Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-622-7 | CAS number: 85-68-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Santicizer 160 (benzyl butyl phthalate) has shown no convincing evidence of skin or eye irritation in rabbit tests involving 24-hour application. Only transient effects were observed, not sufficient for classification as a skin or eye irritant. Although details of the two studies are only available in a brief summary report (hence they have been assigned reliability code 4), the data are considered adequate for assessment. A lack of skin irritation was also reported in a human repeat insult patch test and in two mouse ear swelling tests (reliability code 2), which were designed to evaluate skin sensitisation.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
When undiluted Santicizer 160 (0.5 ml) was applied to the intact and abraded skin of six New Zealand albino rabbits for 24 hours, erythema scores of 1 and 2 (by the method of FHSA) were seen in four and two animals respectively, 24 hours after exposure. At 48 hours, an erythema score of 1 was seen in three animals. No erythema was seen when assessed at 4, 72 or 168 hours after removal of the test material. An oedema score of 1 was seen in one animal at the 24 -hour observation point. The irritation scores were the same for intact and abraded sites. The investigators classed the test material as non-irritating when applied to the intact and abraded skin of rabbits (Birch, 1976c). Although details of this study are only available in a brief summary report (hence it has been assigned reliability code 4), the data are considered adequate for assessment.
When undiluted Santicizer 160 (0.1 ml) was placed in the eyes of six New Zealand albino rabbits, and removed after 24 hours (presumably by rinsing), slight discomfort was observed immediately after exposure. After 10 minutes, copious discharge was noted and after 1 hour, copious discharge and slight erythema were reported, giving a mean irritation score of 8 out of a possible 110 (by the method of FHSA). At 24 hours post-exposure, slight erythema and slight-to-moderate discharge were reported, with a mean irritation score of 4.3/110. All effects were on the conjunctivae. Eyes appeared normal when examined 48, 72, 120 and 168 hours after removal of the test material, giving an overall irritation score of 1.43 (average of scores assessed at 24, 48 and 72 hours post-exposure). The investigators classed the test material as slightly irritating to the eyes of rabbits, but noted that it would not be classed as an eye irritant under FHSA (Birch, 1976d). Again, details of this study are only available in a brief summary report (reliability code 4), but the data are considered adequate for assessment.
In two skin sensitisation studies in AKR and Balb/c mice using the mouse ear swelling test, the application of Santicizer 160 (30 µl at up to 110 mg/ml) to the ears during the induction and sensitisation phases was without effect on ear thickness, indicating that it was not irritating to mouse skin (Little, 1983b,c).
Santicizer 160 showed no skin irritation potential in humans when tested for skin sensitisation using a repeated insult patch test method. During the induction phase, 200 healthy volunteers were exposed to 0.2 ml of the undiluted test material applied to an occlusive patch for 24 hours on fifteen separate occasions and the skin was assessed for irritation after each induction exposure. No evidence of irritation (or sensitisation) was observed by the investigators or reported by any of the volunteers during the study (Shelanski, 1980).
No data are available on the potential of benzyl butyl phthalate to cause irritation of the respiratory tract.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available studies on Santicizer 160 (benzyl butyl phthalate) are considered adequate for concluding that the compound does not need to be classified for skin or eye irritation, under the EU CLP regulations.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

Route: .live1