Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-472-3 | CAS number: 141-24-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_toxicological-information.png)
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames Test (OECD 471, GLP): negative with and without metabolic activation in TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and WP2uvrA RA from CAS 91051-53-5
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15 Jun - 09 Aug 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP - guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his operon for S. typhimurium and trp operon for E. coli
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- cofactor supplemented post-mitochondrial fraction (S9 mix), prepared from the livers of rats treated with phenobarbital and ß-naphthoflavone.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 3, 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3330, 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 2-aminoanthracene: + S9: 1, 2.5, 5 or 10 µg/plate for all strains
- Remarks:
- Before use, all S9 batches were characterised with the mutagens Benzo-(a)-pyrene and 2-aminoanthracene, which require metabolic activation, in tester strain TA 98 at concentrations of 5 μg/plate and 1 μg/plate, respectively.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)DURATION- Exposure duration: 48 hNUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Two independent experiments were performed in triplicates each. DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY- Method: The condition of the bacterial background lawn was evaluated, both macroscopically and microscopically.In the first experiment S9-mix at 5% (v/v) was used. In the second experiment S9-mix at 10% (v/v) was used. The revertant colonies (histidine independent or tryptophan independent) were counted manually if less than 40 colonies per plate were present. If more than 40 colonies were present, these were counted automatically with a Biocount 4000 Pro-S-colony counter. Plates with abundant test article precipitate which interfered with automated colony counting were counted manually and the evidence of test substance precipitate on the plates was recorded.
- Evaluation criteria:
- No formal hypothesis testing was done. A test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the test if:a) The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 is not greater than two (2) times the concurrent control, and the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 or WP2uvrA is not greater than three (3) times the concurrent control.b) The negative response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment. A test substance is considered positive (mutagenic) in the test if:a) The total number of revertants in tester strain TA100 is greater than two (2) times the concurrent control, or the total number of revertants in tester strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 or WP2uvrA is greater than three (3) times the concurrent control.b) In case a repeat experiment is performed when a positive response is observed in one of the tester strains, the positive response should be reproducible in at least one independently repeated experiment.The preceding criteria were not absolute and other modifying factors might enter into the finalevaluation decision.
- Statistics:
- Mean values and standard deviation were calculated.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS- Precipitation: the test substance slightly precipitated at concentrations ≥1000 µg/plateRANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: No reduction of the bacterial background lawn and no biologically relevant decrease in the number of revertants were observed based on preliminary tests in TA 100 and WP2uvrA up to 5000 µg/plate in triplicate. At the highest concentration the test substance exhibited limited solubility. COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: positive and solvent controls were in the range of historical control data
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test substance did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used.
Reference
Table 1: Maximum number of revertants at the first experiment with 5% S9 -mix
| Maximum number of revertants | |||||
solvent Control | positive control | treatment (at dose level [µg/mL]) | ||||
Strain | With S9 | Without S9 | With S9 | Without S9 | With S9 | Without S9 |
TA 1535 | 8 | 12 | 132 | 893 | 12 (100) | 9 (33) |
TA 1537 | 6 | 7 | 417 | 325 | 10 (33) | 9 (1000) |
TA 98 | 28 | 18 | 963 | 1025 | 34 (33) | 21 (333) |
TA 100 | 77 | 69 | 890 | 1248 | 81 (33) | 86 (100) |
WPA2uvrA | 23 | 19 | 465 | 1159 | 35 (5000) | 32 (3330) |
Table 2: Maximum number of revertants at the second experiment with 10% S9 -mix
| Maximum number of revertants | |||||
solvent Control | positive control | treatment (at dose level [µg/mL]) | ||||
Strain | With S9 | Without S9 | With S9 | Without S9 | With S9 | Without S9 |
TA 1535 | 7 | 11 | 134 | 838 | 12 (10) | 13 (100) |
TA 1537 | 6 | 6 | 413 | 154 | 6 (333) | 8 (100) |
TA 98 | 25 | 16 | 517 | 981 | 28 (33) | 21 (100) |
TA 100 | 88 | 89 | 1418 | 925 | 83 (10) | 101 (10) |
WPA2uvrA | 23 | 18 | 200 | 1195 | 31 (33) | 27 (10) |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for read-across
There are no data available regarding genetic toxicity with methyl ricinoleate (CAS 141-24-2). Thus, read-across from an appropriate substance (CAS 91051-53-5, Fatty acids, safflower-oil, ethyl esters) is conducted in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex XI, 1.5. in order to fulfil the standard data requirements defined in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex VII, 8.4.
Structural similarities and comparable toxicokinetic properties of the source and target substance are the basis of read-across. A detailed justification for the analogue read-across approach is provided in the technical dossier (see IUCLID Section 13).
CAS 91051-53-5
A bacterial reverse mutation assay was performed with Fatty acids, safflower-oil, ethyl esters (CAS 91051-53-5) according to OECD guideline 471 and GLP with the S. typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 and the E. coli strain WPA2uvr A (BASF, 2010). The bacterial tester strains were treated with 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3330 and 5000 µg/plate of the test substance in absence and presence of metabolic activation by phenobarbital- and ß-naphthoflavone-induced rat liver S9-mix. Two independent experiments were performed with triplicates each. Sodium Azide, 9-Aminoacridine, 2-Nitrofluorene, Methylmethanesulfonate and 4-Nitroquinoline-N-oxide and 2-Aminoanthracene were used as positive controls without and with metabolic activation, respectively. Positive control materials induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and the activity of the metabolizing system. The test substance slightly precipitated at concentrations ≥ 1000 µg/plate but induced no cytotoxic or genotoxic effects at any concentration neither in the presence nor in the absence of metabolic activation. Based on the study results, Fatty acids, safflower-oil, ethyl esters (CAS 91051-53-5) did not induce gene mutations in four tested Salmonella and one tested E. coli strain.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data on genetic toxicity, the source substance Fatty acids, safflower-oil, ethyl esters (CAS 91051-53-5) did not induce genetic toxicity in bacteria. The same results are expected for the target substance methyl ricinoleate (CAS 141-24-2). However, no final decision on classification for genetic toxicity according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 can be made, as no information on chromosomal aberration and mutagenicity in mammalian cells, and no in vivo information is available.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)