Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Three oral and one dermal acute toxicity studies are available for the REACH-registered substance. This acute toxicity dataset is supplemented with the publically available secondary reference data on the REACH-registered substance and key information on the ADPODS category members (refer to full read-across ADPODS category justification document). No acute inhalation data are available for any of the ADPODS category members; however, as these have low vapor pressures, no inhalation exposures are expected.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1987
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study was not conducted according to guideline/s and GLP but the report contains sufficient data for interpretation of study results
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Three female Fischer 344 rats received the test material, as a 20% aqueous solution, by single dose oral gavage, at dose levels of 1500 or 2000 mg/kg.
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
Fischer 344
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
No additional data
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on oral exposure:
Rats received the test material, as a 20% aqueous solution, by single dose oral gavage.
Doses:
1500 and 2000 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3 females/dose
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
Three female Fischer 344 rats received the test material, as a 20% aqueous solution, by single dose oral gavage, at dose levels of 1500 or 2000 mg/kg. In-life observations and body weights were recorded over a 2-week observation period.
Statistics:
None
Preliminary study:
No data
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 1 500 - < 2 000 mg/kg bw
Mortality:
No rats died at 1500 mg/kg and 2 out of 3 died at 2000 mg/kg.
Clinical signs:
other: In-life signs of toxicity observed on both dose groups included diarrhea. Lethargy, palpebral closure, and facial soiling (reddish color) were observed in the high dose animals only.
Gross pathology:
No data
Other findings:
None

None

Interpretation of results:
Toxicity Category IV
Conclusions:
The acute oral LD50 for female rats was between 1500 and 2000 mg/kg.
Executive summary:

The test material, XU-40340.00 DOWFAX 3B2, powder form, was submitted by the Specialty Chemicals Technical Services & Development Department, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI. The material is of interest for use in the agriculture, cleaning, and textile industries. Standard acute toxicologic tests were conducted and included the acute oral toxicity, skin irritation, and eye irritation studies. The acute, oral LD50 for female Fischer 344 rats was between 1500 and 2000 mg/kg. Therefore, the acute oral toxicity of the test material was categorized as low.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
1 500 mg/kg bw
Quality of whole database:
acceptable

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1993
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study was not conducted according to guideline/s and GLP but the report contains sufficient data for interpretation of study results
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
A single application of 2000 mg/kg of neat Dowfax 3B2 was applied to the clipped trunks of two male New Zealand White rabbits under an impervious, occlusive bandage. Residual test material was washed off when the bandages were removed 24 hours after application, and the animals were collared until dry to prevent grooming of the application site. Observations and body weights were recorded over a 2-week period.
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
In the acute dermal absorption test, animals were prepared 24 hours prior to dosing by clipping the trunk.
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on dermal exposure:
A single application of 2000 mg/kg of neat Dowfax 3B2 was applied to the clipped trunks of two male New Zealand White rabbits under an impervious, occlusive bandage. Residual test material was washed off when the bandages were removed 24 hours after application, and the animals were collared until dry to prevent grooming of the application site.
Duration of exposure:
24 h
Doses:
2000 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
2 male rabbits
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
A single application of 2000 mg/kg of neat Dowfax 3B2 was applied to the clipped trunks of two male New Zealand White rabbits under an impervious, occlusive bandage. Residual test material was washed off when the bandages were removed 24 hours after application, and the animals were collared until dry to prevent grooming of the application site. Observations and body weights were recorded over a 2-week period.
Statistics:
None
Preliminary study:
No data
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Mortality:
None
Clinical signs:
other: Erythema, edema and bums were observed, at the application site, immediately after removing the wrap. These observations were observed through test day four. By test day eight, both animals were observed with scaling, which persisted through the end of th
Gross pathology:
None
Other findings:
None

None

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: other: EU GHS
Conclusions:
The estimated acute dermal LD50 for male New Zealand White rabbits was greater than 2000 mg/kg.
Executive summary:

A sample of Dowfax 3B2 solution surfactant was submitted by Specialty Chemicals, The Dow Chemical Company, Midland. MI for evaluation of acute oral and dermal toxicity and skin and eye irritation. This compound is a potential ingredient in cleaning solutions.

A single application of 2000 mg/kg of neat Dowfax 3B2 was applied to the clipped tnmks of two male New Zealand White rabbits under an impervious, occlusive bandage Erythema, edema and burns were observed, at the application site, immediately after removing the wrap. These observations were observed through test day four. By test day eight, both animals were observed with scaling, which persisted through the end of the study. Both animals survived the test period at the 2000 mg/kg dose level. The estimated acute dermal LD50 for male New Zealand White rabbits was greater than 2000 mg/kg.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Quality of whole database:
acceptable

Additional information

In the key studies conducted with the REACH-registered substance, the acute oral and dermal toxicity were low, with an oral LD50 value of 1500 - 2000 mg/kg, and dermal LD50 value >2000 mg/kg (for the latter study, no deaths were observed). This is also true for the other ADPODS substances relevant for read across, indicating that this particular chemistry has a low order of acute toxicity via the oral and dermal routes.

No data are available for inhalation toxicity. However, this is unlikely to be a relevant route for human exposure due to the low vapor pressure and limited possibility for generating a large concentration of aerosol in normal handling conditions.


Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
acceptable limit dose study for the REACH-registered substance

Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
acceptable limit dose study for the REACH-registered substance

Justification for classification or non-classification

Acute oral category 4 is required for Reaction mass of Disodium decyl(sulphonatophenoxy)benzenesulphonate and Disodium oxybis[decylbenzenesulphonate] according to CLP GHS. No dermal classification is required for the registered substance.