Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP- and guideline compliant

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Report date:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,5-Furandione, dihydro-, mono-C15-20-alkenyl derivs.
EC Number:
272-221-2
EC Name:
2,5-Furandione, dihydro-, mono-C15-20-alkenyl derivs.
Cas Number:
68784-12-3
Molecular formula:
Due to a mixture of numerous isomers a specific molecular formular cannot be provided ( UVCB-substance) .
IUPAC Name:
2,5-Furandione, dihydro-, mono-C15-20-alkenyl derivs.
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): ASA
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state: Yellowish clear liquid
- Analytical purity: 97.1%
- Lot/batch No.: 5500001727
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Storage condition of test material: RT

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Research Models and Services, Germany GmbH, Stolzenseeweg 32 – 36, 88353 Kisslegg
- Age at study initiation: 9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.1 kg – 2.2 kg
- Housing:Single housing; Terulan cages, Ehret GmbH, A-3430 Tulln, 73 cm x 73 cm bottom area, 50 cm height.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):ad libitum
- Acclimation period:for at least 5 days before application


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20°C +/- 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 – 70%
- Air changes (per hr): 12 per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12


Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted

Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Observation period (in vivo):
Approx. 1, 24, 48 and 72 h after application.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): About 24 hours after application of the test item the treated eye of the animal(s) was rinsed with 3 to 6 mL of hand warm tap water for 1 to 2 minutes using a syringe with a blunt probe
- Time after start of exposure: About 24 hours after application of the test item


SCORING SYSTEM: Draize


Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 48 h
Score:
0.3
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 and 72 hours
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The cornea and the iris were not affected in any animal at any examination term. Slight conjunctival redness (grade 1) was noted in one animal only 1 hour after application, in one animal 1 and 24 hours after application. In the third animal no conjunctival redness was observed.
Slight conjunctival chemosis was noted in all three animals only 1 hour after application. Slight discharge (grade 1) was noted in two animals only 1 h our after application.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Considering the described ocular reactions as well as the average score for irritation, ASA is not irritating to eyes under the test conditions chosen.