Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
not specified
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Data provided by ECHA - information from migrated NONS file as per inquiry 06-0000021296-70-0000.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: Body responsible for the test
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1988

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Maxlmlzallon Test of Magnusson and Kligman
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4,6-bis(octylthiomethyl)-o-cresol
EC Number:
402-860-6
EC Name:
4,6-bis(octylthiomethyl)-o-cresol
Cas Number:
110553-27-0
Molecular formula:
C25H44OS2
IUPAC Name:
4,6-bis(octylthiomethyl)-o-cresol

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
other: Albino guinea pig

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Concentration / amount:
Concentration of the test material and vehicle used at induction:

1st induction (intradermal): 1% in sesame oil and adjuvant saline mixture

2nd induction (epidermal): 30% in vaseline

Concentration of the test material used for each challenge:

3% in vaseline
Challenge
Concentration / amount:
Concentration of the test material and vehicle used at induction:

1st induction (intradermal): 1% in sesame oil and adjuvant saline mixture

2nd induction (epidermal): 30% in vaseline

Concentration of the test material used for each challenge:

3% in vaseline
No. of animals per dose:
Number of animals In test group: 20
Number of animals In negative control group: 20

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
3%
No. with + reactions:
7
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 3%. No with. + reactions: 7.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
3%
No. with + reactions:
6
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 3%. No with. + reactions: 6.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
3%
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 3%. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
3%
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 3%. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
3%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 3%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
3%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 3%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Maximum concentrati~n not causing irritating effects in preliminary test: 3 %

Signs of irritation during induction:

10% in vaseline induced erythema reactions.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The test substance is not sensitizing to the skin of guinea pigs.