Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-039-2 | CAS number: 156324-78-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Sensitisation data (human)
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- sensitisation data (humans)
- Type of information:
- other: human data
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 1993-01-18 to 1993-04-30
- Reliability:
- other: not rated acc. to Klimisch
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: relevant
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 993
- Report date:
- 1993
Materials and methods
- Type of sensitisation studied:
- skin
- Study type:
- study with volunteers
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Principle of test: a Human Repeat Insult Patch Test (HRIPT) was carried out on 97 volunteers with the test item according to the Shelanski/Shelanski method (Ref: Shelanski H A and Shelanski M V 1953. A New Technique of Human Patch Tests, Proc Sci Section Toil Group Assoc 19).
- Short description of test conditions: pads treated with the test item was applied to the upper arm of each subject. Patches were applied on monday, wednesday and friday of the first 3 weeks, called the `induction' or 'insult' period. Subjects were instructed to remove the patch after 24 hours. The test sites were scored before application of each subsequent patch and on the fourth monday of the test following the final insult patch application. Fourteen days after the ninth scoring visit challenge patches were applied to both arms of each subject. The results were graded 48 hours and 96 hours after application. Rechallenge was carried out with volunteers showing skin reactions.
- Parameters analysed / observed: skin reactions - GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-[({[(1R,2S,5R)-5-methyl-2-(propan-2-yl)cyclohexyl]oxy}carbonyl)oxy]ethan-1-ol
- EC Number:
- 701-039-2
- Cas Number:
- 156324-78-6
- Molecular formula:
- C13H24O4
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-[({[(1R,2S,5R)-5-methyl-2-(propan-2-yl)cyclohexyl]oxy}carbonyl)oxy]ethan-1-ol
Constituent 1
Method
- Type of population:
- general
- Ethical approval:
- confirmed and informed consent free of coercion received
- Subjects:
- - Number of subjects exposed: 97 volunteers (92 volunteers completed the test)
- Sex: 18 males / 79 females
- Age: ≥21 years - Clinical history:
- All subjects were required to complete a questionnaire before the start of the test.
- Controls:
- During the rechallenge volunteers were used as controls
- Route of administration:
- dermal
- Details on study design:
- TYPE OF TEST(S) USED: patch test (epicutaneous test)
ADMINISTRATION
- Concentrations: 100 % of the test item
- Volume applied: approx. 0.3 mL
- Type of application: semiocclusive
- Description of patch: 2 cm x 2 cm square Webril pads treated with the test item were located down the centre line of a piece of Blenderm tape. The patch strip was applied down the lateral surface of the upper arm of each subject and held in place (when necessary) by additional strips of Micropore adhesive tape.
- Testing/scoring schedule: patches were applied on monday, wednesday and friday of the first 3 weeks, called the `induction' or 'insult' period.
Scoring visit 1 was the first wednesday of the induction period. The test sites were scored before application of each subsequent patch and on the fourth monday of the test following the final insult patch application.
Fourteen days after the ninth scoring visit (i.e., the monday of the sixth week of the test), challenge patches were applied to both arms of each subject. The results were graded 48 hours and 96 hours after application.
- Removal of test substance: subjects were instructed to remove the patch after 24 hours.
RECHALLENGE
Three volunteers who showed reactions during the HRIPT at challenge to the test material were rechallenged with the test item on both arms for 24 hours.
Three other volunteers, who did not show significant reactions during the HRIPT, were patched with the test item on both arms for 24 hours as controls.
All patches were removed after 24 hours and skin reactions assessed 48 hours and 96 hours after application.
EXAMINATIONS
- Grading/Scoring system: please refer to the field "Attached background material" below
Results and discussion
- Results of examinations:
- NOTE: five volunteers dropped out from testing for reasons unrelated to the test
INDUCTION PERIOD:
- irritation recorded to the test item during induction was low in the majority of volunteers.
- a few volunteers developed stronger reactions. Three volunteers wore less than 9 induction patches of the test item because of irritation, but completed challenge.
CHALLENGE PERIOD / RECHALLENGE PERIOD:
Three volunteers developed reactions greater than mild erythema to the test item, as follows:
- one volunteer developed a mild erythema on the original arm and a mild erythema with oedema on the alternate arm at 48 hours. At 96 hours, both reactions were of mild erythema only.
Rechallenge: the volunteer developed a mild erythema on the left arm and a moderate spreading erythema on the right arm at 48 hours. At 96 hours the reactions on both arms were of mild
erythema.
Findings made during challenge were considered as an indication of an irritation reaction, which was confirmed during the rechallenge.
- one volunteeer developed a mild erythema on the original arm and a mild erythema with papules on the alternate arm at 48 hours. At 96 hours, no reaction was visible on the original arm and the reaction on the alternate arm remained as mild erythema with papules.
Rechallenge: the volunteer showed no sensitisation reactions to the test item at rechallenge
Findings made during challenge suggested a possible sensitisation reaction, which was not confirmed during the rechallenge.
- one volunteer developed moderate spreading reactions with oedema on both arms at 48 hours. At 96 hours a strong erythematous reaction with oedema was visible on the original arm and a moderate erythema with oedema was visible on the alternate arm.
Rechallenge: the volunteer developed strong spreading erythematous reactions with oedema and papules on both arms at 48 hours. At 96 hours the reaction on the left arm was of strong spreading erythema with oedema and vesicles and the reaction on the right arm was of moderate spreading erythema with oedema and vesicles.
Findings made during challenge suggested a possible sensitisation reaction, which was confirmed during the rechallenge.
The control volunteers participating in the rechallenge did not develop reactions to the test item.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions, one volunteer appeared to be sensitised to the test item (1/92 volunteers).
- Executive summary:
A Human Repeat Insult Patch Test (HRIPT) was carried out on 97 volunteers with the test item according to the Shelanski/Shelanski method (Ref: Shelanski H A and Shelanski M V 1953. A New Technique of Human Patch Tests, Proc Sci Section Toil Group Assoc 19). Approximately 0.3 mL of 100 % substance was applied to a pad. Then, the pad was applied to the upper arm of each subject and held in place (when necessary) by strips of Micropore adhesive tape. The patch was removed 24 hours after start of treatment. Patches were applied on monday, wednesday and friday of the first 3 weeks (induction period). Fourteen days after the ninth scoring visit (ie, the monday of the sixth week of the test), challenge patches were applied to both arms of each subject. The results were graded 48 hours and 96 hours after application.
5 volunteers dropped out during the study.
During the induction period, irritation recorded to the test item was low in the majority of volunteers. A few volunteers developed stronger reactions. Three volunteers wore less than 9 induction patches of the test item because of irritation.
During the challenge period, three volunteers developed reactions greater than mild erythema to the test item. One volunteer developed a mild erythema on the original arm and a mild erythema with oedema on the alternate arm at 48 hours. At 96 hours, both reactions were of mild erythema only. At rechallenge the volunteer developed a mild erythema on the left arm and a moderate spreading erythema on the right arm at 48 hours. At 96 hours the reactions on both arms were of mild erythema. Findings made during challenge were considered as an indication of an irritation reaction, which was confirmed during the rechallenge.
Another volunteeer developed a mild erythema on the original arm and a mild erythema with papules on the alternate arm at 48 hours. At 96 hours, no reaction was visible on the original arm and the reaction on the alternate arm remained as mild erythema with papules. At rechallenge, the volunteer showed no sensitisation reactions to the test item at rechallenge Findings made during challenge suggested a possible sensitisation reaction, which was not confirmed during the rechallenge.
The third volunteer developed moderate spreading reactions with oedema on both arms at 48 hours. At 96 hours a strong erythematous reaction with oedema was visible on the original arm and a moderate erythema with oedema was visible on the alternate arm. At rechallenge, the volunteer developed strong spreading erythematous reactions with oedema and papules on both arms at 48 hours. At 96 hours the reaction on the left arm was of strong spreading erythema with oedema and vesicles and the reaction on the right arm was of moderate spreading erythema with oedema and vesicles. Findings made during challenge suggested a possible sensitisation reaction, which was confirmed during the rechallenge. The control volunteers participating in the rechallenge did not develop reactions to the test item.
In conclusion, one volunteer appeared to be sensitised to the test item (1/92 volunteers).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.