Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-435-9 | CAS number: 120-92-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
Three studies are available and were considered as key studies, one performed on cyclopentanone and cyclohexanone and two on cyclohexanone. Only one study showed fertility effects on the second generation after cyclohexanone exposure at the highest doses (14000 ppm). At this dose, general toxic effects are also observed. The other studies showed that cyclopentanone and cyclohexanone have no impact on mice and rats fertility or showed that the depressions in male fertility were reversible. Taking into account the overall data, cyclopentanone is not considered as toxic for the fertility.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- two-generation reproductive toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on test type
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- see below attached justification for read-across
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 500 ppm
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- Remarks on result:
- other: results on an analogous (cyclohexanone)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Dose descriptor:
- other: NOAEL Parental F1
- Effect level:
- 500 ppm
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- Remarks on result:
- other: results on an analogous (cyclohexanone)
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- > 1 000 ppm
- Sex:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: results on an analogous (cyclohexanone). No effect observed at the higher tested dose.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F2
- Effect level:
- 500 ppm
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- viability
- body weight and weight gain
- Remarks on result:
- other: results on an analogous (cyclohexanone)
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
Read accross with Cyclohexanone was used.
Summary of the study:
A reproduction study was conducted to ascertain the potential effects of inhalation exposure to cyclohexanone vapor upon reproductive performance, growth, and development of 2 consecutive generations of CD Sprague-Dawley albino rats. Groups of 30 males/30 females were exposed to either 0, 250, 500 or 1000 ppm during the 1st (F0) generation. 30 males/30 females were selected from the F1a litters of each group to continue on test as second (F1) generation animals. The F1 generation animals were exposed to 0, 250, 500 or 1400 ppm cyclohexanone. Assessment for potential neurotoxicologic/neuropathologic effects were conducted pre-weaning and post-weaning in each F1a litter.
The daily time-weighted average concentrations during the F0 generation were 0, 253.2, 499.2 and 1008.9 ppm and during F1 generation the daily time-weighted average concentrations were 0, 249.8, 496.9 abd 1387.2 ppm of cyclohexanone.
Inhalation exposure to 1000 ppm cyclohexanone through one generation and exposure to 250 or 500 ppm cyclohexanone through 2 consecutive generations did not adversely affect the growth, development, and reproductive performance of the CD Sprague-Dawley derived albino rats. Evaluation for behavioral/neurotoxicologic development of selected F1a progeny revealed no consistent differences betwwen treated groups and the control group.
Inhalation exposure of the CD rat (progeny from parental animals exposed to 1000 ppm) to 1400 ppm cyclohexanone through one generation resulted in exposure-related male body weight depressions, reduced progeny survival, and progeny body weight depressions.Based on this study cyclohexanone induce in the F2 generation a reduction on the viability and on the body weight. However the fertility is not impacted and no developmental effect was seen. Therefore cyclohexanone is not considered to be reprotoxic and therefore, by analogy, cyclopentanone is not considered as reprotoxic.
- Endpoint:
- one-generation reproductive toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on generations indicated in Effect levels
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- see below attached justification for read-across
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Positive control:
- no
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 1 400 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no effects observed
- Remarks on result:
- other: results on an analogous (cyclohexanone)
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- > 1 400 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no effects observed
- Remarks on result:
- other: results on an analogous (cyclohexanone)
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
Read accross with Cyclohexanone was used.
Summary of the study:
The study performed by American Biogenics corporation in 1986 was conducted during a post-exposure recovery period to evaluate potential reversibility of treatment-related depression in fertility of male rats exposed to cyclohexanone via inhalation. In this study the exposure of male albino Sprague-Dawley rats to 250, 500 or 1400 ppm (0, 1, 2 and 5.6 mg/L) cyclohexanone pre-natal, post-natal and through sexual maturity did not result in adverse effects on reproductive performance during a post-exposure recovery period (Statistical analysis of the male/female fertility indices and pre-/post-implantation losses calculated for the test groups revealed no significant treatment-related differences from the negative control group. Fetal body weight and external developpement were not affected by paternal exposure to cyclohexanone). Therefore, treatment-related depressions in male fertility were reversible.
Moreover, in this study, the mean number of corpora lutea, implantation sites, early/late resorption sites and viable fetuses obtained from females that were bred with the test groups revealed no significant differences from the negative control group.
Based on this study and by analogy, cyclopentanone is not considered to be reprotoxic.
- Endpoint:
- fertility, other
- Remarks:
- based on test type
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The purity of the test substances was unknown. The GLP were not mentioned but the protocol was quite similar to the standard method.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Antifertility study
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CF-1
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- no data
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
- Details on exposure:
- CF-1 mice were divided into groups of 8 animals each. They were weighed and administered 50 mg/kg of test drug daily i.p. for a total of 28 days.
- Details on mating procedure:
- On the tenth day of dosing, the females were exposed to males (2 females/male) for the remainder of the experiment. The males were rotated every fifth day to avoid male infertility.
No other information are available. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Exposure period: a total of 28 days
Premating exposure period (females): 10 days - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Details on study schedule:
- no data
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
50 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 8 females per dose.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- no data
- Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- no data
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- no data
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- no data
- Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- no data
- Statistics:
- no data
- Reproductive indices:
- % pregnant, % viable fetus per litter and % reabsorption per litter were recorded
- Offspring viability indices:
- no data
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 50 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no effect observed
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
Female mice received i.p. injections of 50 mg/kg bw of cyclopentanone or cyclohexanone daily for a total of 28 days. On the tenth day of dosing, the females were exposed to males for the remainder of the experiment. Cyclohexanone and cyclopentanone demonstrated no toxicity at the dose of 50 mg/kg bw even if the rate of resorptions per litter was 345% that of control with cyclopentanone. By comparison with the results obtained with other cycloalkanones (cyclohexanone, cycloheptanone, cyclooctanone, cyclonanone and cyclododecanone) tested in this study, the high rate of resorption for cyclopentanone might be due to the manipulation during i.p. injection which was the route of administration.
- Endpoint:
- one-generation reproductive toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on generations indicated in Effect levels
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study well described and GLP, but performed on an analogue.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Post-exposure recovery study in males
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- no data
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- whole body
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- TEST ANIMALS:
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc.
- Age at study initiation: (P) 40 days of age ; (F1) were 29-43 days of age at the initiation of the F1 generation
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: ca. 156 +/- 12 g; Females: ca. 130 +/- 8 g; (F1) Males: ca. 55-63 g; Females: ca. 50-56 g
- Fasting period before study: data not available
- Housing: animals were housed in one of 2 types of cages:
* stainless steel, open mesh cage bank units, each containing 10 individual cubicles, were used during acclimation and all study phases, excluding mating, gestating, and lactating periods ;
* hanging, wire-bottom, galvanized steel caging was used during the mating trials.
- Diet: certified Purina Rodent Chow #5002, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 19 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 20 - 25.5°C
- Humidity: 30 - 70%
- Air changes: at least 12 per hr
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 05-SEP-1984 To: ? - Details on mating procedure:
- The males were paired weekly, with 2 untreated virgin females, for 4 consecutive weeks. They were rested during the 5th and 7th weeks of the recovery period, and paired again during the 6th and 8th weeks.
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Exposure period: 160 to 168 exposures
Premating exposure period (males): 160 to 168 exposures (6h/exposure)
Premating exposure period (females): untreated
Duration of test: 8 weeks of recovery - Frequency of treatment:
- daily, 6 hours per day
- Details on study schedule:
- This study was conducted during a post-exposure recovery period to evaluate potential reversibility of treatment-related depression in fertility of male rats exposed to cyclohexanone via inhalation.
The F1 males had previously received 160 to 168 exposures (6h/exposure) to 0, 250, 500 or 1400 ppm cyclohexanone.
Fertile males of the same strain and of a similar age were injected intraperitoneally with 1 ml/kg of 0.05% (w/v) triethylenemelanine (positive control).
All males were rested 2 days following the last exposure with the appropriate test or control article.
The males were paired weekly, with 2 untreated virgin females, for 4 consecutive weeks. They were rested during the 5th and 7th weeks of the recovery period, and paired again during the 6th and 8th weeks.
Females were examined daily during the mating trials to determine if copulation had occured. Females were sacrified on gestation day 20, by CO2 asphyxiation. The uterine contents were examined and findings recorded. Fetuses were sexed, weighted and examined externally. - Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 250, 500 or 1400 ppm (0, 1.0, 2.0 or 5.6 mg/L)
Basis:
nominal conc. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- no data
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- other: positive control: treated with triethylenemelanine
- Positive control:
- no
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- Females were examined daily during the mating trials to determine if copulation had occured. Females were sacrified on gestation day 20, by CO2 asphyxiation. The uterine contents were examined and findings recorded. Fetuses were sexed, weighted and examined externally.
- Statistics:
- Chi-square analysis, Kruskal-Wallis test or an analysis of variance were used in the statistical analysis. Differences were considered significant at p<0.05 or p<0.01.
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 1 400 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no effect related to the substance was observed
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- > 1 400 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no effect observed
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The exposure of male albino Sprague-Dawley rats to 250, 500 or 1400 ppm cyclohexanone pre-natally, post-natally and through sexual maturity did not result in adverse effects on reproductive performance during a post-exposure recovery period.
Therefore, treatment-related depressions in male fertility were reversible. - Executive summary:
The study performed by American Biogenics corporation in 1986 was conducted during a post-exposure recovery period to evaluate potential reversibility of treatment-related depression in fertility of male rats exposed to cyclohexanone via inhalation. In this study the exposure of male albino Sprague-Dawley rats to 250, 500 or 1400 ppm (0, 1, 2 and 5.6 mg/L) cyclohexanone pre-natal, post-natal and through sexual maturity did not result in adverse effects on reproductive performance during a post-exposure recovery period (Statistical analysis of the male/female fertility indices and pre-/post-implantation losses calculated for the test groups revealed no significant treatment-related differences from the negative control group. Fetal body weight and external developpement were not affected by paternal exposure to cyclohexanone). Therefore, treatment-related depressions in male fertility were reversible.
Moreover, in this study, the mean number of corpora lutea, implantation sites, early/late resorption sites and viable fetuses obtained from females that were bred with the test groups revealed no significant differences from the negative control group.
- Endpoint:
- two-generation reproductive toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on test type
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 05 sep 1984 to 19 mar 1986
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study well described and GLP, but performed on an analogue
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 416 (Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS:
- Species: rat
- Strain: RAT STRAINS: Sprague-Dawley
- Sex: male/female
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc.
- Age at study initiation: (P) 40 days of age ; (F1) were 29-43 days of age at the initiation of the F1 generation
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: ca. 156 +/- 12 g; Females: ca. 130 +/- 8 g; (F1) Males: ca. 55-63 g; Females: ca. 50-56 g
- Fasting period before study: data not available
- Housing: animals were housed in one of 2 types of cages:
* stainless steel, open mesh cage bank units, each containing 10 individual cubicles, were used during acclimation and all study phases, excluding mating, gestating, and lactating periods ;
* hanging, wire-bottom, galvanized steel caging was used during the mating trials.
- Diet: certified Purina Rodent Chow #5002, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 19 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 20 - 25.5°C
- Humidity: 30 - 70%
- Air changes: at least 12 per hr
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
IN-LIFE DATES: no data - Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- whole body
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- - Generation of test atmosphere / Chamber description:
Airflow rates through the flasks were 80-100 L/minute and column and flask temperatures were maintained below 105°C (flask, column and chamber temperatures were recorded hourly). Flask air flow, column and flask temperature and FMI pump rate were adjusted to achieve the target concentrations. The pressure drop was measured by minihelic gauge that calibrated against a mass flowmeter. Chamber airflow was recorded hourly.
- Test atmosphere:
* Brief description of analytical method used: gas chromatography (detector: photoionization)
* Samples taken from breathing zone: yes - Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: monogamous cohabitation, whenever possible, was used
- Length of cohabitation: 5 days
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug or sperm-positive results of vaginal smears referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- After 5 days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility.
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged: individually - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- (P) Males: 5 days/weeks before mating (at least 10 weeks), 5 days/week during mating (15-day maximum duration) and until initiation of the F1a weanings
(P) Females: 5-7 days/weeks before mating (at least 7+3 weeks), 7 days/weeks during mating (15-day maximum duration), 7 days/weeks during resulting pregnancies, 7 days/weeks through weaning of their F1 offspring.
(F1) Males: 5 days/weeks before mating (at least 15 weeks), 5 days/week during mating (15-day maximum duration) and until sacrifice
(F1) Females: 5-7 days/weeks before mating (at least 12+3 weeks), 7 days/weeks during mating (15-day maximum duration) and until sacrifice
Duration of test: 2 generations - Frequency of treatment:
- 6 hours per day, 5 days per week (for males and females pre-mating) or 7 days per week (for females only 3 weeks prior to the mating trial, during gestation days 0-20 and on lactation days 5-28).
- Details on study schedule:
- no data
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
F0: 250, 500 or 1000 ppm (1.0, 2.0 or 4.0 mg/L).|F1: 250, 500 or 1400 ppm (1.0, 2.0 or 5.6 mg/L).
Basis:
other: daily time-weighed average concentrations - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 30 males and 30 females in the F0 and the F1a generation
- Control animals:
- other: conditioned air only
- Details on study design:
- no data
- Positive control:
- no
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- * Cage side observations: Yes
- Time schedule: one a week (each animal was removed from its cage and thoroughly examined
* Detailed clinical observations: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations of morbidity and mortality: at least twice each day
* Body weight: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: once a week
- Estrous cyclicity (Parental animals): no
- Sperm parameters (Parental animals): no - Litter observations:
- - Standardisation of litters:
* Performed on day 4 postpartum: yes
* If yes, maximum of 8 pups/litter (4/sex/litter); excess pups were killed and discarded.
- Parameters examined: the sexes and numbers of pups delivered, delivered viable, delivered stillborn, and found partially cannibalized were recorded for each litter of progeny on the day of parturition. The number of pups surviving to lactation days 1, 4, 7, 14 and 28 were determined. Individual pup weights and sexes were determined on lactation days 0, 4, 7, 14, 21 and 28 for all surviving progeny. Each litter of progeny was examined daily for mortality and behavioural anomalies. Each pup was also examined thoroughly for developmental anomalies at birth, at each body weight interval, and again at weaning. Assessment for neurotoxicological effects were conducted on 1 pup from each F1a litter delivered. Ophtalmologic examination was performed on all F1a progeny and all F2a and F2b weanlings
- Gross examination of dead pups: data not available - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- - Sacrifice:
* Male animals: All surviving animals
* Maternal animals: All surviving animals
- Gross necropsy: Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
- Histopathology / organ weights: The tissues indicated in Table 1 (attached document) were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively - Statistics:
- Quantitative continuous variables, i.e. body weights, food consumption, were analyzed by Analysis of Variance with significant differences described by that treatment further studied by multiple comparison. Progeny body weight data were additionally studied using Analysis of Covariance (with the litter size as the covariate) and Dunnett's T-test. Reproductive data and neurotoxicologic data were analyzed using Chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact test.
All statistical analyses were interpreted using the untreated control group for comparison. Differences were considered significant at the p<0.05 and p<0.01 confidence levels. - Reproductive indices:
- Mating index = [ Number of copulations X 100 ] / [ Number of estrus cycles* utilized ]
Fertility index = [ Number of pregnancies X 100 ] / [ Number of copulation ]
Gestation index = [ Number of parturitions X 100 ] / [ Number of pregnancies ]
Female fertility index = [ Number of pregnancies X 100 ] / [ Number of female mated ]
Male fertility index = [ Number of sires X 100 ] / [ Number of males mated ]
* Five days equals 1 estrus cycle - Offspring viability indices:
- Born viable = [ No. pups delivered alive X 100 ] / [ Total No. pup delivered ]
Born dead = [No. stillbirths X 100 ] / [ Total No. pup delivered ]
Born and cannibalized = [ No. pups found partially cannibalized X 100 ] / [Total No. pup delivered ]
1 day = [ No. pups viable at lactation day 1 X 100 ] / [ No. pups born alive ]
4 day = [ No. pups viable at lactation day 4 X 100 ] / [ No. pups born alive ]
7 day = [ No. pups viable at lactation day 7 X 100 ] / [ No. pups retained at lactation day 4 ]
14 day = [ No. pups viable at lactation day 14 X 100 ] / [ No. pups retained at lactation day 4 ]
21 day = [ No. pups viable at lactation day 21 X 100 ] / [ No. pups retained at lactation day 4 ]
28 day = [ No. pups viable at lactation day 28 X 100 ] / [ No. pups retained at lactation day 4 ] - Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 500 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Clinical signs were observed in P0 animals at 1000 ppm
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Dose descriptor:
- other: NOAEL Parental F1
- Effect level:
- 500 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- clinical signs
- body weight and weight gain
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Clinical signs and body weight reduction were seen at 1400 ppm
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- > 1 000 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No effect
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- The NOAEL is higher than 1000 ppm. No effect was noted.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F2
- Effect level:
- 500 ppm
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- viability
- body weight and weight gain
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
A reproduction study was conducted to ascertain the potential effects of inhalation exposure to cyclohexanone vapor upon reproductive performance, growth, and development of 2 consecutive generations of CD Sprague-Dawley albino rats. Groups of 30 males/30 females were exposed to either 0, 250, 500 or 1000 ppm during the 1st (F0) generation. 30 males/30 females were selected from the F1a litters of each group to continue on test as second (F1) generation animals. The F1 generation animals were exposed to 0, 250, 500 or 1400 ppm cyclohexanone. Assessment for potential neurotoxicologic/neuropathologic effects were conducted pre-weaning and post-weaning in each F1a litter.
The daily time-weighted average concentrations during the F0 generation were 0, 253.2, 499.2 and 1008.9 ppm and during F1 generation the daily time-weighted average concentrations were 0, 249.8, 496.9 abd 1387.2 ppm of cyclohexanone.
Inhalation exposure to 1000 ppm cyclohexanone through one generation and exposure to 250 or 500 ppm cyclohexanone through 2 consecutive generations did not adversely affect the growth, development, and reproductive performance of the CD Sprague-Dawley derived albino rats. Evaluation for behavioral/neurotoxicologic development of selected F1a progeny revealed no consistent differences betwwen treated groups and the control group.
Inhalation exposure of the CD rat (progeny from parental animals exposed to 1000 ppm) to 1400 ppm cyclohexanone through one generation resulted in exposure-related male body weight depressions, reduced progeny survival, and progeny body weight depressions.Based on this study cyclohexanone induce in the F2 generation a reduction on the viability and on the body weight. However the fertility is not impacted and no developmental effect was seen.
Referenceopen allclose all
After cyclopentanone (or cyclohexanone) injection, rate of pregnant females was 88% that of controls; viable fetuses per litter was 76% of that of control.
The rate of resorptions per litter was 345% that of controls: although this high rate on resorptions, the authors concluded that at a dose of 50 mg/kg bw/ day, the test substance demonstrated no toxicity at this dose. This high rate on resorptions might be in relation with the route of administration (i.p.).
In the same study, Cyclohexanone demonstrated no toxicity at the dose of 50 mg/kg bw: the rate of pregnant females was 100% that of controls; viable fetuses per litter was 83% and the rate of
resorptions per litter was 46% that of control.
At termination, the mean body weights of all groups were similar, although the high-dose group weighted less (9%) than the negative control group at the start of the mating trials, and gained twice as much weight during the recovery period than the negative control males.
One male of the 1400 ppm group was found dead on the day of scheduled sacrifice: a diffuse red exudate in the nasal region was observed, but was not related to previous exposure to cyclohexanone.
The mean number of corpora lutea, implantation sites, early/late resorption sites and viable fetuses obtained from females that were bred with the test groups revealed no significant differences from the negative control group.
The females bred with positive control males had significant increases in early resorption sites and significant decreases in viable fetuses during weeks 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6.
Statistical analysis of the male/female fertility indices and pre-/post-implantation losses calculated for the test groups revealed no significant treatment-related differences from the negative control group.
No deaths were noted for treated F0 parental animals.
In F0 parental animals, following the first 2 exposures to 1000 ppm, lacrimation, ataxia and irregular breathing were noted.
- BODY WEIGHT AND FOOD CONSUMPTION:
Body weight data of F0 treated animals were comparable to the untreated control animals.
- REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE:
In F0 parental animals, statistical analyses of the mating indices calculated for the treated animals revealed no significant differences.
See table 2 in the attached document.
- OTHER FINDINGS:
Urinalysis was performed in 5 randomly selected F0 parental females from each treatment level post-lactation. The overnight urine volumes collected from these females revealed an increase in the volume of urine from the 1000 ppm females ; however, no qualitative differences were noted that corresponded with this increase. All other urinalysis parameters obtained were comparable to the untreated control females.
In F1 parental animals, irregular breathing, urine soaked fur, prostration, lacrimation and ataxia were the predominant observation noted post-exposure to 1400 ppm. During week 16, these animals appeared to acclimate to treatment with lethargy being the predominant post-exposure observation. Pre-exposure, 27/60 of the 1400 ppm animals had yellow/brown stained fur, and 2 males exhibited a staggering gait during week 30.
Body weight:
in F1 parental animals, the body weight data revealed significant reductions for the 1400 ppm males up the the 33th week and for the 500 ppm males only during the first week, when compared to the untreated control males.
During the 1st generation, F1a litter, progeny delivery and population data were similar for treated groups and the untreated control group. Progeny survival during the F1a litters was not altered by maternal exposure to cyclohexanone.
See table 3 in the attached document.
- BODY WEIGHT:
Body weight data obtained for F1a progeny were not considered to be affected by maternal cyclohexanone exposure.
- GROSS PATHOLOGY:
The examinations for progeny development generally revealed findings/anomalies which were sporadic in occurrence and which have been seen among control progeny. During the F1a litter, 1 pup from the 500 ppm groups and 1 pup from the 1000 ppm group exhibited eye opacity.
Examination of the specified tissues of the nervous system of untreated and 1000 ppm F1a progeny selected for neurotoxicologic testing did not reveal lesions in any of the tissues.
- HISTOPATHOLOGY:
Microscopic examination of the eyes from the F1a progeny revealed lenticular vacuolation for 2/115 of the 500 ppm progeny and 3/111 of the 1000 ppm progeny. The examining pathologist concluded that based on the low incidence and minimal nature of these changes, they were not treatment-related.
- OTHER FINDINGS:
Evaluation of behavioural/neurotoxicologic development of selected F1a progeny revealed no consistent statistical differences between treated and control groups. On lactation day 15, 31-56% fewer test progeny had open eyelids than the untreated control progeny ; however no dose-response pattern was apparent.
The ophthalmologist's interpretation of the examinations of the eyes was that the test substance did not increase the incidence of cataracts in the progeny. The lens and other ocular abnormalities appeared to be within the range of type and incidence expected in the number of animals examined.
Statistical analysis of the F2a and F2b progeny data revealed significant reductions for the mean number of 1400 ppm progeny viable during the lactation period. Progeny delivery and population data for the 250 and 500 ppm groups were comparable to the untreated control group. The % of 1400 ppm F2a and F2b progeny delivered viable and surviving to lactation days 1 and 4 (but not at lactation days 14, 21 and 28) were significantly less than seen for the untreated control. Progeny survival indices calculated for the 250 and 500 ppm groups during the F2a and F2b litters were similar to the untreated control group.
Statistical analysis of the 1400 ppm F2a and F2b progeny body weights revealed significant reduction when compared to the untreated control progeny. Because the statistical weight differences noted for the 250 and 500 ppm F2a progeny were minimal (5 to 17%) and were not seen for the F2b progeny, maternal exposure to 250 or 500 ppm cyclohexanone was not considered to adversely affect pup body weights.
See table 4 in table 4 in the attached document.
Table 1: Gross necropsy and tissue preparation of parent (checked (X) collected (column C), weighed (column W) and examined for histopathology (column H with X = all groups, # = control and top dose animals)
F0 parental |
F1 parental |
||||||
C |
W |
H |
SYSTEM |
C |
W |
H |
SYSTEM |
|
|
|
digestive |
|
|
|
digestive |
|
|
|
Liver |
X |
|
# |
Liver |
|
|
|
Stomach |
|
|
|
Stomach |
|
|
|
reticulo- endothelial |
|
|
|
reticulo- endothelial |
|
|
|
Bone marrow§ |
|
|
|
Bone marrow§ |
|
|
|
Lymph nodes |
|
|
|
Lymph nodes |
|
|
|
Peyer’s patch |
|
|
|
Peyer’s patch |
|
|
|
Spleen |
|
|
|
Spleen |
|
|
|
Thymus |
|
|
|
Thymus |
|
|
|
urogenital |
|
|
|
urogenital |
X |
|
# |
Epididymis |
X |
|
# |
Epididymis |
|
|
|
Kidneys |
X |
|
# |
Kidneys |
X |
|
# |
Ovaries |
X |
|
# |
Ovaries |
|
|
|
Primordial follicles, growing follicles, and large Corpora lutea of lactation from the post-lactation ovary |
|
|
|
Primordial follicles, growing follicles, and large Corpora lutea of lactation from the post-lactation ovary |
X |
|
# |
Prostate |
X |
|
# |
Prostate |
X |
|
# |
Seminal Vesicle with Coagulating Gland (if present) |
X |
|
# |
Seminal Vesicle with Coagulating Gland (if present) |
X |
|
# |
Testes |
X |
|
# |
Testes |
X |
|
# |
Uterus (with oviducts) |
X |
|
# |
Uterus (with oviducts) |
X |
|
# |
Vagina |
X |
|
# |
Vagina |
|
|
|
neurologic |
|
|
|
neurologic |
|
|
|
Brain |
X |
|
# |
Brain |
|
|
|
Peripheral nerve tissue |
|
|
|
Peripheral nerve tissue |
|
|
|
Spinal cord (at least 2 different locations) |
|
|
|
Spinal cord (at least 2 different locations) |
|
|
|
glandular |
|
|
|
glandular |
|
|
|
Adrenal glands |
|
|
|
Adrenal glands |
|
|
|
Pituitary gland |
|
|
|
Pituitary gland |
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
Target organ: |
X |
|
# |
Eyes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Quality of whole database:
- Several studies are available.
Additional information
Read accross with Cyclohexanone was used for Toxicity to reproduction and developmental toxicity/ teratogenicity.
Toxicity to fertility:
Summary of the key studies:
In a Hall, 1976 study with reliability 2 according to Klimisch scale, female mice received i.p. injections of 50 mg/kg bw of cyclopentanone or cyclohexanone daily for a total of 28 days. On the tenth day of dosing, the females were exposed to males for the remainder of the experiment. Cyclohexanone and cyclopentanone demonstrated no toxicity at the dose of 50 mg/kg bw even if the rate of resorptions per litter was 345% that of control with cyclopentanone. By comparison with the results obtained with other cycloalkanones (cyclohexanone, cycloheptanone, cyclooctanone, cyclonanone and cyclododecanone) tested in this study, the high rate of resorption for cyclopentanone might be due to the manipulation during i.p. injection which was the route of administration. Based on this study a NOAEL of 50 mg/kg can be identified for mice and i.p injection.
According to this study, cyclopentanone has no effect on fertility by i.p injection and the closest analogue with similar data on pregnant female rate and viable fetuses per litter is cyclohexanone.
A
reproduction study (Mayhew, 1986) with reliability 1 according to
Klimisch scale, was conducted to ascertain the potential effects of
inhalation exposure to cyclohexanone vapor upon reproductive
performance, growth, and development of 2 consecutive generations of CD
Sprague-Dawley albino rats. Groups of 30 males/30 females were exposed
to either 0, 250, 500 or 1000 ppm (0, 1, 2 and 4 mg/L) during the 1st
(F0) generation. 30 males/30 females were selected from the F1a litters
of each group to continue on test as second (F1) generation animals. The
F1 generation animals were exposed to 0, 250, 500 or 1400 ppm (0, 1, 2
and 5.6 mg/L) cyclohexanone. Assessment for potential
neurotoxicologic/neuropathologic effects was conducted pre-weaning and
post-weaning in each F1a litter.
The daily time-weighted average concentrations during the F0 generation
were 0, 253.2, 499.2 and 1008.9 ppm and during F1 generation the daily
time-weighted average concentrations were 0, 249.8, 496.9 and 1387.2 ppm
of cyclohexanone.
Inhalation exposure to 1000 ppm cyclohexanone through one generation and
exposure to 250 or 500 ppm cyclohexanone through 2 consecutive
generations did not adversely affect the growth, development, and
reproductive performance of the CD Sprague-Dawley derived albino rats.
Evaluation for behavioral/neurotoxicologic development of selected F1a
progeny revealed no consistent differences between treated groups and
the control group. However, inhalation exposure of the CD rat (progeny
from parental animals exposed to 1000 ppm) to 1400 ppm cyclohexanone
through one generation resulted in exposure-related pharmacotoxic
reactions, male body weight depressions, reduced male fertility, reduced
progeny survival, and progeny body weight depressions.
The study performed by American Biogenics corporation in 1986 was conducted during a post-exposure recovery period to evaluate potential reversibility of treatment-related depression in fertility of male rats exposed to cyclohexanone via inhalation. In this study the exposure of male albino Sprague-Dawley rats to 250, 500 or 1400 ppm (0, 1, 2 and 5.6 mg/L) cyclohexanone pre-natal, post-natal and through sexual maturity did not result in adverse effects on reproductive performance during a post-exposure recovery period (Statistical analysis of the male/female fertility indices and pre-/post-implantation losses calculated for the test groups revealed no significant treatment-related differences from the negative control group. Fetal body weight and external developpement were not affected by paternal exposure to cyclohexanone). Therefore, treatment-related depressions in male fertility were reversible. Moreover, in this study, the mean number of corpora lutea, implantation sites, early/late resorption sites and viable fetuses obtained from females that were bred with the test groups revealed no significant differences from the negative control group.
Based on three studies on
cyclopentanone and cyclohexanone, cyclopentanone does not induce
impairment on fertility.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
In a study performed on cyclopentanone, no developmental effects were observed. This was confirm by several data on cyclohexanone.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The test substance purity was unknown. The study was only described in an abstract without details. The protocol was similar to the standard method of the guidelines even if only two doses were used.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- A teratology screening study in rats.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- no data
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- - Vehicle:
Amount of vehicle: 5 mL/kg
No more data - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Details on mating procedure:
- no data
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- From days 6 through 15 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily
- Duration of test:
- 20 days
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25 females per dose.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- no data
- Maternal examinations:
- Appearance and behaviour were evaluated and body weights were recorded.
No more data - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
A gestation day 20 Cesarean section was performed to evaluate intrauterine survival and fetal development indices including fetal body weights and external, skeletal and visceral morphology. - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: no other information available
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: no other information available
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: no other information available
- Head examinations: No data - Statistics:
- no data
- Indices:
- no data
- Historical control data:
- yes
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Details on maternal toxic effects:
No maternal, embryotoxic or teratologic effects were expressed at either dose level.
However, the highest dose was selected to produce maternal toxicity expressed as reduced body weight gain in a range-finding study - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
The only potential compound-related effect in the study was a slightly decreased mean fetal body weight at the 300 mg/kg bw dose although this value was within the range of the WIL historical data.
An increase in the number of litters with fetal variant malaligned sternebrae occurred at the 50 mg/kg bw dose, but the incidence at the highest dose was comparable to the control group: the 50 mg/kg bw/day dose level was considered as "no-effect" level. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 300 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- One developmental study was conducted with cyclopentanone administrated in rats by gavage from days 6 through 15 of gestation at 50 or 300 mg/kg bw. No developmental effects were observed.
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The purity of cyclohexanone was not precised exactly. The protocol was described in details. The study was conducted in good way even if the the test substance was administered daily only on days 8 through 12 of gestation instead of days 6 through 15. The results were presented in details even if 41 subtances have been tested.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Teratology screening protocol in mice
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS:
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, MA
- Age at study initiation: 90-day-old
- Housing: individually housed in transparent plastic cages with wood shavings for bedding
- Diet: commercial lab chow, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Weight at study initiation, fasting period before study, acclimation period: data not available
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: temperature-controlled atmosphere (no other information available)
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
- Humidity , air changes: data not available
IN-LIFE DATES: data not available - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- - Preparation of dosing solutions: data not available
- Vehicle:
> Amount of vehicle: 0.5 mL/day
> Justification for use and choice of vehicle, concentration in vehicle, lot/batch no., purity: data not available - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Details on mating procedure:
- no data
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- From days 8 through 12 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily
- Duration of test:
- From the eighth day of gestation through day 250 of the offspring.
- Dose / conc.:
- 800 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24-25 females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: in studies to determine the minimally toxic dose (MTD), non pregnant female mice were housed 5 per cage. Animals were dosed (0.5 mL/day) for 5 consecutive days at one of five dose levels. Each dose level consisted of 10 animals. The MTD was considered that dose which resulted in either significant weight reduction during the treatment period, mortality or other sign of toxicity
- Rationale for animal assignment: data not available - Maternal examinations:
- - Cage side observations: No data
- Detailed clinical observations: No data
- Body weight: Yes (no other information available)
- Post-mortem examinations: No data - Ovaries and uterine content:
- Dams that had not given birth by postnatal day 3 were killed and examined for the presence of resorptions.
- Fetal examinations:
- The litters were counted and weighted at 1 and 3 days of age. Dead pups
recovered from the cages were necropsied and abnormalities recorded. - Statistics:
- all data analyses compared treatment group and their concurrent controls and were performed using analysis of variance
- Indices:
- number of pregnant, average weight on day 1 and 3, number of live on day 1 and 3
- Historical control data:
- no data
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- No difference on mortality compared to the control.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Details on maternal toxic effects:
see table 1 in results - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 800 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
see table 1 in results - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 800 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- No maternal nor embryotoxic effects observed in this study
- Executive summary:
Female mice CD-1 have been exposed by gavage to 800 mg/kg/day of cyclohexanone from day 8 to day 12 of gestation. Maternal toxicity and effects on pups were compared to control. No maternal toxicity was observed in the tested group compared to the control. The pups compared to the control group were not affected.
Based on this study cyclohexanone is not considered to have an impact on the development.
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to internationally accepted test guidelines (U.S. EPA OPPTS 870.3700, similar to OECD test guideline 414). Details about the method and the results are recorded. The GLP are not mentioned.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3700 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Remark: similar to OECD test guideline 414
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS:
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc., Wilmington, Massachussetts 01887
- Age at study initiation: 83 days old
- Weight at study initiation: 273-274 g (mean body weight)
- Fasting period before study: data not available
- Housing: individually in stainless steel wire mesh cages
- Diet: Purina certified rodent chow No. 5002, ad libitum (except during exposure)
- Water: tap water, ad libitum (except during exposure)
- Acclimation period: 14 days prior to mating
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 18-24 °C
- Humidity: 40-60%
- Air changes: data not available
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
IN-LIFE DATES: data not available - Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- other: in the breathing zone of the animals
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- - Generation of test atmosphere / Chamber descrition:
> Exposure apparatus: a modified Laskin nebulizer
> Source and rate of air: room air (237, 236, 230 and 224 liters per minute at 0, 320, 686, 1430 ppm respectively)
A modifed Laskin nebulizer was connected to a pump and metered cyclohexanone. The resulting aerosol was directed from the flask via a glass "T" connecting tube to a point where room air was added. The test material was drawn as a vapour into the top inlet port of the 1m3 inhalation chamber.
- Test atmosphere: Cyclohexanone was analysed by a gas analyser spectrophotometer. Samples of chamber atmospheres were obtained at least 4 times per exposure at approximately hourly intervals during exposure. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- M/F ratio per cage: 2 : 1
- Proof of pregnancy: females were considered to have mated if sperm was observed at microscopic evaluation of the vaginal smear. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- days 6 through 19 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Duration of test:
- Until day 20 of gestation.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 26 females
- Control animals:
- yes, sham-exposed
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: data not available
- Rationale for animal assignment: females which mated were assigned to groups daily in such a way as to most nearly equalize the day 0 mean group body weights. A manual sorting procedure was used. - Maternal examinations:
- - Cage side observations: No data
- Detailed clinical observations: Yes
> Time schedule for examinations of morbidity and mortality: twice daily
> Detailed physical examination (behaviour, respiration, ocular, appearance, gastroinstestinal, palpation of tissue masses): on days 0, 6, 10, 15 and 20 of gestation
- Body weight: Yes
> Time schedule for examinations: on days 0, 6, 10, 15 and 20 of gestation
- Post-mortem examinations: Yes
> Sacrifice on gestation day 20 (by lethal exposure to ether)
> Organs examined: complete gross post-mortem examination performed on all animals. External surface, all orifices, the cranial cavity, carcass, the external surface of the spinal cord and the external and sectioned surface of the brain, nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, the thoracic, abdominal and pelvic cavities and their viscera and the cervical tissues and organs were determined for all animals. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Other: live and dead fetuses - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: all fetuses per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Head examinations: No data - Statistics:
- The statistical evaluation was made by the ANOVA, Dunnett's test, chi-square and Fisher exact test.
- Indices:
- no data
- Historical control data:
- no data
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Not statistically significant compared to the control.
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Not statistically significant compared to the control.
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes
Details on maternal toxic effects:
All the females survived to the day 20 sacrifice.
Pregnancy rates were 92.3, 88.5, 92.3 and 88.5%, respectively for the control, low-, mid- and high dose groups.
Mean body weight gain during the day 0-6 interval was comparable between control and treated groups. In the high-dose group, mean body weight gain was significantly lower than control data during the day 6-20 gestation interval (P<0.01).
In the high-dose group, lacrimation, lethargy, nasal and brown/red vaginal discharge were observed in several females.
The mean number of corpora lutea, the mean number of resorption sites and the mean percentage of resorptions to implants were comparable between the control and the treated groups. In the low-dose group, the mean number of uterine implantation sites and the mean number of live fetuses were slightly higher than control, but il was not statistically significant. In the mid- and high-dose groups, the percentage of litter with at least one resorption site was slightly higher than control, but with no statistically significancy. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Effect level:
- ca. 657 ppm
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:yes
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Mean fetal weight data were comparable between control, low- and mid-dose groups, but significantly lower in the high-dose group.
The incidence of external malformations in the low-dose group was 0.6% (2/348 fetuses): a fetus had a umbilical hernia and prominent eye bulges, an other was pale in color. No adverse effect of treatment was externally observed in the other groups.
No adverse effect of treatment was evident from the fetal visceral and skeletal malformation data.
At the high-dose level, there was a generalised retardation in ossification ; the incidence of fetuses with incomplete ossification, particularly in cranial ossifications, sternebrae and phalanges, was notably increased from control data. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 657 ppm
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- fetal/pup body weight changes
- other: ossification variations
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
Cyclohexanone was tested for developmental toxicity in of 26 bred female CD rats receiving whole body exposure to nominal vapour concentrations of 0, 300, 650, or 1400 ppm for 6 hours/day on days 6-19 of gestation, in a dynamic air flow chamber. There was no effect of treatment with respect to mortality, pregnancy rate, or uterine implantation data. Maternal toxicity in the high-dose group was evident by statistical differences between dosed groups and controls for body weight and body weight gain. High-dose fetuses also exhibited significantly lower weights. The treatment had no adverse effects with respect to external, visceral, or skeletal malformations. The incidence of fetuses with at least one ossification variation was increased in the high-dose group. This effect is probably due to the maternal toxicity.
Based on the results of this study cyclohexanone is not expected to induce effects on development.
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The purity of cyclohexanone was not mentioned. The protocol was described in details. The study was conducted in good way even if the test substance was administered only on days 8 through 12 of gestation instead of days 6 through 15. The results were presented in details even if 55 substances have been tested.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- In vivo developmental toxicity screen in mice
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICR
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS:
- Strain: ICR/SIM
- Source: Simonsen Laboratories (Gilroy, CA)
- Age at study initiation: adult (no other information available)
- Weight at study initiation: 32 to 36 g
- Fasting period before study: data not available
- Housing: one per cage in 32 x 23 x 15 cm suspended polycarbonate shoebax cages containing hardwood-chip bedding
- Diet: Simonsen Custom Lab diet 7, ad libitum
- Water: UV-purified drinking water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: data not available
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 22 -/+ 2 °C
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
- Humidity, air changes: data not available
IN-LIFE DATES: data not available - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- no data
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Details on mating procedure:
- Mice were either received from the supplier timed-pregnant or were bred in-house (no other information available)
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- From days 8 through 12 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily
- Duration of test:
- From the eighth day of gestation through day 3 of the offspring
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 28 females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: dose level (MTD) was determined in a preliminary study
- Rationale for animal assignment: data not available - Maternal examinations:
- - Cage side observations: No data
- Detailed clinical observations: No data
- Body weight: Yes
> Time schedule for examinations: on gestation days 7, 13 and at 1 day postpartum
- Post-mortem examinations: No data - Ovaries and uterine content:
- Females were allowed to give birth and the litters were counted and weighted at 1 and 3 days of age.
Dams that had not given birth by gestation day 21 or 22 were necropsied and their uteri were examined. - Fetal examinations:
- Dead pups recovered from the cages were necropsied and abnormalities recorded.
- Statistics:
- All analysis compared test substance group and its concurrent control. Fisher's exact one-tailed probability test was used to assess pregnancy and pup survival ratios.
Data on maternal and fetal body weights and litter size were assessed by analysis of variance. To correct for differences in litter size, the number of live pups born was used as a covariant in the body weight analysis. - Indices:
- Parameters used in the evaluation of the results were:
- maternal toxicity
- No. of litters born
- No. of litters resorbed
- Average number of pups/litter alive on postnatal day 1 based on only those litters that came to term
- Average number of pups/litter alive on postnatal day 1 including the results of any pregnancies that had come to term by day 21 or 22, ie, litters alive in utero or totally resorbed (0 live pups)
- Average number of pups/litter dead on postnatal day 1
- Average number of pups/litter alive on postnatal day 3
- % of pup survival from postnatal day 1 to day 3
- Average live pup weight on postnatal day 1
- Average live pup weight on postnatal day 3
- Average live pup weight gain from postnatal day 1 to day 3 - Historical control data:
- no data
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:yes
Details on maternal toxic effects:
See table 1. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- < 2 200 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:yes
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
At 2200 mg/kg bw maternally toxic dose level, cyclohexanone induced a significant (p<0.01) reduced body weight gain of the dams during the exposure (from day 8 to day 12 of gestation) and a significant (p<0.01) reduction in birth weight (on day 1 and day 3). 6/28 dams dead during the treatment period versus no death in control group.
Necropsy of neonates revealed no malformation. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- < 2 200 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- fetal/pup body weight changes
- other:
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- At 2200 mg/kg, marked maternal toxicity was observed. The only effect noted in pups is the reduction of the body weight in day 1 and 3. This decrease of body weight pups is probably due to the marked maternal toxicity. No real developmental effect were observed.
- Executive summary:
ICR mice have been exposed to 2200 mg/kg/day of cyclohexanone from day 8 to day 12 of gestation. An increase of mortality and a decrease of the body weight were observed in dams compared to the control group. In presence of this marked maternal toxicity only reduction in body weight pups on day 1 and 3 was noted. No other developmental effect and no malformation were observed. Based in this study cyclohexanone is not expected to induce effect on development.
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The purity of cyclohexanone was known. The protocol was described in details. The GLP were not mentioned. The study was conducted in good way since the test substance was administered daily on days 5 through 20 of gestation.
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Fetal effects of inhalation exposure in rats
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS:
- Source: Simonsen Laboratories, Gilroy, California
- Housing: individually in 8'' x 11'' stainless steel wire mesh cages
- Diet: standard rat chow, ad libitum (except during exposure)
- Water: tap water, ad libitum (except during exposure)
- Age at study initiation, weight at study initiation, fasting period before study, acclimation period: data not available
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 22-25 °C
- Photoperiod: 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
- Humidity, air changes: data not available
IN-LIFE DATES: data not available - Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- whole body
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on exposure:
- - Generation of test atmosphere / Chamber descrition:
Cyclohexanone was used in a solvent vapour generating system and mixed with purified air to produce cyclohexanone concentration in the inhalation chamber.
- Test atmosphere:
Cyclohexanone vapour concentrations were monitored continuously throughout exposure periods using an infrared gas analyzer connected to a chart recorder.
- Vehicle: data not available - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no data
- Details on mating procedure:
- no data
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- From days 5 through 20 of gestation
- Frequency of treatment:
- 7 hours daily
- Duration of test:
- 16 days
- Dose / conc.:
- 100 ppm
- Dose / conc.:
- 200 ppm
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 ppm
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 in the cyclohexanone-exposed groups, 5 in the negative and positive control group
- Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- no data
- Maternal examinations:
- - Cage side observations: No data
- Detailed clinical observations: No data
- Body weight: Yes
> Time schedule for examinations: on days 5 and 21 of gestation
- Post-mortem examinations: No data - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: Yes
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: No data
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes
- Other: placement of early and late resorption, placement of live and dead fetuses - Fetal examinations:
- - External examinations: Yes: no other information available
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: no other information available
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: no other information available
- Head examinations: Yes: one-half of the fetuses were examined - Statistics:
- A t-test statistic for multiple comparisons was used to examine differences between mean percentages of all observations in exposed rats as compared with control rats exposed concurrently to room air.
The criterion for statistical significance was p<0.05. - Indices:
- no data
- Historical control data:
- no data
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Details on maternal toxic effects:
In 263 fetuses from 21 cyclohexanone-exposed litters, there was only a slight reduction in mean maternal body weight gain and corrected body weight of the exposed groups as compared to controls exposed concurrently to room air.
A grey mottling of the lungs was noted but no other changes were observed when dams were necropsied.
See table 1. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Effect level:
- > 500 ppm
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No maternal toxicity was observed.
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
No cyclohexanone-related effects were observed on implantation, fetal weight, resorptions, fetal death, or sex ratio while 2-ethoxyethanol-administred positive controls did a show a significant decrease in mean fetal weight, and an increase in percent resorptions at dose levels that also inhibited maternal weight.
A few visceral malformations, such as a right subclavain artery arsing off of the aortic arch or absence of the innominate artery, were observed in three fetuses from the 250 and 500 ppm cyclohexanone-exposed groups. In each of these concentration-cyclohexanone group, skeletal malformations occurred in only one fetus (misshapen radius, ulne, femur, tibia and scapula and wavy ribs). Few external malformations were observed in the cyclohexanone-exposed groups.
Although not significantly different from controls, cyclohexanone-exposed fetuses showed some developmental variations, with incompletely ossified sternebrae numbers 5 and 6 and rudimentary 14th ribs seen most frequently.
In the absence of other conventional signs of embryotoxicity (i.e. decrease in fetal weight or increase in embryolethality) in the cyclohexanone-exposed rats, the authors argued that the few variations and malformations observed in fetuses from pregnant rats exposed by inhalation to 250 and 500 ppm cyclohexanone were not considered to be exposure-related.
No external or visceral variations were observed in any of the exposed group. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Effect level:
- > 500 ppm
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- No developmental effect link to the substance is obvered.
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Inhalation exposure of time-pregnant rats to 250 ppm as much as 500 ppm cyclohexanone for 7 hours daily from days 5 through 20 of gestation was not considered to be developmentally toxic.
- Executive summary:
Cyclohexanone (99.8% purity) was investigated for developmental effects using pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats (20/group) exposed to 100, 250 or 500 ppm concentration in an inhalation chamber for 7 hours per day from days 5 through 20 of pregnancy. Controls were exposed to room air. Maternal weight gain at 250 and 500 ppm was only slightly lower than the control dams, and a grey mottling of the lungs was seen in a few of the cyclohexanone-exposed dams. There were no significant differences between the cyclohexanone and control groups in fetal weight, resorption sites, fetal death or sex ratio. External and soft tissue examinations revealed no significant incidence of malformations or variations in cyclohexanone-exposed animals. A slight increase in the mean % of rudimentary ribs per litter was observed in the 250 and 500 ppm exposed groups. However, no significant numbers of skeletal malformations were noticed in either the cyclohexanone or room air control groups. It was concluded that respiratory exposure of rats to as much as 500 ppm cyclohexanone during organogenesis was unlikely to be developmentally toxic.
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Justification for type of information:
- see below attached justification for read-across
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 800 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks on result:
- other: No maternal nor embryotoxic effects observed
- Remarks:
- results on an analogous (cyclohexanone)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- > 800 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: No maternal nor embryotoxic effects observed
- Remarks:
- results on an analogous (cyclohexanone)
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
Read accross with Cyclohexanone was used for Toxicity to developmental toxicity/ teratogenicity.
Summary of the study:
Female mice CD-1 have been exposed by gavage to 800 mg/kg/day of cyclohexanone from day 8 to day 12 of gestation. Maternal toxicity and effects on pups were compared to the control group. No maternal toxicity was observed in the tested group compared to the control group. The pups compared to the control group were not affected.
No maternal nor embryotoxic effects are observed in this study.
Based on this study and by analogy cyclopentanone is not considered to have an impact on the development.
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Justification for type of information:
- see below attached justification for read-across
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICR
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- < 2 200 mg/kg bw/day
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Remarks on result:
- other: results on an analogous (cyclohexanone)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- < 2 200 mg/kg bw/day
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- fetal/pup body weight changes
- other:
- Remarks on result:
- other: results on an analogous (cyclohexanone)
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
Read accross with Cyclohexanone was used for Toxicity to developmental toxicity/ teratogenicity.
ICR mice have been exposed to 2200 mg/kg/day of cyclohexanone from day 8 to day 12 of gestation. An increase of mortality and a decrease of the body weight were observed in dams compared to the control group. In presence of this marked maternal toxicity only reduction in body weight pups on day 1 and 3 was noted. No other developmental effect and no malformation were observed. Based in this study cyclohexanone is not expected to induce effect on development.
Based on this study and by analogy, cyclopentaone is not expected to induce effect on the development.
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Justification for type of information:
- see below attached justification for read-across
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Effect level:
- > 500 ppm
- Basis for effect level:
- other: maternal toxicity
- Remarks on result:
- other: results on an analogous (cyclohexanone)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEC
- Effect level:
- > 500 ppm
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- other: teratogenicity
- Remarks on result:
- other: results on an analogous (cyclohexanone)
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
Read accross with Cyclohexanone was used for Toxicity to developmental toxicity/ teratogenicity.
Summary of the study:
Cyclohexanone (99.8% purity) was investigated for developmental effects using pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats (20/group) exposed to 100, 250 or 500 ppm concentration in an inhalation chamber for 7 hours per day from days 5 through 20 of pregnancy. Controls were exposed to room air. Maternal weight gain at 250 and 500 ppm was only slightly lower than the control dams, and a grey mottling of the lungs was seen in a few of the cyclohexanone-exposed dams. There were no significant differences between the cyclohexanone and control groups in fetal weight, resorption sites, fetal death or sex ratio. External and soft tissue examinations revealed no significant incidence of malformations or variations in cyclohexanone-exposed animals. A slight increase in the mean % of rudimentary ribs per litter was observed in the 250 and 500 ppm exposed groups. However, no significant numbers of skeletal malformations were noticed in either the cyclohexanone or room air control groups. It was concluded that respiratory exposure of rats to as much as 500 ppm cyclohexanone during organogenesis was unlikely to be developmentally toxic.
Based on this study and by analogy cyclopentanone is not expected to induce developmental effect.
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Justification for type of information:
- see below attached justification for read-across
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 657 ppm
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- clinical signs
- Remarks on result:
- other: results on an analogous (cyclohexanone)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- External malformations:
- no effects observed
- Skeletal malformations:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 657 ppm
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- fetal/pup body weight changes
- other: teratogenicity
- Remarks on result:
- other: results on an analogous (cyclohexanone)
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Executive summary:
Read accross with Cyclohexanone was used for Toxicity to developmental toxicity/ teratogenicity.
Summary of the study:
Cyclohexanone was tested for developmental toxicity in of 26 bred female CD rats receiving whole body exposure to nominal vapour concentrations of 0, 300, 650, or 1400 ppm for 6 hours/day on days 6-19 of gestation, in a dynamic air flow chamber. There was no effect of treatment with respect to mortality, pregnancy rate, or uterine implantation data. Maternal toxicity in the high-dose group was evident by statistical differences between dosed groups and controls for body weight and body weight gain. High-dose fetuses also exhibited significantly lower weights. The treatment had no adverse effects with respect to external, visceral, or skeletal malformations. The incidence of fetuses with at least one ossification variation was increased in the high-dose group. This effect is probably due to the maternal toxicity. Cyclohexanone is not expected to induce effects on development.
Based on this study and by analogy, cyclopentanone to have an impact on the development.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: results
Compound |
No.treated |
No. died |
No. pregnant |
Maternal weight change |
No. live day 1 |
Avg. weight day 1 |
No. live day 3 |
Avg. weight day 3 |
Control |
25 |
1 |
14 |
6.9 |
8.9 |
1.71 |
8.9 |
2.43 |
Cyclohexanone |
24 |
2 |
18 |
7.2 |
10.9 |
1.63 |
10.7 |
2.34 |
Table 1: Summary of reproduction data
Observation |
Dose (ppm) |
|||
0 |
300 |
650 |
1400 |
|
# Animals Assigned (Mated) |
26 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
# Animals Pregnant |
24 |
23 |
24 |
23 |
Pregnancy Rate (%) |
92.3 |
88.5 |
92.3 |
88.5 |
Maternal Wastage # Died |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
# Aborted |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
# Premature Delivery |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total # Corpora Lutea Corpora Lutea/Dam |
381 15.9 |
400 17.4 |
391 16.3 |
363 15.8 |
Total # Implantations (Implantations/Dam) |
354 14.8 |
364 15.8 |
352 14.7 |
328 14.3 |
Total # Live Fetuses (Live Fetuses/Dam) |
331 13.8 |
348 15.1 |
326 13.6 |
306 13.3 |
Total # Dead Fetuses (Dead Fetuses/Dam) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Total # Resorptions |
23 |
16 |
26 |
22 |
Resorptions/Dam Early |
1.0 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
Late |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Litters with Total Resorptions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Mean Fetal Weight (g) |
3.67 |
3.66 |
3.68 |
2.73 |
Males |
3.77 |
3.80 |
3.76 |
2.83 |
Females |
3.56 |
3.53 |
3.58 |
2.64 |
Preimplantation Loss (%) |
7.1 |
9.0 |
10.0 |
9.6 |
Postimplantation Loss (%) |
Table 2: Maternal Body Weight Gain (grams)
Interval |
Dose in ppm |
|||
Control |
300 |
650 |
1400 |
|
Days 0 - 6 |
34 |
36 |
36 |
36 |
Days 6 - 15 |
43 |
47 |
37 |
24 |
Days 15 - 20 |
70 |
75 |
71 |
49 |
Days 6 - 20 |
113 |
122 |
108 |
73 |
Table 1: results
Perinatal response |
|||||||||||
Maternal response |
No. of litters |
Avg. No. Neonates/litter |
% survival day 1-3 |
Avg. Neonate weight (g) |
|||||||
Group |
No. Dead/ treated |
Avg. wt. gain (g) |
born |
resorbed |
live day 1 |
Dead day 1 |
Live day 3 |
|
Day 1 |
Day 3 |
2-day gain |
Control |
0/28 |
7.7 |
24 |
0 |
12 |
0.08 |
11.9 |
99 |
1.8 |
2.5 |
0.7 |
Cyclohexanone |
6/28 |
5.9* |
26 |
2 |
12.1 |
0.06 |
12.1 |
99 |
1.68* |
2.34* |
0.65 |
*: p 0.01
Table 1: Summary of maternal data in Cyclohexanone exposed and control groups
Conc. (ppm) |
Actual mean body weight gain (g)a |
Corrected mean body weight gain (g)b |
Mean number of corpora lutea per dam |
||||||
NCc |
CHd |
PCe |
NC |
CH |
PC |
NC |
CH |
PC |
|
100 |
92.7 (± 39)f |
77.6 (± 34.5) |
41.9 (± 12.8) |
33.3 (± 42.8) |
43.7 (± 12.5) |
37.7 (± 8.7) |
12.2 (± 3.3) |
12 (± 1.3) |
11.3 (± 3.1) |
250 |
113.3 (± 6.8) |
97.3 (± 31.2) |
42.9 (± 18.6) |
59.8 (± 28.7) |
40.2 (± 10.9) |
29.5 (± 12.5) |
11.8 (± 0.8) |
11.3 (± 4.7) |
12 (± 1) |
500 |
110.4 (± 10.5) |
83.5 (± 45.7) |
32.5 (± 11.5) |
35 (± 7) |
23.1 (± 14.2) |
10.7 (± 6) |
14.4 (± 1.1) |
11.5 (± 6.2) |
10.4 (± 2.5) |
a: Day 21 weight minus day 5 weight
b: Day 21 weight minus day 5 weight and gravid uterus weight
c: Negative control exposed to room air
d: Cyclohexanone exposed
e: Positive controls were given 2-ethoxyethanol. Dosage was 400 µL/kg body weight per day by gavage for 100 ppm concurrent control and 300 µL/kg for 250 and 500 ppm concurrent controls.
Table 2: Number of Dams and fetuses examined following exposure to either Cyclohexanone, room air, or 2-ethoxyethanol:
Conc. (ppm) |
Number of pregnant rats |
Number of fetuses examined |
||||||||||
External |
Visceral |
Skeletal |
||||||||||
NCa |
CHb |
PCc |
NC |
CH |
PC |
NC |
CH |
PC |
NC |
CH |
PC |
|
100 |
5 |
7 (9)d |
5 (1) |
52 |
59 |
1 |
25 |
31 |
1 |
52 |
59 |
1 |
250 |
5 |
9 |
5 (4) |
57 |
103 |
17 |
29 |
52 |
11 |
57 |
103 |
17 |
500 |
5 |
7 |
5 (4) |
65 |
101 |
20 |
33 |
52 |
11 |
65 |
101 |
20 |
a: Negative control exposed to room air
b: Cyclohexanone exposed
c: Positive controls were given 2-ethoxyethanol. Dosage was 400 µL/kg body weight per day by gavage for 100 ppm concurrent control and 300 µL/kg for 250 and 500 ppm concurrent controls.
d: number of dams with litter shown in parentheses if different from number pregnant.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- The only data on cyclopentaone
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Quality of whole database:
- Several studies are available.
Additional information
Toxicity to development (cyclopentanone):
One developmental study (Rusch, 1988), selected as a key study, was conducted with cyclopentanone administrated in Wistar rats by gavage from days 6 through 15 of gestation at 50 or 300 mg/kg bw in corn oil. Appearance and behaviour were evaluated and body weights were recorded.No maternal, embryotoxic or teratologic effects were expressed at either dose level.
However, the highest dose was selected to produce maternal toxicity expressed as reduced body weight gain in a range-finding study.
The only potential compound-related effect in the study was a slightly decreased mean fetal body weight at the 300 mg/kg bw dose although this value was within the range of the WIL historical data.
An increase in the number of litters with fetal variant malaligned sternebrae occurred at the 50 mg/kg bw dose, but the incidence at the highest dose was comparable to the control group: the 50 mg/kg bw/day dose level was considered as "no-effect" level.
Therefore, in this study no developmental effects were observed in rats.
Three other studies performed on cyclohexanone and selected as supporting study comfim the result of Rush, 1988 study.
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to reprotoxic data on cyclopentanone and cyclohexanone, cyclopentanone does not induce effect on fertility neither developmental effect. Therefore, no classification is required for these endpoints.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.