Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Boiling point

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
boiling point
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
11 Sept - 6 Nov 2002
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study without detailed documentation
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.2 (Boiling Temperature)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
differential thermal analysis
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Batch No.of test material: K100
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: August 12, 2004
- Purity: 98.7%
- Purity test date: February 2, 2005
Key result
Decomposition:
yes
Decomp. temp.:
290 °C
Remarks on result:
other: No boiling point up to decomposition

The temperature of decomposition is based on the onset of an exothermic signal at 290 °C. No observations of decomposition were reported.

Conclusions:
PFBSK+ did not boil up to the point of decomposition (290 °C) according to EU Method A.2.
Executive summary:

PFBSK+ did not boil up to the point of decomposition (290 °C). The study was conducted in accordance with EU Method A.2 and was GLP compliant, however detailed documentation was not available; therefore the study is considered reliable with restrictions.

Description of key information

PFBSK+ did not boil up to the point of decomposition (290 °C) according to EU Method A.2.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

The study was conducted in accordance with EU Method A.2 and was GLP compliant, however detailed documentation was not available; therefore the study is considered reliable with restrictions.