Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 300-523-7 | CAS number: 93941-74-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
NOAEL was estimated to be 1433 mg/kg bw when rats were orally exposed with 2-[[4-[[4-[[6-anilino-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]-1-naphthyl]azo]-6-sulpho-1-naphthyl]azo]benzene-1,4-disulphonic acid, magnesium sodium salt.
Thus, as per criteria of CLP regulation, 2-[[4-[[4-[[6-anilino-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]-1-naphthyl]azo]-6-sulpho-1-naphthyl]azo]benzene-1,4-disulphonic acid, magnesium sodium salt can be not classified for reproductive toxicity.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to reproduction
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with limited documentation / justification
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is predicted using OECD QSAR toolbox version 3.3 and the supporting QMRF report has been attached
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Prediction is done using QSAR Toolbox version 3.3
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- not specified
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- not specified
- Remarks on MMAD:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- not specified
- Details on mating procedure:
- not specified
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Two weeks before mating and during the mating period
- after successful mating, treatment of the females will be continued until day 4 post partum and subsequent sacrifice - Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Details on study schedule:
- not specified
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 433 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 male and 10 female
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Details on study design:
- not specified
- Positive control:
- not specified
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- not specified
- Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- not specified
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- not specified
- Litter observations:
- not specified
- Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- not specified
- Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- not specified
- Statistics:
- not specified
- Reproductive indices:
- not specified
- Offspring viability indices:
- not specified
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality:
- not specified
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not specified
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not specified
- Reproductive performance:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 433 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reproductive performance
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effect observed
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- System:
- other: not specified
- Organ:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
- Clinical signs:
- not specified
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- not specified
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- other: not specified
- Generation:
- other: not specified
- Based on:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Basis for effect level:
- other: not specified
- Remarks on result:
- other: not specified
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- System:
- other: not specified
- Organ:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Treatment related:
- not specified
- Relation to other toxic effects:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- NOAEL was estimated to be 1433 mg/kg bw when rats were orally exposed with 2-[[4-[[4-[[6-anilino-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]-1-naphthyl]azo]-6-sulpho-1-naphthyl]azo]benzene-1,4-disulphonic acid, magnesium sodium salt.
- Executive summary:
In a prediction done by SSS (2018) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the reproductive toxicity was estimated for 2-[[4-[[4-[[6-anilino-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]-1-naphthyl]azo]-6-sulpho-1-naphthyl]azo]benzene-1,4-disulphonic acid, magnesium sodium salt. The NOAEL was estimated to be 1433 mg/kg bw when rats were orally exposed with 2-[[4-[[4-[[6-anilino-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]-1-naphthyl]azo]-6-sulpho-1-naphthyl]azo]benzene-1,4-disulphonic acid, magnesium sodium salt.
Reference
The
prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following
descriptors: NOAEL
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 7 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
((((((((((((("a"
or "b" or "c" or "d" )
and ("e"
and (
not "f")
)
)
and ("g"
and (
not "h")
)
)
and ("i"
and (
not "j")
)
)
and ("k"
and (
not "l")
)
)
and "m" )
and ("n"
and (
not "o")
)
)
and "p" )
and "q" )
and ("r"
and (
not "s")
)
)
and ("t"
and (
not "u")
)
)
and "v" )
and ("w"
and "x" )
)
Domain
logical expression index: "a"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Amine OR Aromatic compound OR
Azo compound OR Hydroxy compound OR Phenol OR Secondary amine OR
Secondary aromatic amine OR Sulfonic acid OR Sulfonic acid derivative by
Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "b"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alcohol, olefinic attach [-OH]
OR Aliphatic Nitrogen, one aromatic attach [-N] OR Aliphatic Nitrogen,
two aromatic attach [-N-] OR Aromatic Carbon [C] OR Azo [-N=N-] OR
Hydroxy, aromatic attach [-OH] OR Hydroxy, sulfur attach [-OH] OR
Magnesium [Mg] OR Miscellaneous sulfide (=S) or oxide (=O) OR Nitrogen,
two or tree olefinic attach [>N-] OR No functional group found OR
Olefinic carbon [=CH- or =C<] OR Oxygen, one aromatic attach [-O-] OR
Suflur {v+4} or {v+6} OR Sulfinic acid [-S(=O)OH] OR Sulfonate, aromatic
attach [-SO2-O] by Organic functional groups (US EPA) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "c"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amine OR Aryl OR Azo OR
Fused carbocyclic aromatic OR No functional group found OR Overlapping
groups OR Phenol OR Sulfonic acid by Organic Functional groups (nested)
ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "d"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amine OR Aryl OR Azo OR
Fused carbocyclic aromatic OR Naphtalene OR Phenol OR Sulfonic acid by
Organic Functional groups ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "e"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by
OASIS v.1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "f"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as AN2 OR AN2 >> Carbamoylation
after isocyanate formation OR AN2 >> Carbamoylation after isocyanate
formation >> N-Hydroxylamines OR Radical OR Radical >> Radical mechanism
via ROS formation (indirect) OR Radical >> Radical mechanism via ROS
formation (indirect) >> N-Hydroxylamines OR SN1 OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic
attack after metabolic nitrenium ion formation OR SN1 >> Nucleophilic
attack after metabolic nitrenium ion formation >> N-Hydroxylamines by
DNA binding by OASIS v.1.3
Domain
logical expression index: "g"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as No alert found by DNA binding by
OECD
Domain
logical expression index: "h"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Michael addition OR Michael
addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type
Chemicals OR Michael addition >> P450 Mediated Activation to Quinones
and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Alkyl phenols OR Michael addition >> P450
Mediated Activation to Quinones and Quinone-type Chemicals >> Arenes by
DNA binding by OECD
Domain
logical expression index: "i"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Non binder, MW>500 AND Non
binder, non cyclic structure by Estrogen Receptor Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "j"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Moderate binder, NH2 group OR
Moderate binder, OH grooup OR Non binder, impaired OH or NH2 group OR
Non binder, without OH or NH2 group OR Strong binder, NH2 group OR
Strong binder, OH group OR Weak binder, OH group by Estrogen Receptor
Binding
Domain
logical expression index: "k"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alkali Earth AND Alkaline Earth
AND Non-Metals by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "l"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Halogens OR Metalloids OR Metals
OR Transition Metals by Groups of elements
Domain
logical expression index: "m"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Amine AND Aromatic compound AND
Azo compound AND Hydroxy compound AND No functional group found AND
Phenol AND Secondary amine AND Secondary aromatic amine AND Sulfonic
acid AND Sulfonic acid derivative by Organic functional groups, Norbert
Haider (checkmol) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "n"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Not categorized by Repeated dose
(HESS)
Domain
logical expression index: "o"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Perhexiline (Hepatotoxicity)
Alert by Repeated dose (HESS)
Domain
logical expression index: "p"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alcohol, olefinic attach [-OH]
AND Aliphatic Nitrogen, one aromatic attach [-N] AND Aliphatic Nitrogen,
two aromatic attach [-N-] AND Aromatic Carbon [C] AND Azo [-N=N-] AND
Hydroxy, aromatic attach [-OH] AND Hydroxy, sulfur attach [-OH] AND
Magnesium [Mg] AND Miscellaneous sulfide (=S) or oxide (=O) AND
Nitrogen, two or tree olefinic attach [>N-] AND No functional group
found AND Olefinic carbon [=CH- or =C<] AND Oxygen, one aromatic attach
[-O-] AND Suflur {v+4} or {v+6} AND Sulfinic acid [-S(=O)OH] AND
Sulfonate, aromatic attach [-SO2-O] by Organic functional groups (US
EPA) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "q"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Alcohol, olefinic attach [-OH]
AND Aliphatic Nitrogen, one aromatic attach [-N] AND Aliphatic Nitrogen,
two aromatic attach [-N-] AND Aromatic Carbon [C] AND Azo [-N=N-] AND
Hydroxy, aromatic attach [-OH] AND Hydroxy, sulfur attach [-OH] AND
Magnesium [Mg] AND Miscellaneous sulfide (=S) or oxide (=O) AND
Nitrogen, two or tree olefinic attach [>N-] AND No functional group
found AND Olefinic carbon [=CH- or =C<] AND Oxygen, one aromatic attach
[-O-] AND Suflur {v+4} or {v+6} AND Sulfinic acid [-S(=O)OH] AND
Sulfonate, aromatic attach [-SO2-O] by Organic functional groups (US
EPA) ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "r"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as (!Undefined)Group All Lipid
Solubility < 0.01 g/kg AND (!Undefined)Group CNS Surface Tension > 62
mN/m AND Exclusion rules not met AND Group All Melting Point > 200 C AND
Group CNS Melting Point > 120 C AND Group CNS Melting Point > 50 C AND
Group CNS Molecular Weight > 620 g/mol by Skin irritation/corrosion
Exclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "s"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Group C Vapour Pressure < 0.0001
Pa by Skin irritation/corrosion Exclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "t"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as (!Undefined)Group All Lipid
Solubility < 0.01 g/kg AND (!Undefined)Group CNS Surface Tension > 62
mN/m AND Exclusion rules not met AND Group All Melting Point > 200 C AND
Group CNS Melting Point > 120 C AND Group CNS Melting Point > 50 C AND
Group CNS Molecular Weight > 620 g/mol by Skin irritation/corrosion
Exclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "u"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Group All log Kow > 9 by Skin
irritation/corrosion Exclusion rules by BfR
Domain
logical expression index: "v"
Referential
boundary: The
target chemical should be classified as Moderate AND Very fast by
Bioaccumulation - metabolism half-lives ONLY
Domain
logical expression index: "w"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= 0.774
Domain
logical expression index: "x"
Parametric
boundary:The
target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 6.74
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 433 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimisch 2 and from OECD QSAR toolbox
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Reproductive toxicity:
In different studies, 2-[[4-[[4-[[6-anilino-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]-1-naphthyl]azo]-6-sulpho-1-naphthyl]azo]benzene-1,4-disulphonic acid, magnesium sodium salt has been investigated for reproductive toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in vivo experiments and estimated data in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for 2-[[4-[[4-[[6-anilino-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]-1-naphthyl]azo]-6-sulpho-1-naphthyl]azo]benzene-1,4-disulphonic acid, magnesium sodium salt along with the study available on structurally similar read across substance Black PN (CAS no 2519-30-4) and D&C Red 33 (CAS no 3567-66-6). The predicted data using the OECD QSAR toolbox has also been compared with the experimental studies.
In a prediction done by SSS (2018) using the OECD QSAR toolbox with log kow as the primary descriptor, the reproductive toxicity was estimated for 2-[[4-[[4-[[6-anilino-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]-1-naphthyl]azo]-6-sulpho-1-naphthyl]azo]benzene-1,4-disulphonic acid, magnesium sodium salt. The NOAEL was estimated to be 1433 mg/kg bw when rats were orally exposed with 2-[[4-[[4-[[6-anilino-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]-1-naphthyl]azo]-6-sulpho-1-naphthyl]azo]benzene-1,4-disulphonic acid, magnesium sodium salt.
In a experimental study conducted by Gauntet al(Food and Cosmetics Toxicology Volume 5, 1967, Pages 171-177) on structurally similar read across substance Black PN (CAS no 2519-30-4), male and female rats were treated with Black PN in the concentration of 0, 150, 500, 1000 mg/kg/day oral in diet for 90 days. No significant changes were observed at any dose level in both treated male and female rats compare to control. Significant growth retardation was observed in males at the 1000mg/kg/day level and it associated with a reduced food intake. There were significant increase in the relative weights of the testes and kidneys at the dose level of 1000 mg/kg/day in treated male was observed as compare to control. The elevated relative kidney weights were not accompanied by changes in the kidney function tests or in organ pathology. Decrease liver weight was also observed at 150 and 1000 mg/kg/day in treated female as compare to control. Significant change was observed in the foci of inflammatory cell infiltration of the myocardium in treated males at 1000 mg/kg/day .The foci of inflammatory cell infiltration of the myocardium which occurred occasionally in males of the 1000 mg/kg/day group were of spontaneous origin. Therefore, NOAEL was considered to be 500 mg/kg/day in male rats and 1000 mg/kg/day in female rats respectively when male and female rats were treated with Black PN for 90 days.
Further supported by experimental study conducted by Gauntet al(Food and Cosmetics Toxicology Volume 10, Issue 1, 1972, Pages 17-27) on structurally similar read across substance Black PN (CAS no 2519-30-4), CFE male and female rats were treated with Black PN the concentration of 0, 50, 250 and 500 mg/kg bw for 2 years by oral feed. No statistically significant change were observed on survival, body-weight gain, food intake, hematology, serum chemistry, renal concentration tests, organ weights and pathological findings at dose level of 50, 250 and 500 mg/kg bw in male and female as compared to control. No effect was observed on gonads, thyroid and pituitary of male and female treated rats as compare to control. Therefore, NOAEL was considered to be 500 mg/kg/day when CFE male and female rats were treated with Black PN by oral (feed) for 2 years.
Again supported by experimental study European Commission (Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (SCCP), OPINION ON Acid Red 33, COLIPA n° C22, 2007 page no -19-20) on structurally similar read across substance D&C Red 33 (CAS no 3567-66-6), male and female rats were treated with D&C Red 33 in the concentration of 0, 12, 25, and 102 mg/kg bw/d for male and 0, 15, 31, and 129 mg/kg bw/d for female orally in diet. No effect on survival and clinical sign of F0 and F1 generation were observed. No effect on body weight and food consumption of treated F0 and F1 rats were observed as compared to control. Similarly, no effects were observed on ophthalmoscopic examination, haematology, clinical chemistry and urinalysis were observed in treated rats as compared to control. No effect on fertility indices, gestation anomalies, viability and survival of the pups were observed in F0 treated rats as compared to control. In addition no effect on histopathology of F0 and F1 treated rats were observed. Therefore, NOAEL was considered to be 102 mg/kg bw/day for male and 129 mg/kg bw/day for female rats of F0 generation and 129 mg/kg bw/day for F1 generation when male and female rats were treated with D&C Red 33 orally in diet for 24 months.
Thus, based on the above studies and predictions on 2-[[4-[[4-[[6-anilino-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]-1-naphthyl]azo]-6-sulpho-1-naphthyl]azo]benzene-1,4-disulphonic acid, magnesium sodium salt and its read across substances, it can be concluded that NOAEL value is 1433 mg/kg bw with no effect on reproduction. Thus, as per criteria of CLP regulation, 2-[[4-[[4-[[6-anilino-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]-1-naphthyl]azo]-6-sulpho-1-naphthyl]azo]benzene-1,4-disulphonic acid, magnesium sodium salt can be not classified for reproductive toxicity.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above studies and predictions on 2-[[4-[[4-[[6-anilino-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]-1-naphthyl]azo]-6-sulpho-1-naphthyl]azo]benzene-1,4-disulphonic acid, magnesium sodium salt and its read across substances, it can be concluded that NOAEL value is 1433 mg/kg bw with no effect on reproduction. Thus, as per criteria of CLP regulation, 2-[[4-[[4-[[6-anilino-1-hydroxy-3-sulpho-2-naphthyl]azo]-1-naphthyl]azo]-6-sulpho-1-naphthyl]azo]benzene-1,4-disulphonic acid, magnesium sodium salt can be not classified for reproductive toxicity.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
