Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-054-0 | CAS number: 10026-04-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Gene mutation (Bacterial reverse mutation assay / Ames test): negative with and without activation in all strains tested (similar to OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP) (Dow Corning Toxicology Dept., 1981).
Cytogenicity in mammalian cells: negative in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells (similar to OECD Test Guideline 473 but not in compliance with GLP) (Litton Bionetics, 1978a).
Mutagenicity in mammalian cells: negative in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells (similar to OECD Test Guideline 476 and pre-GLP) (Litton Bionetics, 1978b).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1981-03-25 to 1981-03-28
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- range of strains used, only 4 doses used which were not replicated.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA-98, TA-100, TA-1535, TA-1537, TA-1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.5-500 µl/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Absolute ethanol was used for the test substance. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was used for positive control substances except sodium azide which was dissolved in water or saline.
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Previously shown to be non-mutagenic - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- TA 100, TA 1535 (without activation)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- TA 1537 (without activation)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- TA 98, TA 1538 (without activation)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-anthramine
- Remarks:
- All strains (with activation)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation);
other: spot plate test
DURATION
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 - 72 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 1 plate for each test concentration
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Evaluation criteria:
- For TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 1538, the test substance is considered mutagenic if a positive dose response is produced over three concentrations with the lowest increase equal to twice the solvent control value.
For TA 98 and TA 100, the test substance is considered mutagenic if a positive dose response is produced over three concentrations with the highest increase equal to twice the solvent control value for TA 100, and two to three times the solvent control value for TA 98. - Species / strain:
- other: Salmonella typhimurium: TA-98, TA-100, TA-1535, TA-1537, TA-1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 500 µl/plate (TA 1535 -MA / TA 1537 +MA)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Silicon tetrachloride has been tested for mutagenicity in a reliable in vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay, conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP. Silicon tetrachloride did not demonstrate any genetic activity in the bacterial strains Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, when tested in the presence and the absence of metabolic activation up to cytotoxic concentration. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave the expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity in the Salmonella typhimurium strains used under the conditions of the test .
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no duplicates
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- mouse liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, 0.32 µl/ml (-S9); 0.08, 0.16, 0.32, 0.48 µl/ml (+S9)
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: none given in report - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- media
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- (without activation)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- media
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-dimethylnitrosamine
- Remarks:
- (with activation)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 hours
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 3 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 3 days
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates for each test concentration
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: % relative growth - Evaluation criteria:
- A compound is considered mutagenic if:-
a. A dose response relationship is observed over three of the four dose levels employed
b. The minimum increase at the high level of the dose response curve is at least 2.5 times greater than the solvent control value
c. The solvent control data are within the normal range of the spontaneous background for the TK locus - Statistics:
- t-statistic used to evaluate statistical significance.
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: >.32 ug/ml
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The maximum tolerated concentration was 0.32 µg/mL indicating that silicon tetrachloride has relatively high cytotoxicity activity. No genetic effects were attributable to the solvent or negative controls. EMS and DMN induced responses within the expected ranges. The following test results were noted:
Point Mutation: The results from this assay were negative. Silicon tetrachloride was not mutagenic when evaluated over the normal concentration range. The highest concentration under activation test procedures showed an elevated mutation response but this could not be considered valid because the cell toxicity was greater than 99%. - Conclusions:
- Silicon tetrachloride has been tested for mutagenicity in a reliable in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay, conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 476 and pre-GLP compliance. Silicon tetrachloride was found to be not mutagenic in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells when tested with and without metabolic activation up to cytotoxic concentration. Appropriate solvent, negative and positive controls were included and gave the expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is not mutagenic to mammalian cells under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- No data
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only 50 cells scored - guideline requires 200. no duplicates. Number cells with 2 or more aberrations presented (rather than % with aberrations).
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- mouse liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.16 and 0.32 µl/ml
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: not specified - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- media
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- (without activation)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- media
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-dimethylnitrosamine
- Remarks:
- (with activation)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 20 hours
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 1
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 50 cells per test substance concentration
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index - Evaluation criteria:
- Criteria for evaluating results: Compound is considered mutagenic in the mouse lymphoma assay if:
a. A dose response relationship is observed over three of the four dose levels employed.
b. The minimum increase at the high level of the dose response curve is at least 2.5 times greater than the solvent control value.
c. The solvent control data are within the normal range of the spontaneous background for the TK locus.
Responses (numbers of aberrations ) to the test substance were compared to concurrent negative and positive controls, as well as to historical data. The data was analysed by t-statistic. - Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 0.16 - 0.32 μL/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- The maximum tolerated concentration was 0.32 µg/ml indicating that silicon tetrachloride has relatively high cytotoxicity activity. No genetic effects were attributable to the solvent or negative controls. EMS and DMN induced responses within the expected ranges. The following test results were noted: Silicon tetrachloride exhibited positive responses in the cytogenetic analysis indicating that the material has the potential to produce chromosome alterations at concentrations approximately ½ the cytotoxic level. These responses were accounted for by unusually low concurrent negative control values and when the test results were compared to the historical controls, the results were not significant.
- Conclusions:
- Silicon tetrachloride has been tested for clastogenicity in a reliable in vitro chromosome aberration assay, conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 473 but not in compliance with GLP. Silicon tetrachloride did not increase the number of chromosomal aberrations in mouse L5178Y lymphoma cells, when tested with and without metabolic activation up to cytotoxic concentration. Appropriate solvent, negative and positive controls were included and gave the expected results. It was concluded that the test substance is negative for induction of chromosome aberrations under the conditions of the test.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 2a: Experiment 1 Overlay plate test, Number of revertants per plate
Conc. |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
||||||
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
|
0 |
41 |
36 |
No |
225 |
196 |
No |
29 |
30 |
No |
0.5 |
31 |
37 |
No |
238 |
186 |
No |
26 |
22 |
No |
5 |
34 |
36 |
No |
236 |
134 |
No |
31 |
17 |
No |
100 |
33 |
45 |
No |
246 |
218 |
No |
23 |
18 |
No |
500 |
38 |
30 |
No |
250 |
160 |
No |
12 |
25 |
Yes |
Positive Control |
431 |
>103 |
No |
476 |
>103 |
No |
311 |
173 |
No |
*solvent control with Ethanol
Table 2b: Experiment 1 Overlay plate test, Number of revertants per plate
Conc. |
TA1537 |
TA 1538 |
||||
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
|
0 |
10 |
17 |
No |
24 |
35 |
No |
0.5 |
7 |
11 |
No |
23 |
45 |
No |
5 |
9 |
14 |
No |
27 |
41 |
No |
100 |
9 |
8 |
No |
20 |
38 |
No |
500 |
9 |
7 |
Yes |
20 |
27 |
No |
Positive Control |
121 |
103 |
No |
130 |
>103 |
No |
*solvent control with Ethanol
Table 1: Results of Mammalian Mutagenicity assay with L5178Y/TK+/- Mouse Lymphoma Cells
Concentrationµg/ml |
Mutant* Frequency |
Mutant* Frequency |
%Relative Growth. |
%Relative Growth. |
Cytotoxicity |
|
— MA |
+ MA |
— MA |
+ MA |
- |
Solvent Control |
15 |
10 |
100 |
100 |
No |
Negative Control |
21.1 |
16.8 |
85.7 |
101.7 |
No |
Positive Control |
273.4 |
529.3 |
35 |
5 |
No |
0.04 |
21.1 |
- |
115.3 |
- |
No |
0.08 |
15.5 |
25 |
102.6 |
74.3 |
No |
0.16 |
17.3 |
20.6 |
87.5 |
85.2 |
No |
0.32 |
15.3 |
18.8 |
41.1 |
43.6 |
Yes |
0.48 |
- |
107.5 |
- |
0 |
Yes |
*Per 106surviving cells
Solvent control with Ethanol
Table 1: Cytogenetic analysis (without activation)
Compound and Concentration |
Total No. Of Cells |
Type / Frequency Aberrations per Cell (%) |
No. Of Cells with 2+ Aberrations (%) |
Mitotic Index (%) |
Negative Control |
50 |
0 |
0 |
3.8 |
Solvent Control |
50 |
0 |
0 |
3.6 |
Positive Control |
50 |
5t, 2tr, 2cr, 2tb, 2f, 4af, 1> |
5 |
5.6 |
0.02 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
4.2 |
0.04 |
50 |
1tb |
0 |
4.4 |
0.08 |
50 |
3tb |
0 |
6.6 |
0.16 |
50 |
1t, 1pu+ |
0 |
2.8 |
0.32 |
TOXIC |
- |
- |
- |
Table 2: Cytogenetic analysis (with activation)
Compound and Concentration |
Total No. Of Cells |
Type / Frequency Aberrations per Cell (%) |
No. Of Cells with 2+ Aberrations (%) |
Mitotic Index (%) |
Negative Control |
50 |
0 |
0 |
3.2 |
Solvent Control |
50 |
1f |
0 |
3.2 |
Positive Control |
50 |
1tb, 6f, 1af, 3tr, 2t, 3qr, 2cr, 2> |
4 |
3.8 |
0.02 |
50 |
1f, 1t |
1 |
3.4 |
0.04 |
50 |
1f |
0 |
4.2 |
0.08 |
50 |
1tb |
0 |
3.8 |
0.16 |
50 |
1f, 2tb |
0 |
4.8 |
0.32 |
TOXIC |
- |
- |
- |
Key
tb |
Chromatid break |
f |
Fragment |
qr |
Quadriradial |
tr |
Triradial |
min |
Minute chromosome |
af |
Acentric fragment |
t |
Translocation |
cr |
Complex rearrangement |
pu+ |
Pulverised chromosome |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Silicon tetrachloride has been tested for mutagenicity in a reliable in vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay, conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP. Silicon tetrachloride did not demonstrate any genetic activity in the bacterial strains Salmonella typhimurium TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, when tested in the presence and the absence of metabolic activation up to cytotoxic concentration. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave the expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity in the Salmonella typhimurium strains used under the conditions of the test (Dow Corning Corporation, 1981).
Silicon tetrachloride has been tested for clastogenicity in a reliable in vitro chromosome aberration assay, conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 473 but not in compliance with GLP. Silicon tetrachloride did not increase the number of chromosomal aberrations in mouse L5178Y lymphoma cells, when tested with and without metabolic activation up to cytotoxic concentration. Appropriate solvent, negative and positive controls were included and gave the expected results. It was concluded that the test substance is negative for induction of chromosome aberrations under the conditions of the test (Litton Bionetics, 1978a).
Silicon tetrachloride has been tested for mutagenicity in a reliable in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay, conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 476 and pre-GLP compliance. Silicon tetrachloride was found to be not mutagenic in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells when tested with and without metabolic activation up to cytotoxic concentration. Appropriate solvent, negative and positive controls were included and gave the expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is not mutagenic to mammalian cells under the conditions of the test (Litton Bionetics, 1978b).
Several supporting studies were available for silicon tetrachloride which were in agreement with the key data.
Silicon tetrachloride has been tested for mutagenicity in an in vitro bacterial mutagenicity toxicity study, conducted to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 471 but pre-GLP. Silicon tetrachloride did not demonstrate genetic activity in any of the tests conducted in this evaluation, both with and without metabolic activation. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave the expected results. The results indicate that the test substance was not considered mutagenic under these test conditions (Litton Bionetics, 1978g).
Silicon tetrachloride has been tested for mutagenicity in an in vitro bacterial mutagenicity, not conducted according to OECD Test Guideline but in compliance with GLP. Silicon tetrachloride did not demonstrate any genetic activity in the bacterial strains Salmonella typhimurium TA97, TA98 and TA100, when tested in the presence or absence of metabolic activation up to cytotoxic concentration. It was concluded that the test substance is not mutagenic under the conditions of the test (Microtest Research Limited, 1987).
Silicon tetrachloride has been tested in vitro for DNA damage and/or repair in a study, not conducted according to any OECD Test Guideline or GLP. Silicon tetrachloride did not cause damage to DNA in E. coli regardless of absence or presence of metabolic activation. Appropriate solvent controls were included and gave the expected results It is concluded that the test substance is not mutagenic under the conditions of the test (Litton Bionetics, 1978d).
Silicon tetrachloride has been tested in an in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study, not conducted according to OECD Test Guideline or GLP. Silicon tetrachloride did not demonstrate genetic activity in the presence or absence of metabolic activation. It was concluded that the test substance is negative under the conditions of the test (Litton Bionetics, 1978h).
Silicon tetrachloride has been tested in an in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study, conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 482 but pre-GLP. Silicon tetrachloride did not demonstrate any genetic activity regardless of presence or absence of metabolic activation. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave the expected results. It was concluded that the test substance is not mutagenic under the test conditions (Litton Bionetics, 1978e).
Silicon tetrachloride has been tested in an in vitro DNA damage and/or repair study, conducted according to a protocol similar to OECD Test Guideline 471 but not in compliance with GLP. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave the expected results. Silicon tetrachloride did not cause damage to DNA in yeast (Litton Bionetics, 1978c).
Silicon tetrachloride has been tested in an in vitro sister chromatid exchange assay, not conducted according to OECD Test Guideline or GLP, silicon tetrachloride was found to be relatively cytotoxic for L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. However, the apparent increases in SCEs were concluded to be a result of the low concurrent controls. It was concluded that the test substance is non-clastogenic in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells (Litton Bionetics, 1978f).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data, silicon tetrachloride is not classified for germ cell mutagenicity according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.