Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Jan 19-Mar 28, 2018
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.8 (Partition Coefficient - Shake Flask Method)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of method:
flask method
Remarks:
Both flask method and solubiilty ratio method was applied.
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water

Test material

1
Reference substance name:
Fatty acids, C16-18 (even numbered) and C18 (unsaturated) hexadecyl esters
EC Number:
701-211-7
Cas Number:
869110-09-8
Molecular formula:
R1, R2, R3: C15-, C17- saturated, C17- unsaturated alkyl chains
IUPAC Name:
Fatty acids, C16-18 (even numbered) and C18 (unsaturated) hexadecyl esters
Test material form:
other: Off white waxy solid
Details on test material:
XP3616
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Off white waxy solid, XP3616

Study design

Analytical method:
liquid chromatography
mass spectrometry

Results and discussion

Partition coefficient
Key result
Type:
log Pow
Remarks on result:
not determinable because of methodological limitations

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Several test methods were applied but none of them were found to be appropriate to the testing of the test item (i.e. registered substance). Both flask method and solubility ratio method was applied. Due to methodological shortcomings no partition coefficient value could be reported.
Executive summary:

Several test methods were applied but none of them were found to be appropriate to the testing of the test item (i.e. registered substance). Both flask method and solubiilty ratio method was applied. Due to methodological shortcomings no partition coefficient value could be reported.