Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
March 1982
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study was performed similar to OECD 405 guideline but without GLP. Limited information on test material and environmental conditions.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1982
Report date:
1982

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The extent of DHT-4A ocular mucous membrane-stimulating effects were investigated in rabbits using the Draize's rating scale.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Aluminium magnesium carbonate hydroxide
EC Number:
943-434-4
Cas Number:
11097-59-9
Molecular formula:
[Al2Mg4(OH)12] CO3
IUPAC Name:
Aluminium magnesium carbonate hydroxide
Details on test material:
Chemical Formula: Mg4.5AL2(OH)13CO3 3.5H2O
Chemical nomenclature: Hydrotalcite DHT-4A

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: male Japanese rabbits (Yugengaisha Ichikaway)
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Healthy white Japanese rabbits weighing approximately 3kg (Yugengaisha I chikawaya ) were used for this study .
All were male, totaling 9. Solid food manufactured by Clea Japan Inc. (CR-l) and normal drinking water in a bottle were taken ad libitum.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
100 mg of undiluted test drug was dropped into the everted lower lid;
upper and lower lids were separated after light contact.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
The rabbits were divided into the 3 whose eyes were not washed after treatment, the 3 those whose eyes were washed with 20ml of mild warm water 2 seconds after treatment, and the 3 those whose eyes were washed with 20 ml of tepid water 4 seconds after treatment.
Observation period (in vivo):
All rabbits were observed 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 days later and evaluated according to rating criteria.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
9
Details on study design:
The experiment was carried out according to the following procedure .
(a ) Nine white male Japanese rabbits (weighing approximately 3kg ) , adjudged normal following a cornea test with fluorescein paper (Haag-streit ag
liebefed-dern Switzerland) were used .
(b) The test drug was dropped into the right eye, the left eye being left untreated for comparison. 100 mg of undiluted test drug was dropped into the everted lower lid; upper and lower lids were separated after light contact.
(c) The rabbits were divided into the 3 whose eyes were not washed after treatment, the 3 those whose eyes were washed with 20ml of mild warm
water 2 seconds after treatment,and the 3 those whose eyes were washed with 20 mL of tepid water 4 seconds after treatment.
(d) all the rabbits were observed 1,2,,3,4, and 7 days later and evaluated according to rating criteria.
(e) after 7- days of observation the animals were killed for autopsy; the upper and lower eyelids, nicititating membranes eyeballs and optic nerves were removed and preserved in formalin fixative.

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
animal #1, #2 and #3
Time point:
other: overall 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: eyes not washed
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
animal #1, #2 and #3
Time point:
other: overall 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
other: eyes not washed
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
animal #1 and #3
Time point:
other: overall 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Remarks on result:
other: eyes not washed
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: overall 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
3
Remarks on result:
other: eyes not washed
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
animal #1 and #2
Time point:
other: overall 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: eyes not washed
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: overall 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Remarks on result:
other: eyes not washed
Irritant / corrosive response data:
In ocular response to DHT-4A undiluted, chief symptoms were conjunctival changes , whereas there were no changes in the cornea or iris.

1. Rabbits whose eyes were not washed
On the first day of eye - dropping, accelerated congestion of the conjunctiva was noted in two of the three rabbits,
while exaggerated conjunctival edema and excess discharge were observed in the other .
However, on the second day of eye-dropping , conjunctival congestion , edema and discharge began to disappear .

2. Rabbits whose eyes were washed 2 seconds after treatment.
On the first day of eye-dropping, excessive discharge was observed in two out of the three.
On the second day of eye-dropping , such disc harge began to cease.

3 . Rabbits whose eyes were washed 4 seconds after treatment .
On the first day of eye-dropping, accelerated conjunctival congestion was noticed in two of the three rabbits, but it disappeared on the second day.

Other effects:
In all the animals killed at the end of the test period , there were no significant changes in the upper or lower lids ,
nictitating membranes, eye balls , optic nerves or other organs.

Any other information on results incl. tables

In ocular response to DHT-4A undiluted, chief symptoms were conjunctival changes , whereas there were no changes in the cornea or iris.

1. Rabbits whose e yes were not washed

On the first day of eye - dropping, accelerated congestion of the conjunctiva was noted in two of the three rabbits,

while exaggerated conjunctival edema and excess discharge were observed in the other .

However, on the second day of eye-dropping , conjunctival congestion , edema and discharge began to disappear .

2. Rabbits whose eyes were washed 2 seconds after treatment.

On the first day of eye-dropping, excessive discharge was observed in two out of the three.

On the second day of eye-dropping , such disc harge began to cease.

3 . Rabbits whose eyes were washed 4 seconds after treatment .

On the first day of eye-dropping, accelerated conjunctival congestion was noticed in two of the three rabbits, but it disappeared on the second day.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
slightly irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information The very slight effects were fully reversible 48 hours after application. Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
This study of the primary stimulating effect of DHT- 4A on the ocular mucous membrane of the rabbit performed similar to OECD 405 guideline, indicated that DHT-4A showed very slight conjunctivae in 2 animals and very slight chemosis in one animal. The effects were fully reversible 48 hours after application.
Executive summary:

This study of the primary stimulating effect of DHT- 4A on the ocular mucous membrane of the rabbit performed similar to OECD 405 guideline.

DHT-4A showed very slight conjunctivae in 2 animals and very slight chemosis in one animal. The effects were fully reversible 48 hours after application. Based on the results, DHT-4A does not have to be classified for eye irritation according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.

Categories Display