Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
This read-across hypothesis corresponds to scenario 2 of the Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF), ECHA, March 2017 - different compounds have qualitatively similar properties - of the read-across assessment framework i.e. properties of the target substance are predicted to be quantitatively equal to those of the source substance. Namely, the source substance BADGE predicts the toxicological and ecotoxicological properties of the target substance Soya/Linseed Oil Fatty Acid-BADGE reaction product.

1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
for details see Justification for read-across attached to iuclid section 13

2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
for details see Justification for read-across attached to iuclid section 13

3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
for details see Justification for read-across attached to iuclid section 13

4. DATA MATRIX
for details see Justification for read-across attached to iuclid section 13
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across: supporting information
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
No clean water control, only a solvent (acetone) control included in the test design
Analytical monitoring:
no
Test organisms (species):
Daphnia magna
Test type:
semi-static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
21 d
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal concentrations: 0, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3
Reference substance (positive control):
not specified
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
0.3 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: survival, growth and reproduction
Remarks on result:
other: no data
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
LOEC
Effect conc.:
1 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: survival, growth and reproduction
Remarks on result:
other: no data
Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Remarks:
One control beaker was omitted from the anaysis as it showed lower than normal reproduction.
Conclusions:
The NOEC is 0.3 mg/L; survival, growth and reproduction were all significantly reduced at 1 mg/L.
Executive summary:

D. magna were exposed to five concentrations of Epikote 828 ranging from 0.03 - 3 mg/L and control dilution water for 21 days in a static renewal test design. Survival, growth, and reproduction rate were all significantly reduced at 1 mg/L of Epikote 828, but were all unaffected at 0.3 mg/L.

Description of key information

21-day NOEC = 0.3 mg/L (similar to OECD TG 2011, Daphnia magna; read-across: BADGE)

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Fresh water invertebrates

Fresh water invertebrates
Effect concentration:
0.3 mg/L

Additional information

No experimental data are available for the target substance Soya/Linseed Oil Fatty Acid-BADGE. However, a reliable Daphnia reproduction study is available for the source substance BADGE. A justification for read-across is attached to iuclid section 13.

 

A long term test with Daphnia magna similar to OECD TG 211 was conducted with BADGE. This test was deemed reliable and useful for risk assessment (Klimish score = 2). In this test, D. magna were exposed to five concentrations of the test item ranging from 0.03 - 3 mg/L and control dilution water for 21 days in a static renewal test design. Survival, growth, and reproduction rate were all significantly reduced at 1 mg/L, but were all unaffected at 0.3 mg/L.