Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 201-853-3 | CAS number: 88-72-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1997
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- other company data
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 997
- Reference Type:
- secondary source
- Title:
- 4-Nitrotoluene - CAS N°: 99-99-0 - SIDS Initial Assessment Report.
- Author:
- OECD
- Year:
- 2 003
- Bibliographic source:
- UNEP Publications
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- No data about GLP compliance; analytical purity not reported
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- Guideline OECD 406 study available, reporting no concern for sensitisation. Conduct of additional LLNA would not be scientifically justified for animal welfare reasons.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4-nitrotoluene
- EC Number:
- 202-808-0
- EC Name:
- 4-nitrotoluene
- Cas Number:
- 99-99-0
- Molecular formula:
- C7H7NO2
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-methyl-4-nitrobenzene
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 4-nitrotoluene
- Analytical purity: not reported
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: not reported. Young adult animals were used
- Weight at study initiation: 326-521 grams
- Housing: animals were individually housed in wire mesh suspension cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): diet ad libitum during acclimatization and test period
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water ad libitum during acclimatization and test period
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18°-26°
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs light/12 hrs dark cycle
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Induction
- Route:
- other: epicutaneous, chamber
- Vehicle:
- other: acetone
- Concentration / amount:
- 50% w/v
- Day(s)/duration:
- 1/week for a total of 3 approximate 6-hour exposures (see 'details on study design' for further information)
- Adequacy of induction:
- not specified
Challenge
- Route:
- other: epicutaneous, chamber
- Vehicle:
- other: acetone
- Concentration / amount:
- 10% w/v
- Day(s)/duration:
- see 'details on study design' for further information
- No. of animals per dose:
- 20
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS: Irritation screening (Pilot)
The irritation potential of the test material at levels of 50%, 25%, 10%, 5%, 2.5%, 1%, 0.5% and 0.25% was evaluated in 2 groups of 4 animals each. 4 levels of the test material were evaluated per animal such that each animal in a given pilot group was exposed to the same levels. Dilutions of the test material were formulated w/v in acetone.
On the day prior to test material exposure the hair was removed from each of the animals' backs. A 0.3 ml quantity of each test preparation was applied into a 25 mm chamber which was applied to the clipped surface of the animals in restrainers and occluded with rubber dental dam pulled out and fastened to the bottom of the restrainer with clips. The day following the irritation exposure all animals were depilated and scored.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
Induction Phase
The left shoulder (site 1) of each test animal was clipped the day before exposure. The animals were restrained and a 0.3 ml quantity of the test preparation was applied as previously described. The procedure was repeated at the same site once a week for the next 2 weeks for a total of 3 approximate 6-hour exposures. After the last induction exposure, the animals were left untreated for approximately 2 weeks (13 days) before primary challenge.
50% w/v concentration of 4-nitrotoluene in acetone was chosen for use at induction.
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
Primary Challenge Phase
The test animals were again exposed in the challenge phase.
In addition 10 naive animals which had never been exposed to the test material were concurrently treated with the same test material concentration.
The same exposure procedure was used as for the "Induction Phase" but the chambers were applied to a skin side that had not been exposed previously. Each animal received one patch of the test material using site 2.
10% w/v concentration of 4-nitrotoluene in acetone was chosen for use at primary challenge. - Challenge controls:
- See 'details on study design'
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 1-Chloro-2,4-Dinitrobenzene, alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- Historical positive control data (Primary Challenge)
1-Chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene, incidences-mean score:
0.1% in acetone: 10/10 = 1.7 (24 hrs), 10/10 = 1.4 (48 hrs)
alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyd, techn. = 85 %, incidences-mean score:
5 % in acetone: 10/10 = 1.1 (24 hrs), 7/10 = 0.9 (48 hrs)
2.5 % in acetone: 7/10 = 0.9 (24 hrs), 4/10 = 0.8 (48 hrs)
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- Various: See 'positive control results' field
- No. with + reactions:
- 10
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: See 'positive control results' field for further details
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- Various: See 'positive control results' field
- No. with + reactions:
- 10
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- other: See 'positive control results' field for further details
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- 10/10 females with slight, patchy erythema, 10/10 males with slight, patchy erythema: numerical mean score : 0.5
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Clinical observations:
- 5/10 females with slight, patchy erythema, 5/10 females with no reaction, 6/10 males with slight, patchy erythema, 4/10 males with no reaction: numerical mean score 0.3
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- 5/5 females, 5/5 males : with slight, patchy erythema, numerical mean score, 0.5
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 10%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- 3/5 females with slight patchy erythema, 2/5 females with no reactions, 2/5 males with slight patchy erythema, 3/5 males with no reaction: numerical mean score 0.3
Any other information on results incl. tables
A tabulated summary of results is provided below:
Group | Material | Concentration | Incidence of Responses | Mean severity scores | ||||||||||
24 hours | 48 hours | |||||||||||||
0 | ± | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | ± | 1 | 2 | 3 | 24-h | 48-h | |||
Test | para-Nitrotoluene | 10% | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
Naiive Control | para-Nitrotoluene | 10% | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
Based on these results an assessment by comparison of responses in the test group to that of the corresponding control group was carried out. Since the Buehler test showed the same effects in the test group and the control group, 4-nitrotoluene was evaluated as not sensitizing to the skin of guinea pigs.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Executive summary:
Chemfirst Inc. (1998)
A Buehler test performed with 20 guinea pigs according to OECD TG 406 with deviations (No data about GLP compliance; analytical purity not reported) did not reveal any skin sensitization.
Induction was performed by dermal application of a 50 % solution in acetone and a 10 % solution was used for challenge. Concurrent control guinea pigs were treated with acetone alone. Animals treated with 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (10/10 positive at 24 and 48 hrs), or alpha hexylcinnamaldehyde (10/10 positive at 24 hrs, 7/10 at 48 hrs) served as positive controls.
4-Nitrotoluene was not sensitizing to the skin of guinea pigs acoording to the conditions of this study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.