Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin irritation: OECD TG 431/ OECD TG 439 (BASF SE, 2015): not corrosive, not irritating
Eye irritation: EpiOcular (BASF SE, 2015): not irritating

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation / corrosion
Remarks:
in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline- and GLP-conformant study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
testing lab.
Species:
other: not applicable (in vitro test)
Strain:
other: not applicable (in vitro test)
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Tissue model: EPI-200
Tissue Lot Number: 21630 (Certificate of Analysis see appendix)
Origin: MatTek In Vitro Life Science Laboratories, Bratislava, Slovakia
Type of coverage:
other: not applicable (in vitro test)
Preparation of test site:
other: not applicable (in vitro test)
Controls:
other: not applicable (in vitro test)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
see "Any other information on materials and methodes incl. tables"
Observation period:
see "Any other information on materials and methodes incl. tables"
Number of animals:
not applicable (in vitro test)

The substance was not able to reduce MTT directly.

Corrosion test

Exposure period: 3 min

Test substance

 

tissue 1

tissue 2

mean

SD

CV (%)

NC

mean OD570

1.998

2.002

2.000

0.003

 

 

viability (% of NC)

99.9

100.1

100.0

0.1

0.1

CAS 1370461-06-5

mean OD570

1.865

2.060

1.977

0.116

 

 

viability (% of NC)

94.8

103.0

98.9

5.8

5.9

PC

mean OD570

0.394

0.268

0.331

0.089

 

 

viability (% of NC)

19.7

13.4

16.5

4.5

27.0

 

Exposure period: 1 hour

Test substance

 

tissue 1

tissue 2

mean

SD

CV (%)

NC

mean OD570

2.169

1.811

1.990

0.253

 

 

viability (% of NC)

109.0

91.0

100.0

12.7

12.7

CAS 1370461-06-5

mean OD570

2.265

2.060

2.163

0.145

 

 

viability (% of NC)

113.8

103.5

108.7

7.3

6.7

PC

mean OD570

0.154

0.148

0.151

0.005

 

 

viability (% of NC)

7.8

7.4

7.6

0.2

3.0

 

Irritation test:

 

Exposure period: 1 hour + recovery time

Test substance

 

tissue 1

tissue 2

tissue 3

mean

SD

CV (%)

NC

mean OD570

2.219

2.302

2.342

2.288

0.063

 

 

viability (% of NC)

97.0

100.6

102.4

100.0

2.7

2.7

CAS 1370461-06-5

mean OD570

2.399

2.365

2.227

2.330

0.091

 

 

viability (% of NC)

104.8

103.4

97.3

101.9

4.0

3.9

PC

mean OD570

0.073

0.078

0.087

0.080

0.007

 

 

viability (% of NC)

3.2

3.4

3.8

3.5

0.3

8.9

 

NC, negative control

PC, positive control

SD, standard deviation

CV, coefficient of variation

 

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Reliable and GLP-conformant study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Commission Regulation (EU) No 1152/2010
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD (2014a) Draft Proposal for a New Test Guideline (EpiOcularTM)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
testing lab.
Species:
other: not applicable (in vitro test)
Strain:
other: not applicable (in vitro test)
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: not applicable (in vitro test)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
see "Any other information on materials and methodes incl. tables"
Observation period (in vivo):
see "Any other information on materials and methodes incl. tables"
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
not applicable (in vitro test)

The tested substance did not reduce MTT directly.

 

Results of EpiOcular test:

Test substance

 

tissue 1

tissue 2

mean

Inter-tissue variability (%)

NC

mean OD570

1.745

1.788

1.767

 

 

viability (% of NC)

98.8

101.2

100.0

2.4

CAS 1370461-06-5

mean OD570

1.902

2.065

1.984

 

 

viability (% of NC)

107.7

116.9

112.3

9.2

PC

mean OD570

0.365

0.321

0.343

 

 

viability (% of NC)

20.6

18.2

19.4

2.5

 

NC, negative control

PC, positive control

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Skin irritation and corrosion was tested with a turnkey testing strategy in vitro. The test substance was applied to a 3 -dimensional reconstructed human epidermis model for either 3 minutes or 1 hour for corrosivity testing, or for 1 hour + 42 hours recovery time for irritation testing. Cell viability was used as an indicator for tissue damage. Mean tissue viability for all conditions tested was 98.9 -108.7% compared to negative control. Therefore, Aluminum, [(2E)-2-butenedioato(2-)- O1]hydroxy- is considered not irritant and not corrosive to the skin.

Eye irritation potential was tested in the EpiOcularTM test (OECD (2014a) Draft Proposal for a New Test Guideline). Therefore, the test substance was applied to a 3D tissue model for the human corneal epithelium for 6 hours, followed by 18 hours incubation.

Cell viability was used as an indicator for tissue damage. Mean tissue viability was 112% compared to negative control. Conclusively, Aluminum, [(2E)-2-butenedioato(2-)- O1]hydroxy- did not show potential for eye irritation or serious eye damage.


Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Guideline- and GLP-conformant study with robust study summary

Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Reliable and GLP-conformant study with robust study summary

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available data do not fulfill the criteria laid out in Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 (CLP). Therefore, a non-classification of Aluminium, [(2E)-2 -butenedioato(2 -)-O1]hydroxy- is warranted.