Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 403-140-4 | CAS number: 103694-68-4 MAJANTOL; MAJANTOL R
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1987-08-26
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 987
- Report date:
- 1987
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3-(2,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypropyl)toluene
- EC Number:
- 403-140-4
- EC Name:
- 3-(2,2-dimethyl-3-hydroxypropyl)toluene
- Cas Number:
- 103694-68-4
- Molecular formula:
- C12H18O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,2-dimethyl-3-(3-methylphenyl)propan-1-ol
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: adult, 3 months old
- Weight at study initiation: males: 28 - 34 g; females: 26 - 32 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes, under following basis: by lot
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: collective caging
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 11 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 20 +/- 2°C
- Humidity: 50 - 80 %
- Air changes: not specified
- Photoperiod: 12 / 12 hrs dark / hrs light
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: isotonic saline
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: recommended by guideline - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test solution was prepared by diluting appropriate amounts with isotonic saline. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single intraperitoneal application
- Frequency of treatment:
- 1
- Post exposure period:
- 24, 48, 72 hours, respectively
Doses / concentrations
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Male: 1000 mg/kg bw; No. of animals: 5; Sacrifice time: 24 hours
Male: 1000 mg/kg bw; No. of animals: 5; Sacrifice time: 48 hours
Male: 1000 mg/kg bw; No. of animals: 5; Sacrifice time: 72 hours
Female: 1000 mg/kg bw; No. of animals: 5; Sacrifice times: 24 hours
Female: 1000 mg/kg bw; No. of animals: 5; Sacrifice times: 48 hours
Female: 1000 mg/kg bw; No. of animals: 5; Sacrifice times: 72 hours - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- cyclophosphamide
- Justification for choice of positive control: recommended by the guideline
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal
- Doses / concentrations: 40 mg/ kg bw
- Positive control animals were evaluated 24 h after application
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Erythrocytes from femura bone marrow.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: Preparations were dried, fixed in absolute (99 %) methanol for 5 min. and then allowed to air dry. The slides were stained using a May-Grünwald and Giemsa solution.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: From each animal 2 preparations were made. Prior to analysis all the slides were randomized and coded (blind evaluation). The cells were examined at a magnification of 1000 x.
A total of 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes was scored from each slide and the number of micronucleated cells in each sample was recorded. The ratio of polychromatic erythrocytes to normochromatic (mature) erythrocytes was calculated on the base of 1000 cells. - Evaluation criteria:
- Cell counts are based on a total of 1000 cells per anirnal. Due to own laboratory historical data an incidence of (up to) 0.8 %, respectively of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes is considered to be within normal limits.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- clinical signs of toxicity were seen at 1000 mg/kg bw
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- No lethal effects, no cytytoxicity (PCE/NCE).
Any other information on results incl. tables
Dose-Range-Finding
A preliminary dose-range-finding study was performed applying single doses of 5000, 2500 and 1000 mg/kg body weight, respectively by intraperitoneal injection in 2 mice each. Animals treated at 5000 mg/kg body weight survived, but exhibited signs like marked sedation, ventral position, ataxia, cyanosis and writhing reflex up to six hours p.a. A dose level of 2500 mg/kg body weight produced similar signs less severe and 1000 mg/kg produced only slight, individually barely perceptible reactions. This dose level was therefore considered to be a suitable dosage, representing the area of the MTD (maximally tolerated dosage).
Number of polychromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei
The number of polychromtic erythrocytes with micronuclei was significantly increased 24 h post injection in the positive control animals. This result confirms the sensitivity of the used animal strain. There was no significant difference to control values at any time point in the males of the test compound treated group. All group mean values lay within normal ranges.
Number of polychromatic erythrocvtes
The number of polychromatic erythrocytes was not significantly different in the test item treated animals. It decreased, however, significantly in the positive control group (sum of both sexes).
Number of normochromatic erythrocytes
There was an analogue increase in the number of normochromatic erythrocytes in the positive control group, but none in the test item treated mice.
Ratio polychromatic normochromatic ervthrocytes
Due to the previous results, the ratio dropped significantly only in the positive control group attaining statistical significance in the sum of both sexes.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The intraperitoneal administration of the test item at a dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw to male and female mice did not produce significant increases in the frequency of micronuclei in the polychromatic erythrocyte stem cells. All mean values lay completely within laboratory own normal ranges. Therefore, under the experimental conditions of this study, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic at any tested time point in this test system.
- Executive summary:
The test item was administered once intraperitoneally at one high dose level of 1000 mg/kg body weight to mice of the NMRI-strain. Samples of the bone marrow were taken after 24 hours, after 48 hours and finally after 72 hours from 5 males and 5 females each. A concurrent control group (C) received the vehicle only and a positive control group (C-pos.) was treated with Cyclophosphamide (EndoxanR) at a dose level of 40 mg/kg body weight. Results from the data analysis show that there was no significant difference in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes compared to the control values at any time point. The number of polychromatic and normochromatic erythrocytes and the ratio polychromatic / normochromatic erythrocytes was also not significantly different to the controls in animals treated with the test item at any time point. The positive control group, treated with 40 mg Cyclophosphamide /kg bw revealed a distinct, significant increase in the incidence of micronuclei (62.3‰, p < 0.001). In this group the ratio of polychromatic erythrocytes to normochromatic erythrocytes was significantly decreased in the sum of both sexes in the positive control group, thus indicating signs of toxicity to erythropoiesis. The decrease in the ratio was due to a significant dropping of polychromatic erythrocytes and a significant increase in the number of normochromatic erythrocytes.
The intraperitoneal administration of the test item at a dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw to male and female mice did not produce significant increases in the frequency of micronuclei in the polychromatic erythrocyte stem cells. All mean values lay completely within laboratory own normal ranges. Therefore, under the experimental conditions of this study, the test item is considered to be non-mutagenic at any tested time point in this test system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.