Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
additional toxicological information
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Study period:
1989
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
abstract

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Pharmacology of iotroxic acid, a new intravenous cholangiographic agent. II. Experimental animal study of side effects
Author:
Speck U. et al.
Year:
1978
Bibliographic source:
Arzneimittelforschung 28(12), 2290-2296.

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The general, neural and cardiovascular tolerance of iotroxic acid (Biliscopin) and its deleterious effect on membranes were investigated in comparison with iodipamic- (Biligrafin), ioglycamic- (Biligram, Bilivistan) und iodoxamic acids in different experimental models.
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Iotroxic acid
EC Number:
256-917-3
EC Name:
Iotroxic acid
Cas Number:
51022-74-3
Molecular formula:
C22H18I6N2O9
IUPAC Name:
3-{2-[2-(2-{[(3-carboxy-2,4,6-triiodophenyl)carbamoyl]methoxy}ethoxy)ethoxy]acetamido}-2,4,6-triiodobenzoic acid

Results and discussion

Any other information on results incl. tables

The general, neural and cardiovascular tolerance of iotroxic acid (Biliscopin) and its deleterious effect on membranes were investigated in comparison with iodipamic- (Biligrafin), ioglycamic- (Biligram, Bilivistan) und iodoxamic acids in different experimental models. Tolerance (DL50) of iotroxic acid after i.v. injection in the rat proved to be significantly better than that of all the reference substances. The difference was most apparent in animals which had previously been given histamine. Neural tolerance was found to be best after iotroxic acid and iodipamic acid and poorest after iodoxamic acid. In in vitro investigations the erythrocyte membranes were far less damaged by iodoxamic acid and iotroxic acid than by iodipamic acid. Iotroxic acid was also particularly well tolerated after intracisternal injection and after injection into the carotid artery of the rat. The effect of iotroxic acid on the cardiovascular system of the cat was distinctly weaker than that of ioglycamic acid and, when given in high doses, evidently also weaker than that after administration of iodoxamic acid. The excellent general tolerance of iotroxic acid can be explained by the fact that its deleterious effect on membranes is less than that of iodipamic acid and that its neurotoxicity is distinctly lower than that of iodoxamic acid.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
In comparison to iodipamic, ioglycamic- and iodoxamic acid IX-acid has a better cardiovascular and neural tolerance.
Executive summary:

The general, neural and cardiovascular tolerance of iotroxic acid (Biliscopin) and its deleterious effect on membranes were investigated in comparison with iodipamic- (Biligrafin), ioglycamic- (Biligram, Bilivistan) und iodoxamic acids in different experimental models. Tolerance (DL50) of iotroxic acid after i.v. injection in the rat proved to be significantly better than that of all the reference substances. The difference was most apparent in animals which had previously been given histamine. Neural tolerance was found to be best after iotroxic acid and iodipamic acid and poorest after iodoxamic acid. In in vitro investigations the erythrocyte membranes were far less damaged by iodoxamic acid and iotroxic acid than by iodipamic acid. Iotroxic acid was also particularly well tolerated after intracisternal injection and after injection into the carotid artery of the rat. The effect of iotroxic acid on the cardiovascular system of the cat was distinctly weaker than that of ioglycamic acid and, when given in high doses, evidently also weaker than that after administration of iodoxamic acid. The excellent general tolerance of iotroxic acid can be explained by the fact that its deleterious effect on membranes is less than that of iodipamic acid and that its neurotoxicity is distinctly lower than that of iodoxamic acid.