Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to soil microorganisms
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Information published in peer reviewed literature, limitations in design and/or reporting but otherwise adequate for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1989

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Surface soil samples were treated with test substance and incubated, after which the percentage inhibition of nitrification was calculated.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-methylpyrazole
EC Number:
231-445-0
EC Name:
4-methylpyrazole
Cas Number:
7554-65-6
Molecular formula:
C4H6N2
IUPAC Name:
4-methyl-1H-pyrazole
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 4-Methylpyrazole

Sampling and analysis

Details on sampling:
Soil samples were placed in 25 x 200 mm test tubes and treated with 6 mL water containing 4 mg nitrogen as (NH4)2SO4 and 0, 0.01, 0.10, or
0.50 µmol test compound/g soil. The test tubes were then placed unsealed in an incubator maintained at 25 °C. The amount of water lost from
the soil samples during the incubation was measured gravimetrically at 5-day intervals and was replaced if it exceeded 1 mL. After 21 days, of test tubes were removed from the incubator, and their triplicate contents were analyzed for NH4+-N, NO2--N, and NO3--N as described by Bremner and Keeney (1966).

Test substrate

Vehicle:
no
Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
The soils used were surface (0-15 cm) samples of Iowa soils selected to obtain a range in pH (6.1-8.1), texture (9%-60% sand, 12%-49% silt, 28%-42% clay), organic-C content (1.2%-4.2%), and CaCO3 equivalent (0%-4,1%). Before use, each sample was air-dried and crushed to pass through a 2-mm screen.

Test organisms

Test organisms (inoculum):
soil

Study design

Total exposure duration:
21 d

Test conditions

Nominal and measured concentrations:
0.01; 0.1; 0.5 µmol/g
Reference substance (positive control):
no

Results and discussion

Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
2 mg/kg soil dw
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
nitrate formation rate
Remarks on result:
other: based on visual interpolation of test data (Webster soil)
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
4 mg/kg soil dw
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
nitrate formation rate
Remarks on result:
other: based on visual interpolation of test data (Harps soil)
Reported statistics and error estimates:
The amount of (NO3- +NO2-)-N produced during the incubation was calculated from the results of analyses for (NO3- +NO2- )-N before and after the incubation, and the percentage inhibition of nitrification by the test compound was calculated from (C-T)/Cx 100, where T is the amount of (NO3-+NO2)-N produced in the soil sample treated with the test compound and C is the amount of (NO3 +NO2 )-N produced by the control sample (no test compound added). None of the incubated soil samples contained more than 1 µg NO 2-N per g of soil, and no NH4+N was detected after incubation for 21 days of the (NH4)2SO4-amended soil samples that had not been treated with a test compound.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Note from the reviewer: the article only provides inhibition of nitrification % per concentration. EC50 Effect values were interpolated via log normal interpolation and there after linear regression to establish the EC50

Applicant's summary and conclusion