Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2011-09-23
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Date of inspection 2011-07-19, 2011-07-20 & 2011-07-21; Date of signature 2011-08-31

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Reaction Mass of 1,4-dimethyl-7-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-octahydroazulene and 3,8-dimethyl-5-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,2,3,3a,4,5,6,7-octahydroazulene and 4,8a,9,9-tetramethyldecahydro-1,6-methanonaphthalen-1-ol
EC Number:
939-227-3
Cas Number:
84238-39-1
Molecular formula:
Not applicable (a generic Molecular formula cannot be provided for this substance)
IUPAC Name:
Reaction Mass of 1,4-dimethyl-7-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-octahydroazulene and 3,8-dimethyl-5-(prop-1-en-2-yl)-1,2,3,3a,4,5,6,7-octahydroazulene and 4,8a,9,9-tetramethyldecahydro-1,6-methanonaphthalen-1-ol

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
other: Excised Bovine Cornea
Strain:
other: Not Applicable
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Not applicable

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
-Amounts(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.75 mL of the test material was applied to triplicate corneas.
-Concentration (if solution): the test material was used as supplied.

VEHICLE
- No vehicle used
Duration of treatment / exposure:
The undiluted test material was applied for 10 minutes followed by an incubation period of 120 minutes.
Observation period (in vivo):
Not applicable
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Not applicable
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 0.75 mL of the test material was applied to triplicate corneas.
- Percentage coverage: the test material was topically applied to the cornea. The holders were gently tilted back and forth to ensure a uniform application of the material over the entire cornea.
-Type of wrap used: none.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
-Washing (if done): at the end of the exposure period the test material was removed from the anterior chamber and each cornea was rinsed three times with fresh complete MEM containing phenol red before a final rinse with complete MEM.
-Time after start of exposure: 10 minutes post exposure

SCORING SYSTEM
- Results from the two test method endpoints, opacity and permeability, were combined in an empirically derived formula to generate an In Vitro Irritancy Score.
- Opacity Measurement: the change in opacity for each cornea (including the negative control) was calculated by subtracting the initial opacity reading from the final opacity reading. These values were then corrected by subtracting from each the average change in opacity observed for the negative control corneas. The mean opacity value of each treatment group was then calculated by averaging the corrected opacity values of each cornea for that treatment group.
- Permeability Measurement: the corrected OD492 was calculated by subtracting the mean OD492 of the negative control corneas from the OD492 value of each treated cornea. The OD492 value of each treatment group was calculated by averaging the corrected OD492 values of the treated corneas for the treatment group.
- In Vitro Irritancy Score = mean opacity value + (15 x mean OD492 value).

DATA INTERPRETATION
- A test material that induces an in vitro irritancy score > than or equal to 55.1 is defined as an ocular corrosive or severe irritant.
- Additionally, the opacity and permeability values were evaluated independently to determine whether the test material induced a response through only one of the two endpoints.
- Visual Observation: the condition of the cornea was visually assessed immediately after rinsing and at the final opacity measurement.

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
in vitro irritation score
Run / experiment:
120 minutes post rinsing
Value:
0.8
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Other effects / acceptance of results:
The neat test material induced an in vitro irritancy score of 0.8 and was therefore considered not to be an ocular corrosive or severe irritant.
The corneas treated with the test item were clear post treatment and post incubation.

Any other information on results incl. tables

RESULTS

CORNEAL OPACITY AND PERMEABILITY MEASUREMENT

- Individual and mean corneal opacity measurements and individual and mean corneal permeability measurements are given in Table 1.

CORNEAL EPITHELIUM CONDITION

- The condition of the cornea immediately after rinsing and at the final opacity measurement is given in Table 2.

- The corneas treated with the test item or negative control item were clear post treatment and post incubation. 

- The corneas treated with the positive control item were cloudy post treatment and post incubation.

IN VITRO IRRITANCY SCORE

- The results are summarised as follows:

Treatment

In Vitro Irritancy Score

Test Material

0.8

Negative Control

1.3

Positive Control

36.1

CRITERIA FOR AN ACCEPTABLE TEST

- The positive control In Vitro irritancy Score was within the range of 30.9 to 67.7. The positive control acceptance criterion was therefore satisfied.

Table 1: Individual and Mean Corneal Opacity and Permeability Measurements

Treatment

Cornea Number

Opacity

Permeability (OD)

In vitroIrritancy Score

Pre-Treatment

Post-Treatment

Post-Incubation

Post-Incubation-Pre‑Treatment

Corrected Value

 

Corrected Value

Negative Control

1

2

3

3

1

 

0.085

 

 

2

4

4

5

1

 

0.028

 

 

3

2

2

2

0

 

0.020

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.7*

 

0.044+

 

1.3

Positive Control

4

4

32

30

26

25.3

1.173

1.129

 

5

4

32

29

25

24.3

0.753

0.709

 

6

2

24

21

19

18.3

0.891

0.847

 

 

 

 

 

 

22.7·

 

0.895·

36.1

Test Item

7

4

5

5

1

0.3

0.048

0.004

 

8

3

4

4

1

0.3

0.046

0.002

 

9

3

4

5

2

1.3

0.058

0.014

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.7·

 

0.006·

0.8


OD= Optical density                 * = Mean of the post treatment-pre‑treatment values      += Mean permeability              ·= Mean corrected value


Table 2: Corneal epithelium condition

Treatment

Cornea Number

Observation

Post Treatment

Post Incubation

Negative Control

1

clear

clear

2

clear

clear

3

clear

clear

Positive Control

4

cloudy

cloudy

5

cloudy

cloudy

6

cloudy

cloudy

Test Item

7

clear

clear

8

clear

clear

9

clear

clear


Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The neat test item was considered not to be an ocular corrosive or severe irritant and as the IVIS was below 3, the test item should not be classified for eye irritancy.