Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-622-7 | CAS number: 85-68-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Butyl benzyl phthalate showed weak positive responses in two key in vivo studies (reliability 2) conducted under the auspices of the National Toxicology Program (NTP, 1997f). Both studies involved a single intraperitoneal injection of up to 5 g/kg bw in mice. In the chromosome aberration assay, examination of the bone marrow cells 17 hours later revealed a weak (but statistically significant) increase in aberrations at the top dose of 5 g/kg bw, while no such increase was observed at the delayed 36-hour sampling time. In this assay the mitotic index was not determined as an indicator of cytotoxicity. In the sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) assay, in which the bone marrow cells were examined 23 or 42 hours after treatment, there was a weak increase in numbers of SCEs; this showed a significant trend at 42 hours, and also at 23 hours after disregarding the top dose level (which had shown a reduced response).
Two other in vivo studies of lower reliability provide no evidence of genotoxic potential. Thus, in a study available in abstract form only (reliability 4), butyl benzyl phthalate did not induce dominant lethal mutations in the foetuses when two strains of male mice were given three subcutaneous injections of up to 4.6 g/kg bw and mated with untreated females of the same strain. A slight, dose-related reduction in total implants was observed after the first mating period, indicating that the compound was tested at a high enough dose to produce signs of toxicity (a slight reduction in fertility) (Bishop et al., 1987). Another study assigned a reliability code of 3 (not reliable) due to the low test dose used (0.18 mg/kg bw/day) found no evidence of micronucleus induction in the bone marrow of female rats that were treated via the drinking water throughout pregnancy and lactation (Ashby et al., 1997).
In two reliable studies, butyl benzyl phthalate did not induce chromosome aberrations and showed no convincing evidence of sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) induction when tested in vitro with Chinese hamster ovary cells, both in the presence and absence of a rat liver metabolic activation (S9) fraction (NTP, 1997e). Although an equivocal result was obtained in the first SCE assay in the absence of S9 (a significant trend (P=0.004) without any significant increase in SCEs at any of the dose levels), the subsequent study without S9 using a higher top dose and the assay with S9 were clearly negative.
Butyl benzyl phthalate (or Santicizer 160) also showed no convincing evidence of mutagenicity at the thymidine kinase locus in two reliable mouse lymphoma assays, when tested up to a cytotoxic concentration in the presence and absence of a rodent liver metabolic activation fraction (Litton Bionetics, 1977; NTP, 1997c). The NTP study reported increased mutant frequencies in the absence of S9, but only at concentrations that produced precipitation. No increase in mutant frequency was observed in the presence of S9 (NTP, 1997c).
When tested at concentrations of 10 mg/plate or higher in the Ames bacterial test, in the presence and absence of a liver metabolic activation fraction, butyl benzyl phthalate (or Santicizer 160) has shown no evidence of mutagenic potential in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538. Three such studies are reported, two reliability 2 (Litton Bionetics, 1976; NTP, 1997d) and the other reliability 4, not assignable (Flowers, 1976).
Short description of key information:
Butyl benzyl phthalate has shown only weak genotoxic potential in vivo, in chromosome aberration and sister-chromatid exchange (SCE) assays, following a single intraperitoneal injection of up to 5 g/kg bw in mice. Other, less reliable, in vivo assays in mice, for dominant lethal mutations or micronucleus induction, gave negative results. The compound has shown no convincing evidence of genotoxic activity in vitro, in chromosome aberration or SCE tests in Chinese hamster ovary cells, in the mouse lymphoma assay, or in Ames bacterial tests.
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available studies on the in vivo and in vitro genotoxicity of butyl benzyl phthalate are considered adequate for concluding that the compound does not need to be classified for mutagenicity, under the EU CLP Regulations.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.