Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 619-437-9 | CAS number: 99474-22-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Additional physico-chemical information
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- other: Half-life in various aqueous media
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 03/09/2018 to 06/09/2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The stability of the test item in aqueous media was determined by measuring the test item and its degradation products concentration over time, using a validated HPLC method.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Pyrrolidine, 1-[2-[2-nitro-4-(phenylmethoxy)phenyl]ethenyl]-
- Cas Number:
- 99474-22-3
- Molecular formula:
- C19H20N2O3
- IUPAC Name:
- Pyrrolidine, 1-[2-[2-nitro-4-(phenylmethoxy)phenyl]ethenyl]-
Constituent 1
Results and discussion
- Results:
- The standard in all media showed insufficient stability. After 4 hours at the latest, more than half of the initial concentration of the test item had decomposed. Only in the hydrolysis buffer pH 9 and in the alga test medium a low signal (concentration < LOQ) of the test item could be detected after 24 h.
To perform a half-life calculation, at least 3 measured values are required, therefore only the half-life of the test item in the media demineralized water and hydrolysis buffer solution pH 9 can be calculated.
The half life of the test item was determined considering a first order kinetics.
The calculated half-life of the test item in demineralized water is:
t1/2 (demin. H2O; 25 °C) = 1.2 ± 0.7 h
The calculated half-life of the test item in hydrolyse buffer pH 9 is:
t1/2 (demin. H2O; 25 °C) = 3.1 ± 0.2 h
Any other information on results incl. tables
RESULTS
Stability in demineralized water
Nominal |
Dilution |
Peak |
Concen- |
Mean |
Stability |
||||||
50 |
none |
6.2270 |
39.18 |
36.58 |
100 |
||||||
5.9970 |
37.76 |
||||||||||
5.6509 |
35.62 |
||||||||||
5.3531 |
33.78 |
||||||||||
50 |
none |
4.2755 |
27.12 |
25.83 |
70.6 |
||||||
4.1483 |
26.33 |
||||||||||
3.9402 |
25.05 |
||||||||||
3.9038 |
24.82 |
||||||||||
50 |
none |
1.5530 |
10.29 |
9.58 |
26.2 |
||||||
1.5415 |
10.22 |
||||||||||
1.3235 |
8.88 |
||||||||||
1.3297 |
8.91 |
||||||||||
50 |
none |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
0.0 |
||||||
n.a. |
n.a. |
||||||||||
n.a. |
n.a. |
||||||||||
n.a. |
n.a. |
The test item showed a very low stability in demineralized water. In addition to the decomposition of the test item, degradation products (DP) could be detected. The following table reports the retention times and the relative areas at the corresponding points in time of the test item and the degradation products.
Sample |
Test item [%] |
DP 1 |
DP 2 |
DP 3 |
DP 4 |
DP 5 |
DP 6 |
Retention |
1.92 |
0.77 |
0.99 |
1.26 |
0.56 |
1.04 |
1.39 |
0 |
94.74 |
n.a |
5.26 |
n.a |
n.a |
n.a |
n.a |
0.5 |
89.46 |
n.a |
10.54 |
n.a |
n.a |
n.a |
n.a |
4 |
54.92 |
4.85 |
37.32 |
2.91 |
n.a |
n.a |
n.a |
24 |
n.a |
9.82 |
32.03 |
11.54 |
18.85 |
24.04 |
3.73 |
Stability in hydrolysis buffer solution pH 4
The test item immediately decomposed with the addition of the hydrolysis buffer solution pH 4. No signal of the test object could be detected in the chromatogram, only degradation products (DP) could be detected. The following table reports the retention times and the relative areas at the corresponding points in time of the degradation products.
Sample |
Test item [%] |
DP 1 |
DP 2 |
DP 3 |
DP 4 |
Retention |
|
0.78 |
0.99 |
1.26 |
0.58 |
0 |
n.a |
12.34 |
87.66 |
n.a |
n.a |
0.5 |
n.a |
12.97 |
87.03 |
n.a |
n.a |
4 |
n.a |
11.81 |
81.41 |
6.09 |
n.a |
24 |
n.a |
9.78 |
67.95 |
13.35 |
8.92 |
Stability in hydrolysis buffer solution pH 7
The test item immediately decomposed with the addition of the hydrolysis buffer solution pH 7. No signal of the test object could be detected in the chromatogram, only degradation products (DP) could be detected. The following table reports the retention times and the relative areas at the corresponding points in time of the degradation products.
Sample |
Test item [%] |
DP 1 |
DP 2 |
DP 3 |
DP 4 |
Retention |
|
0.78 |
0.99 |
1.39 |
0.56 |
0 |
n.a |
12.10 |
87.90 |
n.a |
n.a |
0.5 |
n.a |
12.91 |
87.09 |
n.a |
n.a |
4 |
n.a |
10.60 |
81.41 |
8.00 |
n.a |
24 |
n.a |
7.75 |
57.03 |
13.21 |
22.01 |
Stability in hydrolysis buffer solution pH 9
Nominal |
Dilution |
Peak |
Concen- |
Mean |
Stability |
50 |
none |
7.5369 |
47.28 |
46.69 |
100 |
7.6106 |
47.73 |
||||
7.1660 |
44.98 |
||||
7.3281 |
45.99 |
||||
50 |
none |
6.7903 |
42.66 |
41.76 |
89.8 |
6.7398 |
42.35 |
||||
6.4459 |
40.53 |
||||
6.5996 |
41.48 |
||||
50 |
none |
2.8297 |
18.18 |
18.01 |
38.7 |
2.8882 |
18.55 |
||||
2.7213 |
17.51 |
||||
2.7640 |
17.78 |
||||
50 |
none |
n.a. |
0.00 |
< LOQ |
0.0 |
n.a. |
0.00 |
||||
0.5887 |
< LOQ |
||||
0.5818 |
< LOQ |
The test item showed a low stability in hydrolysis buffer solution pH 9. In addition to the decomposition of the test item, degradation products (DP) could be detected. The following table reports the retention times and the relative areas at the corresponding points in time of the test item and the degradation products.
Sample |
Test item [%] |
DP 1 |
DP 2 |
DP 3 |
DP 4 |
DP 5 |
Retention |
1.92 |
0.75 |
1.00 |
1.21 |
0.56 |
1.04 |
0 |
99.12 |
n.a |
0.88 |
n.a |
n.a |
n.a |
0.5 |
97.46 |
n.a |
2.54 |
n.a |
n.a |
n.a |
4 |
64.49 |
3.06 |
26.68 |
5.77 |
n.a |
n.a |
24 |
9.29 |
8.54 |
n.a. |
10.18 |
10.47 |
61.52 |
Stability in algal test medium
Nominal |
Dilution |
Peak |
Concen- |
Mean |
Stability |
50 |
none |
7.5662 |
47.46 |
44.26 |
100 |
7.3644 |
46.21 |
||||
6.6201 |
41.61 |
||||
6.6467 |
41.77 |
||||
50 |
none |
0.0838 |
< LOQ |
< LOQ |
0.0 |
0.0847 |
< LOQ |
||||
0.0839 |
< LOQ |
||||
0.0818 |
< LOQ |
||||
50 |
none |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
0.0 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||||
n.a. |
n.a. |
||||
n.a. |
n.a. |
The test item showed a low stability in algal test medium. In addition to the decomposition of the test item, degradation products (DP) could be detected. The following table reports the retention times and the relative areas at the corresponding points in time of the test item and the degradation products.
Sample |
Test item [%] |
DP 1 |
DP 2 |
DP 3 |
DP 4 |
DP 5 |
DP 6 |
Retention |
1.92 |
0.70 |
0.95 |
1.26 |
0.53 |
1.04 |
1.39 |
0 |
77.52 |
19.49 |
2.63 |
n.a |
0.35 |
n.a |
n.a |
24 |
2.24 |
45.34 |
21.81 |
15.03 |
11.17 |
n.a |
4.41 |
72 |
n.a |
30.14 |
10.32 |
18.50 |
28.70 |
4.00 |
5.32 |
Stability in daphnia test medium
Nominal |
Dilution |
Peak |
Concen- |
Mean |
Stability |
50 |
none |
7.2693 |
45.62 |
44.21 |
100 |
7.1750 |
45.04 |
||||
6.9313 |
43.53 |
||||
6.7850 |
42.63 |
||||
50 |
none |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
0.0 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||||
n.a. |
n.a. |
||||
n.a. |
n.a. |
||||
50 |
none |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
0.0 |
n.a. |
n.a. |
||||
n.a. |
n.a. |
||||
n.a. |
n.a. |
The test item showed a very low stability in algal test medium. In addition to the decomposition of the test item, degradation products (DP) could be detected. The following table reports the retention times and the relative areas at the corresponding points in time of the test item and the degradation products.
Sample |
Test item [%] |
DP 1 |
DP 2 |
DP 3 |
Retention |
1.93 |
0.70 |
0.96 |
1.21 |
0 |
77.20 |
20.04 |
2.76 |
n.a |
24 |
n.a |
51.20 |
36.09 |
12.72 |
48 |
n.a |
45.22 |
43.50 |
11.28 |
Assessment of stability
The standard in all media showed insufficient stability. After 4 hours at the latest, more than half of the initial concentration of the test item had decomposed. Only in the hydrolysis buffer pH 9 and in the alga test medium a low signal (concentration < LOQ) of the test item could be detected after 24 h.
To perform a half-life calculation, at least 3 measured values are required, therefore only the half-life of the test item in the media demineralized water and hydrolysis buffer solution pH 9 can be calculated.
The half life of the test item was determined considering a first order kinetics.
The calculated half-life of the test item in demineralized water is:
t1/2(demin. H2O; 25 °C) = 1.2 ± 0.7 h
The calculated half-life of the test item inhydrolyse buffer pH 9is:
t1/2(demin. H2O; 25 °C) = 3.1 ± 0.2 h
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The standard in all media showed insufficient stability. After 4 hours at the latest, more than half of the initial concentration of the test item had decomposed. Only in the hydrolysis buffer pH 9 and in the algal test medium a low signal (concentration < LOQ) of the test item could be detected after 24 h.
For the medias demineralised water and hydrolyse buffer pH 9 the half-life t1/2 was calculated:
t1/2 (demin. H2O; 25 °C) = 1.2 ± 0.7 h
t1/2 (hydrolyse buffer solution pH 9; 25 °C) = 3.1 ± 0.2 h
No observations arousing doubts concerning the accuracy of the results and the validity of the study were made. - Executive summary:
The stability of the test item in aqueous media (demineralized water, Hydrolysis Buffer Solutions pH 4, pH 7, pH 9, Algal, and Daphnia test medium) was determined by measuring the concentration of the test item and its degradation products over time, using a validated HPLC method.
Due to the poor solubility of the test item, the medium / acetonitrile ratio must be 50 / 50 % (v/v).
The stability was determined by measuring a standard solution containing 50 mg/L :
- in demineralized water, Hydrolysis Buffer Solutions pH 4, pH 7, pH 9 at the time levels 0 h, 0.5 h, 4 h and 24 h, stored in closed bottles at room temperature (24.2 – 25.8 °C).
- in algal test medium at the time levels 0 h, 24 h and 72 h, stored in glass beakers covered with perforated plastic wrap at 21 – 23.3 °C.
- in daphnia test medium at the time levels 0 h, 24 h and 48 h, stored in glass beakers covered with perforated plastic wrap at 22.2 ± 23.5 °C.
The standard in all media showed insufficient stability. After 4 hours at the latest, more than half of the initial concentration of the test item had decomposed. Only in the hydrolysis buffer pH 9 and in the algal test medium a low signal (concentration < LOQ) of the test item could be detected after 24 h.
For the medias demineralized water and hydrolysis buffer pH 9 the half-life t1/2 was calculated:
t1/2(demin. H2O; 25 °C) = 1.2 ± 0.7 h
t1/2(hydrolysis buffer solution pH 9; 25 °C) = 3.1 ± 0.2 h
No observations arousing doubts concerning the accuracy of the results and the validity of the study were made.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.