Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 252-161-3 | CAS number: 34708-08-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The key study for the sensitisation of triethoxy(3-thiocyanatopropyl)silane (CAS No. 34708-08-2, EC No. 252-161-3) found the test material to be not sensitising in a study conducted according OECD Test Guideline 406 (non-LLNA, Buehler test) and in compliance with GLP (Harlan Laboratories Ltd., 2012, reliability score 1).
As per the ECHA Endpoint Specific guidance (Chapter R.7a, version 6, July 2017) existing data of good quality that were generated before 10 May 2017, or for which the study was initiated before 10 May 2017, can be used to address the skin sensitisation endpoint. The OECD 406 Test Guideline study for triethoxy(3-thiocyanatopropyl)silane was conducted in 2012 and therefore additional testing for this endpoint is not required.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- An LLNA study was not performed because the test method is not considered to be suitable for substances that contain silicon. Please refer to the attached document for further details.
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Laboratories, The Netherlands
- Age at study initiation: 4 to 6 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 302.4 - 411.7g
- Housing: in groups of up to ten in stainless steel cages with standard softwood bedding
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 or 7 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: diglyme
- Concentration / amount:
- Undiluted test substance (induction).
15% and 5% in diglyme (first challenge). - Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: diglyme
- Concentration / amount:
- Undiluted test substance (induction).
15% and 5% in diglyme (first challenge). - No. of animals per dose:
- 20 for test group, 10 for control group
- Details on study design:
- Twenty Albino Dunkin Hartley guinea pigs (males) of the test group were treated topically with the undiluted test item once a week for a 3-week induction phase. Two weeks after the last induction, the animals were challenged with 15% and 5% (weight/weight) test item in diglyme.
The ten animals of the control group 1 were not treated during the induction. The animals were challenged with 15% (the highest non-irritating concentration) and 5% (weight/weight) test item in diglyme.
Due to ambiguous results in the first challenge, a second challenge was conducted using the same test animals and ten additional naive control animals (control groups 2 and 3). The same concentrations of 15% and 5% of the test item in diglyme were used. - Challenge controls:
- Refer to table.
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2-mercapto-benzothiazole or alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde
- Positive control results:
- Positive controls were assessed at the laboratory at least twice a year. During 2011 (prior to this experiment), the result from the positive control study had resulted in allergic contact dermatitis in >15% of the test animals when testing alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde as a skin sensitiser. Alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde is recommended to use by the Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008, B.6 and OECD 406 since it causes moderate skin sensitisation in guinea pigs. No further details are provided.
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: first challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 15%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: first challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 15%
- No. with + reactions:
- 2
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: first challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: first challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 2
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: first challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 15%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: first challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 15%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: first challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: first challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: second challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 15%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: second challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 15%
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: second challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 1
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: second challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: second challenege
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 15%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: second challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 15%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: second challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: second challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 5%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Key result
- Reading:
- other: not specified
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde
- Remarks on result:
- other: The results from most recent the positive control study (2011 report not available) confirm alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde as skin sensitizer, as it produced allergic contact dermatitis in >15% of the test animals.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Based on study conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 406 (non-LLNA, Buehler test) and in compliance with GLP (Harlan Laboratories Ltd., 2012, reliability score 1), triethoxy(3-thiocyanatopropyl)silane is concluded to be not sensitising in the male guinea pig when tested at 5 and 15% in diglyme under occlusive conditions for 6 hours. Induction was conducted once a week for 3 weeks, with the first challenge two weeks after the last induction dose. A separate second challenge was performed to further assess overall incidence. After the confirmatory second challenge, the overall incidence of test-item skin reactions was 10%.
Reference
Positive controls:
Positive controls were assessed at the laboratory at least twice a year. During 2011 (prior to this experiment), the result from the positive control study had resulted in allergic contact dermatitis in >15% of the test animals when testing alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde as a skin sensitiser. Alpha-hexylcinnamaldehyde is recommended to use by the Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008, B.6 and OECD 406 since it causes moderate skin sensitisation in guinea pigs. No further details are provided.
Results of First Challenge:
All animals of control group 1 and 18 of 20 animals of the test group did not show any skin reactions after the first challenge with 15% (weight/weight) test item in diglyme. Two animals of the test group (animals no.16 and no. 19) showed discrete or patchy erythema at the 48-hour reading after the first challenge with 15% test item in diglyme. One animal of control group 1 (animal no.12) and one animal of the test group (animal no. 19) showed discrete or patchy erythema at the 48-hour reading after the first challenge with 5% test item in diglyme and another animal of the test group (animal no. 32) showed discrete or patchy erythema at the 24-hour as well as at 48-hour reading after the first challenge with 5% test item in diglyme.
Results of Second Challenge:
One animal (animal no. 19) of the test group showed discrete or patchy erythema at the 48-hour reading after the challenge with 15% (weight/weight) test item in diglyme and one animal of the test group (animal no. 14) showed discrete or patchy erythema at the 24-hour reading after the challenge with 5% (weight/weight) test item in diglyme. No skin reactions occurred in the control groups.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
In the key non-adjuvant sensitisation test, conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 406 and in compliance with GLP (Harlan Laboratories Ltd., 2012, reliability score 1), male guinea pigs (20 test item and 10 controls) were exposed to 5% and 15% of the test item and to diglyme, respectively, under occlusive conditions for 6 hours. Induction was conducted once a week for 3 weeks, with the first challenge two weeks after the last induction dose. An incidence of 10% was observed for each of the triethoxy(3-thiocyanatopropyl)silane concentrations of 5% and 15% in diglyme in the first challenge. However, as different animals responded, the overall incidence in this first challenge was 15%, which is the threshold for sensitisers as defined by the OECD and EC guidelines. Therefore, a second challenge was performed, again testing the same concentrations of 5% and 15%. In this second challenge, an incidence of 5% was observed for each of the tested concentrations of 5% and 15% of test item in diglyme in the second challenge and the overall incidence was 10%, which is below the 15% threshold. Taking into account that one control animal also responded in the first challenge and the incidence of the skin reactions decreased in the second challenge, the observed skin reactions are attributed to a slight irritation of the skin and not to true sensitisation. Therefore, triethoxy(3-thiocyanatopropyl)silane is considered not sensitising.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the findings in a non-adjuvant sensitisation test in guinea pigs, triethoxy(3-thiocyanatopropyl)silane does not require classification as a skin sensitiser in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.