Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-976-0 | CAS number: 130-14-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Based on the available data for the structurally similar read across chemicals and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded thatSodium naphthalene-1-sulfonatewill also behave in similar manner that of the read across chemicals.Sodium naphthalene-1-sulfonatewas estimated to be not sensitizing to skin.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Weight of evidence approach based on similar chemicals
- Justification for type of information:
- Weight of evidence approach based on similar chemicals
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Weight of evidence approach based on similar chemicals
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Weight of evidence approach based on similar chemicals
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of study:
- other: Weight of evidence approach based on similar chemicals
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material: Sodium naphthalene-1-sulfonate
- Molecular formula: C10H7NaO3S
- Molecular weight: 230.218 g/mol
- Smiles notation: c12c(S(=O)(=O)[O-])cccc1cccc2.[Na+]
- InChl: 1S/C10H8O3S.Na/c11-14(12,13)10-7-3-5-8-4-1-2-6-9(8)10;/h1-7H,(H,11,12,13);/q;+1/p-1
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: Solid - Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: petroleum jelly
- Concentration / amount:
- 500mg (0.5 g) of 30% (w/w) test chemical diluted in petroleum jelly
- Day(s)/duration:
- 6 hours, once a week, for 3 weeks
- Adequacy of induction:
- not specified
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Concentration / amount:
- 42.8%
- Day(s)/duration:
- no data available
- Adequacy of induction:
- not specified
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: petroleum jelly
- Concentration / amount:
- 0.1 g each of 30%, 10%, 3%, or the petroleum jelly
- Day(s)/duration:
- 24 hours
- Adequacy of challenge:
- not specified
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Concentration / amount:
- 42.8%
- Day(s)/duration:
- No data available
- Adequacy of challenge:
- not specified
- No. of animals per dose:
- 1. Ten animals were used in the treatment group and 10 in the control group
2. 20 - Details on study design:
- Weight of evidence approach based on the values of structurally similar chemicals
- Challenge controls:
- no data available
- Positive control substance(s):
- not specified
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Group:
- test chemical
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Clinical observations:
- no dermal reactions observed
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not sensitizing
- Conclusions:
- Based on the available data for the structurally similar read across chemicals and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded thatSodium naphthalene-1-sulfonatewill also behave in similar manner that of the read across chemicals.Sodium naphthalene-1-sulfonatewas estimated to be not sensitizing to skin.
- Executive summary:
Based on the available studies for the structurally similar read across substances, the weight of evidence approach was applied to determine the extent of dermal sensitization potential of Sodium naphthalene-1-sulfonate.
A delayed contact hypersensitivity test was conducted on Guinea pigs to evaluate the skin sensitization potential of test chemical under occlusive condition.
Ten animals were used in the treatment group and 10 in the control group. During induction, the test site on the flank was clipped and shaved and 500mg (0.5 g) of 30% (w/w) test chemical diluted in petroleum jelly was applied for 6 h under a closed patch, once a week, for 3 weeks. A control site received only the petroleum jelly. Two weeks after the last application, 0.1 g each of 30%, 10%, 3%, or the petroleum jelly were applied to the shaved skin and left for 24 h under a closed patch. Skin reactions were scored on a −, ±, +, ++, +++ scale at 24 and 48 h.
None of the treated animal showed delayed contact hypersensitivity within 48 hours. Thus, the chemical was considered to be not sensitizing in Guinea pigs.
This is supported by the results of a Buehler test conducted according to OECD Guideline 406 to assess the dermal sensitization potential of the structurally similar chemical in Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs. During the test, 20 guinea pigs were used. In induction, the animals were induced dermally at concentration of 42.8 %. After induction animals were challenged dermally with the same concentration under occlusive condition. No known skin reactions were observed at induction as well as at challenge exposure. Thus the chemical was considered to be not sensitizing in Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs.
Based on the available data for the structurally similar read across chemicals and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded thatSodium naphthalene-1-sulfonatewill also behave in similar manner that of the read across chemicals.Sodium naphthalene-1-sulfonatewas estimated to be not sensitizing to skin.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
Based on the available studies for the structurally similar read across substances, the weight of evidence approach was applied to determine the extent of dermal sensitization potential of Sodium naphthalene-1-sulfonate.
A delayed contact hypersensitivity test was conducted on Guinea pigs to evaluate the skin sensitization potential of test chemical under occlusive condition.
Ten animals were used in the treatment group and 10 in the control group. During induction, the test site on the flank was clipped and shaved and 500mg (0.5 g) of 30% (w/w) test chemical diluted in petroleum jelly was applied for 6 h under a closed patch, once a week, for 3 weeks. A control site received only the petroleum jelly. Two weeks after the last application, 0.1 g each of 30%, 10%, 3%, or the petroleum jelly were applied to the shaved skin and left for 24 h under a closed patch. Skin reactions were scored on a −, ±, +, ++, +++ scale at 24 and 48 h.
None of the treated animal showed delayed contact hypersensitivity within 48 hours. Thus, the chemical was considered to be not sensitizing in Guinea pigs.
This is supported by the results of a Buehler test conducted according to OECD Guideline 406 to assess the dermal sensitization potential of the structurally similar chemical in Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs. During the test, 20 guinea pigs were used. In induction, the animals were induced dermally at concentration of 42.8 %. After induction animals were challenged dermally with the same concentration under occlusive condition. No known skin reactions were observed at induction as well as at challenge exposure. Thus the chemical was considered to be not sensitizing in Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs.
Based on the available data for the structurally similar read across chemicals and applying the weight of evidence approach, it can be concluded thatSodium naphthalene-1-sulfonatewill also behave in similar manner that of the read across chemicals.Sodium naphthalene-1-sulfonate was estimated to be not sensitizing to skin.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
The results of the experimental studies from the structurally similar read across substances indicate a possibility that Sodium naphthalene-1-sulfonate can be not sensitizing to skin.
Hence, by applying the weight of evidence approach, Sodium naphthalene-1-sulfonate can be considered to be not sensitizing to skin. It can be classified under the category “Not Classified” as per CLP regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.