Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 218-121-4 | CAS number: 2051-49-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- January - May 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 29 July 2016
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hexanoic anhydride
- EC Number:
- 218-121-4
- EC Name:
- Hexanoic anhydride
- Cas Number:
- 2051-49-2
- Molecular formula:
- C12H22O3
- IUPAC Name:
- hexanoyl hexanoate
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: over 4 hours at room temperature in the light (Watson P, Study Number FP 57HY Envigo Report 13 April 2017)
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Treatment of test material prior to testing: All formulations were prepared freshly before treatment and used within two hours of preparation.
Method
- Target gene:
- not applicable
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Source of cells: Labor für Mutagenitätsprüfungen (LMP), Technical University Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
- Suitability of cells: used successfully for many years in in vitro experiments; high proliferation rate, and a reasonable plating effeiciency
- Cell cycle length, doubling time or proliferation index: doubling time approximately 13 hours
- Methods for maintenance in cell culture if applicable: stocks are stored in liquid nitrogen; before freezing each batch is screened for mycoplasm contamination and
checked for karyotype stability
- Modal number of chromosomes: 22 +/- 1
MEDIA USED
- Type and identity of media including CO2 concentration if applicable: Minimal essential medium (MEM) with different supplements; incubations were done at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 1.5% carbon dioxide.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically 'cleansed' against high spontaneous background: not specified - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Exp. I, (4 hrs): 3.9, 7.8, 15.5, 31.3, 62.5, 125, 250, 500,1000 and 2000μg/mL (without and
with S9 mix)
Exp. IIA, (24 hrs): 62.5, 125, 250, 500,1000 and 2000 μg/mL (without S9 mix)
Exp. IIA, (4 hrs): 62.5, 125, 250, 500,1000 and 2000 μg/mL (with S9 mix)
Exp. IIB (4 hrs): 62.5, 125, 250, 500,1000 and 2000 μg/mL (with S9 mix)
The highest applied concentration was chosen with respect to the current OECD TG 487.
The following concentrations were selected for reading in all experiments: 500, 1000, 2000 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The solvent was chosen due to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures.
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- other: Griseofulvin
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- - Culture conditions: Thawed stock cultures were propagated at 37 °C in 80 cm^2 plastic flasks. About 5 x 10^5 cells per flask were seeded in 15 mL of MEM (minimal essential medium) containing Hank’s salts, glutamine and Hepes (25 mM). Additionally, the medium was supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL/100 μg/mL) and 10 % (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cells were sub-cultured twice a week.
Exponentially growing stock cultures more than 50 % confluent were rinsed with Ca-Mg-free salt solution containing 8000 mg/L NaCl, 200 mg/L KCl, 200 mg/L KH2PO4 and 150 mg/L Na2HPO4. Afterwards the cells were treated with trypsin-EDTA-solution at 37 °C for approx. 5 minutes. Then, by adding complete culture medium including 10 % (v/v) FBS the enzymatic treatment was stopped and a single cell suspension was prepared. The trypsin concentration for all subculturing steps was 0.25 % (w/v) in Ca-Mg-free salt solution. The cells were seeded into Quadriperm dishes containing microscopic slides. Into each chamber 1.0 x 10^5 – 1.5 x 10^5 cells were seeded. For RICC (relative increase in cell count) determination, 16600 cells per well (Exp. I), 16720 cells per well (exp. IIA) and 15600 cells per well (Exp. IIB) were seeded in duplicates in a 24-well-plate.
All incubations were done at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 1.5 % carbon dioxide (98.5 % air).
- TREATMENT:
Pre-experiment:
A preliminary cell growth inhibition test (determination of proliferation index) was performed to determine the concentrations to be used in the main experiment. The experimental conditions in this pre-experimental phase were identical to those required and described below for the mutagenicity assay.
The pre-test was performed with 10 concentrations of the test item separated by no more than a factor of √10 and a solvent and positive control. All cell cultures were set up in duplicate. Exposure time was 4 hrs (with and without S9 mix). The preparation interval was 24 hrs after start of the exposure.
Pulse exposure: The culture medium of exponentially growing cell cultures was replaced with serum-free medium containing the test item. For the treatment with metabolic activation 50 μL S9 mix per mL culture medium was added. After 4 hours the cultures were washed twice with "Saline G" (pH 7.2) containing 8000 mg/L NaCl, 400 mg/L KCl, 1100 mg/L glucose • H2O, 192 mg/L Na2HPO4 • 2 H2O and 150 mg/L KH2PO4. The cells were then cultured in complete medium containing 10 % (v/v) FBS for the remaining culture time of 20 hours.
Continuous exposure (without S9 mix) : The culture medium of exponentially growing cell cultures was replaced with complete medium containing 10 % (v/v) FBS including the test item. The medium was not changed until preparation of the cells.
Preparation of micronuclei: The cells were treated on the slides in the chambers with deionised water for 1 – 1.5 min at 37 °C. Afterwards the cells were fixed twice with a mixture of ethanol and glacial acetic acid (3+1 parts, respectively) containing 1.25 % formaldehyde. The slides were stained with Giemsa, mounted after drying and covered with a cover slip. All slides were labelled with a computer-generated random code to prevent scorer bias.
Evaluation of the slides was performed using microscopes with 40 x objectives. The micronuclei were counted in cells showing a clearly visible cytoplasm area. The criteria for the evaluation of micronuclei are described in the publication of Countryman and Heddle. The micronuclei have to be stained in the same way as the main nucleus. The area of the micronucleus should not extend the third part of the area of the main nucleus. Per culture at least 1000 cells from clones with 2 - 8 cells were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides. The frequency of micronucleated cells was reported as % micronucleated cells.
Cytotoxicity was assessed by the determination of the relative increase in cell counts (RICC).
RICC = (increase in number of cells in treated cultures (final - starting)) diveded by (increase in number of cells in control cultures (final - starting)) multiplied by 100
Cytotoxicity [%] = 100 – RICC
In addition, cytotoxicity was assessed via counting the number of clones consisting of 1 cell (c1), 2 cells (c2), 3 - 4 cells (c4), and 5 - 8 cells (c8) among the cells that were scored for the presence of micronuclei. These clusters represent the cells that have divided 1, 2, or 3 times within the experiment. From these data, a proliferation index (PI) was calculated (see formula below). Only those cultures were evaluated which showed a PI > 1.3, in order to guarantee a sufficient cell proliferation during treatment and recovery.
PI = [(c1 x 1) + (c2 x 2) + (c4 x 3) + (c8 x 4)] / [c1 + c2 + c4 + c8]
PI = Proliferation index
cx = Number of clones with x cells (with x: 1, 2, 4, or 8) - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptability criteria:
The micronucleus assay will be considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
− The concurrent solvent control will normally be within the laboratory historical solvent control data range.
− The concurrent positive controls should induce responses that are compatible with the laboratory historical positive control data and produce a statistically significant increase.
− Cell proliferation criteria in the solvent control are considered to be acceptable.
− All experimental conditions described in details on test system and conditions were tested unless one exposure condition resulted in a clearly positive result.
− The quality of the slides must allow the evaluation of an adequate number of cells and concentrations.
− The criteria for the selection of top concentration are consistent with those described above.
Evaluation Criteria:
Clearly negative if, in all of the experimental conditions examined:
− None of the test item concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent solvent control
− There is no concentration-related increase
− The results in all evaluated test item concentrations should be within the range of the laboratory historical solvent control data
The test item is then considered unable to induce chromosome breaks and/or gain or loss in this test system.
Clearly positive if, in any of the experimental conditions examined:
− At least one of the test item concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent solvent control
− The increase is concentration-related in at least one experimental condition
− The results are outside the range of the laboratory historical solvent control data
When all of the criteria are met, the test item is then considered able to induce chromosome breaks and/or gain or loss in this test system.
There is no requirement for verification of a clear positive or negative response. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance was confirmed by the Chi square test (α < 0.05), using a validated test script of “R”, a language and environment for statistical computing and graphics. Within this test script a statistical analysis was conducted for those values that indicated an increase in the number of cells with micronuclei compared to the concurrent solvent control.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no relevant influence
- Effects of osmolality: no relevant influence
- Precipitation: phase separation was observed in all experimental parts at 2000 µg/mL at the end of treatment
Any other information on results incl. tables
In all experimental parts in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration, which showed phase separation.
In
Experiment I and IIA, in the absence of S9 mix, no relevant increases in
micronucleated cells were observed after treatment with the test item.
In
Experiment IIA in the presence of S9 mix, two statistically significant
increases in micronucleated cells (1.45 and 2.05 %) were observed after
treatment with 500 and 1000 µg/mL, respectively. The second value
exceeded the range of the laboratory historical solvent control
(0.20 – 1.72 % micronucleated cells).
In
the confirmatory experiment IIB, the values of all evaluated
concentrations were within the range of the laboratory historical
solvent control data (0.20 – 1.72 % micronucleated cells) and no
statistical significance was observed after treatment with the test item.
Table Summary of results
Exp. |
Preparation |
Test item |
Proliferation |
RICC |
Cytotoxicity |
Micronucleated |
|
interval |
concentration |
Index |
in % |
in % |
Cells* |
|
|
in µg/mL |
|
|
|
in % |
Exposure period 4 hrs without S9 mix |
||||||
I |
24 hrs |
Solvent control1 |
2.66 |
100.00 |
0.00 |
0.90 |
|
|
Positive control2 |
2.31 |
74.06 |
25.94 |
4.05S |
|
|
500 |
2.65 |
97.63 |
2.38 |
0.60 |
|
|
1000 |
2.60 |
95.56 |
4.44 |
0.70 |
|
|
2000PS |
2.61 |
109.34 |
n.c. |
0.70 |
Exposure period 24 hrs without S9 mix |
||||||
IIA |
24 hrs |
Solvent control1 |
3.06 |
100.00 |
0.00 |
0.45 |
|
|
Positive control3 |
2.54 |
78.20 |
21.80 |
8.40S |
|
|
500 |
2.80 |
71.93 |
28.07 |
0.45 |
|
|
1000 |
2.47 |
73.18 |
26.82 |
0.60 |
|
|
2000PS |
2.93 |
72.55 |
27.45 |
0.60 |
Exposure period 4 hrs with S9 mix |
||||||
IIA |
24 hrs |
Solvent control1 |
2.02 |
100.00 |
0 |
0.75 |
|
|
Positive control4 |
1.33 |
36.25 |
63.75 |
14.80S |
|
|
500 |
1.79 |
72.18 |
27.82 |
1.45S |
|
|
1000# |
1.93 |
82.44 |
17.56 |
2.05S |
|
|
2000PS |
1.84 |
79.68 |
20.32 |
0.95 |
IIB |
24 hrs |
Solvent control1 |
2.40 |
100.00 |
0.00 |
1.25 |
|
|
Positive control5 |
1.40 |
45.21 |
54.79 |
7.65S |
|
|
500 |
2.24 |
84.67 |
15.33 |
1.70 |
|
|
1000 |
2.38 |
104.03 |
n.c. |
1.40 |
|
|
2000PS |
2.52 |
106.69 |
n.c. |
1.65 |
* The number of micronucleated cells was determined in a sample of 2000 cells
# The number of micronucleated cells was determined in a sample of 4000 cells
n.c. Not calculated as the RICC is equal or higher than the solvent control value
S Number of micronucleated cells statistically significantly higher than corresponding control values
PS Phase separation was observed at the end of treatment
1 DMSO 0.5 % (v/v)
2 Mitomycin C 0.1 µg/mL
3 Griseofulvin 8.0 µg/mL
4 CPA 10.0 µg/mL
5 CPA 15.0 µg/mL
* The number of micronucleated cells was determined in a sample of 2000 cells
# The number of micronucleated cells was determined in a sample of 4000 cells
S Number of micronucleated cells statistically significantly higher than corresponding control values
PS Phase separation was observed at the end of treatment
n.c. Not calculated as the RICC is equal or higher than the solvent control value
1 DMSO 0.5 % (v/v)
2 Mitomycin C 0.1 μg/mL
3 Griseofulvin 8.0 µg/mL
4 CPA 10.0 μg/mL
5 CPA 15.0 µg/mL
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- negative
- Executive summary:
The test item, dissolved in DMSO, was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in Chinese hamsterV79cellsin vitroin three independent experiments. The highest applied concentration in this study (2000 µg/mL of the test item) was chosen with respect to the current OECD Guideline 487. In all experimental parts in the absence and presence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration, which showed phase separation. Under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce micronuclei as determined by thein vitromicronucleus test in Chinese hamsterV79cells. Appropriate mutagens were used as positive controls. They induced statistically significant increases in cells with micronuclei.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.