Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Not stated
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study was conducted according to guideline and/or standard method but was non-GLP.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
The genotoxic activity of glycerol in an in vitro test battery
Author:
Doolittle, D
Year:
1988
Bibliographic source:
Fd Chem Toxic 26(7): 631-635

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
highest dose tested was 1000 ug/ml with no evidence of cytotoxicity or precipitate formation
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Glycerol
EC Number:
200-289-5
EC Name:
Glycerol
Cas Number:
56-81-5
Molecular formula:
C3H8O3
IUPAC Name:
propan-1,2,3-triol
Details on test material:
purity >99.5%

Method

Target gene:
chromosomal aberrations
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
rat S-9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
100, 200, 400, 600, 800 and 1000 ug/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
water
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
triethylenemelamine(-S9); cyclophosphamide (+S9)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
SYSTEM OF TESTING
- Species/cell type: CHO-cells WBL
- Metabolic activation system: rat S-9
- No. of cells scored: 100/concentration (50 for positive controls)

ADMINISTRATION:
- Dosing: 100, 200, 400, 600, 800 and 1000 ug/mL
- Treatment: 10 and 14 hours (with S-9) without recovery; 2 hours (without S-9) with 10 and 14 hr recovery
- Negative control: water (solvent)
- Positive control groups: triethylenemelamine(-S9); cyclophosphamide (+S9)





Evaluation criteria:
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING RESULTS:
A statistically significant, reproducible and dose-dependent increase in frequency of cells with aberrations compared to solvent control.

Statistics:
No additional information available.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
GENOTOXIC EFFECTS:
- With metabolic activation: negative
- Without metabolic activation: negative

In the initial assay with metabolic activation a statistically significant increase in the number of aberrations compared to controls was seen only at 200 ug/mL (recovery period 10 hr)

PRECIPITATION CONCENTRATION: not indicated

MITOTIC INDEX:
without S-9 (10 hr): 84-97% of control
without S-9 (14 hr): 78-101% of control
with S-9 (10 hr rec.): 59-92% of control (no relationship with concentration)
with S-9 (14 hr rec): no decrease observed

CYTOTOXIC CONCENTRATION:
No cytotoxicity observed with concentrations tested.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1 Chromosome aberration assay

 Treatment and concentration (ug/ml)  Duration of treatment or recovery (h)  Mitotic index (%)  No. of cells scored  No. of aberrations/cell  Cells with aberrations (%)
      Non-activation assay     
 Solvent control (H2O)  10  8.6  100  0.02  1.0
 Positive control  10  3.4  50  0.44  36.0*
 Glycerol          
 100  10  7.3  100  0.07  6.0
 200  10  7.4  100  0.01  1.0
 400  10  8.0  100  0.06  5.0
 600  10  8.0  100  0.02  2.0
 800  10  8.3  100  0.01  1.0
           
 Solvent control (H2O)  14  12.1  100  0.02  2.0
 Positive control  14  3.8  50  1.04  68.0*
 Glycerol          
 100  14  11.1  100  0.02  2.0
 200  14  9.4  100  0.03  2.0
 400  14  10.1  100  0.04  3.0
 600  14  11.3  100  0.01  1.0
 800  14  12.2  100  0.00  0.0
 1000  14  11.7  100  0.00  0.0
     Activation assay      
 Solvent control (H2O)  10  5.1  100  0.03  3.0
 Positive control  10  6.3  50  1.98  78.0*
 Glycerol          
 100  10  4.7  100  0.01  1.0
 200  10  3.0  100  0.18  9.0*
 400  10  3.7  100  0.02  2.0
 600  10  3.7  100  0.04  3.0
 800  10  3.3  100  0.04  4.0
 1000  10  3.2  100  0.02  2.0
           
 100  14  11.0  100  0.00  0.0
 200  14  11.4  100  0.00  0.0
 400  14  12.3  100  0.02  2.0
 600  14  11.3  100  0.01  1.0
 800  14  11.7  100  0.00  0.0
 1000  14  12.3  100  0.02  2.0

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

The test material did not induce a mutagenic response in the Chinese Hamster Ovary assay with and without metabolic activation.
Executive summary:

The test material was evaluated in the Chinese hamster ovary Chromosomal Aberration assay. The test material did not induce a mutagenic response in the Chinese hamster ovary CA assay with and without metabolic activation.