Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Study period:
2017
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: test was technically not feasible due to the physical-chemical properties of the test item

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Spiro[piperidine-​1,​1'-​pyrrolidinium] bifluoride
Cas Number:
1803551-73-6
Molecular formula:
C9 H18 N . F2 H
IUPAC Name:
Spiro[piperidine-​1,​1'-​pyrrolidinium] bifluoride
Test material form:
solid: granular
Details on test material:
Batch RFR 6861-2-3

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Justification for test system used:
commercially available test method
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: epiCS® (CellSystems, Troisdorf, Germany).
- Cat.-No: CS-1001

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: RT (room temperature)
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation (if applicable): Incubator temperature: 37 ± 2° C (CO2 gas concentration: 5 %; Humidity: maximum)

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 1mg/ml
- Incubation time: 3 hours
- Spectrophotometer: EL808, Bio-Tek
- Wavelength: 570 nm

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA:
- Corrosivity potential of test materials is predicted from the cell viabilities obtained after 3 min and 60 min treatment compared to the negative control. A chemical is classified "corrosive" (sub-category 1A) if the cell viability after 3 min treatment is decreased by more than 50 %. If cell viability after 3 min exposure is ≥ 50 %, while it is below 15 % after 60 min exposure the substance is also classified as corrosive, but sub-category 1 B/1 C. If cell viability after 3 min exposure is ≥ 50 % and after 60 min exposure ≥ 15 %, the substance is classified as non-corrosive.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 50 µL

NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 50 µL
- Concentration (if solution): 0.9% NaCl

Duration of treatment / exposure:
3 and 60 minutes
Number of replicates:
3

Results and discussion

In vitro

Other effects / acceptance of results:
Under the conditions of the assay the test item became electrostatically charged, therefore an even distribution on the epidermal surface and proper conduction of the assay could not be achieved. Hence the results on viability were considered unreliable and not reported here. No prediction on the corrosive potential of the test item and thus no conclusion on classification according to UN GHS was drawn.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Executive summary:

A study for predicting a non-specific, corrosive potential of the test item by using reconstructed human epidermis (test method epiCS®) was initiated according to OECD TG 431. However, under the conditions of the assay the test item became electrostatically charged, therefore an even distribution on the epidermal surface and proper conduction of the assay could not be achieved. Hence the results on viability were considered unreliable and not reported here. No prediction on the corrosive potential of the test item and thus no conclusion on classification according to UN GHS was drawn.