Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 273-066-3 | CAS number: 68937-41-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Neurotoxicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
An overview of neurotoxic effects are discussed.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effect on neurotoxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- neurotoxicity: chronic oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- Not specified.
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP. Reported under EC 793/93 for Existing substances regulations. Full methodology etc not available. Deemed reliable as evaluated by the European Commission. This data is considered the property of the data submitter. However it has not been possible to locate the study report due to re-organisation associated with the merger.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Four groups of twenty birds each were administered the test substance by oral gavage daily for 91 days at dosage levels of 10, 20, 90 and 270 mg/kg/day. One group received corn oil only (control) and two other groups received TOCP at 1.5 and 7.5 mg/kg/day (positive controls). Body weights and food consumption were measured weekly and signs of neurotoxicity were looked for daily. At study termination the brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerve were fixed in situ and 10/group were examined microscopically for signs of neurological damage.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- hen
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Not specified.
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- Four groups of twenty birds each were administered the test substance by oral gavage daily for 91 days at dosage levels of 10, 20, 90 and 270 mg/kg/day.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- No data.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 91 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily dose
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
10 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
20 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
90 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
270 mg/kg/day
Basis:
actual ingested - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 20
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- One group received corn oil only (control) and two other groups received TOCP at 1.5 and 7.5 mg/kg/day (positive controls). Body weights and food consumption were measured weekly and signs of neurotoxicity were looked for daily. At study termination the brain, spinal cord and peripheral nerve were fixed in situ and 10/group were examined microscopically for signs of neurological damage.
- Observations and clinical examinations performed and frequency:
- Food Consumption: Weekly
Bodyweight: Weekly. - Specific biochemical examinations:
- Not specified.
- Neurobehavioural examinations performed and frequency:
- Neurotoxicity: Daily
- Sacrifice and (histo)pathology:
- Not specified.
- Other examinations:
- Not applicable.
- Positive control:
- Two positive control groups received TOCP at 1.5 and 7.5 mg/kg/day.
- Statistics:
- Not specified.
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Ataxia was observed in 20% and 45% of the birds receiving 90 and 270 mg/kg/day test substance respectively. The hens receiving 10 and 20 mg/kg/day showed no morphological signs of neurotoxicity, while groups receiving 90 and 270 mg/kg/day showed degenerative changes which correlated with the ataxia.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- not specified
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not specified
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Ataxia was observed in 20% and 45% of the birds receiving 90 and 270 mg/kg/day test substance respectively. The hens receiving 10 and 20 mg/kg/day showed no morphological signs of neurotoxicity, while groups receiving 90 and 270 mg/kg/day showed degenerative changes which correlated with the ataxia.
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- not specified
- Neuropathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The hens receiving 10 and 20 mg/kg/day showed no morphological signs of neurotoxicity, while groups receiving 90 and 270 mg/kg/day showed degenerative changes which correlated with the ataxia.
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Migrated information from 'Further observations for developmental neurotoxicity study'
Details on results (for developmental neurotoxicity):Not applicable. (migrated information) - Details on results:
- Ataxia was observed in 20% and 45% of the birds receiving 90 and 270 mg/kg/day test substance respectively, and 30% of the birds receiving 7.5 mg/kg/day TOCP. The hens receiving 10 and 20 mg/kg/day showed no morphological signs of neurotoxicity, while groups receiving 90 and 270 mg/kg/day showed degenerative changes which correlated with the ataxia. The test substance produced neurotoxicity at these two dosage levels.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: for 90 day exposure
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Conclusions:
- The NOEL of the test substance for 90 days of exposure was 20 mg/kg/day
- Executive summary:
The NOEL of the test substance for 90 days of exposure was 20 mg/kg/day.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- hen
- Quality of whole database:
- K2-study not conducted to GLP or in compliance with agreed protocols.
Effect on neurotoxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- neurotoxicity: acute inhalation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- Not specified.
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP. Reported under EC 793/93 for Existing substances regulations. Full methodology etc not available. Deemed reliable as evaluated by the European Commission. This data is considered the property of the data submitter. However it has not been possible to locate the study report due to re-organisation associated with the merger.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Ten hens/group were exposed by inhalation to the aerosol form of the test substance in a single eight-hour period and then examined for the next 21 day period for signs of neurotoxicity.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- hen
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Not specified.
- Route of administration:
- inhalation: aerosol
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on exposure:
- Ten hens/group were exposed by inhalation to the aerosol form of the test substance in a single eight-hour period and then examined for the next 21 day period for signs of neurotoxicity.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Samples of atmosphere were analysed. No further information is detailed within the report.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 8 hours, 21 day exposure period.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Single 8 hour exposure.
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0.62 mg/L
Basis:
analytical conc. - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2.40 mg/L
Basis:
analytical conc. - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2.54 mg/L
Basis:
analytical conc. - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
3.09 mg/L
Basis:
analytical conc. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- Not specified.
- Observations and clinical examinations performed and frequency:
- No data.
- Specific biochemical examinations:
- No data.
- Neurobehavioural examinations performed and frequency:
- No data.
- Sacrifice and (histo)pathology:
- No data.
- Other examinations:
- Not applicable.
- Positive control:
- No data.
- Statistics:
- Not applicable.
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Mild or moderate ataxia was seen in 2/10 birds exposed to 2.40 mg/L and in 4/10 birds exposed to 3.09 mg/L.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- not specified
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not specified
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Mild or moderate ataxia was seen in 2/10 birds exposed to 2.40 mg/L and in 4/10 birds exposed to 3.09 mg/L.
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- not specified
- Neuropathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Histological examination of nervous tissues confirmed that degenerative changes were observed at these two dosage levels (2.40 mg/L and 3.09 mg/L).
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Histological examination of nervous tissues confirmed that degenerative changes were observed at these two dosage levels (2.40 mg/L and 3.09 mg/L).
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Migrated information from 'Further observations for developmental neurotoxicity study'
Details on results (for developmental neurotoxicity):Not applicable. (migrated information) - Details on results:
- Mild or moderate ataxia was seen in 2/10 birds exposed to 2.40 mg/L and in 4/10 birds exposed to 3.09 mg/L. Histological examination of nervous tissues confirmed that degenerative changes were observed at these two dosage levels. No effects were observed at the 0.62 mg/L level.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 0.62 mg/L air (analytical)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Conclusions:
- Mild or moderate ataxia was seen in 2/10 birds exposed to 2.40 mg/L and in 4/10 birds exposed to 3.09 mg/L. Histological examination of nervous tissues confirmed that degenerative changes were observed at these two dosage levels. No effects were observed at the 0.62 mg/L level.
- Executive summary:
Mild or moderate ataxia was seen in 2/10 birds exposed to 2.40 mg/L and in 4/10 birds exposed to 3.09 mg/L. Histological examination of nervous tissues confirmed that degenerative changes were observed at these two dosage levels. No effects were observed at the 0.62 mg/L level.
This information is provided as supporting study data only.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- 0.62 mg/m³
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- hen
- Quality of whole database:
- K2-study not conducted to GLP or in compliance with agreed protocols.
Effect on neurotoxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- neurotoxicity: sub-chronic dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- Not specified.
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Non-GLP. Reported under EC 793/93 for Existing substances regulations. Full methodology etc not available. Deemed reliable as evaluated by the European Commission. This data is considered the property of the data submitter. However it has not been possible to locate the study report due to re-organisation associated with the merger.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- 50 mg/kg of the test material was applied by pipette to the combs of 10 hens and spread evenly over the comb surface. Any residual was placed on the hen wottles. This procedure was repeated 5 days/week for 4 months. Animals were observed for signs of neurotoxicity. At the end of the treatment blood was drawn for haematology and clinical chemistry analysis. All animals received a full gross necroscopy. Brains were removed and analysed for neurotoxic esterase. The spinal and peripheral nerves were examined for signs of neuropathology microscopically. TOCP was used as the positive control and was applied to 10 hens in the same manner as the test material.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- hen
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Not specified.
- Route of administration:
- dermal
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on exposure:
- 50 mg/kg of the test material was applied by pipette to the combs of 10 hens and spread evenly over the comb surface. Any residual was placed on the hen wottles. This procedure was repeated 5 days/week for 4 months.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Not applicable.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 months
- Frequency of treatment:
- 5 days/week
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
50 mg/kg/day
Basis:
nominal conc. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- Not specified.
- Observations and clinical examinations performed and frequency:
- Not specified.
- Specific biochemical examinations:
- Brains were removed and analysed for neurotoxic esterase.
- Neurobehavioural examinations performed and frequency:
- Animals were observed for signs of neurotoxicity daily.
- Sacrifice and (histo)pathology:
- All animals received a full gross necroscopy. Brains were removed and analysed for neurotoxic esterase. The spinal and peripheral nerves were examined for signs of neuropathology microscopically.
- Other examinations:
- Not specified.
- Positive control:
- Yes, TOCP applied to 10 hens in the manner as the test material.
- Statistics:
- Not specified.
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not specified
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Neuropathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Migrated information from 'Further observations for developmental neurotoxicity study'
Details on results (for developmental neurotoxicity):Not applicable. (migrated information) - Details on results:
- No signs of neurotoxicity were observed during the in-life portion of the study in hens receiving test material. There was no haematological, biochemical or histological evidence of a toxic effect on the hens receiving the test material in this study. TOCP produced ataxia and nerve damage, as expected.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: Conducted over 4 months.
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Conclusions:
- No signs of neurotoxicity were observed during the in-life portion of the study in hens receiving test material. There was no haematological, biochemical or histological evidence of a toxic effect on the hens receiving the test material in this study.
- Executive summary:
No signs of neurotoxicity were observed during the in-life portion of the study in hens receiving test material. There was no haematological, biochemical or histological evidence of a toxic effect on the hens receiving the test material in this study. A NOEC of 50 mg/kg/day was therefore applied.
This information is provided as supporting study data only.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- hen
- Quality of whole database:
- K2-study not conducted to GLP or in compliance with agreed protocols.
Additional information
There are multiple studies for neurotoxicity on the substance, carried out over a number of years and using a variety of dose levels. On a weight of evidence basis, it appears that a neurotoxic response is only triggered for the substance at higher dose levels. Represented within the data set are a large number of acute oral toxicity studies that indicate that the substance only causes effects at high dose levels (range of > 2000 mg/kg to >20000 mg/kg).
For chronic neurotoxicity, there exists a subacute and subchronic test; the data for oral neurotoxicity has been taken from this study and is detailed at 20 mg/kg/day. Only one study for inhalation effects of neurotoxicity has been undertaken; this is an acute toxicity study, and as such, the results are questionable but are included for completeness purposes.
On the basis of the data available for review, it is deemed that neurotoxicity only takes place at higher dose levels. As such, no classification and labelling is applicable.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The above studies have all been ranked reliability 2 or 3 according to the Klimisch et al system. This ranking was deemed appropriate because the studies were not conducted to GLP or in compliance with agreed protocols. The reports do not detail a specific method; however it documents dose levels and responses in detail, so is deemed appropriate for use in the support of a formal registration. Sufficient dose ranges and numbers are detailed; hence it is appropriate for use based on reliability and animal welfare grounds.
Justification for classification or non classification
The above results triggered no classification under the Dangerous Substance Directive (67/548/EEC) and the CLP Regulation (EC No 1272/2008). No classification for acute effects is therefore required.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.