Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 942-548-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Ecotoxicological Summary
Administrative data
Hazard for aquatic organisms
Freshwater
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC aqua (freshwater)
- PNEC value:
- 1.06 µg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 2
- Extrapolation method:
- sensitivity distribution
Marine water
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC aqua (marine water)
- PNEC value:
- 2.36 µg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 3
- Extrapolation method:
- sensitivity distribution
STP
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC STP
- PNEC value:
- 0.37 mg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 10
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Sediment (freshwater)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC sediment (freshwater)
- PNEC value:
- 53.8 mg/kg sediment dw
- Assessment factor:
- 10
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Sediment (marine water)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC sediment (marine water)
- PNEC value:
- 69.8 mg/kg sediment dw
- Assessment factor:
- 10
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Hazard for air
Air
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Hazard for terrestrial organisms
Soil
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC soil
- PNEC value:
- 10.9 mg/kg soil dw
- Assessment factor:
- 2
- Extrapolation method:
- sensitivity distribution
Hazard for predators
Secondary poisoning
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no potential for bioaccumulation
Additional information
Read-across statement
Under environmentally-relevant conditions, metal carboxylate salts readily dissociate from an ionic bonded salt into metal ions and free carboxylic acid upon dissolution in aqueous media. Dissociation is a reversible process and the proportion of dissociated salt present is dependent on the pH and composition of the solution and the metal-ligand dissociation constant of the salt. Predictions of stability of metal carboxylates (propionate, valerate, isovalerate and benzoate salts for Ca, K, Zn, Mn and Co) in a standard ISO 6341 medium (2 mMCaCl2, 0.5 mM MgSO4, 0.77 mM NaHCO3 and 0.077 mM KCl, pH 6 and 8) clearly show that monodentate ligands such as carboxylic acids have no potential for complexing metal ions in solution (<<1% of metal complexed at 0.001 mM; Visual minteq. Version 3.0, update of 18 October 2012. http://www2.lwr.kth.se/English/OurSoftware/vminteq/index.html). Complexation of the liberated free metal ion with ligands present in the natural environment (e.g. dissolved organic matter) will further increase the degree of dissociation of the metal-carboxylate salts.
Upon dissolution and dissociation of metal carboxylates into the metal ion and carboxylate anion, both constituent ions will each show its proper partitioning, degradation, and bioaccumulation behaviour in the environment. The environmental fate and behaviour for the metal and organic moieties is predicted to be clearly different from each other, resulting in a different relative distribution over the environmental compartments (water, air, sediment and soil). Because the relative exposure to both constituent ions in the various environmental compartments is hence predicted to be different from the original composition of the metal carboxylate, data for the ecotoxicological properties of metal carboxylates tested as such are also considered less relevant and a read-across approach to separate data for both the metal cation and carboxylate anion is preferred.
Physicochemical and ecotoxicological data for the individual dissociation products (i.e., metal and carboxylic acids) are therefore essential to understanding the environmental fate and toxicological characteristics of the metal carboxylate salts. Environmental fate and effects data developed with the free acid, or a simple salt that would readily dissociate (e.g. the sodium salt), can serve as surrogate data for the carboxylic acid component of each cobalt carboxylate salt. Similarly, data for the metal ions can be represented by fate and toxicity data generated with simple metal salts (e.g. chloride or nitrate salts). For example, the potential hazards associated with cobalt acetate can be estimated through the evaluation of the cobalt free ion, tested as cobalt dichloride, and the acetate moiety, tested as sodium acetate. Thus, data for each individual carboxylic acid (tested as the free acid or Na, K or Ca salt) and the individual metal (tested as the free metal, metal chloride, other simple metal salt) can be used to “read-across” to characterize the hazard of a cobalt carboxylate compound.
Most testing efforts generally suggest that the test material will dissociate in water into its cationic and anionic components and that the effects noted can be attributed to the individual components, as occurs for ionic salts at concentrations of environmental concern. The USEPA, in their guidance document for derivation of ambient water quality criteria (USEPA 1985), states: “The toxic metal [for testing] should be added in the form of an inorganic salt having relatively high solubility. Nitrate salts are generally acceptable; chloride and sulphate salts of many metals are also acceptable.” For this reason, testing is usually done with a readily soluble metal salt, where the anionic component is not likely to “overshadow” the cation’s contribution to any observed toxicity.
For the most part, this is considered to be an environmentally “conservative” approach, and therefore metals testing is generally done with chloride or nitrate salts.
For most metal-containing compounds, it is the potentially bioavailable metal ion that is liberated (in greater or lesser amounts) upon contact with water that is the moiety of ecotoxicological concern. Therefore, the solubility of the metal carboxylates has to be taken into account and compared with the effect concentrations for dissolved metals. The solubility of the metal carboxylates is generally above the range of effects concentrations for dissolved metals in the aquatic environment and therefore ecotoxicity data for soluble metal salts can be directly used in a read-across approach for the metal carboxylates. As a conservative approach, the ecotoxicological properties of the carboxylic acid can be considered, if it is believed that this may significantly contribute to the toxicity of the salt.
In case both the metal and organic moieties require a risk assessment (e.g. because both are classified as hazardous to the aquatic environment or have L(E)C50 values < 100 mg/l; REACH Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment, chapter B.8 Scope of exposure assessment), the dose additivity approach can be used to explain the ecotoxicological effects of the metal carboxylate based on the data for the individual moieties. As stated in a toxicity assessment of chemical mixtures opinion for the European Commission (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS), Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER), and Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) [2011] “Preliminary opinion on Toxicity and Assessment of Chemical Mixtures,” the dose/concentration addition method should be preferred over the independent action approach if no mode of action information is available.
In the framework of the European REACH regulation (EC 1907/2006), some measured data on solubility, behaviour and toxicity of a range of metal carboxylates (e.g. some zinc carboxylates) were collected in order to support this read-across approach or for the purpose of classification and labeling under the European CLP regulation (EC 1272/2008). These data are available on the REACH dissemination website (http://echa.europa.eu/web/guest/information-on-chemicals/registered-substances) after registration.
Empirical data from chronic toxicity tests conducted with the cladoceran, Ceriodaphnia dubia, and the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas, as part of the Cobalt Development Institute (CDI) research programme, support the proposed “read-across” approach for evaluating the toxicity of cobalt inorganic and carboxylate salts compounds. Cobalt 10% effect concentrations (i.e., EC10 values) for all five of the compounds tested were statistically similar to one another, suggesting that the free cobalt ion dictates the chronic toxicity of all of the compounds or, at the very least, the EC10 values of the compounds are a conservative estimator of cobalt toxicity. It is also apparent that the addition of the boron atom, in the case of the cobalt borate complexes, does not contribute to the toxicity of the salt; this is likely due to the reduced toxicity of boron, compared with cobalt and the fact that cobalt is present in a 3:1 ratio to boron in these materials.
Ceriodaphnia dubia 10% effect concentrations (EC10) for cobalt compounds
Test material EC10 (95% CI; μg dissolved Co/L)
Cobalt dichloride 7.9 (0.7-86.4)
Cobalt hydroxide oxide 11.6 (9.8-13.8)
Cobalt bis (2-ethylhexanoate) 19.7 (14.7-26.4)
Cobalt borate neodecanoate 15.1 (7.0 – 32.6)
Cobalt stearate 23.3 (14.7-37.0)
Cobalt resinate 8.4 (4.0-17.6)
Fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) 10% effect concentrations EC10) for cobalt compounds
Test material EC10 (95% CI; μg dissolved Co/L)
Cobalt dichloride 350 (210-590)
Cobalt naphthenate 206 (94-452)
Cobalt neodecanoate 204 (17-2503)
Cobalt resinate 187 (164 - 213)
These findings are sufficient justification for the implementation of a “read-across strategy” using results obtained in tests conducted with soluble cobalt salts (e.g., cobalt dichloride), and this is applicable for all relevant environmental endpoints (aquatic toxicity, sediment toxicity, terrestrial toxicity, toxicity to microorganisms, toxicity to birds, and toxicity to mammals). Cobalt dichloride, the most frequently tested compound, is a readily soluble substance and yields free cobalt(II) ions upon dissolution, i.e., the same speciation form that is relevant upon dissolution of cobalt metal, cobalt inorganic salts, and cobalt carboxylate salts.
It should be noted that all effects levels from these studies are expressed as dissolved cobalt (i.e., operationally defined as that portion passing through a 0.45 μm filter).
With reference to the RAAF (ECHA, 2017), criteria for a category approach Scenario 5 with Appendices C are met for the cobalt category substances as detailed in Appendix 1.3 of the CSR. Due to the absence of substance specific information for the majority of substances within the cobalt category, the approach will read-across data from representative source substances to all other members of the read-across group. Salt reaction of cobalt(2+) and C2/C8/C20 carboxylates can be considered as part of this read-across group.
Conclusion on classification
Environmental classification of the Salt reaction of cobalt(2+) and C2/C8/C20 carboxylates is derived from the environmental classification of its 3 main constituents as a worst case scenario. The proposed classification is as follows:
- Acute 1 (M = 1) and Chronic 2
The EU CLP guidance document (ECHA 2017) permits consideration of the “environmental transformation” of metals in the environment, including removal from the water column and deposition and sequestration in sediments, much the same way as the concept of “rapid degradation” is considered for organic chemicals. To indicate “rapid removal” for a metal, it is assumed that one must demonstrate greater than 70% removal of soluble metal within 28 days of addition to the water column, as is the case with organic compounds. Furthermore, one must demonstrate that the potential for metal remobilisation from sediments is limited, for example by changes in metal speciation, remineralisation and permanent burial in the sediment. If these conditions are met, the metal is considered “rapidly removable” and poses lower chronic environmental risk. Results of modelling using the Unit World Model (UWM) and initial empirical testing via the extended transformation/dissolution protocol (e-TDp) indicate that the cobalt ion satisfies the requirements for “rapid” metals removal, i.e. > 70% removal from the water column in 28 days, and the limited sediment remobilisation potential under most environmental conditions.
(i) Cobalt bis(2-ethylhexanoate)
The lowest available acute reference value is:
Algae, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (following OECD Method 201)
EC50: 0.654 mg/L (0.109 mg Co/L)
No compound specific acute data are available for invertebrates or fish species
Data classify substance as Acute 1; M = 1
Available chronic EC10values for algae and invertebrates are:
Algae, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (following OECD Method 201)
EC10: 0.219 mg/L (0.036 mg Co/L)
Invertebrate, Ceriodaphnia dubia
EC10: 0.119 mg/L (0.0197 mg Co/L)
No compound specific chronic data are available for fish species,but fish generally least sensitive
Chronic data classify substance as Chronic 2 or 3 depending on rapid removal
Chronic tests take precedence over acute data for chronic classification, so acute algae value not considered under surrogate scheme
There is no evidence for bioaccumulation or biomagnification in the environment
Proposed self-classification: Acute 1 (M = 1) and Chronic 3
(ii) Resin and rosin acids, cobalt salts
The lowest available acute reference values are:
Algae, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (following OECD Method 201)
EC50: 4.15 mg/L (0.322 mg Co/L)
Invertebrate, Daphnia magna (following OECD Method 202)
EC50: 8.59 mg/L (0.667 mg Co/L)
Fish, Onchorynchus mykiss (following OECD Method 203)
EC50: 1.44 mg/L (0.119 mg Co/L)
Data indicate no classification required
Available chronic NOEC/EC10values for algae and invertebrates are:
Algae, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (following OECD Method 201)
NOEC: 0.264 mg/L (0.021 mg Co/L)
Invertebrate, Ceriodaphnia dubia (following USEPA 2002)
EC10: 0.105 mg/L (0.008 mg Co/L)
Fish; Pimephales promelas (following OECD Method 210)
EC10: 2.102 mg/L (0.187 mg Co/L)
No compound specific chronic data are available for fish species
Chronic data for algae/invertebrates classify substance as Chronic 2 or 3 depending on rapid removal
Chronic tests take precedence over acute data for chronic classification, so acute algae/invertebrate/fish values not considered under surrogate scheme
There is no evidence for bioaccumulation or biomagnification in the environment
Proposed self-classification: Chronic 3
(iii) Cobalt diacetate
For classification purposes, Ecotoxicity Reference Values (ERVs) should be derived using the “lowest value” approach. For metals ERVs are derived using data from one or more soluble metal substances, and in most cases, test data are reported on a “dissolved” metal concentration basis. In the assessment for Co, the aquatic toxicity classifications of Co metal and Co compounds are derived by comparing the quantity of dissolved Co liberated during an OECD Transformation/Dissolution test (OECD 29) with the ERVs derived from laboratory toxicity tests developed with a soluble cobalt compound (e.g. cobalt dichloride). In the case of Co, single acute and chronic ERVs are available without consideration of factors that might affect Co bioavailability or toxicity (i.e. pH, DOC, hardness).
The acute ERV is based on available ecotoxicity data for an plant species, Lemna minor, while the chronic ERV is based on available ecotoxicity data for the epibenthic invertebrate, Hyalella azteca. The reported Co ERVs are as follows:
Acute: Lemna minor 52.0μg/L
Chronic: Hyalella azteca 7.6μg/L
As outlined in the CLP guidance (ECHA 2017), substance-specific ERVs can be developed using the following equation:
ERVsubstance = ERVCo × MWsubstance / (n × MWCo)
where n is the stoichiometric number of Co atoms in the substance molecule.
A full description of ERV derivation is provided as attachment to endpoint summary of IUCLID section 6.
Water solubility is 82.4 g Co/L at 20C
Expected to be readily soluble under TDp as well
Molecular weight is 177.03 g/mol
Substance-specific ERVs are:
Acute ERV: 156.2 μg/L– <1mg/L so Acute 1
Chronic ERV: 22.8 μg/L– between 10 and 100μg/L so Chronic 1 (M=1) or Chronic 2 depending on rapid removal
Proposed self-classification:
Acute 1 (M = 1) and Chronic 2
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.