Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 217-568-2 | CAS number: 1889-67-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 19 June 2015 and 21 April 2016
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- (2001)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.31 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- (2008)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- (2008)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,1'-(1,1,2,2-tetramethylethylene)dibenzene
- EC Number:
- 217-568-2
- EC Name:
- 1,1'-(1,1,2,2-tetramethylethylene)dibenzene
- Cas Number:
- 1889-67-4
- Molecular formula:
- C18H22
- IUPAC Name:
- (2,3-dimethyl-3-phenylbutan-2-yl)benzene
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Toxi-Coop Zrt.,1103 Budapest Cserkesz u. 90., Hungary
- Age at study initiation: females (9 weeks of age at start of the mating period), males (33-35 weeks of age at start of the mating period)
- Weight at study initiation: 160-193 g
- Housing: before mating: 1-3 females per cage, 1-2 males per cage; mating: 1 male and 1-3 females/cage; during gestation: 2 sperm positive females per cage
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days for females, 174 days for males
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 - 22
- Humidity (%): 48 - 59
- Air changes (per hr): 10 -15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours daily, from 6.00 a.m. to 6.00 p.m.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: sunflower oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The test item was formulated in the vehicle (sunflower oil) in concentrations of 15 mg/mL, 5 mg/mL and 1.5 mg/mL. Formulations were prepared in the formulation laboratory of the Test Facility less than three days before use and stored at 5 ± 3°C.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle: The test item was not soluble in water. Therefore sunflower oil was used for preparing formulations appropriate for oral administration. Sunflower oil was a suitable vehicle to facilitate formulation analysis for the test item.
- Concentration in vehicle: 1.5, 5 and 15 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle: 2 mL/kg - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Analytical control of the dosing solutions (control of concentration) was performed in the Analytical Laboratory of the Test Facility two times during the study. Five samples from different places were taken from each concentration for analysis of concentration and homogeneity on two occasions. Similarly, five samples were taken from the vehicle and analyzed. The suitability of the chosen vehicle for the test item was analytically proven. Recovery was between 101 and 98 % of nominal concentrations at 1 and 200 mg/mL in sunflower oil, respectively.
HPLC Conditions:
Detector: 220 nm
Column: Purospher STAR RP-18e 30-2 mm, 3 μm No.: 014664
Mobil Phase: Acetonitrile : water = 60 : 40 (v/v)
Flow Rate: 0.5 mL/min
Injection volume: 5 μL
Temperature: 25 °C
Retention time of CUROX®CC-DC: 4 min
Run time: 6 minutes - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- M/F ratio per cage:1:1 to 1:3
- Length of cohabitation: The females were paired to males in the morning for two to four hours (one male: one to three females) until the number of sperm positive females per group reached at least twenty two.
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug and/or sperm in the vaginal smear - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The sperm positive females were treated from gestational day 5 to 19.
- Frequency of treatment:
- 7 days/week every day at a similar time
- Duration of test:
- All sperm positive females were sacrificed by decapitation after anesthesia with Isofluranum on gestation day 20.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 0 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- vehicle control
- Dose / conc.:
- 3 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 30 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 22 sperm positive females per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The dose setting with 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg bw/day was based on findings obtained in a previous repeated dose toxicity studies with CUROX®CC-DC in the rat (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test with CCDFB-90 in the Rat; OECD 422; GLP, study no. 552.422.2950).
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: once daily (observations for signs of morbidity and mortality were made twice daily, at the beginning and end of the working day)
- Examinations: signs of morbidity, mortality, toxicity as well as behaviour and general conditions
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Body weight of sperm positive females was measured on gestation days 0, 3, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17 and 20. The corrected body weight was calculated for the 20th day of pregnancy (body weight on day 20 minus the weight of the gravid uterus).
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Time schedule: between gestation days 0 to 3, 3 to 5, 5 to 8, 8 to 11, 11 to 14, 14 to 17 and 17 to 20 by re-weighing the non-consumed diet
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20
- Organs examined: uterus with cervix and ovary
OTHER:
- Examination of placental signs: All sperm positive animals were examined for vaginal bleeding (placental sign of gestation) on gestational day 13. If negative on day 13, the examination was repeated on day 14 of gestation. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all live fetuses per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Head examinations: Yes: half per litter - Statistics:
- The homogeneity of variance between groups was checked by Bartlett’s test. Where no significant heterogeneity was detected, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out. If the obtained result was significant, Duncan’s Multiple Range test was used to assess the significance of inter-group differences. If significance was the result of the Bartlett’s test, the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance was used and the inter-group comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U-test.
- Historical control data:
- The results were compared to the laboratory historical control data.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no clinical signs observed.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- None of the animals died before scheduled necropsy.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In the 30 mg/kg bw/day group, the body weight was significantly reduced (5-10%) from gestation day 8 until the end of the in-life phase compared to the control group. The body weight gain of these animals was also significantly lower between gestation days 5 and 11, 17 and 20 as well as for gestation days 0 to 20. The corrected body weight and body weight gain was statistically significantly lower in the 30 mg/kg bw/day group.
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- In the 30 mg/kg bw/day group, the food consumption was significantly reduced (12 to 24%) from gestational days 5 – 11 and 14 – 17. This reduction was attributed to the treatment.
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no macroscopic alterations recorded for the maternal animals.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not examined
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- There was no effect indicated related to the administration of the test item in the mean percentage of pre-implantation loss, early embryonic, late- and fetal death, the mean number of implantations, the sex distribution of the fetuses as well as in the mean number of viable fetuses in the test item groups.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
Maternal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The body weight of the fetuses was slightly but statistically significantly lower in the 30 mg/kg bw/day group versus control. Although the values were within the historical control range (3.0-3.5 g for controls and 2.8-3.5 g if combined with inactive treatments) this reduction was considered to be treatment-related and may be due to the moderate maternal toxicity.
The placental weight (654.9-747.5 mg) was statistically significantly lower in all test item groups than in the controls but stayed within the historical control range or slightly below. Moreover, the control values were slightly above the historical control level. The relative placental weight was statistically significantly lower in the 10 and 30 mg/kg bw/day groups than in the control but within the historical control range (186.9-234.4 mg/g). The statistically significantly lower placental weight values were attributed to the slightly higher current control values. - Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no malformed fetuses found at external examination.
Body weight retardation (below 2.74 g for males and 2.64 g for females) was evaluated as an external variation. The incidence of body weight retarded fetuses increased moderately and statistically significantly in the 30 mg/kg bw/day dose group, which was attributed to the treatment and might be a consequence of the moderate maternal toxicity.
Placental changes such as fibrinoid degenerated and fused placentas were found with a low incidence and unrelated to the treatment. - Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Skeletal malformations were found in two control fetuses (bent vertebral column and misaligned spinous process in one and bent scapula as well as short and slightly bent humerus).
The following variations were evaluated: incompletely or not ossified skull bones, incompletely or not ossified, misaligned or bipartite sternebra, wavy ribs, dumb-bell shaped, bipartite, asymmetrically ossified vertebral centra or slightly dumb-bell shaped cartilage, lumbar/sacral asymmetric pelvic articulation, incomplete ossification of pubic bones, slightly bent femur and asymmetric or incomplete ossification of metacarpal and metatarsal. There were no significant increases in the incidence of the skeletal variations in the test item treated groups. - Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Malformation in the form of enlarged perimeningeal space and impressed cerebral hemisphere were found in two fetuses at 10 mg/kg bw/day and in one fetus at 30 mg/kg bw/day, respectively. In addition, a dilated 3rd brain ventricle was observed in another fetus in the 30 mg/kg bw/day group. Variations in the form of slightly dilated lateral ventricles were recorded for one fetus each in the control and in the 3 mg/kg bw/day group.
However, according to the laboratory historical control data similar or identical brain alterations in the form of slightly dilated lateral brain vehicles, slightly dilated 3rd ventricle and enlarged perimeningeal space occurred also in control fetuses with low incidence. Therefore and based on the single occurrence the more than slightly dilated 3rd brain ventricle was finally considered as incidental observation. In addition, there was no dose-response relationship in the incidence of fetuses with enlarged perimeningeal spaces and impressed cerebral hemispheres. Hence, all brain findings were finally judged to be not related to the treatment.
Hydroureter (uni- or bilateral) was evaluated as a variation and was found in the experimental groups without any dose-response relationship. A slightly malpositioned kidney was observed in one fetus in the 10 mg/kg bw/day group. This finding occurs sporadically in control fetuses according to the laboratory historical database. - Other effects:
- no effects observed
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Basis for effect level:
- fetal/pup body weight changes
Fetal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Overall developmental toxicity
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The No Observed Adverse Effect Levels (NOAELs) were determined as follows:
NOAEL (maternal toxicity): 10 mg/kg bw/day
NOAEL (developmental toxicity including teratogenicity): 10 mg/kg bw/day - Executive summary:
The test item was examined for its possible prenatal developmental toxicity. Groups of 22 sperm-positive female Hsd. Wistar rats were treated with the test item by oral administration daily at three dose levels of 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg bw/day from day 5 up to and including day 19 post coitum. A control group of 22 sperm positive females was included and the animals were given the vehicle sunflower oil. The treatment volume was 2 mL/kg bw.
Sufficient stability and homogeneity in the chosen vehicle were verified over the range of relevant concentrations at the appropriate frequency of preparation. The test item was proved to be stable in sunflower oil formulations at ~1 and ~200 mg/mL concentration levels at least for one day at room temperature and at least for 3 days in the refrigerator (5 ± 3°C). Analytical control of dosing solutions was performed on the first and last week of treatment. Concentrations of the test item in the dosing formulations varied in the acceptable range between 104 and 106 % of nominal concentrations at both analytical occasions confirming proper dosing. During the study, mortality was checked and clinical observations were performed. Body weight and food consumption of the dams were also recorded. The day, when sperm was detected in the vaginal smear, was regarded as day 0 of gestation. Caesarean section and gross pathology were performed on gestational day 20. The number of implantations, early and late resorptions, live and dead fetuses in each uterine horn and the number of corpora lutea were recorded. Each fetus was weighed and examined for sex and gross external abnormalities. The placentas were weighed and examined externally. About half of each litter was preserved for visceral examination and the other half of the litters were preserved for skeletal evaluation. At visceral examination, the bodies were micro dissected with a dissecting microscope. The heads were examined by Wilson's free-hand razor blade method. After cartilage-bone staining the skeletons were examined with a dissecting microscope. All abnormalities found during the fetal examinations were recorded.
On gestation day 20, a total of 20, 20, 21 and 21 litters in the control, 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg bw/day groups, respectively, were evaluated. None of the dams died before scheduled necropsy. No clinical signs of toxicity or treatment related necropsy findings were observed. In the 30 mg/kg bw/day group, the body weight was significantly reduced from gestation day 8 up to the end of the in-life phase, the body weight gain was clearly decreased between gestation days 5 to 11and from days 0 to 20. The corrected body weight/body weight gain were clearly reduced in the high dose group (30 mg/kg bw/day). In the high dose group there was also a clearly statistically significantly lower food consumption of the dams from gestational days 5-11 and 14-20. The observed clear reductions in body weight parameter and food consumption are considered to be a consequence of the treatment. The mean number of implantations, the intrauterine mortality and sex distribution of the fetuses was not influenced by the treatment.
The body weight of the fetuses was slightly but statistically significantly lower in the 30 mg/kg bw/day group versus control. Although the values were within the historical control range, this reduction was considered to be a consequence of the treatment, maybe due to the moderate maternal toxicity. The placental weight was statistically significantly lower in all test item groups than in the control but stayed within the historical control range or slightly below. The relative placental weight was statistically significantly lower in the 10 and 30 mg/kg bw/day groups than in the control, but within the historical control range. The statistically significance indicated in the lower placental weight parameters might be attributed to the relatively higher current control values, which were slightly above the historical control range.
There were no malformed fetuses found at external examination. The body weight retardation (below 2.74 g for males and 2.64 g for females) was evaluated as an external variation. The incidence of body weight retarded fetuses increased moderately and statistically significantly in the 30 mg/kg bw/day dose group which was attributed to the treatment and might be a consequence of the moderate maternal toxicity. The result of the statistical analysis was not significant if the number of affected litters was evaluated. Placental changes were found at a low incidence and unrelated to the treatment.
At visceral examination, malformation in the form of enlarged perimeningeal space and impressed cerebral hemisphere were found in two fetuses at 10 mg/kg bw/day and in one fetus at 30 mg/kg bw/day, respectively. In addition, a dilated 3rd brain ventricle was observed in another fetus in the 30 mg/kg bw/day group. Variations in the form of slightly dilated lateral ventricles were recorded for one fetus each in the control and in the 3 mg/kg bw/day group. However, according to the laboratory historical control data similar or identical brain alterations in the form of slightly dilated lateral brain vehicles, slightly dilated 3rd ventricle and enlarged perimeningeal space occurred also in control fetuses with low incidence. Therefore and based on the single occurrence the more than slightly dilated 3rd brain ventricle was finally considered as incidental observation. In addition, there was no dose-response relationship in the incidence of fetuses with enlarged perimeningeal spaces and impressed cerebral hemispheres. Hence, all brain findings were finally judged to be not related to the treatment. Visceral variations were found in the experimental groups without any dose-response relationship.
Skeletal malformations were only found in two control fetuses. There were no significant increases in the incidence of the skeletal variations in the test item treated groups.
Based on these observations, the No Observed Adverse Effect Levels (NOAELs) were determined as follows:
NOAEL (maternal toxicity): 10 mg/kg bw/day
NOAEL (developmental toxicity including teratogenicity): 10 mg/kg bw/day
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.