Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin irritation: Mallory VT (1990) determined in a reliable K2 study, the skin irritation potential of the test substance in New Zealand White rabbits according to OECD Guideline 404. The test substance was observed to be corrosive to the skin. This study was selected as key study.

Eye irritation: BASF (1964) performed an eye irritation test in Angora rabbits according to a method equivalent to OECD Guideline 405. It is possible that the results in this eye irritation test were not as severe as expected as only 0.05 ml of the test substance instead of 0.1 ml as recommended in OECD guideline 405 was applied to the eye. On the basis of the findings of this study, the test substance would have to be classified as eye irritant Cat. 2B according to CLP. The test substance is however corrosive to the skin (Cat. 1B) and therefore is classified for eye damage category 1.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1990-08-22 - 1990-09-05
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
Well documented GLP study performed according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 404 with the following deviations: an occlusive dressing was used (instead of semi-occlusive). Furthermore, next to application of the test substance on intact shaved skin, also abraded skin was tested.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
occlusive dressing used (instead of semi-occlusive); abraded skin was tested
GLP compliance:
yes
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 6398-24-20, Project #90-005
- Substance type: clear, colorless liquid
- Physical state: liquid
- Lot No.: 90-005
- Purity: responsibility of the sponsor
- Stability under test conditions: There was no apparent change in the physical state of the test article during administration.
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hare-Marland, Hewitt, NJ, USA
- Age at study initiation: adult animals
- Weight at study initiation: males 2129-2507 g (mean 2351 g); females 2170-2633 g (mean 2468 g)
- Housing: individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 +/- 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): not indicated
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
other: abraded and intact shaved skin
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL/site


Duration of treatment / exposure:
The test substance was kept in contact with the skin on the upper dorsal site (intact) for four hours and at the lower dorsal sites (intact and abraded) for twenty four hours.
Observation period:
Dermal irritation was scored at 30-60 minutes, 24, 48 and 72 hours and on Days 4 through 14 after patch removal. Dermal irritation of the lower dorsal sites (intact and abraded) were scored at 24, 48 and 72 hours and on Days 4 through 14 after application of the test material.
Number of animals:
6 (3 males and 3 females)
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: one intact site on the upper dorsal trunk and at two sites, one intact and one abraded, on the lower dorsal trunk of the animal.
- Type of wrap if used: All application sites were clipped free of hair. The abraded site was prepared using a burred needle; the abrasion penetrated the stratum corneum but not the derma. Following the application of the test material, gauze patches were applied to each of the sites then wrapped with a rubber dam and an elastic bandage to retard evaporation.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
At the end of each exposure period, the sites were wiped with water and gauze and observed for erythema and edema.

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize evaluation of dermal irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
other: application on intact shaved skin (upper dorsal area)
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
other: application on intact shaved skin (upper dorsal area)
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
other: application on intact shaved skin (upper dorsal area)
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
other: application on intact shaved skin (upper dorsal area)
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
other: application on intact shaved skin (upper dorsal area)
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
other: application on intact shaved skin (upper dorsal area)
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
other: application on intact shaved skin (upper dorsal area)
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
other: application on intact shaved skin (upper dorsal area)
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
other: application on intact shaved skin (upper dorsal area)
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
other: application on intact shaved skin (upper dorsal area)
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
other: application on intact shaved skin (upper dorsal area)
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks on result:
other: application on intact shaved skin (upper dorsal area)
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Moderate to severe erythema and edema were observed at the 30-60 minute observation period on the upper dorsal site. Severe erythema and edema were observed at the 24, 48 and 72 hours and on days 4 through 14 on the upper dorsal site. Severe erythema and edema were observed at the 24, 48 and 72 hours and on days 4 through 14 on the lower dorsal sites. Necrosis of the skin was observed at each application site at the 24, 48 and 72 hours and on days 4 through 14 observation periods at each application site. Sloughing of the skin at the application site was observed at the day 14 observation period on the upper dorsal site and at the day 13 and 14 observation periods at the lower dorsal sites. The study was terminated following the day 14 observation period.
Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (corrosive) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
Based on the test results and according to the criteria of the CLP Regulation, the substance is classified as category 1 corrosive.
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
1964
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
Acceptable study comparable to guideline (non GLP; occlusive conditions; TS purity not specified, 1 min, 5 min, 15 min or 20 hours treatment duration; TS preparation: 50% in water, up to 8 days observation period)
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
occlusive conditions; 1 min, 5 min, 15 min or 20 hours treatment duration; TS preparation: 50% in water, up to 8 days observation period
GLP compliance:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 4-Methyl-morpholine
no further data.
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 2.37 and 2.13 kg
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
other: intact skin
Vehicle:
water
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 ml
- Concentration (if solution): 50%
Duration of treatment / exposure:
1 min, 5 min, 15 min and 20 hours
Observation period:
up to 8 days
Number of animals:
2 (all males)
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5x2.5 cm

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): The skin was washed with Lutrol (conc.) and Lutrol/water (1:1)
- Time after start of exposure: 1, 5 or 15 min / 1 hour

SCORING SYSTEM: comparable to the OECD scoring system
Irritation parameter:
other: necrosis
Time point:
other: after 1 and 5 min exposure
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: Exposure of rabbit skin to the test substance for 1 to 5 min under occlusive conditions did not lead to necrosis
Irritation parameter:
other: necrosis
Time point:
other: after 15 min and 1 hour exposure
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 8 days
Remarks on result:
other: Exposure of rabbit skin to the test substance for 15 min or 20 hours under occlusive conditions led to full thickness necrosis.
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Strong signs of irritation reactions were also seen, but are not reported here because corrosivity was the leading effect.

Exposure of rabbit skin to the test substance for 15 min or 20 hours under occlusive conditions led to full thickness necrosis of the skin. No full thickness necrosis was observed, when the test substance was applied for 1 or 5 minutes.

Interpretation of results:
Category 1B (corrosive) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
In this study, necrosis was observed after 15 min and 1 hour of exposure. Exposure of rabbit skin to the test substance for 15 min or 20 hours under occlusive conditions led to full thickness necrosis.
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
No data
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
Non GLP study performed according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 404 with the following deviations: an occlusive dressing was used (instead of semi-occlusive), no irritation score readings at 48h and later than 72h, application to abraded skin sites (next to intact skin sites).
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
occlusive dressing used, abraded skin sites tested, no 48h score readings and no observations after 72h
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Hazardous Materials Regulations of the Department of Transportation (1976)
GLP compliance:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Sample No. 4236-13-34, AUS-0099
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Pel-Freez, Inc. USDA No. 7I-B-16, Rogers, Arkansas 72756
- Age at study initiation: approximately 10-13 weeks of age
- Housing: The animals were housed in suspended, wire-bottomed steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 7 days prior to experimental use

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
other: one abraded and one intact shaved site
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL/test site
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
One hour after removal of the test material, each abraded and intact test site was examined and scored separately for erythema and edema on a graded scale of 0 to 4. After 24 and 72 hours, the sites were again examined and scored.
Number of animals:
6 animals
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: back and flank from each rabbit
- Two test sites located lateral to the midline of the back approximately 10 centimeters apart were selected. One of the test sites was abraded (with a slighly bent tip of a hypodermic needle) by making 4 epidermal abrasions, 2 perpendicular to the other 2, while the other test site remained intact. Each site was immediately occluded with a 2-inch square gauze patch which was secured with masking tape. The trunk of each animal was then wrapped with impervious plastic sheeting. The wrap held the patches in position but did not retard evaporation of the test material during the 4-hour exposure period.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
At the end of the 4 hours, the plastic wrappings and patches were removed. In addition, all residual test material was removed by flooding the test sites with lukewarm tap water while gently rubbing the sites.

SCORING SYSTEM: In evaluating the average irritation present, the mean scores for erythema and edema of the intact test sites after 4, 24 and 72 hours were added. Similarly, the mean scores for erythema and edema of the abraded test sites after 4, 24 and 72 hours were added. These 2 values were totaled and divided by 6 to obtain the mean primary irritation score.
The test material was classified corrosive if corrosion occurs when the material is tested on intact rabbit skin. Corrosion will be considered to have resulted if the substance in contact with the rabbit skin has caused destruction or irreversible alteration of the tissue after an exposure period of 4 hours or less. Tissue destruction is considered to have occurred if, at any of the readings, there is ulceration or necrosis. Tissue destruction does not include merely sloughing of the epidermis, or erythema, edema or fissuring.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals
Time point:
other: 24 and 72h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
no data
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals
Time point:
other: 24 and 72h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
no data
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Burns were severe and diffuse. Second degree chemical burns were observed after 4 hours (not resulting in fibrosis). Third degree chemical burns were observed after 24 and 72h (resulting in fibrosis).
Primary irritation score: 8 (max possible)
Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (corrosive) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
A mean primary irritation score of 8.0 was observed after 4 hours application of the substance to New Zealand White rabbit skin. The substance shows chemical burns and is considered corrosive.
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
1979-01-05 - 1979-04-05
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
Non GLP study performed according to a method similar to OECD Guideline 404 with the following deviations: an occlusive dressing was used (instead of semi-occlusive), abraded skin sites were tested, no scoring at 48h or later than 72h, 24h exposure (instead of 4h).
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
occlusive dressing used, abraded skin sites tested, no readings at 48h and later than 72h, 24h exposure time.
GLP compliance:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): sample label 4236-24-30
- Substance type: clear liquid
- Physical state: liquid
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Ace Animals
- Age at study initiation: at least 8 weeks old
- Housing: The animals were housed 2/cage in suspended wire mesh cages (30" x 18" x 18").
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum) and water (e.g. ad libitum): Fresh Purina rabbit chow and water were freely available.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-21°C
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
other: intact and abraded
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL


Duration of treatment / exposure:
The test material was kept in contact with the skin for 24 hours.
Observation period:
Dermal reactions were scored at 24 and 72 hours
Number of animals:
6 rabbits (2 males, 4 females)
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
The fur was clipped from the backs and sides of the animals. The back from the left of the spinal column of all animals was abraded. The abrasions, extending the length of the exposure site, scratched the stratum corneum but did not reach the derma or produce bleeding. The back to the right of the spinal cord column remained intact.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
The test material was kept in contact with the skin for 24 hours, at which time the wrappings were removed.

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system
Irritation parameter:
primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 and 72 hours
Score:
2.29
Max. score:
8
Reversibility:
no data
Remarks:
72 hours
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Average erythema scores were very slight to well defined.
Average edema scores were very slight to slight.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The primary dermal index of the substance is determined to be 2.29 after 24 hours application to New Zealand White rabbit skin.
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
1978-08 - 1978-10
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
documentation insufficient for assessment
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
occlusive dressing used, abraded skin sites tested, no readings at 48h and later than 72h, 24h exposure time, limited data on test material, animals and environmental conditions.
GLP compliance:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): RC-106 or RC-107
- Substance type: clear liquid
- Physical state: liquid
- Analytical purity: no data
- Lot/batch No.: no data
- Stability under test conditions: no data
- Storage condition of test material: no data
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Plummer Rabbitry
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: no data
- Housing: no data
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): no data
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): no data
- Acclimation period: no data

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): no data
- Humidity (%): no data
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): no data
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
other: abraded and intact shaved skin
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 ml
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24h
Observation period:
72h
Number of animals:
6
Irritation parameter:
primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals, intact and abraded skin
Time point:
other: 24 and 72h
Score:
6.25
Max. score:
8
Reversibility:
no data
Remarks on result:
other: Test substance RC-106
Irritation parameter:
primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals, intact and abraded skin
Time point:
other: 24 and 72h
Score:
6
Max. score:
8
Reversibility:
no data
Remarks on result:
other: Test substance RC-107
Irritant / corrosive response data:
RC-106: necrosis, peripheral erythema and blanching of the skin was observed after 24h; coriaceous (entire site) and peripheral erythema was observed after 72h
RC-107: necrosis and blanching of the skin was observed after 24h; leathery and thickened texture (still flexible) was observed after 72h
Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
Corrosive effects were observed after application of the test substance to the rabbit skin during 24h.
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (corrosive)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1964
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
Acceptable study comparable to guideline (no GLP, TS purity not specified, 50 µl TS, 8-day observation period).
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
50 µl TS, 8-day observation period
GLP compliance:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 4-Methylmorpholin
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Angora
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 2.54 and 2.61 kg

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
no data
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: left eye of the same rabbits treated with NaCl (0.9%)
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): ca. 0.05 ml
Duration of treatment / exposure:
single application
Observation period (in vivo):
8 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
2 (all females)
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no

SCORING SYSTEM: comparable to the OECD scoring system

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 8 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 8 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 24 hours
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 24 hours
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 8 days
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 8 days
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 8 days
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 8 days
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The mean scores (24/48/72 hours) of the individual animals were:
- cornea score: 1 in 2/2 animals
- iris score: 1 in 2/2 animals
- conjunctivae score: 1 in 2/2 animals
- chemosis score: 0 in 2/2 animals
Other effects:
Mucous bleeding, pupil retraction, ciliary injection and misty opacity were generally present, but also reversible within 5-8 days.

In a skin irritation test, the test substance was corrosive. It might be possible that the results in this eye irritation test were not as severe as expected as only 0.05 ml of the test substance instead of 0.1 ml as recommended in OECD guideline 405 were applied to the eye. Due to the findings of this study, the test substance would have to be classified as eye irritant Cat. 2B according to GHS-criteria. The test substance is however corrosive to the skin (Cat. 1B).

Interpretation of results:
Category 2B (mildly irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
In a skin irritation test, the test substance was corrosive.
It might be possible that the results in this eye irritation test were not as severe as expected as only 0.05 ml of the test substance instead of 0.1 ml as recommended in OECD 405 were applied to the eye. Due to the findings of this study, the test substance would have to be classified as eye irritant Cat. 2B according to CLP criteria, although the test substance is corrosive to the skin (Cat. 1B).
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
1978-08 - 1978-10
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
documentation insufficient for assessment
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
limited data on test material, animals and environmental conditions, no 21 day observation period
GLP compliance:
no
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): RC-106 or RC-107
- Substance type: clear liquid
- Physical state: liquid
- Analytical purity: no data
- Lot/batch No.: no data
- Stability under test conditions: no data
- Storage condition of test material: no data
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Plummer Rabbitry or Sweetwater Farm, Inc.
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: no data
- Housing: no data
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): no data
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): no data
- Acclimation period: no data

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): no data
- Humidity (%): no data
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): no data
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: left eye were untreated and served as controls
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 ml
Duration of treatment / exposure:
6 animals: no rinsing
3 animals: rinsed after 30 sec
Observation period (in vivo):
7 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
9
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals (unrinsed)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.78
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not reversible within 7 days
Remarks on result:
other: Test substance RC-106
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals (unrinsed)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.5
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not reversible within 7 days
Remarks on result:
other: test substance RC-106
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
erythema
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals (unrinsed)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.44
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
other: not reversible within 7 days
Remarks on result:
other: test substance RC-106
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals (unrinsed)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.22
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not reversible within 7 days
Remarks on result:
other: test substance RC-106
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals (unrinsed)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not reversible within 7 days
Remarks on result:
other: test substance RC-107
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
erythema
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals (unrinsed)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
other: not reversible within 7 days
Remarks on result:
other: test substance RC-107
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals (unrinsed)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not reversible within 7 days
Remarks on result:
other: test substance RC-107
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Corneal opacity in eyes of RC-107 treated animals prevented scoring of iris.
Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Conclusions:
According to the criteria of CLP, RC-106 would be classified as irritating to eyes, and RC-107 would be classified as causing serious damage to eyes. However, the study is considered not reliable as the documentation was not sufficient.
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Skin irritation / corrosion:

Mallory VT (1990c) studied skin irritation/corrosion by applying the test substance on one intact site on the upper dorsal trunk and at two sites, one intact and one abraded, on the lower dorsal trunk of the animal. At the end of each exposure period, the sites were wiped with water and gauze and observed for erythema and edema. Moderate to severe erythema and edema were observed at the 30-60 minute observation period on the upper dorsal site. Severe erythema and edema were observed at the 24, 48 and 72 hours and on days 4 through 14 on the upper dorsal site. Severe erythema and edema were observed at the 24, 48 and 72 hours and on days 4 through 14 on the lower dorsal sites. Necrosis of the skin was observed at each application site at the 24, 48 and 72 hours and on days 4 through 14 observation periods at each application site. Sloughing of the skin at the application site was observed at the day 14 observation period on the upper dorsal site and at the day 13 and 14 observation periods at the lower dorsal sites. The study was terminated following the day 14 observation period.

In addition, the test substance was observed to be corrosive in a non GLP primary skin irritation test (Scibon G, 1977) after 4 hours application of the substance to New Zealand White rabbit skin. Also, BASF (1964) observed necrosis in rabbits after 15 min and 1 hour of exposure, but not after 1 or 5 min of exposure. Exposure of rabbit skin to the test substance for 15 min or 20 hours under occlusive conditions led to full thickness necrosis.These studies were used as supporting evidence.

Based on the test results and according to the criteria of the CLP Regulation, the substance is classified as category 1B corrosive.

Eye irritation:

BASF (1964) performed an eye irritation test in Angora rabbits according to a method equivalent to OECD Guideline 405 (single application in 2 female rabbits). The left eye of the same rabbits treated with NaCl (0.9%) served as control. In a skin irritation test, the test substance was corrosive. It is possible that the results in this eye irritation test were not as severe as expected as only 0.05 ml of the test substance instead of 0.1 ml as recommended in OECD guideline 405 was applied to the eye. Due to the findings of this study, the test substance would have to be classified as eye irritant Cat. 2B according to CLP. The test substance is however corrosive to the skin (Cat. 1B) and therefore is classified for eye damage category 1.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on all available data and according to the criteria of the CLP Regulation and as burns were excessive at 24 hours onward the substance is classified as corrosive category 1B (H314, causes severe skin burns and eye damage). In addition, the substance is classified for eye damage category 1 (H318).