE 6. Summary of Maternal Data
Sex: Female Day(s) Relative to Mating |
| G1 0 mg/kg/day | G2 111 mg/kg/day | G3 333 mg/kg/day | G4 1000 mg/kg/day | |
Group size |
| N | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 |
Pregnant at C/S |
| N | 23 | 21 | 24 | 23 |
Gravid Uterus Weight | [a] | Mean SD | 84.183 19.582 | 85.852 17.355 | 88.837 15.053 | 87.965 14.543 |
Number of CorporaLutea | [k] | Mean SD Sum | 16.4 1.8 377 | 16.2 2.0 340 | 17.3 2.1 414 | 16.7 2.3 384 |
No. of Implantation | [k] | Mean SD Sum | 14.7 2.4 338 | 14.7 2.9 308 | 15.8 2.1 380 | 15.2 2.6 349 |
Dams with Early Resorption |
| N | 10 | 13 | 10 | 12 |
Number of Early Resorptions | [k] | Mean SD Sum | 0.8 1.4 19 | 0.8 0.7 17 | 0.9 1.4 22 | 0.7 0.9 17 |
% Early Resorption /Animal | [k] | Mean SD | 6.88 15.80 | 6.24 6.14 | 5.72 9.00 | 4.92 5.92 |
Dams with Late Resorption |
| N | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
Number of Late Resorptions | [k] | Mean SD Sum | 0.2 0.5 4 | 0.3 0.7 7 | 0.3 0.5 6 | 0.0 0.0 0 |
% Late Resorption /Animal | [k] | Mean SD | 1.16 3.27 | 2.15 4.81 | 1.76 3.72 | 0.00 0.00 |
Dams with Resorptions | [f] | N | 11 | 15 | 13 | 12 |
Total Number of Resorption (Early + Late) | [f] | Mean SD Sum | 1.0 1.5 23 | 1.1 1.2 24 | 1.2 1.7 28 | 0.7 0.9 17 |
Pre-implantation Loss/Animal | [k] | Mean SD | 1.70 1.64
| 1.52 1.78
| 1.42 1.32
| 1.52 1.62
|
% Preimplantation Loss | [k] | Mean SD | 10.4 10.7 | 9.9 13.3 | 8.1 7.1 | 9.1 10.3 |
Postimplantation Loss/Animal | [k] | Mean SD | 1.00 1.51
| 1.14 1.20
| 1.17 1.74
| 0.74 0.86
|
% Postimplantation Loss (%) | [k] | Mean SD | 8.0 16.1 | 8.4 8.4 | 7.5 11.2 | 4.9 5.9 |
Note: Gross evaluation of placenta revealed no findings
[a] - Anova & Dunnett(Log)
[k] - Kruskal-Wallis & Wilcoxon
[f] - Cochran Armitage, Chi-Squared & Fisher's Exact
TABLE 7. Summary of Litter Data
Sex: Female Day(s) Relative to M | ating |
| G1 0 mg/kg/day | G2 111 mg/kg/day | G3 333 mg/kg/day | G4 1000 mg/kg/day |
Total Number of fetuses |
| Sum | 315 | 284 | 352 | 332 |
Total Number of Dead Fetuses |
| Sum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total Number of Live fetuses |
| Sum | 315 | 284 | 352 | 332 |
Live Male fetus |
| Sum | 173 | 158 | 187 | 159 |
% Male Fetus |
|
| 54.9 | 55.6 | 53.1 | 47.9 |
Mean Fetal Weight- Male (g) | [c] | Mean SD | 4.01 0.33 | 4.29* 0.33 | 4.10 0.24 | 4.08 0.32 |
Mean AGD- Male (mm) | [c] | Mean SD | 2.74 0.11 | 2.75 0.11 | 2.71 0.16 | 2.78 0.20 |
Live Female fetus |
| Sum | 142 | 126 | 165 | 173 |
% Female Fetus |
|
| 45.1 | 44.4 | 46.9 | 52.1 |
Mean Fetal Weight- Female (g) | [c1] | Mean SD | 3.78 0.31 | 4.03* 0.27 | 3.85 0.23 | 3.79 0.27 |
Mean AGD- Female (mm) | [c1] | Mean SD | 1.07 0.07 | 1.08 0.08 | 1.07 0.10 | 1.06 0.06 |
Mean Fetal Weight -Male+Female (g) | [c2] | Mean SD | 3.91 0.30 | 4.17* 0.28 | 3.99 0.23 | 3.94 0.31 |
Mean AGD Male + Female (mm) | [c2] | Mean SD | 1.98 0.24 | 2.02 0.19 | 1.95 0.26 | 1.87 0.30 |
[c] - Ancova/Anova & Dunnett; {Covariate(s): Number of Live Male Fetuses}
[c1] - Ancova/Anova & Dunnett; Covariate(s): Number of Live Female Fetuses}
[c2] - Ancova/Anova & Dunnett; Covariate(s): Number of Live Fetuses}
*: Statistically significant different from vehicle control at p < 0.05
TABLE 8. Summary of Fetal External Observations
Exam Type: External |
Number of Live Fetuses Examined: | G1 0 mg/kg/day | G2 111 mg/kg/day | G3 333 mg/kg/day | G4 1000 mg/kg/day | |
315 | 284 | 352 | 332 | |||
| Number of Litters Evaluated: | 23 | 21 | 24 | 23 | |
Limbs Tail, Rudimentary - Anomaly |
| Fetuses N(%) | 1(0.3) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.3) | 0(0.0) |
|
| Litters N(%) | 1(4.3) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.2) | 0(0.0) |
[Fetuses N]
TABLE 9. Summary of Fetal External Observations
Exam Type: Fresh Visceral-Body Only |
Number of Live Fetuses Examined: | G1 0 mg/kg/day | G2 111 mg/kg/day | G3 333 mg/kg/day | G4 1000 mg/kg/day | |
152 | 137 | 172 | 159 | |||
| Number of Litters Ev aluated: | 23 | 21 | 24 | 23 | |
Abdomen Kidney, both, Renal pelvis dilation, Moderate - Anomaly |
| Fetuses N(%) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.6) | 3(1.9) |
|
| Litters N(%) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.2) | 2(8.7) |
Kidney, Right, Renal pelvis dilation, Moderate - Anomaly |
| Fetuses N(%) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.6) |
|
| Litters N(%) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.3) |
[Fetuses N]
TABLE 10. Summary of Fetal Skeletal Observations
Exam Type: Skeletal-Entire |
Number of Live Fetuses Examined: | G1 0 mg/kg/day | G2 111 mg/kg/day | G3 333 mg/kg/day | G4 1000 mg/kg/day | |
163 | 147 | 180 | 173 | |||
| Number of Litters Evaluated: | 23 | 21 | 24 | 23 | |
Caudal vertebrae 4th caudal centrum, Absent - Malformation |
| Fetuses N(%) | 1(0.6) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.6) | 0(0.0) |
|
| Litters N(%) | 1(4.3) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.2) | 0(0.0) |
3rd caudal centrum, Absent - Malformation |
| Fetuses N(%) | 1(0.6) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.6) | 0(0.0) |
|
| Litters N(%) | 1(4.3) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.2) | 0(0.0) |
2nd caudal centrum, Absent - Malformation |
| Fetuses N(%) | 1(0.6) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.6) | 0(0.0) |
|
| Litters N(%) | 1(4.3) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.2) | 0(0.0) |
1st caudal centrum, Absent - Malformation |
| Fetuses N(%) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.6) | 0(0.0) |
|
| Litters N(%) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.2) | 0(0.0) |
2nd caudal arch, Absent - Malformation |
| Fetuses N(%) | 1(0.6) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.6) | 0(0.0) |
|
| Litters N(%) | 1(4.3) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.2) | 0(0.0) |
1st caudal arch, Absent - Malformation |
| Fetuses N(%) | 1(0.6) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.6) | 0(0.0) |
|
| Litters N(%) | 1(4.3) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.2) | 0(0.0) |
sacral vertebrae 4th sacral arch, Incomplete ossification - Variation |
| Fetuses N(%) | 1(0.6) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
|
| Litters N(%) | 1(4.3) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
Lumbar vertebrae 1st lumbar centrum, Dumbbell-shaped - Anomaly |
| Fetuses N(%) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.7) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
|
| Litters N(%) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.8) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) |
thoracic vertebrae 13th thoracic centrum, Split - Anomaly |
| Fetuses N(%) | 0(0.0) | 1(0.7) | 1(0.6) | 0(0.0) |
|
| Litters N(%) | 0(0.0) | 1(4.8) | 1(4.2) | 0(0.0) |
[Fetuses N]
1. REPRODUCTION, BREEDING AND PUP DATA
SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE
P Animals Breeding for F1 Litters
Group |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
Female numbers |
45-55 |
56-66 |
67-77 |
78-88 |
Number of females paired |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
Number of females mated |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
Number of non pregnant females (A) |
3 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
Numbers of pregnant females, |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Number of females which reared their pups until day 4 post partum |
8 |
10 |
8 |
10 |
(A) Female Nos. 45, 46, 55, 62, 74, 75 and 77.
(B) Female No. 85 had implantations only.
MATING PERFORMANCE AND FERTILITY
Mating performance and fertility were not affected by the treatment at any dose level.
All females in groups 2, 3 and 4 mated within the first pairing period. In group 1, one female (no. 54) was mated during the second pairing period.
Mean (median) precoital times were 4.5 (3), 2.5 (3), 4.0 (2) and 2.6 (3) days at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively.
Seven females were not pregnant: three in the control group and in the mid-dose level and one in the low-dose level. Consequently, fertility indexes (number of females pregnant as percentages of females paired) and conception rate (number of females pregnant as percentages of females mated) were 72.7%, 90.9%, 72.7% and 100.0% at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively.
One female at the high dose level had one implantation site but delivered no pups. Consequently, gestation index (number of females with living pups as percentages of females pregnant) was 100% in the control group and at low- and mid-dose levels and 90.9% at the high-dose level.
CORPORA LUTEA COUNT
No test item-related effects on corpora lutea count were observed at any dose level.
Mean number of corpora lutea per dam was 16.0, 17.2, 16.3 and 18.4 in order of ascending dose levels.
DURATION OF GESTATION
No effects on duration of gestation were observed at any dose level.
Mean duration of gestation was 21.6, 21.6, 21.5 and 21.7 days, in order of ascending dose level.
IMPLANTATION RATE AND POST-IMPLANTATION LOSS
No effects on implantation rate and post-implantation loss were observed at any dose level.
In order of ascending dose levels, mean number of implantations per dam was 12.6, 14.9, 12.6 and 14.0 whereas mean incidence of post-implantation loss per dam was 1.5, 0.8, 0.6 and 0.5 per dam.
LITTER SIZE AT FIRST LITTER CHECK
No effects on litter size were noted at any dose level.
During the first litter check, one dead pup was found in a litter at the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day. Because of isolated occurrence, this finding was considered to be incidental.
Mean number of living pups per dam at first litter check was 11.1, 14.3, 12.0 and 13.5 in order of ascending dose levels.
Birth index (number of pups born alive as a percentage of implantations) was 88.1%, 94.8%, 95.0% and 96.4% at the dose level of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Birth index at the dose level of 1000 mg kg bw/day was statistically significantly higher than the respective control value. This was considered to be a result of biological variability.
POSTNATAL LOSS DAYS 0 - 4 POST PARTUM
No test item-related effects on postnatal loss were noted at any dose level.
In the control group one pup was missing on day 4, at the low-dose level one pup was missing on day 2, at the mid dose level three pups (from two litters) were missing on day 2 and at the high dose level no postnatal loss was noted in any litter.
Mean postnatal loss per dam during four days of lactation was 0.1%, 0.1%, 0.4% and 0.0% at the dose level of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively. Consequently, viability index (number of pups alive at termination on day 4 p.p. as a percentage of pups born alive) was 98.9%, 99.3%, 96.9% and 100% in order of ascending dose levels.
EXTERNAL EXAMINATION OF PUPS AT FIRST LITTER CHECK AND DURING LACTATION
No test item-related findings were noted in pups during first litter check and during lactation at any dose level.
Incidentally, one pup in the control group was found with a wound and missing tail tip, two further pups, each one at the low- and mid-dose levels, had a wound at first litter check. These findings were also noted during the remaining lactation period.
SEX RATIOS OF PUPS
Pups sex ratio was not affected by exposure to the test item at any dose level.
At first litter check, percentages of male pups were 56%, 48%, 51% and 56% at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
BODY WEIGHTS OF PUPS TO DAY 4 POST PARTUM
Body weights and body weight gain of pups were not affected by the treatment with the test item at any dose level.
Mean body weights of pups on day 1 post partum were: 6.4 g, 6.1 g, 6.4 and 6.2 g and mean differences in body weights during lactation were +49.9%, +43.6%, +47.8% and +42.6%, at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg/day, respectively.
At the dose levels of 100 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day, slightly not statistically significantly lower body weight gain of pups was noted. This effect was considered to be due to a higher number of pups at these dose levels which was supported by observation that reduction of body weight gain was more pronounced in litters of higher size. Therefore this effect was considered not to be test item-related.
MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS IN PUPS
No test item-related findings were noted at macroscopic examination of pups at any dose level.
Incidentally, in the control group one pup had a sore in the thoraco-dorsal region, one further pup in this group had a missing tail tip. These findings were already recorded during the in life phase. At the high-dose level, one pup had a watery cyst in the left kidney.
No further findings were noted in pups at any dose level.
2. IN-LIFE DATA OF PARENTAL MALES
VIABILITY / MORTALITY
All animals survived the scheduled study period.
DAILY CLINICAL SIGNS OR OBSERVATIONS
Red stained feces were noted in all males in all dose groups starting from day 2 of treatment until completion of the study with dose-related intensity of discoloration. This observation was due to staining properties of the test item.
No further test item-related clinical signs or observations were noted in males at any dose level.
Incidentally, in one male (no. 16) at the dose level of 100 mg/kg bw/day chromodacryorrhea was noted during the study (starting on day 1 of the pre-pairing period) and eye reduced in size was noted in the same animal from day 13 of the pre-pairing period.
No further test item-related findings were noted at any dose level.
FINDINGS AT DETAILED WEEKLY CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS
No test item-related findings were noted during detailed weekly clinical observations.
The only findings noted were chromodacryorrhea and eye reduced in size in male no. 16 at the dose level of 100 mg/kg bw/day recorded already during the daily clinical observations.
FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL BATTERY
No test item-related findings were noted during the functional observational battery tests in males at any dose level.
Statistically significantly lower body temperature was noted. In males mean body temperature was 37.9 °C and 37.8 °C at the high- and mid-dose levels, respectively, compared to 38.4 °C in the control group. The differences noted were only minor, not clearly dose dependent and all values remained in the historical control range. For these reasons, changes in body temperature were considered not to be test item-related.
No further findings were noted during functional observational battery in males at any dose level except for the eye findings in male no. 16 at 100 mg/kg bw/day.
LOCOMOTOR ACTIVITY
No effects on locomotor activity were noted in males at any dose level.
Mean beam counts during the 30 minutes of measurement at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were respectively: 1255, 1137, 1219 and 1209 in males.
FOOD CONSUMPTION OF MALES
No effects on food consumption were noted in males at any dose level.
Mean differences in food consumption at the dose levels 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were respectively: +1.1%, -3.4% and -3.4% during the pre-pairing period and -1.5%, -3.1% and -3.8% during the after pairing period (percentages refer to the respective values in the control group).
BODY WEIGHTS OF MALES
At the dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day, a slightly lower body weight gain when compared to the controls was noted during the pre-pairing period. Mean body weight gain within this period was +10%, compared to +13% in the control group. The difference in body weight gain was statistically significant during most days starting from day 3 until the end of the pre-pairing period. This effect was considered to be test item-related. During the pairing and after pairing periods, body weight gain was similar at all dose levels.
No significant changes in body weights were noted in males at any time during the study.
Because the lower body weight gain at the high-dose level was reversible despite the fact that treatment continued and did not result in any significant changes in body weights, this finding was considered not to be adverse.
No significant changes in body weight gain or body weights were noted in males at the dose levels of 100 and 300 mg/kg bw/day.
Mean differences in body weight gain at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day were respectively: +13%, +13%, +11% and +10% during the pre-pairing period, +10%, +10%, +9% and +9% during the pairing period and +7%, +6%, +7% and +6% during the after pairing period (percentages refer to the body weight change within the respective period).
3. CLINICAL LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS IN PARENTAL MALES
HEMATOLOGY
No test item-related effects on hematology parameters were noted in males at any dose level.
In males, statistically significant changes of several parameters: higher distribution width of red cell volume (RDW) at the low-dose level and higher distribution width of hemoglobin concentration (HDW) at the low- and mid-dose levels occurred in the absence of an effect at the high dose and therefore were considered not to be test item-related.
No further changes of hematology parameters were noted in males at any dose level.
CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
No test item-related effects on biochemistry parameters were noted in males at any dose level.
In males, at the mid-dose level, statistically significantly lower concentration of triglycerides was noted. In the absence of dose dependency, this finding was not test item-related.
No further changes of biochemistry parameters were noted in males at any dose level.
URINALYSIS
No changes in urine parameters were noted in males at any dose level.
4. TERMINAL FINDINGS IN PARENTAL MALES
SEMINOLOGY AND SPERMATID COUNT
In all dose groups, statistically significant changes in motility of sperms were noted. Following values were assessed in sperm samples at the dose levels of 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day respectively: 81.1%, 64.6%, 57.3% and 47.5% of progressive sperms (changes were statistically significant in all dose groups), 3.7%, 11.3%, 6.0% and 11.9% of stationary sperms (changes were statistically significant at the dose levels of 1000 and 100 mg/kg bw/day) and 15.2%, 24.1, 36.7 and 40.6% of not motile sperms (changes were statistically significant at the dose levels of 1000 and 300 mg/kg bw/day). These changes might be test item-related. However no significant dose dependent trend indicated by probability values of <0.05 was determined for any of these changes when performing a linear regression analysis (least squares).
No further changes were noted during sperm analysis. At the high-dose level, all morphological categories of sperms were represented with similar frequency to that in the control group whereas sperm count was similar to the respective control values in samples from both testis and epididymidis.
ORGAN WEIGHTS
No changes in absolute organ weights or organ weights to body weights and to brain weights ratios were noted in males at any dose level.
MACROSCOPICAL FINDINGS
Type and distribution of findings noted during macroscopical examination of males did not indicate any test item-related effect.
HISTOPATHOLOGY FINDINGS
Under the conditions of this experiment, treatment with the test item did not cause pathological findings. All findings recorded were within the range of normal background lesions which may be recorded in animals of this strain and age.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Valid, Studies according to OECD 422 and 414, GLP
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
No classification, no relevant adverse effects observed
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.