Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Toxic effect type:
concentration-driven

Effects on fertility

Description of key information

Toxicity to reproduction

Based on the experimental studies on test hemical ,No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) was considered to be 1000mg/kg/day in rats for reproductive toxicity as no effects on reproductive organ was observed .Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation test chemical cannot be classified as reproductive toxicant.

 

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
reproductive toxicity, other
Remarks:
chronic toxicity study
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Data from peer reviewed journal
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: As mention below
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Reproductive toxicity study of test material was performed on Osborne-Mendel rats.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
yes
Justification for study design:
No data available
Species:
rat
Strain:
Osborne-Mendel
Details on species / strain selection:
No data available
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Housing:The animals were housed individually in wire cages
- Use of restrainers for preventing ingestion (if dermal): yes/no
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):ad libitum

Route of administration:
oral: feed
Vehicle:
other: feed
Details on exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The test chemical was mixed with feed at dose level of 0, 1000, 2500 or 10000 ppm (0, 100, 250 or 1000 mg/Kg/day).

DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): Weekly
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): Details not specified
- Storage temperature of food: No data available

VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Food
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 5000, 10000 or 20000 ppm (0, 250, 500 or 1000 mg/Kg/day)
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): No data available
- Lot/batch no. (if required): No data available
- Purity: No data available
Details on mating procedure:
No data available
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Duration of treatment / exposure:
17 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
Daily
Details on study schedule:
No data available
Remarks:
0, 1000, 2500 or 10000 ppm (0, 100, 250 or 1000 mg/Kg bw)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Total: 80
0 mg/kg bw: 10 males and 10 females
100 mg/kg bw: 10 males and 10 females
250 mg/kg bw: 10 males and 10 females
1000 mg/kg bw: 10 males and 10 females
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
No data available
Positive control:
No data available
Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Weekly
- Cage side observations checked in table [No.?] were included. General condition

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data
- Time schedule: No data

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Weekly

FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes, weekly
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data

FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data

WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data
- Time schedule for examinations:
Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
No data available
Sperm parameters (parental animals):
No data available
Litter observations:
No data available
Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes, The tissues of all the rats were examined macroscopically at the time of sacrifice. The viscera were removed and the liver, kidneys, spleen, heart, and testes were weighed.
Postmortem examinations (offspring):
No data available
Statistics:
No data available
Reproductive indices:
No data available
Offspring viability indices:
No data available
Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not specified
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Food efficiency:
not specified
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
not specified
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Hematologic findings were normal.
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not specified
Urinalysis findings:
not specified
Behaviour (functional findings):
not specified
Immunological findings:
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not specified
Other effects:
not specified
Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
not specified
Reproductive function: sperm measures:
not specified
Reproductive performance:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
clinical signs
mortality
body weight and weight gain
organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
gross pathology
histopathology: non-neoplastic
Remarks on result:
other: No effects on reproductive organ
Critical effects observed:
not specified
System:
other: not specified
Organ:
not specified
Clinical signs:
not specified
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not specified
Mortality / viability:
not specified
Body weight and weight changes:
not specified
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
not specified
Food efficiency:
not specified
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
not specified
Haematological findings:
not specified
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not specified
Urinalysis findings:
not specified
Sexual maturation:
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not specified
Gross pathological findings:
not specified
Histopathological findings:
not specified
Other effects:
not specified
Behaviour (functional findings):
not specified
Developmental immunotoxicity:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
other: not specified
Generation:
other: not specified
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
not specified
Basis for effect level:
other: not specified
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Critical effects observed:
not specified
System:
other: not specified
Organ:
not specified
Description (incidence and severity):
The animals were housed individually in wire cages
Reproductive effects observed:
not specified
Treatment related:
not specified
Conclusions:
The no observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the test chemical using Osborne-Mendel rats for a duration of 17 weeks was considered to be 1000 mg/Kg bw.
Executive summary:

Reproductive /chronic oral toxicity study of test chemical was performed on male and female Osborne-Mendel rats.10 male and 10female were used in each dose group.The test material was fed through the diet at a concentration of 0, 1000, 2500 or 10000 ppm (0, 100, 250 or 1000 mg/Kg/day)for 17 weeks.Animals were checked for clinical signs, Food consumption and body weight every week. At the termination of the experiments the rats were sacrificed and exsanguinated.The tissues of all the rats were examined macroscopically at the time of sacrifice. The viscera were removed and the liver, kidneys, spleen, heart, and testes were weighed. These organs, the remaining abdominal and thoracic viscera, and one hind leg, for bone, bone marrow, and muscle, were preserved in 10% buffered formalin-saline solution for histopathological examination. For routine histopathology, sections were embedded in paraffin wax and stained with haematoxylin and eosin.No treatment-related clinical signs and premature deaths were observed. No relevant necropsy findings were noted. No effects on testes weight was noted in treated rats at dose concentration 1000mg/kg bw, Based on the observations made, the no observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the test chemical using Osborne-Mendel rats for a duration of 17 weeks is considered to be 1000 mg/Kg bw

Effect on fertility: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Study duration:
subchronic
Species:
rat
Quality of whole database:
Data is from peer reviewed journal
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information

Reproductive toxicity

The study on test chemical has been investigated for reproductive toxicity .The study is as mentioned below:

Reproductive /chronic oral toxicity study of test chemical was performed on male and female Osborne-Mendel rats.10 male and 10female were used in each dose group.The test material was fed through the diet at a concentration of 0, 1000, 2500 or 10000 ppm (0, 100, 250 or 1000 mg/Kg/day)for 17 weeks.Animals were checked for clinical signs, Food consumption and body weight every week. At the termination of the experiments the rats were sacrificed and exsanguinated.The tissues of all the rats were examined macroscopically at the time of sacrifice. The viscera were removed and the liver, kidneys, spleen, heart, and testes were weighed. These organs, the remaining abdominal and thoracic viscera, and one hind leg, for bone, bone marrow, and muscle, were preserved in 10% buffered formalin-saline solution for histopathological examination. For routine histopathology, sections were embedded in paraffin wax and stained with haematoxylin and eosin.No treatment-related clinical signs and premature deaths were observed. No relevant necropsy findings were noted. No effects on testes weight was noted in treated rats at dose concentration 1000mg/kg bw, Based on the observations made, the no observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the Ethyl formate using Osborne-Mendel rats for a duration of 17 weeks is considered to be 1000 mg/Kg bw

Thus, based on the above experimental studies of test chemical , No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) was considered to be 1000mg/kg/day in rats for reproductive toxicity .Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation test chemical cannot be classified as reproductive toxicant.

 

Effects on developmental toxicity

Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Toxicity to reproduction: other studies

Description of key information

No compound related effects were observed, the no observed adverse effect level ( NOAEL) value for teretogenicity of test chemical was considered to be 25 mg/egg in chicken embryo.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to reproduction: other studies
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Data from peer reviewed journal
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: As mentioned below
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Teratogenicity of test Chemicals was performed in the Developing Chicken Embryo
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
in vitro
Species:
other: Chicken
Strain:
other: Single-Comb White Leghorn
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
No data avilable
Route of administration:
other: Injection (Via Yolk and via air cell injection)
Vehicle:
not specified
Details on exposure:
No data avilable
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Duration of treatment / exposure:
At two stages of incubation: preincubation (0 hr) and at the fourth day (96 hr)
Frequency of treatment:
At 0h and 96 h
Duration of test:
96 h
Remarks:
0.50 to 75 mg/egg (5 dose level)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
500 eggs (100 eggs per dose)
Control animals:
yes
Statistics:
No data avilable
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
25 other: mg/egg
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
not specified
Basis for effect level:
other: No teratogenic effect were observed
Remarks on result:
other: No teratogenic effect were observed
Mortality, abnormalities included all structural anomalies as well as toxic responses such as edema, hemorrhage, hypopigmentation of the down, significant growth retardation, cachexia, and other nerve disorders. Structural abnormality of the head, viscera, limbs, or body skeleton were examined.No teratogenic effect were observed
Conclusions:
The NOAEL value for teretogenicity of test chemical was considered to be 25 mg/egg in chicken embryo.
Executive summary:

Teretogenicity study of test chemical was conducted in Fresh fertile eggs from Single-Comb White LeghornChicken.Test chemical was administered by two routes, into tha yolk and through the air cell. For each enjection route, eggs were treated at0h and at 96 h. Five dose level tested range from 0.50 to 75 mg/egg and 100 embryos were treated per dose. Mortality, abnormalities included

all structural anomalies as well as toxic responses such as edema, hemorrhage, hypopigmentation of the down, significant growth retardation, cachexia, and other nerve disorders.Structural abnormality of the head, viscera, limbs, or body skeleton were examined. No teretogenic effect observed at dose level of 25 mg/egg. Hence,the NOAEL value for teretogenicity of test chemical was considered to be 25 mg/egg in chicken embryo.

 

Additional information

Teretogenicity study of test chemical was conducted in Fresh fertile eggs fromSingle-Comb White LeghornChicken. Test chemical was administered by two routes, into tha yolk and through the air cell. For each enjection route, eggs were treated at0h and at 96 h. Five dose level tested range from 0.50 to 75 mg/egg and 100 embryos were treated per dose. Mortality, abnormalities included all structural anomalies as well as toxic responses such as edema, hemorrhage, hypopigmentation of the down, significant growth retardation, cachexia, and other nerve disorders.Structural abnormality of the head, viscera, limbs, or body skeleton were examined. No teretogenic effect observed at dose level of 25 mg/egg. Hence,the NOAEL value for teretogenicity of test chemical was considered to be 25 mg/egg in chicken embryo.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation test chemical cannot be classified as reproductive toxicant.

 

Additional information