Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: inhalation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
Study completion date: 1991-12-23
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
Valid and conclusive guideline study conducted under quality control but not not formally GLP. Nonetheless the study was considered acceptable by U.S. EPA, but as a deficiency it was recognized as the report does not state which phase of the study the quality assurance unit observed. The original full study report was not available, but a robust study summary is available from a U.S. EPA Memorandum.
Justification for type of information:
The Reporting Format for the Chemical Category According to ECHA (2008) Guidance R.6.2.6.2 can be found in the Endpoint Summary of Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution.

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
other: Authority assessment report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1993
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1991
Report date:
1991
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994
Report date:
1994

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPP 81-3 (Acute inhalation toxicity)
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.1300 (Acute inhalation toxicity)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Remarks:
Quality assurance (40 CFR §160.12) included
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Ferric sulphate anhydrous
IUPAC Name:
Ferric sulphate anhydrous
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Diiron tris(sulphate)
EC Number:
233-072-9
EC Name:
Diiron tris(sulphate)
Cas Number:
10028-22-5
Molecular formula:
Fe2(SO4)3
IUPAC Name:
diiron tris(sulphate)
Test material form:
other: off-white powder /granules
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): iron (III) sulfate

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Lab colony
- Age at study initiation: Young adult
- Weight at study initiation: 242-267 g males, 202-219 g females

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation
Type of inhalation exposure:
whole body
Vehicle:
air
Details on inhalation exposure:
TEST ATMOSPHERE
- MMAD (Mass median aerodynamic diameter) 2.75±5.925 µm Geometric Standard Deviation
Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
yes
Remarks:
gravimentic
Duration of exposure:
4 h
Concentrations:
Nominal 18.5 mg/L, analytical (gravimetric) 1.1 mg/L
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 males and 5 females
Control animals:
no

Results and discussion

Effect levelsopen allclose all
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
> 1.1 mg/L air (analytical)
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks:
Fe2(SO4)3
Exp. duration:
4 h
Remarks on result:
other: MMAD 2.75±5.925 µm; Nominal dose 18.5 mg/L, analytical (gravimetric) 1.1 mg/L
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
> 0.3 mg/L air (analytical)
Based on:
element
Remarks:
Fe
Exp. duration:
4 h
Remarks on result:
other: Converted on the basis of molecular weights
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
discriminating conc.
Effect level:
1.1 mg/L air (analytical)
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks:
Fe2(SO4)3
Exp. duration:
4 h
Remarks on result:
other: MMAD 2.75±5.925 µm; Nominal dose 18.5 mg/L, analytical (gravimetric) 1.1 mg/L
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
discriminating conc.
Effect level:
0.3 mg/L air (analytical)
Based on:
element
Remarks:
Fe
Exp. duration:
4 h
Remarks on result:
other: Converted on the basis of molecular weights
Mortality:
All animals survived
Clinical signs:
other: Yellow perineal staining, back covered with test material
Gross pathology:
No pathologic findings

Any other information on results incl. tables

Reported mortality

Exposure concentration

Number killed / number tested

Males

Females

Combined

1.1 mg/L

0/5

0/5

0/10

Chamber Atmosphere

Dose level

MMAD

GSD

particles

< 4 µm

particles

< 1.4 µm

1.1 mg/L

2.75 µm

5.925 µm

57.65 %

32.6 %

Chamber Environment

Chamber volume:

47.4 L

Airflow:

10 L/min

Temperature:

76 °F / 24.4 °C

Target relative humidity.

62-64 %

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: absence of effects at a limit lower than the classification cut-off
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
No toxicity at 1.1 mg/L. (discriminating dose)
Executive summary:

The acute inhalation toxicity of the test item Ferric sulphate (CAS 10028-22-5), provided as off-white powder / granules to rats was investigated in 40 CFR §160.12 quality assurance study according to the EPA OPP 81-3 (Acute inhalation toxicity) standards (comparable to EPA OPPTS 870.1300), however the report does not state which phase of the study the quality assurance unit observed. Nonetheless it can be assumed that comparable standards applied as the test was conducted in a specialized laboratory. The reporting is limited but the basic information is given. The experiment is deemed valid, conclusive and suitable for assessment with minor restrictions (Klimisch 2). However reliable and relevant the experiment is not fully adequate as it does not allow concluding finally on classification. .

In a limit study design 5 male and 5 female Sprague-Dawley derived laboratory cultured rats, were during 4 h exposed to a test atmosphere of nominal 18.5 mg test item/L corresponding to analytical (gravimetric) 1.1 mg test item/L. Consequently the observations were assigned to the measure concentration. The test atmosphere was characterized by MMAD (Mass median aerodynamic diameter) 2.75±5.925 µm Geometric Standard Deviation, 57.65 % of the particles were < 4 µm, and 32.6 % particles were < 1.4 µm. No control group was involved.

No mortality was observed and no observation of sublethal effects was made, but the test organisms showed yellow perineal staining and their back was covered with test material due to the whole body exposure. Therefore a discriminating concentration of 1.1 mg test item/L was evidenced, which means that the LD50 can be assigned to be significantly greater than this level.

In summary no effects were visible in the classifiable range up to >1.0 mg/L bw (lower border of CLP up to 5th ATP, 2013, acute toxicity hazard category 4 for dusts and mists and DSD, R20 Harmful by inhalation) but no evidence for the absence of effects until 5.0 mg/L (upper border of CLP up to 5th ATP, 2013, acute toxicity hazard category 4 for dusts and mists and DSD, R20 Harmful by inhalation) is given.

Therefore classification in accordance with EU CLP Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of 14 May 2009, chapter 3.1 or Commission Directive 2001/59/EC of 6 August 2001, chapter 3.2.3, p. L 225/274 cannot be decided on the basis of this study alone, but more severe classification than acute toxicity hazard category 4 (CLP) or R20 Harmful by inhalation (DSD) is discouraged by the results of this study.