Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin irritation (OECD 404): not irritating
Eye irritation (OECD 405): irritating

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
26 Jun - 06 Jul 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP - Guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no information on systemic effects are given in the test report
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no information on systemic effects are given in the test report
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
GROUPE INTERMINISTERIEL DES PRODUITS CHIMIQUES
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Elevage de Gérome, Quartier Labaste, Linxe, France
- Age at study initiation: 11 - 13 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.39 - 2.70 kg
- Housing: individual
- Diet: SDS - C15, ad libitum
- Water: tap-water from public distribution system, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): approx. 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
clipped
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Remarks:
(the test item was moistened with distilled water prior to treatment to ensure good contact with the skin)
Controls:
other: not required, untreated sites of the same animal served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 g
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h
Observation period:
72 h
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h
Number of animals:
1 female (initial test)
2 females (confirmatory test)
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6 cm² on the flank
- Type of wrap if used: The patch containing the test substance was secured in position with a strip of surgical adhesive tape.

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0.7
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 h
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
other: mean out of all 3 animals
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Slight erythema were noted on the treated area in 2/3 animals starting 1 h after patch removal which lasted for up to 72 h.
Other effects:
Yellow coloration was noted on the treatment site of animal#2 which did not interfere with erythema assessment.
Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2 Jul - 24 Jul 2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP-Guideline study (according to OECD Guideline 405 adopted 24th April 2002 (no anesthetics or analgesics were used)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion) (adopted 24 April 2002)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no information on clinical signs or pain/distress are given in the test report
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no information on clinical signs or pain/distress are given in the test report
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
GROUPE INTERMINISTERIEL DES PRODUITS CHIMIQUES
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Elevage de Gérome, Quartier Labaste, Linxe, France
- Age at study initiation: 12 - 13 weeks
- Weight during study period: 2.66 - 3.78 kg
- Housing: individual
- Diet: SDS - C15, ad libitum
- Water: tap-water from public distribution system, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): 10 - 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: The untreated eye served as control.
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 g
Duration of treatment / exposure:
1 h (remaining test item was rinsed with physiological saline 1 h after instillation in all animals)
Observation period (in vivo):
14 days
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48, 72 h and on Day 7 and 14
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
1 female (initial test)
2 females (confirmatory test)
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM: similar to Draize scoring system, supplemented with scoring for discharge and extent of opacity

Discharge:
No discharge - 0
Slight discharge (normal slight secretions in the inner corner to be taken into account) -2
Discharge with moistening of the eyelids and neighbouring hairs - 2
Discharge with moistening of the eyelids and large areas around the eye -3

Cornea: Extent of opacity:
Opaque area present but covering 1/4 or less - 1
Between 1/4 or 1/2 - 2
Between 1/2 and 3/4 - 3
Between 3/4 and the entire surface - 4
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0.7
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
2
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 14 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 14 days
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
1.3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
1.7
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 7 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 14 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 2 days
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The test item induced slight to severe eye reactions:
- slight to moderate corneal opacity in 3/3 animals noted 24 h after instillation which was fully reversible within 2 days.
- congestion of the iris in 1/3 animals noted 24 h after instillation which was fully reversible within 2 days.
- moderate to severe redness of the conjunctivae in 3/3 animals noted after 24 h instillation which was fully reversible latest within 14 days.
- slight to severe chemosis in 3/3 animals noted 24 h after instillation which was fully reversible latest within 14 days.
Further, white coloration of the inferior conjunctiva was noted in animal#1 between Day 2 and Day 7.
Other effects:
No information on clinical signs or pain/distress are reported.

Table 1. Eye reactions after instillation.

 

 

 

Rabbit #

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Time [h]

 

conjunctivae

 

iris

 

cornea

 

 

conjunctivae

 

iris

 

cornea

 

redness

swelling

redness

swelling

24

2

3

0

1

48

2

1

0

0

72

2

1

0

0

average

2

1.7

0.0

0.3

Time to reversion

14 days

7 days

0

2 days

24

3

4

1

2

48

3

3

0

0

72

3

2

0

0

average

3

3

0.3

0.7

Time to reversion

14 days

14 days

2 days

2 days

24

2

1

0

1

48

1

0

0

0

72

1

0

0

0

average

1.3

0.3

0.0

0.3

Time to reversion

2 days

7 days

0

2 days

Interpretation of results:
irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: Eye irrit 2, H319
DSD: not classified
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irritating)

Additional information

Skin irritation/corrosion

A GLP-guideline study according to OECD guideline 404 did not determine skin irritating properties of 2-Butenedioic acid (2Z)-, reaction products with ammonium di-µ3-hydroxyhexacosa-µ-oxododecaoxododecatungstate(6-) (6:1), ammonium octa-µoxodi-µ3-oxo-µ4-oxododecaoxoheptamolybdate(6-) (6:1), nickel(2+) nitrate (1:2) and nickel(2+) sulfate (1:1) (Colas, 2012). Thus, the test item is considered to be non-irritating to skin.

Eye irritation

In a GLP-guideline study performed according to OECD guideline 405 (adopted 24thApril 2002), 3 female New Zealand White rabbits were treated with 0.1 g test material (Colas, 2013). 2-Butenedioic acid (2Z)-, reaction products with ammonium di-µ3-hydroxyhexacosa-µ-oxododecaoxododecatungstate(6-) (6:1), ammonium octa-µ-oxodi-µ3-oxo-µ4-oxododecaoxoheptamolybdate(6-) (6:1), nickel(2+) nitrate (1:2) and nickel(2+) sulfate (1:1) induced slight to severe eye reactions visible as slight to moderate corneal opacity in 3/3 animals with overall cornea scores of 0.3 or 0.7, congestion of the iris in 1/3 animals (mean score 0.3), moderate to severe redness of the conjunctivae in 3/3 animals (overall score 1.3, 2 or 3) and slight to severe chemosis in 3/3 animals (overall score 0.3, 1.7 or 3). All effects were fully reversible latest within 14 days. Based on the effects observed, 2-Butenedioic acid (2Z)-, reaction products with ammonium di-µ3-hydroxyhexacosa-µ-oxododecaoxododecatungstate(6-) (6:1), ammonium octa-µoxodi-µ3-oxo-µ4-oxododecaoxoheptamolybdate(6-) (6:1), nickel(2+) nitrate (1:2) and nickel(2+) sulfate (1:1) is considered as eye irritant.


Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
There is only one study available.

Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
There is only one study available.

Effects on eye irritation: irritating

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available data on skin irritation do not meet the classification criteria according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 or Directive 67/548/EEC, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.

The available data on eye irritation do not meet the classification criteria according to Directive 67/548/EEC but meet the classification criteria as serious eye irritant according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.