Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Carcinogenicity

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Description of key information

As the effects noted for terephthalic acid (202-830-0; 100-21-0) are non-genotoxic and a threshold mode of action of limited relevance to the human risk assessment and ethane-1,2-diol (203-473-3; 107-21-1) is not oncogenic, BHET (959-26-2; 213-497-6) is predicted to be non-carcinogenic.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Carcinogenicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
carcinogenicity: oral
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
accepted calculation method
Justification for type of information:
The basis for this read-across approach is that the target substance is expected to undergo transformation into terephthalic acid (202-830-0; 100-21-0) and ethane-1,2-diol (203-473-3; 107-21-1). The toxicity of the metabolites will accurately predict the toxicity of the bis(2-hydroxyethyl)terephthalate (BHET; 959-26-2; 213-497-6). Refer to the JUSTIFICATION FOR READ-ACROSS OF TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION in Section 13 of this dossier for further details.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across: supporting information
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate value is read-across from supporting terephthalic acid (202-830-0; 100-21-0) and ethane-1,2-diol (203-473-3; 107-21-1) data.
Species:
rat
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
217 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
female
Basis for effect level:
other: most conservative value
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
0.8 other: mmol/kg bw/day
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
female
Basis for effect level:
other: most conservative value
Conclusions:
As the effects noted for terephthalic acid (202-830-0; 100-21-0) are non-genotoxic and a threshold mode of action of limited relevance to the human risk assessment and ethane-1,2-diol (203-473-3; 107-21-1) is not oncogenic, BHET (959-26-2; 213-497-6) is predicted to be non-carcinogenic.
Executive summary:

Fischer-344 rats were exposed to 20, 142, or 1 000 mg/kg bw/day terephthalic acid in their diet for 24 months. This two-year feeding study showed increase incidence of calculi, bladder hyperplasia and tumors in rats. These effects were seen at doses of 2% and higher terephthalic acid in the diet. The induction of bladder tumors is believed to be a result of injury to the bladder epithelium from calculi formation. Transitional cell tumours were increased in high dose females and findings were associated with a chronic proliferative response to urolithiasis and therefore represent a non-genotoxic threshold mode of action of limited relevance to the human risk assessment. The oncogenicity of ethylene glycol was assessed in a study that pre-dates GLP by exposing Fischer-344 rats to 40, 200, or 1 000 mg/kg bw/day ethylene glycol in their diet for 24 months. In general, inclusion of ethylene glycol in the diet of Fischer-344 rats for 2 years resulted in a variety of marked toxic effects at the high dose level, the most pronounced of which was renal toxicity. Under the conditions of this study, ethylene glycol was reported as not oncogenic. Information on the source substances is considered to be directly applicable to an equivalent molar amount of the target substance; therefore, as neither source substance is concerned to be carcinogenic, BHET was predicted to be non-carcinogenic.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed

Justification for classification or non-classification

As the effects noted for terephthalic acid (202-830-0; 100-21-0) are non-genotoxic and a threshold mode of action of limited relevance to the human risk assessment and ethane-1,2-diol (203-473-3; 107-21-1) is not oncogenic, BHET (959-26-2; 213-497-6) is predicted to be non-carcinogenic.

Additional information

Fischer-344 rats were exposed to 20, 142, or 1 000 mg/kg bw/day terephthalic acid in their diet for 24 months. This two-year feeding study showed increase incidence of calculi, bladder hyperplasia and tumors in rats. These effects were seen at doses of 2% and higher terephthalic acid in the diet. The induction of bladder tumors is believed to be a result of injury to the bladder epithelium from calculi formation. Transitional cell tumours were increased in high dose females and findings were associated with a chronic proliferative response to urolithiasis and therefore represent a non-genotoxic threshold mode of action of limited relevance to the human risk assessment. The oncogenicity of ethylene glycol was assessed in a study that pre-dates GLP by exposing Fischer-344 rats to 40, 200, or 1 000 mg/kg bw/day ethylene glycol in their diet for 24 months. In general, inclusion of ethylene glycol in the diet of Fischer-344 rats for 2 years resulted in a variety of marked toxic effects at the high dose level, the most pronounced of which was renal toxicity. Under the conditions of this study, ethylene glycol was reported as not oncogenic. Information on the source substances is considered to be directly applicable to an equivalent molar amount of the target substance; therefore, as neither source substance is concerned to be carcinogenic, BHET was predicted to be non-carcinogenic.