Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
15 Jul - 16 Dec 1981
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study without detailed documentation

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1983
Report date:
1983

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 49, Part 173, Appendix II
Version / remarks:
1977
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPP 81-5 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
Version / remarks:
1978
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
: no 72 h observation period
Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Principle of test: patch-test

GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Diethyl bis(2-hydroxyethyl)aminomethylphosphonate
EC Number:
220-482-8
EC Name:
Diethyl bis(2-hydroxyethyl)aminomethylphosphonate
Cas Number:
2781-11-5
Molecular formula:
C9H22NO5P
IUPAC Name:
diethyl {[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]methyl}phosphonate
Test material form:
liquid: viscous
Details on test material:
- Physical state: viscous liquid
- Colour: amber
- Expiry date: not reported
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Receipt date: 25 Jun 1981
- Color: amber
- Form: viscous liquid

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Stauffland albino rabbits
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Phillips Rabbitry, Soquel, USA

Test system

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
not specified
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 0.5 mL

Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h
Observation period:
Reading time points: 4 and 48 h
Number of animals:
6
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 1 inch of intact skin
- Type of wrap: gauze patch held in place with adhesive tape and wrapped with rubberized damming

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Time after start of exposure: 4 h

OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
- 4 and 48 h

SCORING SYSTEM:
- Method of calculation: as described by Draize (1965)

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 4/48 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No indication of irritation. The observation time points differs from the 24/48/72 standard, however since there was no irritation observed at 4 or 48 hours, this deviation would probably not alter the conclusion.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 4/48 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No indication of irritation. The observation time points differs from the 24/48/72 standard, however since there was no irritation observed at 4 or 48 hours, this deviation would probably not alter the conclusion.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 4/48 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No indication of irritation. The observation time points differs from the 24/48/72 standard, however since there was no irritation observed at 4 or 48 hours, this deviation would probably not alter the conclusion.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
other: 4/48 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No indication of irritation. The observation time points differs from the 24/48/72 standard, however since there was no irritation observed at 4 or 48 hours, this deviation would probably not alter the conclusion.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
other: 4/48 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No indication of irritation. The observation time points differs from the 24/48/72 standard, however since there was no irritation observed at 4 or 48 hours, this deviation would probably not alter the conclusion.
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
other: 4/48 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No indication of irritation. The observation time points differs from the 24/48/72 standard, however since there was no irritation observed at 4 or 48 hours, this deviation would probably not alter the conclusion.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
other: 4/48 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No indication of irritation. The observation time points differs from the 24/48/72 standard, however since there was no irritation observed at 4 or 48 hours, this deviation would probably not alter the conclusion.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
other: 4/48 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No indication of irritation. The observation time points differs from the 24/48/72 standard, however since there was no irritation observed at 4 or 48 hours, this deviation would probably not alter the conclusion.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
other: 4/48 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No indication of irritation. The observation time points differs from the 24/48/72 standard, however since there was no irritation observed at 4 or 48 hours, this deviation would probably not alter the conclusion.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
other: 4/48 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No indication of irritation. The observation time points differs from the 24/48/72 standard, however since there was no irritation observed at 4 or 48 hours, this deviation would probably not alter the conclusion.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
other: 4/48 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No indication of irritation. The observation time points differs from the 24/48/72 standard, however since there was no irritation observed at 4 or 48 hours, this deviation would probably not alter the conclusion.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
other: 4/48 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
other: No indication of irritation. The observation time points differs from the 24/48/72 standard, however since there was no irritation observed at 4 or 48 hours, this deviation would probably not alter the conclusion.
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No adverse effects were observed for all tested animals at the time points 4 and 48 h.
Other effects:
- Other adverse local effects: none
- Other adverse systemic effects: none

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this study, the test material is not classified according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS.
Executive summary:

In a primary dermal irritation study, conducted similarly to the EPA OPP 81-5 Guideline, six female Stauffland albinorabbits were dermally exposed to (0.5mL) of  undiluted test material to the dorsal area of the trunk.  Test sites were covered with an occlusive dressing for 4 hours. Skin reactions of the animals were assessed at removal of the patches and 48 hours after. Irritation was scored according to the Draize scale.


 


The test material produced no irritation in intact skin of albino rabbits.


Mean (4/48 hrs) individual erythema score: 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.00.


Mean (4/48 hrs) individual oedema score: 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.00.


 


Under the conditions of this study, the test material is not classified according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS.