Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information
The mutagenic potential of para bromoanisole was tested in vitro in a bacterial reverse mutation assay. The test was performed similar to the OECD guideline 417 (Ames test), but a modification was used. 10 tester strains, including the ones recommended in the OECD 417 guideline, were tested. However, instead of definite concentrations, concentration ranges (0.1 - 1, 1 - 10, 10 - 100 and 100 - 1000 µg/ml) of the test substance were tested. Positive and negative controls were included and the test was performed with and without metabolic activation. About 854 chemicals next to para bromoanisole were tested in the same study. According to the authors of the study, p-Bromoanisole showed no mutagenic potential in the concentation range of 0.1 to 1000 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation. The study was considered to be reliable with restrictions.
Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1979
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
At the time of the study no GLP-rules had been established; therefore the study is a non-GLP study. A modification of Ames test was used and a detailled documentation of testing procedure is given. The testing procedure was similar to OECD guideline 471; positive and negative controls were included; 10 tester strains including the ones recommended by OECD 471, were used in the test; no definite exposure concentrations were tested, but a concentration-gradient; no data on analytical results of the test substance, no individual data and no data on the storage of the individual values are given. The reputation of the test laboratory allows to speculate that these data exist and have been stored.
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Screening is done using a concentration gradient of the test substance and 10 tester strains on one Agar plate, 8 Agar plates were prepared for each substance: with concentration gradients approx. 0.1-1, 1-10, 10-100 and 100 to 1000 µg/ml and with and without metabolic activation; hence, no definite concentrations were tested; as result the upper and lower concentrations tested or those with a positive result are reported.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
- Dependant on the strain tested; histidine in many cases
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli, other: WP2 tryptophan
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium, other: G46, C3076, D3052 and TA1538
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
mixture of rat liver enzymes from animals treated with Aroclor
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- No distinct concentration tested, but testing of four concentration gradients: approx. 0.1-1, 1-10, 10-100 and 100 to 1000 µg/ml
Vehicle / solvent:
dimethyl sulfoxide, water or dimethoxyethane
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
not specified
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
2-acetylaminofluorene
other: streptozotocin
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION

Exposure duration:48 hr



DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
yes

Evaluation criteria:
- The concentration range over which chemically induced mutant colonies are present is recorded
Statistics:
- Operator judgement
- Experienced personel
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
The single values of the testing results are missing. The result "negative" is only listed in a table(no. 6).
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

According to the authors of the study, a negative result was obtained for p-Bromoanisole in the concentation range of 0.1 to 1000 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation.
Executive summary:

The mutagenic potential of para bromoanisole was tested in vitro in a bacterial reverse mutation assay. The test was performed similar to the OECD guideline 417 (Ames test), but a modification was used. 10 tester strains, including the ones recommended in the OECD 417 guideline, were tested. However, instead of definite concentrations, concentration ranges (0.1 - 1, 1 - 10, 10 - 100 and 100 - 1000 µg/ml) of the test substance were tested. Positive and negative controls were included and the test was performed with and without metabolic activation. About 854 chemicals next to para bromoanisole were tested in the same study. According to the authors of the study, p-Bromoanisole showed no mutagenic potential in the concentation range of 0.1 to 1000 µg/mL with and without metabolic activation. The study was considered to be reliable with restrictions.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

Additional information from genetic toxicity in vitro:

Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
The study by McMahon et al 1979 was considered reliable with restrictions.

Justification for classification or non-classification