Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 416-530-4 | CAS number: 178949-82-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Ecotoxicological Summary
Administrative data
Hazard for aquatic organisms
Freshwater
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC aqua (freshwater)
- PNEC value:
- 0.64 mg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 50
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Marine water
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC aqua (marine water)
- PNEC value:
- 0.064 mg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 500
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
STP
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC STP
- PNEC value:
- 16.7 mg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 30
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Sediment (freshwater)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC sediment (freshwater)
- PNEC value:
- 15.1 mg/kg sediment dw
- Extrapolation method:
- equilibrium partitioning method
Sediment (marine water)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC sediment (marine water)
- PNEC value:
- 1.51 mg/kg sediment dw
- Extrapolation method:
- equilibrium partitioning method
Hazard for air
Air
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Hazard for terrestrial organisms
Soil
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC soil
- PNEC value:
- 0.32 mg/kg soil dw
- Assessment factor:
- 100
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Hazard for predators
Secondary poisoning
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC oral
- PNEC value:
- 66.6 mg/kg food
- Assessment factor:
- 90
Additional information
PNEC aqua (freshwater)
For trisodium EDDS, there are reliable short-and long-term toxicity tests with freshwater fish, invertebrates, and algae, covering three trophic levels (predators, plant-eating animals, and primary producers, respectively), and NOECs have been reported for each trophic level.
The most sensitive NOEC (0.125 mg/L) was from the freshwater algae, Chlorella vulgaris (Neven and Henderix, 1990). However, for chelating agents, the findings from this test are not considered as measures of direct toxicity to algae, but rather an indirect effect of complexing the trace metals in the medium, resulting in limited availability of essential nutrients (Schowanek et al. 1996). If algal laboratory data are extrapolated to the field in this way an unrealistically low PNEC value will be obtained (Jaworska et al. 1999). According to the EU RARs on EDTA and tetrasodium EDTA, the apparent toxicity of complexing agents to algae in standard tests is related to essential trace metal bioavailability. Trace metal levels tend to be more important in algal growth tests than in other short-term tests (e.g. on fish or daphnia); the main reason is the rapid increase of biomass during the test. In standard tests using uncomplexed agents, the concentrations of free essential metal ions decrease drastically, leading to nutrient deficiency and relatively low effect concentrations. Addition of stoichiometric amounts of nutrients results in detoxification of the agent. Therefore direct effects caused by intrinsic toxicity are not expected in surface waters, where in nearly every case a stoichiometric surplus of metal ions is present (EU 2004a,b). Consequently, it is expected that such toxicity to algae would not be seen in the environment, and therefore this is not a realistic and relevant NOEC to use as the basis for deriving a PNEC aqua (freshwater).
Therefore, we turn our attention to plant-eating animals and predators. In this instance, we have good quality and reliable studies for fish and invertebrates. For freshwater zebra fish a 96-h NOEC of 1000 mg/L and a 30-day NOEC of 61 mg/L were identified for trisodium EDDS (Hooftman and van Drongelen-Sevenhuijsen, 1993, 1997). For the freshwater crustacean, Daphnia magna, a 48-h NOEC of 1000 mg/L (Hooftman and van Drongelen-Sevenhuijsen, 1993) and a 21-day NOEC of 32 mg/L (Hooftman and Kauffmanvan Bommel, 1994) were identified for trisodium EDDS. Therefore, the most sensitive species and relevant study is the long-term study on D. magna.
In a GLP study (similar to OECD Guideline 211 and EU Method C.20) the 21-d NOEC for trisodium EDDS for effects on reproduction, survival, condition and size of D. magna in freshwater was 32 mg/L (Hooftman and Kauffmanvan Bommel, 1994). An assessment factor (AF) of 10 would be sufficient as long-term toxicity results are available from three species across three trophic levels (e.g. fish, Daphnia, and algae), and is considered to be protective of other aquatic freshwater species. However, as we are discounting the algae tests as unrealistic, it is conservative and health precautionary to include an AF of 50 as we essentially have long-term results from two species representing two trophic levels (fish and Daphnia).
PNECaqua (freshwater) = 32 mg/L / 50 = 0.64 mg/L
PNEC aqua (saltwater)
For trisodium EDDS, no relevant data with marine/estuarine predators, plant-eating animals or primary producers were identified. The most relevant study to determine the PNEC aqua (saltwater) is to extrapolate from the well-conducted and reliable D. magna study [described above in more detail] (Hooftman and Kauffmanvan Bommel, 1994), in which a 21-d NOEC of 32 mg/L was determined. It is assumed that the greater species diversity in the marine environment, compared to freshwaters, including the presence of a number of taxa that occur only in the marine environment, implies a broader distribution of sensitivities of species and a higher uncertainty in extrapolation. Therefore, REACH technical guidance (Chapter R.10) states that an AF of 100 will be applied when longer-term toxicity results are available from three freshwater or saltwater species (algae, crustaceans and fish) across three trophic levels. However, as we are discounting the algae tests as unrealistic, it is conservative and health precautionary to include an AF of 500 as we essentially have long-term results from two speciesrepresenting two trophic levels (fish and Daphnia).
PNECaqua (saltwater) = 32 mg/L / 500 = 0.064 mg/L
PNEC aqua (intermittent releases)
REACH guidance (Chapter R.16) states that "Intermittent releases are defined as occurring infrequently, i.e. less than once per month and for no more than 24 hours". It is not anticipated that such releases will occur, therefore, a PNEC aqua for intermittent release has not been derived. If, however, such releases do occur in the future, the PNECs derived for continuous exposure (0.64 and 0.064 mg/L, in the freshwater and saltwater compartments, respectively) are considered protective of intermittent releases, and can therefore be used.
PNEC microorganisms (STP; sewage treatment plant)
No activated sludge respiration tests were identified for trisodium EDDS. However, in a test for biodegradability in sludge, 85% of trisodium EDDS was degraded after 28 days, demonstrating that the test substance did not significantly inhibit the activity of the sludge microflora (Lisec, 1993). In addition, due to its good biodegradability, adverse effects on the sewage treatment plant are not anticipated (Jaworska et al. 1999).
In a test conducted according to OECD Guideline 209, no significant inhibition of the respiration rate was detected in an activated domestic sewage sludge treated with disodium EDTA at up to 500 mg/L ("referred as H4EDTA") after 30 minutes. Equimolar amounts of CaCl2 were added, thus calcium EDTA was formed in the stock solutions. Both the EC10 and NOEC values were concluded to be above 500 mg/L (van Ginkel and Stroo, 2000). The EU RAR (2004a,b) on EDTA and tetrasodium EDTA considers the EC10 of 500 mg/L determined in this study as the most relevant to use for deriving a PNEC STP. Due to their structural similarity, data on EDTA (and its simple salts) are considered relevant to use for understanding the effects of trisodium EDDS on the inhibition of microbial respiration rate, and are acceptable for using as read-across information.
REACH guidance suggests that an AF of 10 can be applied to the NOEC or EC10 from a respiration inhibition test using mixed bacterial populations. An additional AF of 3 will be included due to the increased uncertainty in using data on a closely-related material (i.e. read-across information). [Please note: this NOEC/EC10 value has not been modified to take into consideration the differences in the molecular weights of the source and target (trisodium EDDS) substances, mainly as it is not certain as to the identity of the tested source material (e.g. tetrasodium EDTA, calcium EDTA, or more likely a mixture of the two)].
PNECmicroorganisms = 500 mg/L / 30 = 16.7 mg/L
PNEC sediment (freshwater)
There are no studies currently available on the effects of exposure of sediment-dwelling organisms to trisodium EDDS or EDDS acid (or its other simple salts). Therefore, the PNEC sediment (freshwater) may be provisionally calculated using the equilibrium partitioning method (EPM).
The following formula, which is based on equilibrium partitioning theory, is applied:
PNECsediment = Ksusp-water x PNECfreshwater x 1000
RHOsusp
Therefore:
PNECsediment = 124.8 x 0.64 x 1000 = 69.5 mg/kg of wet sediment
1150
Where:
PNECaqua (freshwater) [mg/L]
RHOsusp (bulk density of wet suspended matter) [kg/m3]
Ksusp-water (partition coefficient suspended matter-water) = [m3/m3]
PNECsediment (freshwater) [mg/kg of wet sediment]
Where Ksusp-water can be calculated as follows:
Fwater-susp + Fsolid-susp x Kpsusp x RHOsolid = 0.9 + 0.1 x Kpsurp x 2500
1000 1000
Where for the geometric mean Koc (4.95 x 103):
Kpsusp = Focsusp x Koc = 0.1 x 4.95E3 = 495.4
Therefore:
Ksusp-water= 0.9 + 0.1 x 495.4 x 2500 = 124.8
1000
As the log Kow for trisodium EDDS is low (<-4.7 at 20°C) (de Vries, 1993a), uptake via other pathways (ingestion of sediment and indirect contact with sediment) are not considered important exposure routes.
It has to be considered that the equilibrium partitioning method may result both in an overestimation or underestimation of the toxicity to benthic organisms. Therefore this method can only be used as rough screening to decide whether sediment toxicity tests with benthic organisms are required.
To convert the PNECsediment to a dry weight basis from a wet weight basis, 69.5 mg/kg wet sediment is divided by 4.6. This results in a PNECsediment (freshwater) of 15.1 mg/kg dry sediment
PNEC sediment (saltwater)
There are no studies currently available on the effects of exposure of sediment-dwelling organisms to trisodium EDDS or EDDS acid (or its other simple salts). Therefore, the PNEC sediment (saltwater) may be provisionally calculated using the EPM. The following formula, which is based on equilibrium partitioning theory, is applied:
PNECsediment = Ksusp-water x PNECsaltwater x 1000
RHOsusp
Therefore:
PNECsediment = 124.8 x 0.064 x 1000 = 6.95 mg/kg of wet sediment
1150
Where:
PNECaqua (saltwater) [mg/L]
RHOsusp (bulk density of wet suspended matter) [kg/m3]
Ksusp water (partition coefficient suspended matter-water) = [m3/m3]
PNECsediment (saltwater) [mg/kg of wet sediment]
Where Ksusp-water can be calculated as follows:
Fwater-susp + Fsolid-susp x Kpsusp x RHOsolid = 0.9 + 0.1 x Kpsusp x 2500
1000 1000
Where for the geometric mean Koc (4.95 x 103):
Kpsusp = Focsusp x Koc = 0.1 x 4.95E3 = 495.4
Therefore:
Ksusp-water = 0.9 + 0.1 x 495.4 x 2500 = 124.8
1000
As the log Kow for trisodium EDDS is low (<-4.7 at 20°C) (de Vries, 1993a), uptake via other pathways (ingestion of sediment and indirect contact with sediment) are not considered important exposure routes.
It has to be considered that the equilibrium partitioning method may result both in an overestimation or underestimation of the toxicity to benthic organisms. Therefore this method can only be used as rough screening to decide whether sediment toxicity tests with benthic organisms are required.
To convert the PNECsediment to a dry weight basis from a wet weight basis, 6.95 mg/kg wet sediment is divided by 4.6. This results in a PNECsediment (marine water) of 1.51 mg/kg dry sediment
PNEC soil (terrestrial)
There is a prolonged toxicity test with plants [see note below] and a short-term test involving earthworms with trisodium EDDS (covering primary producers and consumers, respectively) and a short-term microorganism toxicity test with EDDS acid (covering decomposers).
In a GLP study conducted according to OECD Guideline 208, the 18-d NOEC values for the growth of Avena sativa (oat), Lactuca sativa (lettuce) and Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato) were 1000, 100 and 320 mg trisodium EDDS/kg of dry soil, respectively. The corresponding 18-d NOECs for their condition (visual appearance) were 1000, 32 and 100 mg/kg of dry soil, respectively, and for their emergence and survival were 1000, 320, 1000 mg/kg of dry soil, respectively (Henzen, 1999b). [Please note: studies conducted according to the updated OECD Guideline 208 are designed to assess the potential effects of substances on seedling emergence and growth. Therefore, it is specific to a part of the plant's life-cycle and does not cover chronic effects or effects on reproduction. However, it is assumed to cover a sensitive stage in the life-cycle of a plant and therefore data obtained from this study can be used to estimate chronic toxicity.]
In a GLP study conducted according to OECD Guideline 207, the 14-d LC50 (survival) of trisodium EDDS to the earthworm, Eisenia fetida, was calculated to be 115 mg/kg dry soil, respectively. Further, the 14-d NOEC for survival, appearance, behaviour and weight loss was 32 mg/kg dry soil.
In a study using several endpoints to measure toxicity to soil microorganisms, EDDS acid at 1000 mg/kg dry weight soil for 3 days (considered the study NOEC) did not affect substrate-induced respiration (used as an indicator of potential biomass activity) or the activity of four enzymes (considered important for the breakdown of organic matter), although it did cause a significant inhibition of soil basal respiration. [If corrected for the differences in molecular weights, this would be equivalent to a NOEC of about 1226 mg/kg dry weight for trisodium EDDS] (Epelde et al. 2008).
Therefore, the most sensitive species appear to be L. sativa and E. fetida. As the plant study can be used to estimate chronic toxicity, REACH guidance (Chapter R.10) recommends applying a default AF of 100 to the NOEC for one long-term toxicity test (i.e. the 18-d NOEC of 32 mg/kg dry wt soil for effects on plant condition).
Therefore:
PNECsoil: 32 mg/kg dry wt / 100 = 0.32 mg/kg dry wt
PNEC oral (secondary poisoning; birds/mammals)
No avian toxicity studies on trisodium EDDS, EDDS acid or its other simple salts are available.
In a GLP study conducted according to OECD Guideline 408 (available at the time), a 90-day NOAEL of 300 mg/kg bw/day was established for trisodium EDDS based on a reduction in body weight gain and effects on the pancreas seen in rats at 700 mg/kg bw/day and above following repeated dietary administration (Dotti et al. 1995). Using a conversion factor of 20 (for rats over 6 weeks of age) from a NOAEL of 300 mg/kg bw/day corresponds to a NOEC of 6000 mg/kg food. According to REACH guidance, an AF of 90 is appropriate for extrapolation from a 90-day study in mammals, which takes into account both interspecies variation and lab-to-field extrapolation.
PNECoral (mammal): 6000 mg/kg diet / 90 = 66.6 mg/kg food
Atmospheric compartment
No data are available on possible effects of trisodium EDDS (or EDDS or its other simple salts) on the atmospheric compartment. However, given its low volatility, neither biotic nor abiotic effects (e.g. global warming, ozone depletion/formation, acidification) are considered likely.
Conclusion on classification
Trisodium EDDS is not classified as dangerous for the environment.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.